Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
Case ReportCASE REPORTS AND CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment of Depression in a Patient With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Alessandro Iliceto, Rachel L Seiler and Korak Sarkar
Ochsner Journal September 2018, 18 (3) 264-267; DOI: https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.17.0075
Alessandro Iliceto
1The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel L Seiler
1The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Korak Sarkar
1The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA
2Department of Neurology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: korak.sarkar@ochsner.org
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) commonly presents with a constellation of findings, including physical, cognitive, and psychological disturbances. Traditionally, few options have been available for long-term management of mood symptoms for post-TBI patients who are refractory to medications. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising alternative treatment.

Case Report: A 37-year-old male with history of anxiety and bipolar depression incurred a TBI after a 60-foot fall. After his physical recovery, the patient had refractory depression. Eight months after the TBI event, he underwent a 6-week course of rTMS treatment and had a 70.8% improvement in mood symptoms by the end of the therapy as indicated by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, transitioning from severe to mild depression according to the scoring system. Clinical correlation during the months following conclusion of rTMS therapy showed no signs of remission or adverse side effects. The patient remains stable and lives independently 1 year after treatment with mood-stabilizing medications.

Conclusion: This case provides evidence for successful treatment of refractory depressive symptoms after severe TBI with the addition of rTMS to psychotherapy and mood-stabilizing medications, supporting the safety and tolerability of this novel therapeutic approach. Further studies are needed to validate the contribution of rTMS for management of mood symptoms in patients with TBI.

Keywords:
  • Brain injuries–traumatic
  • depression
  • repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are projected to affect a growing number of Americans each year, already increasing from an estimated 1.9 million in 2007 to 2.8 million in 2013, according to a 2017 report.1 The most common post-TBI morbidity is major depressive disorder (MDD), with typically reported symptoms of fatigue, frustration, and poor concentration.2-4 Traditionally, treatment modalities have been limited to the customary multifactorial rehabilitation, pharmacotherapy, and psychotherapy approach of the biopsychosocial model.5

However, interest has increased in the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a potential nonpharmacologic alternative therapeutic tool for modulating brain function.6 This noninvasive method of stimulating nerve cells in the brain uses a magnetic field that generates a current to modulate brain activity,7 and rTMS is thought to have an effect on brain plasticity during the chronic phase of recovery (>3 months post-TBI) that can help overcome long-term cognitive deficits after injury.8,9 The inaugural case study showed the benefit of rTMS in reducing depressive symptoms.10 The use of rTMS has since been validated via other studies that provided evidence of equally promising outcomes in the management of unipolar and bipolar depression.11-13 However, this form of therapy has not been thoroughly evaluated in the post-TBI patient population, particularly in patients with severe TBI, because of a lack of data regarding its safety and efficacy.

In this study, we add to the limited amount of available literature supporting the safe and successful use of rTMS in the treatment of refractory depression in a patient with a history of severe TBI. Additionally, this case study showcases a new model of therapy that incorporates rTMS treatment in conjunction with current standard therapeutic approaches.

CASE REPORT

A 37-year-old male with a medical history of anxiety and bipolar disorder type I sustained a 60-foot fall in July 2015 from a suicide attempt. The fall resulted in a closed head injury and multiple rib and pelvic fractures. The patient was in a coma for 11-12 days with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3. He required an intensive care unit stay with a tracheostomy tube for respiratory support. Initial brain scans with gradient recalled echo T2-weighted imaging showed diffuse axonal injury (Figure). This type of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows for greater sensitivity in detecting microhemorrhages compared to conventional MRI or computed tomograpy imaging.14 After discharge from the hospital, the patient was admitted to a neurologic rehabilitation facility where he initially endorsed cognitive decline and visual processing deficits. He also displayed signs of dysarthria, intermittent dysphagia, and retrograde and anterograde amnesia with no recollection of the accident, in addition to self-reported fatigue and insomnia. The patient physically improved at the rehabilitation facility until discharge in October 2015 but continued to endorse severe depressive symptoms with recurrent suicidal ideation. Symptoms were refractory to increased dosages of his psychiatric medications that included bupropion 300 mg daily before noon, olanzapine 5 mg at bedtime, oxcarbazepine 150 mg twice daily, and lamotrigine 100 mg daily. Trazodone 100 mg at bedtime was added to manage insomnia. A multifaceted approach was adopted in collaboration with the patient's neurologist in an attempt to control his mood symptoms, including pet therapy, supportive groups (eg, regular church attendance, National Alliance on Mental Illness group meetings), and lifestyle modifications. In March 2016, the attending psychiatrist changed the patient's medication regimen, substituting quetiapine 200 mg for olanzapine because of lack of response and adding methylphenidate 40 mg daily to improve concentration. Despite these changes, the patient continued to endorse suicidal ideation, and his ability to function (eg, live independently, interact with others in social situations) remained dramatically impaired. Because of the severity and refractory nature of his condition, he was referred to an outside psychiatrist to discuss the possibility of rTMS therapy. Of note, the patient did not endorse any manic symptoms throughout these evaluations, and he did not experience any posttraumatic seizure following the TBI.

Figure.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure. Gradient recalled echo sequence shows hemosiderin deposition consistent with mild diffuse axonal injury (arrows).

An rTMS treatment course was adopted using standard depression protocols.15 The patient's rTMS treatment apparatus consisted of the NeuroStar TMS Therapy System (v.2.3.3). Coil position was set at 10.3 cm anterior/posterior, zero-degree angle, and stimulus onset asynchronies of 33 degrees. The patient underwent 30 treatment sessions in the outpatient setting (5 days of therapy per week for 6 weeks) of 1-hour and 2-minute duration per session. High-frequency stimulation at 6 Hz over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was used. Treatment was set at a standard motor threshold (MT) level of 1.62 with treatment intensity at 120% of MT level, a 4-second stimulation time, and a 26-second interstimulation interval for a total of 3,000 pulses administered per session. The patient completed the treatment course between March 2016 and May 2016.

The patient's mood symptoms were quantitatively evaluated throughout the treatment protocol using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to self-report mood symptoms during psychiatry visits. The patient scored 24 on the PHQ-9 after 1 week of rTMS therapy, placing him on the severe depression spectrum. As shown in the patient's weekly scores (Table), mood improvement was observed within 2 weeks of initiating treatment when the patient's score decreased to 16 (moderately severe depression). After 1 month of therapy, the patient reported being more functional and was able to relocate to an apartment and live by himself without further endorsement of suicidal ideation. At the end of 6 weeks of therapy, the patient's score improved to 7 (mild depression), constituting a 70.8% reduction in score from the beginning to the conclusion of his rTMS treatment protocol. The patient was regularly followed by the psychiatrist and neurologist who did not note clinical or self-reported adverse effects to the therapy.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Assessments During 6-Week Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment

Subsequent visits focused on community reintegration, which included defining interests, long-term life goals, and the possibility of obtaining employment. The patient was amenable to volunteering at the rehabilitation facility where he had resided during the initial treatment for his TBI. At 2-year follow-up, he has not endorsed further mood decompensations or suicidal ideation, he has not required additional hospitalizations, and he maintains functional independence by living in his own apartment. He remains on the same medication regimen and reports adequate compliance with no severe adverse effects.

DISCUSSION

The improvement in mood symptoms demonstrated by this patient is consistent with results of the few published case studies on the use of rTMS16,17 and provides further support for the safe and effective clinical use of rTMS for refractory depression in post-TBI patients, without significant side effects.

The PHQ-9 questionnaire used to track the patient's response to rTMS is a well-established method for objectively measuring the severity of major depressive symptoms (ranked on scale 0-3 ranging from “not at all” to “nearly every day”) in multiple contexts of personal emotions, feelings, and daily life activities. Classification of depression level is determined by the PHQ-9 composite score of each item set and ranges from minimal depression (total score 1-4) to severe depression (total score 20-27).18 The PHQ-9 has proved to be useful for initial evaluation and for monitoring treatment and relapses of patients with MDD.19 The results of the PHQ-9 that the patient completed throughout his treatment period showed a clear improvement in self-reported mood symptoms over time that was corroborated by medical professionals during follow-up visits. Some other studies on this topic have used provider-based assessments of mood, such as the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D),20,21 so our results cannot be directly compared to those. One study, despite documenting a decrease in mood symptoms with the HAM-D from baseline to follow-up, did not show a concurrent significant self-reported decrease in symptoms according to the PHQ-9, differing from our findings.17

TBI was considered a relative contraindication to the use of rTMS because of the risk of seizures.22 This case report and several aforementioned studies6,8,16,17 have shown that rTMS can be safely used in the TBI population. Our patient tolerated 30 sessions of high-frequency rTMS without any seizures or other clinical adverse effects.

Limitations to this case study that warrant consideration include the lack of a true baseline quantitative evaluation of the patient's depressive symptoms prior to the TBI or the start of rTMS therapy. The patient did not receive any formal testing of his functional abilities; they were assessed by the neurologist based upon the patient's self-reported evaluation during each consultation. Moreover, several changes in the patient's psychiatric medication regimen started around the time of rTMS therapy initiation, including the substitution of quetiapine for olanzapine and the addition of methylphenidate. Consequently, determining the level of contribution of rTMS to his self-reported change in mood is not possible; the mood changes might have resulted from the alterations in his pharmacotherapy during the treatment protocol. However, prior attempts to adjust the patient's medications, including dose and class, did not show consistent evidence of mood symptom improvement. Finally, if the patient may suffer from possible long-term effects from rTMS therapy is unclear, as the last treatment was administered in May 2016. Worth noting, however, is that the therapy resulted in a sustained and profound long-lasting improvement in the patient's functional level from his debilitating mental illness, justifying the decision for aggressive management.

CONCLUSION

Despite the increasing use of rTMS as a noninvasive therapy for a variety of psychological and cognitive symptoms, it has not yet been recognized as a standard adjunct therapy in the TBI population. Concerns remain regarding the safety and longevity of rTMS therapy, given that the physiologic effects of the treatment and the extent of stimulation that may be administered without seizure induction are not fully understood. Our case report is one of the few documented studies of successful rTMS use for debilitating mood symptoms in patients who previously incurred a severe TBI. It provides further evidence regarding the safety of this type of treatment and its positive impact when used in combination with other therapeutic interventions. Powered studies are needed to validate the contribution of rTMS in the treatment of severe depression in the post-TBI populace. Further work is also required to establish guidelines regarding definitive rTMS safety and efficacy protocols for use in this patient population.

This article meets the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Medical Specialties Maintenance of Certification competencies for Patient Care and Medical Knowledge.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter of this article.

  • © Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Taylor CA,
    2. Bell JM,
    3. Breiding MJ,
    4. Xu L
    . Traumatic brain injury-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths - United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Mar 17;66(9):1-16. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6609a1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Koponen S,
    2. Taiminen T,
    3. Portin R,
    4. et al.
    Axis I and II psychiatric disorders after traumatic brain injury: a 30-year follow-up study. Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Aug;159(8):1315-1321.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Whelan-Goodinson R,
    2. Ponsford J,
    3. Johnston L,
    4. Grant F
    . Psychiatric disorders following traumatic brain injury: their nature and frequency. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):324-332. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181a712aa.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kreutzer JS,
    2. Seel RT,
    3. Gourley E
    . The prevalence and symptom rates of depression after traumatic brain injury: a comprehensive examination. Brain Inj. 2001 Jul;15(7):563-576.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fann JR,
    2. Hart T,
    3. Schomer KG
    . Treatment for depression after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma. 2009 Dec;26(12):2383-2402. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1091.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Lee JC,
    2. Blumberger DM,
    3. Fitzgerald PB,
    4. Daskalakis ZJ,
    5. Levinson AJ
    . The role of transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: a review. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(36):5846-5852.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Health Quality Ontario. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of major depressive disorder: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2004;4(7):1-98.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Chisari C,
    2. Fanciullacci C,
    3. Lamola G,
    4. Rossi B,
    5. Cohen LG
    . NIBS-driven brain plasticity. Arch Ital Biol. 2014 Dec;152(4):247-258. doi: 10.12871/00039829201445.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Villamar MF,
    2. Santos Portilla A,
    3. Fregni F,
    4. Zafonte R
    . Noninvasive brain stimulation to modulate neuroplasticity in traumatic brain injury. Neuromodulation. 2012 Jul;15(4):326-338. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00474.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. George MS,
    2. Wassermann EM,
    3. Williams WA,
    4. et al.
    Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves mood in depression. Neuroreport. 1995 Oct 2;6(14):1853-1856.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Rostami R,
    2. Kazemi R,
    3. Nitsche MA,
    4. Gholipour F,
    5. Salehinejad MA
    . Clinical and demographic predictors of response to rTMS treatment in unipolar and bipolar depressive disorders. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Oct;128(10):1961-1970. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.07.395.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Reti IM,
    2. Schwarz N,
    3. Bower A,
    4. Tibbs M,
    5. Rao V
    . Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a potential new treatment for depression associated with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2015;29(7-8):789-797. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1009168.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Klein E,
    2. Kreinin I,
    3. Chistyakov A,
    4. et al.
    Therapeutic efficacy of right prefrontal slow repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depression: a double-blind controlled study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Apr;56(4):315-320.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Tang MY,
    2. Chen TW,
    3. Zhang XM,
    4. Huang XH
    . GRE T2*-weighted MRI: principles and clinical applications. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:312142. doi: 10.1155/2014/312142.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Leggett LE,
    2. Soril LJ,
    3. Coward S,
    4. Lorenzetti DL,
    5. MacKean G,
    6. Clement FM
    . Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in adult and youth populations: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2015 Nov 5;17(6). doi: 10.4088/PCC.15r01807.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    1. Fitzgerald PB,
    2. Hoy KE,
    3. Maller JJ,
    4. et al.
    Transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression after a traumatic brain injury: a case study. J ECT. 2011 Mar;27(1):38-40. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3181eb30c6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Nielson DM,
    2. McKnight CA,
    3. Patel RN,
    4. Kalnin AJ,
    5. Mysiw WJ
    . Preliminary guidelines for safe and effective use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4 Suppl):S138-S144. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kroenke K,
    2. Spitzer RL,
    3. Williams JB
    . The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-613.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Wang J
    . Validity of the patient health questionnaire-9 for DSM-IV major depressive disorder in a sample of Canadian working population. J Affect Disord. 2015 Nov 15;187:122-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.044.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. O'Reardon JP,
    2. Solvason HB,
    3. Janicak PG,
    4. et al.
    Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Dec 1;62(11):1208-1216.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Martin JL,
    2. Barbanoj MJ,
    3. Schlaepfer TE,
    4. Thompson E,
    5. Pérez V,
    6. Kulisevsky J
    . Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of depression. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;182:480-491.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Rossi S,
    2. Hallett M,
    3. Rossini PM,
    4. Pascual-Leone A
    ; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal: 18 (3)
Ochsner Journal
Vol. 18, Issue 3
Sep 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment of Depression in a Patient With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment of Depression in a Patient With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Alessandro Iliceto, Rachel L Seiler, Korak Sarkar
Ochsner Journal Sep 2018, 18 (3) 264-267; DOI: 10.31486/toj.17.0075

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment of Depression in a Patient With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Alessandro Iliceto, Rachel L Seiler, Korak Sarkar
Ochsner Journal Sep 2018, 18 (3) 264-267; DOI: 10.31486/toj.17.0075
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • CASE REPORT
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Extrahepatic Bile Duct
  • Surgical Resection of Bertolotti Syndrome
  • Patellar Dislocation and Fracture After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in a Patient With Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Show more CASE REPORTS AND CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Brain injuries–traumatic
  • depression
  • repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Current Post at the Blog

Ochsner Journal Cover Features Art by Ochsner Clinical School Grad

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2022 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire