Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
Research ArticleArticle

Utility of the 6-Minute Walk Test Following Lung Transplantation

Leonardo Seoane, Sheny Alex, Claude Pirtle, Maneesh Gupta, David E. Taylor, Vincent G. Valentine and Lee M. Arcement
Ochsner Journal December 2010, 10 (4) 227-230;
Leonardo Seoane
*Ochsner Multi-Organ Transplant Institute, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lseoane@ochsner.org
Sheny Alex
†Chabert Medical Center, Houma, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claude Pirtle
†Chabert Medical Center, Houma, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maneesh Gupta
†Chabert Medical Center, Houma, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David E. Taylor
*Ochsner Multi-Organ Transplant Institute, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent G. Valentine
‡University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston, Galveston, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lee M. Arcement
†Chabert Medical Center, Houma, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: The 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) has replaced standard cardiopulmonary exercises for the evaluation of lung disease. However, data on the utility and characteristics of the 6-MWT following lung transplant are lacking. This study aimed to determine if 6-MWT distance has a normal distribution at 6 months post-transplant and if lower 6-MWT distance was predictive of all-cause mortality.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 6-MWT data on all patients who were lung transplant recipients at Ochsner Medical Center between 2000 and 2005. Forty-nine lung transplant recipients completed a 6-MWT at 6 months following transplant. Of these 49 patients, 34 had completed both the 6-month and 12-month 6-MWT, and data from these were used to evaluate change in distance walked over time.

Results: The mean age was 46 ± 16 years, 57% were female, and 69% received a bilateral lung transplant. Normal distribution by Kolmogorov-Smirnov was demonstrated for 6-MWT distance at 6 months (P  =  0.873). Mean distance walked improved from 348 ± 15 m to 478 ±14 m at 12 months (P  =  0.0001). The 6-MWT distance at 6 months was not a predictor of survival (OR  =  1.002).

Conclusions: Distance for the 6-MWT followed a normal distribution following lung transplant, and distances walked continued to improve for a year following transplant. Although 6-MWT distances are not a predictor of survival, other components of the test may strengthen the predictive value for morbidity and mortality post-transplant.

Keywords:
  • Cardiothoracic surgery
  • lung transplant
  • pulmonary
  • 6-minute walk test

INTRODUCTION

The 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) has been used in pulmonary diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pulmonary fibrosis, sarcoidosis, and pulmonary hypertension to assess functional status, response to therapy, and prognosis.1-5 The procedure is simple, inexpensive, reproducible, and well received by patients and has replaced standard cardiopulmonary exercises for the evaluation of lung disease. The 6-MWT has been shown to better reflect daily life activities of the subjects than other walk tests.6 It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism.7 Little has been published about the utility of the 6-MWT following transplant. Riess et al8 reported decreased 6-MWT distance in kidney transplant patients; the test also has been shown to be a safe, practical way to assess functional status following heart transplant.9 Because lower 6-MWT distance has been shown to correlate with worse survival in patients with pulmonary hypertension, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and COPD, 6-MWT has become one of the parameters used to calculate the lung allocation score for patients awaiting lung transplant.10,11 However, data are lacking on the utility and characteristics of the 6-MWT in lung transplant recipients. We are not aware of any studies evaluating the utility of the 6-MWT as a predictor of outcomes following lung transplant or normative values for the 6-MWT for this patient population. This study was conducted to describe the results of the 6-MWT in our cohort of patients following lung transplant. The aims of the study were to (1) determine if 6-MWT distance has a normal distribution at 6 months following transplant and (2) determine if lower 6-MWT distance was predictive of all-cause mortality.

METHODS

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Ochsner Medical Center. We performed a retrospective chart review of 6-MWT data on all patients transplanted at our institution between 2000 and 2005. Forty-nine lung transplant recipients completed a 6-MWT at 6 months following transplant, and 52 patients completed a 6-MWT 12 months following transplant. The 6 MWT was not a standard part of the assessment for all patients following transplant, which led to discordance between the number of completed tests at 6 months and 12 months. The 49 patients with 6-month 6-MWT data were used for analysis. Thirty-four lung transplant recipients completed both the 6-month and the 12-month 6-MWT, and these were used to evaluate change in distance walked over time. Retransplants and lung transplant recipients not surviving 6 months were excluded. The tests, with distances measured in meters, were performed according to the American Thoracic Society guidelines.5

Continuous variables were analyzed with a paired t test. Categorical variables were analyzed with the chi-square method. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test for normality in the cohort regarding distance walked. Patients were assembled into quartiles by distance walked: 1st quartile  =  240 to 362 m, 2nd  =  362 to 423 m, 3rd  =  423 to 480 m, and 4th  =  480 to 711 m. Differences between demographic variables were assessed with either the unpaired t test or chi-square test as appropriate. The impact of distance walked on survival was assessed in 2 ways. A logistic regression model was constructed to assess the impact of 6-MWT distance on all-cause mortality, controlling for age, gender, race, bilateral vs. single transplant, body mass index, and hypertension. In addition, Kaplan Meier survival curves were constructed by quartiles and differences between groups were tested with the log rank test.

RESULTS

Patient Characteristics

Forty-nine patients took the 6-MWT 6 months following lung transplant. Demographic data are summarized in Table 1. The underlying diagnosis included COPD, pulmonary fibrosis, bronchiectasis, or pulmonary hypertension.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1

Demographics of the 49 Patients Taking the 6-Month 6-Minute Walk Test

The 6-Minute Walk Test

No complications were reported for any of the patients undergoing the 6-MWT. The mean (±SD) distance walked at 6 months was 426 ± 84.5 m (range, 240-711 m). The 6-MWT distance per quartile is described in Table 2. A normal distribution by Kolmogorov-Smirnov was demonstrated for 6-MWT distance at 6 months (P  =  .873) following transplant (Figure 1). When one compares just the 34 patients that completed both the 6-month and 12-month 6-MWT, there was a significant improvement in 6-MWT distance at 12 months compared to 6 months. The mean distance walked improved from 348 ± 15 m to 478 ± 14 m at 12 months (P  =  .0001). The demographics are reported in Table 3. Twenty-six (77%) of lung transplant recipients improved their 6-MWT distance from 6 to 12 months, 3 (9%) remained the same, and 5 (14%) walked a shorter distance at 12 months.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Normal distribution by Kolmogorov-Smirnov for 6-minute walk test distance at 6 months (P  =  .873) following lung transplant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2

Distance by Quartile of Distance Walked at 6 Months

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3

Demographics of Cohort Completing 6-month and 12-month 6-Minute Walk Test (n = 34)

Predictors of Survival

Kaplan Meier curves showed that the 6-MWT distance at 6 months following lung transplant was not predictive of survival when analyzed by quartiles (Figure 2) or when analyzed with respect to the median distance walked (Figure 3). Using a logistic regression model, adjusted for confounding variables, only bilateral lung transplant was an independent predictor of improved survival with an odds ratio of 0.106. The 6-MWT distance at 6 months was not a predictor of survival (OR  =  1.002). Reason for lung transplant was not predictive of survival (Figure 4).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Survival curves based on 6-minute walk test distance at 6 months following lung transplant analyzed by quartiles. 1 = below 1st quartile; 2 = between 1st and 2nd quartile; 3 = between 2nd and 3rd quartile; 4 = above 3rd quartile.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Survival curves based on 6-minute walk test distance at 6 months following lung transplant analyzed by median distance walked. 1 = below median; 2 =  above median.

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

Survival curves for patients with the 4 diagnostic categories. 1 = cystic fibrosis/bronchiectasis; 2 = pulmonary fibrosis; 3 = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; 4 = other.

DISCUSSION

The 6-MWT is a safe, quick, and inexpensive measure of functional status that is routinely used in pulmonary diseases. The 6-MWT following lung transplantation is feasible and follows a normal distribution at 6 months. The distance walked continues to improve during the first year in patients who have undergone lung transplant.

Bilateral lung transplant was consistently the best predictor of survival in our analysis. Lower distance walked during 6-MWT at 6 months following lung transplant was not predictive of all-cause mortality in our cohort of lung transplant recipients. However, there was a trend to worse outcomes in the cohort that had lower 6-month 6-MWT distances than the median when compared with the cohort that walked longer distances than the median. This trend was not always consistent when comparing different quartiles because of the small sample sizes. Although we did not find that 6-MWT distance predicted outcomes, further studies are warranted to assess if a larger sample size or other features of the 6-MWT beyond distance walked have prognostic significance. For example, assessing 6-MWT distance prior to 6 months, change in distance over time, or desaturation during the test may be predictive of outcomes. The 6-MWT distance may also have some predictive value if used in combination with other predictive measures. In addition, the 6-MWT may have some predictive value for patients who develop bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Further study is required to delineate which factors affect 6-MWT distance following lung transplant, but understanding normative values for 6-MWT distance following transplant and expected improvement over time is an important step to exploring the utility of the 6-MWT in this situation.

