Using Technology to Improve Women's Health Care

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   Half of older adults don’t use their health provider's secure patient communication site, poll finds. University of Michigan. Institute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation. Accessed November 19, 2020. ihpi.umich.edu/news/half-older-adults-don’t-use-their-health-provider's-secure-patient-communication-site-poll-finds
2. 2.↵
   Committee on Patient Safety and Quality Improvement; Committee on Practice Management. Committee opinion no. 621: patient safety and health information technology. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):282-283. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000459867.14114.7a

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. 3.↵
   1. Harkavy H.

   Greater than the sum of the parts. Eighteen New York physician practices gain centralized patient information database with ASP-hosted system. Health Manag Technol. 2004;25(7):40-42.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Redd D

   . Flying solo isn’t easy. Addressing the challenges of private practice. Health Manag Technol. 2013;34(5):12-13.

   OpenUrl
5. 5.↵
   1. Tucker G

   . What works. All-around efficiency. Massachusetts OB/GYN practice improves its financial and administrative health with practice management software. Health Manag Technol. 2003;24(5):44-46.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Overdijkink SB,
   2. Velu AV,
   3. Rosman AN,
   4. van Beukering MD,
   5. Kok M,
   6. Steegers-Theunissen RP

   . The usability and effectiveness of mobile health technology-based lifestyle and medical intervention apps supporting health care during pregnancy: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(4):e109. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8834

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 7.↵
   1. Jake-Schoffman DE,
   2. Silfee VJ,
   3. Waring ME,
   4. et al.

   Methods for evaluating the content, usability, and efficacy of commercial mobile health apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(12):e190. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8758

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. 8.↵
   FDA allows marketing of first direct-to-consumer app for contraceptive use to prevent pregnancy. News release. U.S. Food & Drug Administration; August 10, 2018. Accessed November 23, 2020. www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-allows-marketing-first-direct-consumer-app-contraceptive-use-prevent-pregnancy
9. 9.↵
   1. Lopez L,
   2. Resser L,
   3. Rodriguez N,
   4. Ramos D

   . Leveraging mobile technology to increase breastfeeding rates in Los Angeles County (LAC) [18B]. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(1):23S. doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000483338.35778.ef

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. 10.↵
    1. Marko KI,
    2. Ganju N,
    3. Brown J,
    4. Benham J,
    5. Gaba ND

    . Remote prenatal care monitoring with digital health tools can reduce visit frequency while improving satisfaction [3]. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127:1S. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000483620.40988.df

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. 11.
    1. Krapf JM,
    2. Gaba ND,
    3. Ganju N,
    4. Marko KI,
    5. Martinez AG

    . Remote capture and monitoring of clinical data during pregnancy [54]. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:26S. doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000462736.04207.70

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 12.↵
    1. Denicola N,
    2. Sheth S,
    3. Leggett K,
    4. Woodland MB,
    5. Ganju N,
    6. Marko K

    . Evaluating patient satisfaction and experience for technology-enabled prenatal care for low risk women [1L]. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:192S. doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000533541.36412.24

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 13.↵
    1. Peahl AF,
    2. Novara A,
    3. Heisler M,
    4. Dalton VK,
    5. Moniz MH,
    6. Smith RD

    . Patient preferences for prenatal and postpartum care delivery: a survey of postpartum women. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(5):1038-1046. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003731

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. 14.↵
    1. Nores J,
    2. Malone F,
    3. Athanassiou A,
    4. Craigo S,
    5. Simpson L,
    6. Dalton M

    . Validation of first-trimester telemedicine as an obstetric imaging technology: a feasibility study. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(3):353-356. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00265-2

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 106: intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(1):192-202. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3181aef106

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Hopkins L,
    2. Hampton BS,
    3. Abbott JF,
    4. et al.

    To the point: medical education, technology, and the millennial learner. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2):188-192. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.001

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 17.↵
    1. Pellini T,
    2. Martino M,
    3. Patruno J

    . The educational value and feasibility of a video-capture system in the surgical training of OBGYN residents. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:64S. doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000502749.34595.25

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. 18.↵
    1. Wollschlaeger K,
    2. White KA.

    A contraception simulation lab developed for OB/GYN residents in Catholic hospitals. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:58S. doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000502728.57850.83

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 19.↵
    1. Auguste TC,
    2. Benda NC,
    3. Kellogg K,
    4. Fairbanks R

    . Validation of an affordable and accessible alternative simulation technology [7D]. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(5):43S. doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000514353.51835.38

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. 20.↵
    1. Perry R,
    2. Burns R,
    3. Simon-Freeman R

    . A survey of mobile application use among California obstetrics and gynecology residents [8I]. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(5):95S. doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000514947.40973.52

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 21.↵
    1. Patel S,
    2. Lidor A,
    3. Sanyal A,
    4. Hueppchen N

    . Smartphones: are they really a smart idea? Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:585S. doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000502726.73097.56

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 22.↵
    1. Shah J,
    2. Vyas A,
    3. Vyas D

    . The history of robotics in surgical specialties. Am J Rob Surg. 2014;1(1):12-20. doi: 10.1166/ajrs.2014.1006

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. 23.↵
    1. Gala RB,
    2. Margulies R,
    3. Steinberg A

    , et al; Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group. Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(3):353-361. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.11.010

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Desai PH,
    2. Lin JF,
    3. Slomovitz BM

    . Milestones to optimal adoption of robotic technology in gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(1):13-20. doi: 10.1097/aog.0000000000000055

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed