Review ArticleReviews and Commentaries

Adjacent Segment Disease Perspective and Review of the Literature

Fanor M. Saavedra-Pozo, Renato A. M. Deusdara and Edward C. Benzel
Ochsner Journal March 2014, 14 (1) 78-83;

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Chang UK,
    2. Kim DH,
    3. Lee MC,
    4. Willenberg R,
    5. Kim SH,
    6. Lim J
    (7, 2007) Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 7(1):33–39, pmid:17633485.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Finn MA,
    2. Brodke DS,
    3. Daubs M,
    4. Patel A,
    5. Bachus KN
    (10, 2009) Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after single-level fusion or cervical arthroplasty. Eur Spine J 18(10):1520–1527, pmid:19585159, Epub 2009 Jul 8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Anakwenze OA,
    2. Auerbach JD,
    3. Milby AH,
    4. Lonner BS,
    5. Balderston RA
    (9 1, 2009) Sagittal cervical alignment after cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(19):2001–2007, pmid:19730207.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Cho SK,
    2. Riew KD
    (1, 2013) Adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(1):3–11, pmid:23281466.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hilibrand AS,
    2. Robbins M
    (Nov-Dec 2004) Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4((6 Suppl)):190S–194S, pmid:15541666.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Boden SD,
    2. McCowin PR,
    3. Davis DO,
    4. Dina TS,
    5. Mark AS,
    6. Wiesel S
    (9, 1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(8):1178–1184, pmid:2398088.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Hilibrand AS,
    2. Carlson GD,
    3. Palumbo MA,
    4. Jones PK,
    5. Bohlman HH
    (4, 1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(4):519–528, pmid:10225797.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Matsumoto M,
    2. Okada E,
    3. Ichihara D,
    4. et al.
    (1 1, 2010) Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degeneration: comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(1):36–43, pmid:20023606.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Nassr A,
    2. Lee JY,
    3. Bashir RS,
    4. et al.
    (1 15, 2009) Does incorrect level needle localization during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion lead to accelerated disc degeneration? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(2):189–192, pmid:19139670.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Kim HJ,
    2. Kelly MP,
    3. Ely CG,
    4. Dettori JR,
    5. Riew KD
    (10 15, 2012) The risk of adjacent-level ossification development after surgery in the cervical spine: are there factors that affect the risk? A systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37((22 Suppl)):S65–S74, pmid:22872223, Erratum in: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jan 1;38(1):E49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Park JB,
    2. Cho YS,
    3. Riew KD
    (3, 2005) Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(3):558–563, pmid:15741622.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Dmitriev AE,
    2. Cunningham BW,
    3. Hu N,
    4. Sell G,
    5. Vigna F,
    6. McAfee PC
    (5 15, 2005) Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(10):1165–1172, pmid:15897831.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Eck JC,
    2. Humphreys SC,
    3. Lim TH,
    4. et al.
    (11 15, 2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(22):2431–2434, pmid:12435970.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Levin DA,
    2. Hale JJ,
    3. Bendo JA
    (2007) Adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 65(1):29–36, pmid:17539759.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Park JY,
    2. Cho YE,
    3. Kuh SU,
    4. et al.
    (8, 2007) New prognostic factors for adjacent-segment degeneration after one-stage 360 degrees fixation for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: special reference to the usefulness of pelvic incidence angle. J Neurosurg Spine 7(2):139–144, pmid:17688052.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Hwang SH,
    2. Kayanja M,
    3. Milks RA,
    4. Benzel EC
    (Mar-Apr 2007) Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis. Spine J 7(2):216–221, pmid:17321972.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Hioki A,
    2. Miyamoto K,
    3. Kodama H,
    4. et al.
    (Nov-Dec 2005) Two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease: improved clinical outcome with restoration of lumbar lordosis. Spine J 5(6):600–607, pmid:16291098.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Sudo H,
    2. Oda I,
    3. Abumi K,
    4. Ito M,
    5. Kotani Y,
    6. Minami A
    (8, 2006) Biomechanical study on the effect of five different lumbar reconstruction techniques on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and lamina strain. J Neurosurg Spine 5(2):150–155, pmid:16925082.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Vialle R,
    2. Ilharreborde B,
    3. Dauzac C,
    4. Lenoir T,
    5. Rillardon L,
    6. Guigui P
    (10, 2007) Is there a sagittal imbalance of the spine in isthmic spondylolisthesis? A correlation study. Eur Spine J 16(10):1641–1649, pmid:17437136, Epub 2007 Apr 17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Barrey C,
    2. Jund J,
    3. Noseda O,
    4. Roussouly P
    (9, 2007) Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 16(9):1459–1467, pmid:17211522, Epub 2007 Jan 9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Hresko MT,
    2. Labelle H,
    3. Roussouly P,
    4. Berthonnaud E
    (9 15, 2007) Classification of high-grade spondylolistheses based on pelvic version and spine balance: possible rationale for reduction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(20):2208–2213, pmid:17873812.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Chen WJ,
    2. Lai PL,
    3. Tai CL,
    4. Chen LH,
    5. Niu CC
    (10, 2004) The effect of sagittal alignment on adjacent joint mobility after lumbar instrumentation—a biomechanical study of lumbar vertebrae in a porcine model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 19(8):763–768.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Keorochana G,
    2. Taghavi CE,
    3. Lee KB,
    4. et al.
    (5 15, 2011) Effect of sagittal alignment on kinematic changes and degree of disc degeneration in the lumbar spine: an analysis using positional MRI. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(11):893–898, pmid:21242877.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Ozer E,
    2. Yücesoy K,
    3. Yurtsever C,
    4. Seçil M
    (2, 2007) Kyphosis one level above the cervical disc disease: is the kyphosis cause or effect? J Spinal Disord Tech 20(1):14–19, pmid:17285046.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Nunley PD,
    2. Jawahar A,
    3. Kerr EJ
    (3 15, 2012) 3rd, et al. Factors affecting the incidence of symptomatic adjacent-level disease in cervical spine after total disc arthroplasty: 2- to 4-year follow-up of 3 prospective randomized trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(6):445–451, pmid:21587111.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Bartels RH,
    2. Donk R,
    3. Verbeek AL
    (6, 2010) No justification for cervical disk prostheses in clinical practice: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neurosurgery 66(6):1153–1160, pmid:20421840, discussion 1160.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Gao Y,
    2. Liu M,
    3. Li T,
    4. Huang F,
    5. Tang T,
    6. Xiang Z
    (3 20, 2013) A meta-analysis comparing the results of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(6):555–561, pmid:23515991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. McAfee PC,
    2. Reah C,
    3. Gilder K,
    4. Eisermann L,
    5. Cunningham B
    (5 15, 2012) A meta-analysis of comparative outcomes following cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical fusion: results from 4 prospective multicenter randomized clinical trials and up to 1226 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(11):943–952, pmid:22037535.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Burkus JK,
    2. Haid RW,
    3. Traynelis VC,
    4. Mummaneni PV
    (9, 2010) Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 13(3):308–318, pmid:20809722.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Coric D,
    2. Kim PK,
    3. Clemente JD,
    4. Boltes MO,
    5. Nussbaum M,
    6. James S
    (1, 2013) Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site. J Neurosurg Spine 18(1):36–42, pmid:23140129.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Maldonado CV,
    2. Paz RD,
    3. Martin CB
    (8, 2011) Adjacent-level degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 3):403–407, pmid:21796395, Epub 2011 Jul 28.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Heller JG,
    2. Sasso RC,
    3. Papadopoulos SM,
    4. et al.
    (1 15, 2009) Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(2):101–107, pmid:19112337.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Mummaneni PV,
    2. Burkus JK,
    3. Haid RW,
    4. Traynelis VC,
    5. Zdeblick TA
    (3, 2007) Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6(3):198–209, pmid:17355018.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. Murrey D,
    2. Janssen M,
    3. Delamarter R,
    4. et al.
    (4, 2009) Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 9(4):275–286, pmid:18774751, Epub 2008 Sep 6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Helgeson MD,
    2. Bevevino AJ,
    3. Hilibrand AS
    (3, 2013) Update on the evidence for adjacent segment degeneration and disease. Spine J 13(3):342–351, pmid:23420004, Epub 2013 Feb 15.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Harrop JS,
    2. Youssef JA,
    3. Maltenfort M,
    4. et al.
    (7 1, 2008) Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(15):1701–1707, pmid:18594464.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Wai EK,
    2. Santos ER,
    3. Morcom RA,
    4. Fraser RD
    (8 1, 2006) Magnetic resonance imaging 20 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(17):1952–1956, pmid:16924212.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Ishihara H,
    2. Osada R,
    3. Kanamori M,
    4. et al.
    (4, 2001) Minimum 10-year follow-up study of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 14(2):91–99, pmid:11285419.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Min JH,
    2. Jang JS,
    3. Lee SH
    (7, 2007) Comparison of anterior- and posterior-approach instrumented lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 7(1):21–26, pmid:17633483.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Radcliff KE,
    2. Kepler CK,
    3. Jakoi A,
    4. et al.
    (6 14, 2013) Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions. Spine J, [Epub ahead of print].
  41. ↵
    1. Kolstad F,
    2. Nygaard ØP,
    3. Leivseth G
    (3 1, 2007) Segmental motion adjacent to anterior cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(5):512–517, pmid:17334284.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section

Keywords