The present study has several limitations. First, it is a retrospective study with a relatively small sample size of mostly Caucasian patients. Although we have some understanding of the factors that affect 6-MWT distance in the normal population (ie, height, body mass index, age, and gender), we do not know which factors may influence the distance walked by patients following transplant.12

In summary, the 6-MWT distance follows a normal distribution when administered after lung transplant, and distances walked continue to improve for a year postoperatively. Although the 6-MWT distance was not a predictor of survival, other components of the test may strengthen the predictive value for morbidity and mortality following transplant.

  • Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Flaherty K. R.,
    2. Andrei A. C.,
    3. Murray S.,
    4. et al.
    (2006) Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: prognostic value of changes in physiology and six-minute-walk test [published online ahead of print July 6, 2006]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 174((7)):803–809, pmid:16825656, doi:10.1164/rccm.200604-488OC.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sciurba F.,
    2. Criner G. J.,
    3. Lee S. M.,
    4. et al.
    (2003) Six-minute walk distance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: reproducibility and effect of walking course layout and length [published online ahead of print February 20, 2003]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167((11)):1522–1527, pmid:12615634, doi:10.1164/rccm.200203-166OC.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Miyamoto S.,
    2. Nagaya N.,
    3. Satoh T.,
    4. et al.
    (2000) Clinical correlates and prognostic significance of six-minute walk test in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Comparison with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161((2 pt 1)):487–492, pmid:10673190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lederer D. J.,
    2. Arcasoy S. M.,
    3. Wilt J. S.,
    4. D'Ovidio F.,
    5. Sonett J. R.,
    6. Kawut S. M.
    (2006) Six-minute walk distance predicts waiting list survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [published online ahead of print June 15, 2006]. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 174((6)):659–664, pmid:16778159, doi:10.1164/rccm.200604-520OC.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Alhamad E. H.
    (2009) The six-minute walk test in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis. Ann Thorac Med 4((2)):60–64, pmid:19561926.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    (2002) ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166((1)):111–117, pmid:12091180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Solway S.,
    2. Brooks D.,
    3. Lacasse Y.,
    4. Thomas S.
    (2001) A qualitative systematic overview of the measurement properties of functional walk tests used in the cardiorespiratory domain. Chest 119((1)):256–270, pmid:11157613.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Riess K. J.,
    2. Gourishanker S.,
    3. Oreopoulos A.,
    4. et al.
    (2006) Impaired arterial compliance and aerobic endurance in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation 82((7)):920–923, pmid:17038907.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Doutreleau S.,
    2. Di Marco P.,
    3. Talha S.,
    4. Charloux A.,
    5. Piquard F.,
    6. Geny B.
    (2009) Can the six-minute walk test predict peak oxygen uptake in men with heart transplant? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90((1)):51–57, pmid:19154829.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Kadikar A.,
    2. Maurer J.,
    3. Kesten S.
    (1997) The six-minute walk test: a guide to assessment for lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 16((3)):313–319, pmid:9087875.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Egan T. M.,
    2. Murray S.,
    3. Bustami R. T.,
    4. et al.
    (2006) Development of the new lung allocation system in the United States. Am J Transplant 6((5 pt 2)):1212–1227, pmid:16613597.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Enright P. L.,
    2. Sherrill D. L.
    (1998) Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 158((5 pt 1)):1384–1387, pmid:9817683.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal
Vol. 10, Issue 4
Dec 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign up with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Utility of the 6-Minute Walk Test Following Lung Transplantation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Utility of the 6-Minute Walk Test Following Lung Transplantation
Leonardo Seoane, Sheny Alex, Claude Pirtle, Maneesh Gupta, David E. Taylor, Vincent G. Valentine, Lee M. Arcement
Ochsner Journal Dec 2010, 10 (4) 227-230;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Utility of the 6-Minute Walk Test Following Lung Transplantation
Leonardo Seoane, Sheny Alex, Claude Pirtle, Maneesh Gupta, David E. Taylor, Vincent G. Valentine, Lee M. Arcement
Ochsner Journal Dec 2010, 10 (4) 227-230;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • Letters to the Editor
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • From the Editor's Desk: A Focus on Organ Transplantation
  • Clinical Images: Interventional Management of Pediatric Rex Shunt Stenosis
  • Letters to the EditorBeware of Right Renal Vein Valves in Transplanted Kidneys: Renal Vein Valvuloplasty in a Donor KidneySeizure Caused by Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Inhibitor-Induced Central Nervous System DemyelinationPositron Emission Tomography-Positive Pleural-Based Nodule Following Talc Pleurodesis
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cardiothoracic surgery
  • lung transplant
  • pulmonary
  • 6-minute walk test

Current Post at the Blog

COPE Provides a Framework for Ethical Peer Review

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2021 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire