Review ArticleREVIEWS AND CONTEMPORARY UPDATES
Open Access

Current Approaches to Risk Assessment and Prevention of Preterm Birth—A Continuing Public Health Crisis

Joseph R. Biggio
Ochsner Journal December 2020, 20 (4) 426-433; DOI: https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.20.0005

Abstract

Background: Preterm birth remains a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Several potential pathways and pathophysiologic processes can lead to preterm birth, complicating efforts to screen for the risk of preterm birth and making implementation of prevention strategies difficult.

Methods: Based on a review of the literature, this article addresses screening strategies for preterm birth risk stratification and interventions for preterm birth prevention.

Results: In women with a history of a prior spontaneous preterm birth, cervical cerclage placement in the setting of short cervix reduces the rate of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. Weekly injections of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-P) have been used as standard treatment for the prevention of recurrent preterm birth since 2011. However, results of a replication study of 17-P published in 2020 have raised questions regarding the effectiveness of this drug, and it is under review by the US Food and Drug Administration. Among women with no history of preterm birth, cervical length appears to be the best predictor of risk for preterm birth in asymptomatic women. In women with a cervical length <25 mm, vaginal progesterone has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of preterm birth.

Conclusion: Strategies including cervical length screening, vaginal progesterone administration, cervical cerclage placement, and, potentially, 17-P administration may help reduce rates of preterm birth when used in the appropriate patient populations. Development of protocols for patient evaluation and risk stratification will help identify patients at highest risk for preterm birth and allow use of the best available therapeutic interventions.

Keywords:

INTRODUCTION

Preterm birth remains the most common cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality in the United States.1-3 Rates of preterm birth in Louisiana are among the highest in the country, with rates in some parishes approaching those of developing countries. While the rate of preterm birth declined nationally from 2007 to 2014, the rate rose to 9.93% in 2017.4-7 In Louisiana, the rate of preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation was 12.7% in 2017. Other states in the southeastern United States have similar challenges with high rates of preterm birth.6,7

Although the rate of preterm birth has risen, some interventions have been demonstrated to have a potential role in reducing the likelihood of recurrent preterm birth in women with prior preterm births. Even with these interventions, however, the impact on the overall rate of preterm birth is minimal because 90% of deliveries prior to 34 weeks of gestation and 85% of deliveries prior to 37 weeks of gestation occur in women with no previous history of preterm birth.8-10 Therefore, other strategies are needed to identify women at highest risk in the absence of a history of prior preterm birth.

The focus of this review is the current (2020) data on interventions used to reduce the risk of recurrent preterm birth in women with a prior spontaneous preterm birth, as well as risk assessment methods and interventions to reduce the risk of preterm birth in the obstetric population with no history of prior preterm birth.

DEFINITION OF PRETERM BIRTH

Preterm birth has typically been classified as either spontaneous, which includes preterm labor and premature rupture of membranes, or indicated because of a maternal or fetal complication. Approximately two-thirds of preterm births are spontaneous.4 While classification of preterm birth has historically been limited to births that occur between 20 weeks 0 days and 36 weeks 6 days of gestation, many of the etiologies of deliveries at 16 weeks 0 days to 20 weeks are similar to those of later preterm births, and these women appear to have a high risk of recurrent preterm birth.11,12 While the true definition of preterm birth applies only to births occurring at 20 weeks of gestation or later, based on the similar etiologies and the high risk for recurrence, preterm birth screening and prevention approaches have been recommended for women with a prior preterm birth as early as 16 weeks’ gestation.13

ETIOLOGIES AND RISK FACTORS FOR PRETERM BIRTH

The strongest predictor of spontaneous preterm birth is a history of spontaneous preterm birth.8 Spontaneous preterm birth recurs in 35% to 50% of women, and the probability of spontaneous preterm birth increases with the number of prior spontaneous preterm births.14 Several other risk factors have been associated with spontaneous preterm birth, including non-Hispanic Black race, low socioeconomic status, midtrimester cervical length <25 mm, history of dilation and evacuation procedure, maternal smoking, late prenatal care, uterine overdistension, decidual hemorrhage, and short interpregnancy interval.15-19

Despite the magnitude of the problem, the underlying etiologies of spontaneous preterm birth remain poorly understood. Strong evidence suggests a genetic contribution to spontaneous preterm birth. Women who were born prematurely are at increased risk to have a spontaneous preterm birth.20,21 A further hypothesis suggests that differences in risk-predisposing genetic variant frequencies may partly explain differences in rates of preterm birth among women of different races and ethnicities.22-25

MANAGEMENT OF SINGLETON GESTATIONS WITHOUT A HISTORY OF PRIOR SPONTANEOUS PRETERM BIRTH

Cervical Length Assessment

As already noted, the majority of preterm births occur in women who have no history of prior preterm birth—that is, they occur in women who are nulliparous or have had prior term births. Development of short cervix has been associated with subsequent preterm birth, and midtrimester cervical length assessment by transvaginal ultrasound is the best clinical predictor of subsequent spontaneous preterm birth.26 The prevalence of short cervix in women without a prior spontaneous preterm birth ranges from 1.7% to 7.9%.27,28 Risk stratification with cervical length measurement has, therefore, been suggested to help identify potential candidates for intervention.

A cervical length measurement below the 10th centile for gestational age has been used as an arbitrary cutoff to diagnose short cervix. At 18 to 24 weeks of gestation, the 10th centile corresponds to a cervical length <26 mm.29 Women with singleton gestations with a cervical length ≤25 mm at 24 weeks of gestation have a 6-fold increased risk of preterm birth, and the risk is along a continuum with the risk of preterm birth increasing as cervical length decreases.29 In one study of unselected pregnant women at 22 to 24 weeks of gestation, only 1.7% had a cervical length <15 mm, but these women accounted for 86% of preterm births at <28 weeks of gestation and 58% of preterm births at <32 weeks of gestation.28

The positive and negative predictive values of transvaginal cervical length screening for preterm birth are highly dependent on the population being screened, especially at later gestational ages. The positive predictive value of a cervical length <25 mm in identifying subsequent preterm birth at <34 to <35 weeks is good (as high as 81%) in high-risk cohorts of women with a prior spontaneous preterm birth, but it is only fair in the general obstetric population, ranging from 26.3% to 39.1%.30-32 A 2017 observational study of nulliparous women reported that a cervical length cutoff of 25 mm identified only 23.3% of women with spontaneous preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation.27 The specificity of short cervical length is also related to the cutoff used. In an unselected cohort and using a cervical length ≤20 mm, the specificity was 99.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 99.8-100.0) for preterm birth at <34 weeks, but specificity decreased to 90.1% (95% CI 89.0-91.2) for a cervical length ≤30 mm.32 Regardless of the cutoff used, the positive predictive value of short cervix remains relatively low.

Despite these limitations, the finding of short cervical length, irrespective of prior pregnancy history, has been consistently associated with an elevated risk of spontaneous preterm birth. No universal agreement on a threshold for diagnosis of short cervix has been reached; most clinicians use 15, 20, or 25 mm as the threshold at which to offer treatment for women with no history of prior preterm birth. As of 2020, neither the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) nor the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) recommends a universal cervical length screening for all patients but instead state that cervical length screening can be considered as part of a strategy for preterm birth prevention.33

Treatment for Short Cervix in Singleton Gestation – No History of Preterm Birth

Given the association of cervical shortening with preterm birth, several interventions aimed at reducing the risk of preterm birth have been investigated, including 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-P), cerclage, pessary, and vaginal progesterone.34-40 Studies of pessary and cerclage have produced conflicting results, while 17-P treatment has failed to demonstrate benefit when prescribed for the indication of cervical shortening. Results have, however, been consistently more salutary for vaginal progesterone.

17-Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate

In a large multicenter trial, women with a cervical length <30 mm at 16 to 22 weeks were randomized to receive weekly injections of 17-P or placebo. The rate of preterm birth was similar between groups (25.1% vs 24.2%, relative risk [RR] 1.03, 95% CI 0.79-1.35), and no improvement was seen in neonatal outcomes.36 Two smaller studies produced conflicting results on the efficacy of 17-P in the setting of short cervix, with one study demonstrating benefit similar to vaginal progesterone and the other demonstrating no reduction in preterm birth.41,42 In aggregate, in the absence of a history of prior preterm birth, 17-P has not been consistently demonstrated to reduce the occurrence of spontaneous preterm birth, even in the setting of short cervical length.

Cerclage

Cervical cerclage, an operative procedure in which a suture is placed in purse-string fashion around the cervix, is most traditionally used for the prevention of recurrent cervical insufficiency (painless dilation). Cerclage has historically been reserved for patients with a diagnosis of cervical insufficiency. However, cervical insufficiency is now recognized to be along a spectrum, with some women demonstrating cervical shortening prior to painless dilation or clinically apparent signs such as labor or rupture of membranes.43

While compelling data demonstrate the benefit of cerclage in the setting of short cervix among women with a prior preterm birth, in the absence of a history of prior preterm birth, cerclage has not generally been demonstrated to result in a reduction of preterm birth.44-48 In a study published in 2004, 253 women with very short midtrimester cervical lengths (<15 mm) were randomized to cerclage (n=127) vs expectant management (n=126); the incidence of preterm birth at <33 weeks’ gestation was not improved with cerclage placement (22% vs 26%, RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54-1.31).48 A meta-analysis of 5 randomized trials that included 419 asymptomatic women with cervical length <25 mm and no prior preterm birth (n=224 in the cerclage group) found that cerclage placement did not prevent preterm birth.49 These studies excluded women with visible membranes, and these findings therefore may not extend to this subgroup of women. However, a 2018 retrospective study examined the utility of cerclage placement in women being treated with vaginal progesterone because of short cervix who developed further cervical shortening to <10 mm. The cohort who received vaginal progesterone plus cerclage delivered 7 weeks later than those treated with progesterone alone (34 weeks 3 days vs 27 weeks 2 days, P<0.001), and the rate of spontaneous preterm birth was reduced even after controlling for confounders (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03-0.41).50 Neonatal outcomes, including neonatal intensive care unit admission, respiratory distress syndrome, and necrotizing enterocolitis, were all significantly improved as well. Given the conflicting results in these studies, the role of ultrasound-indicated cerclage placement in women without a history of preterm birth who develop further cervical shortening despite treatment with vaginal progesterone needs additional investigation. Neither the ACOG nor the SMFM provides recommendations for this subgroup of patients.

Cervical Pessary

As cervical length screening has become more common, interest has grown in nonpharmacologic and nonsurgical interventions to reduce preterm birth. The Arabin pessary, a silicone ring-shaped pessary that encircles the cervix, has been studied. Putative mechanisms of action include alteration in the uterine-cervical angle, displacement of the weight of the gravid uterus, prevention of opening of the internal cervical os, and protection of the cervical mucus plug.51,52

The results of randomized trials investigating whether placement of an Arabin pessary in women with short cervix reduces the risk of preterm birth have been conflicting.35,53,54 Goya and colleagues randomized 385 women with singleton gestations and a cervical length ≤25 mm to Arabin pessary or usual care between 18 and 22 weeks of gestation. Women treated with a pessary had an 82% reduction in preterm birth at <34 weeks compared to the usual care group (6% vs 27%, RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.08-0.37), as well as a similar reduction in adverse neonatal outcomes (3% vs 16%, RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.39).35 In a study funded by the Fetal Medicine Foundation, 932 women with a cervical length ≤25 mm were randomized to pessary or usual care.53 Cervical length was measured at 20 weeks 0 days to 24 weeks 6 days. Among the women enrolled in the trial, 16.5% had a history of prior preterm birth. Women in both treatment groups who had a cervical length ≤15 mm were prescribed 200 mg vaginal progesterone nightly (pessary, 43.9%; usual care, 46.9%). No reduction in spontaneous preterm birth was seen at <34 weeks (12.0 vs 10.8%, P=0.57, odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% CI 0.75-1.69), and no difference was noted in adverse neonatal outcomes (6.7% vs 5.7%, P=0.55) with pessary placement compared to usual care.

A 2017 meta-analysis of study-level data on more than 1,400 women, many of whom were included in the previously discussed trials, concluded that for singleton pregnancies in women with a cervical length <25 mm, placement of an Arabin pessary does not reduce the rate of preterm birth at <34 weeks or improve neonatal outcomes.55 However, subsequent to the publication of that meta-analysis, the report of a single-center trial from Italy was published. In that trial, 300 women with no history of preterm birth and a cervical length ≤25 mm at 18 weeks 0 days to 23 weeks 6 days were randomized to pessary or usual care.54 Women with a cervical length ≤20 mm, nearly 90% of the women in the trial, were also treated with 200 mg vaginal progesterone. Treatment with pessary was associated with a 52% reduction in spontaneous preterm birth at <34 weeks (7.3% vs 15.3%, RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.95), as well as a reduction in adverse neonatal outcomes (14.7% vs 32.0%, RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.72). Additional studies investigating the cervical pessary are currently ongoing in the United States and elsewhere, but in 2020, use of a pessary for prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervix remains investigational.

Vaginal Progesterone

The efficacy of vaginal progesterone in women with a sonographic diagnosis of short cervix has been demonstrated by 2 multicenter, randomized controlled trials and by independent patient-level meta-analyses that included data from these studies and several smaller trials. Fonseca and colleagues conducted a double-blind trial that randomized women with a cervical length ≤15 mm to 200 mg vaginal progesterone or placebo.34 A total of 413 women were treated from 24 to 34 weeks’ gestation. The incidence of delivery prior to 34 weeks was reduced to 19.2% in the group that received vaginal progesterone vs 34.4% in the placebo group (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.86). Eighty-five percent of the women included in the Fonseca et al study had no prior history of preterm birth. In a subgroup analysis of these women without a history of preterm birth, a significant reduction in preterm birth rate at <34 weeks was noted in women with short cervix (≤15 mm) who received progesterone (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.93).

In the PREGNANT trial, Hassan and colleagues reported that administration of vaginal progesterone gel (90 mg) to women with a cervical length of 10 to 20 mm identified at 19 weeks 0 days to 23 weeks 6 days of gestation resulted in a significant reduction in the rate of preterm birth at <33 weeks of gestation (8.9% vs 16.1%, RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.92) and at <35 and <32 weeks of gestation.37 Moreover, the study demonstrated a neonatal benefit, with a significant reduction in respiratory distress syndrome (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.92). Only 16% of the study population had a history of prior preterm birth, and even after excluding these subjects, progesterone was still associated with a significant benefit in the setting of isolated short cervix (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27-0.90).

A 2018 meta-analysis incorporated data on 974 singleton gestations with a cervical length ≤25 mm.38 Two of the 5 studies included in the meta-analysis specifically enrolled women with short cervix, while the women from the other studies represent the short cervix subgroup enrolled in the total study patient population.34,37,56-58 The meta-analysis reported a reduction in the risk of preterm birth at <32 weeks of gestation (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.86) with vaginal progesterone treatment; preterm births at <28, <34, and <37 weeks of gestation were significantly reduced as well. In addition, the meta-analysis showed a reduction in composite neonatal morbidity and mortality (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.91), as well as a reduction in birthweight <2,500 g and <1,500 g.38 This meta-analysis included data on 128 women with a cervical length of 21 to 25 mm; in this subgroup, the reduction in preterm birth was not statistically significant (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.22-1.38).

While these data are compelling, treatment with vaginal progesterone following the diagnosis of short cervix and the threshold of cervical length at which to initiate treatment remain areas of debate. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) did not approve vaginal progesterone for the indication of preterm birth prevention in the setting of short cervix, in part because data from the PREGNANT trial failed to demonstrate a benefit when only US patients were analyzed. In addition, the FDA declined approval because vaginal progesterone did not appear to be effective in Black or obese women. Despite debate about the clinical utility in all subgroups, given the data on the potential benefit and lack of harm, the ACOG and SMFM have recommended vaginal progesterone as a management option for women with short cervix.33 In addition, with evidence of the benefits of vaginal progesterone administration in the setting of short cervix and its cost-effectiveness, some authors have recommended universal cervical length screening for asymptomatic women without a prior preterm birth.59-61 The cost-effectiveness of such recommendations, however, is founded on a single, not serial, cervical length measurement at the time of the anatomy ultrasound examination. While treatment with vaginal progesterone is not associated with any significant risks, its use for the indication of short cervix is off-label in 2020.

Many formulations of micronized progesterone contain peanut oil in the excipients (the inert materials in which the drug is suspended). Women with severe peanut allergies, such as anaphylaxis, should not receive micronized progesterone capsules.62 Vaginal gel formulations do not contain peanut oil and can be used by women with peanut allergies.63 Other contraindications to vaginal progesterone treatment include the typical contraindications to hormonal therapy, such as hormone receptor–positive breast cancer.

MANAGEMENT OF SINGLETON GESTATIONS WITH A HISTORY OF PRIOR SPONTANEOUS PRETERM BIRTH

Progesterone Treatment

The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network conducted a multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial of 463 women with a singleton pregnancy and prior spontaneous preterm birth between 16 and 36 weeks who received 17-P or placebo. Treatment with 17-P was associated with a 34% reduction in recurrent preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation (from 54.9% to 36.3%, adjusted RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.54-0.81), as well as significant reductions in early preterm birth at <32 and <35 weeks and significant reductions in infant complications (intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and need for supplemental oxygen).64 In February 2011, the FDA approved 17-P for the prevention of recurrent preterm birth, and use of this agent for prevention of recurrent preterm birth became the standard of care in the United States.

As one of the conditions for market approval, the FDA required the manufacturer of 17-P to conduct a replication trial. The multisite international PROLONG (Progestin's Role in Optimizing Neonatal Gestation) trial used the same study design, inclusion criteria, and exclusion criteria as the previously noted NICHD trial.65 A total of 1,708 women with a prior spontaneous preterm birth were enrolled and randomized to either 17-P or placebo. The study showed that 17-P administration did not reduce the rate of preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation (17-P 11% vs placebo 11.5%, RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.71-1.26), nor did it reduce neonatal morbidity (5.6% vs 5.0%, RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.68-1.61).66 This study could not recruit well in the United States because 17-P was already on the market and incorporated into the standard care for women with prior preterm birth, resulting in significant demographic and risk differences between the PROLONG trial and the NICHD study. Only 22% of patients enrolled in PROLONG were from the United States; 61% were from Russia and Ukraine. In addition, only 1.1% of patients had a cervical length <25 mm and only 7% of the patients were Black—two of the greatest risk factors for preterm birth. These differences in study populations and the conflicting results of the 2 trials have introduced considerable uncertainty and controversy into the management of patients with prior preterm birth. In October 2019, the FDA convened an advisory panel to review the data on 17-P. The panel voted 9-7 to recommend that the drug be removed from the market.67 In October 2020, the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research proposed withdrawal of 17-P from the market. The final decision is subject to potential additional public hearings and ruling from the FDA Commissioner.68

The SMFM has advocated that critical differences between the study populations in the original NICHD trial and the PROLONG study account to some extent for the disparate results. A 2020 statement from SMFM concludes that providers can reasonably continue to use 17-P in women with a risk profile similar to that of the enrollees in the NICHD study.69 Given the preponderance of data in a US population, the SMFM states that women with a singleton gestation and a history of prior spontaneous preterm birth between 20 and 36 weeks 6 days of gestation may be prescribed intramuscular administration of 250 mg 17-P weekly, starting at 16 to 20 weeks of gestation until 36 weeks of gestation or delivery. If 17-P is not available or the patient declines the medication, vaginal progesterone may be a reasonable alternative.69

The utility of vaginal progesterone has been investigated in women with prior spontaneous preterm birth. In 2003, da Fonseca and colleagues reported the results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial of 142 women at high risk for preterm birth (94% had a prior preterm birth) who were treated with either 100 mg vaginal progesterone per day or placebo.70 The incidence of preterm birth was reduced at <37 weeks (28.5% to 13.8%, P=0.03) and at <34 weeks of gestation (18.6% to 2.7%, P=0.002). While subsequent studies have produced mixed results, a 2019 meta-analysis readdressed the question of the optimal intervention for women with a prior preterm birth and concluded that vaginal progesterone treatment was associated with a reduction in recurrent preterm birth at <34 weeks (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12–0.68) and <37 weeks (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23–0.74). 17-P also reduced preterm birth at <37 weeks (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.27–0.95) and neonatal death (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16–0.95).71 Many of the studies in this meta-analysis were conducted outside of the United States, so these findings may not be generalizable to the US population.

Cervical Length Screening and Cerclage

Cervical length is inversely related to risk of recurrent preterm birth and gestational age at delivery, and the transvaginal approach offers better sensitivity to detect cervical shortening than the transabdominal approach.29,72,73 Traditional history-based cerclages are placed at 12 to 14 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound-indicated cerclage should be considered for women with a prior spontaneous preterm birth if the cervical length shortens to <25 mm in the midtrimester (16 weeks to 23 weeks 6 days).44,74 Although some controversy exists regarding optimal cervical length screening regimens, based on the regimen used in the largest randomized trial that demonstrated benefit, women with a prior spontaneous preterm birth at <34 weeks should begin transvaginal cervical length assessment at 16 weeks, with serial measurement every 2 weeks until 23 weeks.74 If cervical length shortens to ≤30 mm during surveillance, the screening interval should be reduced to weekly.44

The strongest evidence for benefit of cerclage in the setting of short cervix comes from a meta-analysis75 of patient-level data derived from 5 randomized trials enrolling a total of 504 women (n=250 cerclage procedures).44-48 Among women with singleton gestations, a prior preterm birth, and sonographic diagnosis of short cervix, cerclage reduced preterm birth at <37 weeks by 30% and reduced composite perinatal morbidity and mortality by 36%. The number of cerclage procedures needed to prevent 1 perinatal death in this group was estimated to be 20.75

Furthermore, for women with a history of preterm birth, especially if the diagnosis of cervical insufficiency is questionable, data indicate that they can be safely monitored with transvaginal ultrasound.76 For women who do not develop cervical shortening, additional procedures such as cerclage placement may be avoided. Sonographic monitoring with subsequent ultrasound-indicated cerclage in women with a prior preterm birth has equivalent obstetric outcomes to history-indicated cerclage, but only a fraction (36% to 42%) of the monitoring cohort ultimately requires cerclage.75,76

Combination Therapies

Data regarding the efficacy of combining therapies, such as intramuscular progesterone with or without vaginal progesterone and with or without cervical cerclage, are limited. The utility of combined treatment with history-based cerclage and intramuscular 17-P is unclear, and small retrospective studies have reported mixed results.77,78 In a secondary analysis of the Owen et al cerclage trial44 that evaluated the subgroup of women with short cervix who were also using 17-P, investigators found a trend toward benefit in the cerclage group.79 This study was not, however, designed or powered to examine the combination therapy or the therapies’ interactions. Thus, although no additional benefit to cerclage has been reported when cervical shortening occurs in women on 17-P,79,80 the SMFM recommends continuation of 17-P in women who receive an ultrasound-indicated cerclage.81

CONCLUSION

Preterm birth remains a major public health problem. Strategies including cervical length screening, 17-P administration, vaginal progesterone administration, and cervical cerclage placement may help reduce the rates of preterm birth in specific patient populations. Development of and adherence to protocols for patient evaluation and risk stratification will help identify patients at highest risk for preterm birth and the optimal targets for therapeutic interventions.

This article meets the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Medical Specialties Maintenance of Certification competencies for Patient Care and Medical Knowledge.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author has no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter of this article.

©2020 by the author(s); licensee Ochsner Journal, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode) that permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Blencowe H,
    2. Cousens S,
    3. Oestergaard MZ,
    4. et al.
    National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012 Jun 9;379(9832):2162-2172. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.
    1. Frey HA,
    2. Klebanoff MA
    . The epidemiology, etiology, and costs of preterm birth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Apr;21(2):68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2015.12.011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Purisch SE,
    2. Gyamfi-Bannerman C.
    Epidemiology of preterm birth. Semin Perinatol. 2017 Nov;41(7):387-391. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.07.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Goldenberg RL,
    2. Culhane JF,
    3. Iams JD,
    4. Romero R
    . Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008 Jan 5;371(9606):75-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.
    1. Gyamfi-Bannerman C,
    2. Ananth CV
    . Trends in spontaneous and indicated preterm delivery among singleton gestations in the United States, 2005-2012. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;124(6):1069-1074. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000546.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Martin JA,
    2. Hamilton BE,
    3. Osterman MJK,
    4. Driscoll AK,
    5. Drake P
    . Births: final data for 2017. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018 Nov;67(8):1-50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Martin JA,
    2. Hamilton BE,
    3. Osterman MJK,
    4. Driscoll AK,
    5. Drake P
    . Births: final data for 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018 Jan;67(1):1-55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Adams MM,
    2. Elam-Evans LD,
    3. Wilson HG,
    4. Gilbertz DA
    . Rates of and factors associated with recurrence of preterm delivery. JAMA. 2000 Mar 22-29;283(12):1591-1596. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.12.1591.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Ananth CV,
    2. Getahun D,
    3. Peltier MR,
    4. Salihu HM,
    5. Vintzileos AM
    . Recurrence of spontaneous versus medically indicated preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;195(3):643-650. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.022.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Petrini JR,
    2. Callaghan WM,
    3. Klebanoff M,
    4. et al.
    Estimated effect of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate on preterm birth in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;105(2):267-272. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000150560.24297.4f.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Edlow AG,
    2. Srinivas SK,
    3. Elovitz MA
    . Second-trimester loss and subsequent pregnancy outcomes: what is the real risk? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):581.e1-581.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.09.016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Goldenberg RL,
    2. Mayberry SK,
    3. Copper RL,
    4. Dubard MB,
    5. Hauth JC
    . Pregnancy outcome following a second-trimester loss. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Mar;81(3):444-446.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Iams JD
    . Clinical practice. Prevention of preterm parturition. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 16;370(3):254-261. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1103640.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. McManemy J,
    2. Cooke E,
    3. Amon E,
    4. Leet T
    . Recurrence risk for preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;196(6):576.e1-576.e6; discussion 576.e6-576.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.01.039.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kyrklund-Blomberg NB,
    2. Cnattingius S
    . Preterm birth and maternal smoking: risks related to gestational age and onset of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Oct;179(4):1051-1055. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70214-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.
    1. Meis PJ,
    2. Michielutte R,
    3. Peters TJ,
    4. et al.
    Factors associated with preterm birth in Cardiff, Wales. I. Univariable and multivariable analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Aug;173(2):590-596. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90287-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.
    1. Saccone G,
    2. Perriera L,
    3. Berghella V
    . Prior uterine evacuation of pregnancy as independent risk factor for preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;214(5):572-591. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.044.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.
    1. Srinivasjois RM,
    2. Shah S
    , Shah PS; Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants Of Preterm/LBW Births. Biracial couples and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Oct;91(10):1134-1146. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Wong LF,
    2. Wilkes J,
    3. Korgenski K,
    4. Varner MW,
    5. Manuck TA
    . Risk factors associated with preterm birth after a prior term delivery. BJOG. 2016 Oct;123(11):1772-1778. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13683.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Porter TF,
    2. Fraser AM,
    3. Hunter CY,
    4. Ward RH,
    5. Varner MW
    . The risk of preterm birth across generations. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jul;90:63-67. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00215-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Wilcox AJ,
    2. Skjaerven R,
    3. Lie RT
    . Familial patterns of preterm delivery: maternal and fetal contributions. Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Feb 15;167(4):474-479. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Jones NM,
    2. Holzman C,
    3. Tian Y,
    4. et al.
    Innate immune system gene polymorphisms in maternal and child genotype and risk of preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Mar;25(3):240-247. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.569614.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.
    1. Menon R,
    2. Pearce B,
    3. Velez DR,
    4. et al.
    Racial disparity in pathophysiologic pathways of preterm birth based on genetic variants. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009 Jun 15;7:62. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.
    1. Velez DR,
    2. Fortunato S,
    3. Thorsen P,
    4. Lombardi SJ,
    5. Williams SM,
    6. Menon R
    . Spontaneous preterm birth in African Americans is associated with infection and inflammatory response gene variants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb;200(2):209.e1-209.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.051.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Wu W,
    2. Clark EAS,
    3. Stoddard GJ,
    4. et al.
    Effect of interleukin-6 polymorphism on risk of preterm birth within population strata: a meta-analysis. BMC Genet. 2013 Apr 25;14:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-14-30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. To MS,
    2. Skentou CA,
    3. Royston P,
    4. Yu CKH,
    5. Nicolaides KH
    . Prediction of patient-specific risk of early preterm delivery using maternal history and sonographic measurement of cervical length: a population-based prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;27(4):362-367.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Esplin MS,
    2. Elovitz MA,
    3. Iams JD
    , et al; nuMoM2b Network. Predictive accuracy of serial transvaginal cervical lengths and quantitative vaginal fetal fibronectin levels for spontaneous preterm birth among nulliparous women. JAMA. 2017 Mar 14;317(10):1047-1056. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1373.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Heath VC,
    2. Southall TR,
    3. Souka AP,
    4. Elisseou A,
    5. Nicolaides KH
    . Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Nov;12(5):312-317. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12050312.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Iams JD,
    2. Goldenberg RL,
    3. Meis PJ,
    4. et al.
    The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 29;334(9):567-572. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602293340904.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Guzman ER,
    2. Walters C,
    3. Ananth CV,
    4. et al.
    A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Sep;18(3):204-210. doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00526.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.
    1. Iams JD,
    2. Goldenberg RL,
    3. Mercer BM
    , et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The preterm prediction study: can low-risk women destined for spontaneous preterm birth be identified? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Mar;184(4):652-655. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.111248.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Leung TN,
    2. Pang MW,
    3. Leung TY,
    4. Poon CF,
    5. Wong SM,
    6. Lau TK
    . Cervical length at 18-22 weeks of gestation for prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery in Hong Kong Chinese women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Dec;26(7):713-717. doi: 10.1002/uog.2617.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 130: prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;120(4):964-973. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723b1b.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Fonseca EB,
    2. Celik E,
    3. Parra M,
    4. Singh M,
    5. Nicolaides KH
    ; Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 2;357(5):462-469. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067815.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Goya M,
    2. Pratcorona L,
    3. Merced C
    , et al; Pesario Cervical para Evitar Prematuridad (PECEP) Trial Group. Cervical pessary in pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 May 12;379(9828):1800-1806. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60030-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Grobman WA,
    2. Thom EA,
    3. Spong CY
    , et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network. 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate to prevent prematurity in nulliparas with cervical length less than 30 mm. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;207(5):390.e1-390.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.09.013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Hassan SS,
    2. Romero R,
    3. Vidyadhari D
    , et al; PREGNANT Trial. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;38(1):18-31. doi: 10.1002/uog.9017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Romero R,
    2. Conde-Agudelo A,
    3. Da Fonseca E,
    4. et al.
    Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a short cervix: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):161-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.576.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.
    1. Romero R,
    2. Conde-Agudelo A,
    3. El-Refaie W,
    4. et al.
    Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth and neonatal morbidity and mortality in women with a twin gestation and a short cervix: an updated meta-analysis of individual patient data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;49(3):303-314. doi: 10.1002/uog.17397.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.↵
    1. Romero R,
    2. Nicolaides K,
    3. Conde-Agudelo A,
    4. et al.
    Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;206(2):124.e1-124.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Pirjani R,
    2. Heidari R,
    3. Rahimi-Foroushani A,
    4. Bayesh S,
    5. Esmailzadeh A
    . 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate versus vaginal progesterone suppository for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographically short cervix: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017 Jan;43(1):57-64. doi: 10.1111/jog.13151.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. 42.↵
    1. Pustotina O
    . Effectiveness of dydrogesterone, 17-OH progesterone and micronized progesterone in prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Jul;31(14):1830-1838. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1330406.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    1. Owen J,
    2. Iams JD,
    3. Hauth JC
    . Vaginal sonography and cervical incompetence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb;188(2):586-596. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Owen J,
    2. Hankins G,
    3. Iams JD,
    4. et al.
    Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;201(4):375.e1-375.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.
    1. Althuisius SM,
    2. Dekker GA,
    3. Hummel P,
    4. Bekedam DJ,
    5. van Geijn HP
    . Final results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;185(5):1106-1112. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.118655.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.
    1. Berghella V,
    2. Odibo AO,
    3. Tolosa JE
    . Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;191(4):1311-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.054.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.
    1. Rust OA,
    2. Atlas RO,
    3. Reed J,
    4. van Gaalen J,
    5. Balducci J
    . Revisiting the short cervix detected by transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester: why cerclage therapy may not help. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;185(5):1098-1105. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.118163.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. To MS,
    2. Alfirevic Z,
    3. Heath VCF
    , et al; Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004 Jun 5;363(9424):1849-1853. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16351-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Berghella V,
    2. Ciardulli A,
    3. Rust OA,
    4. et al.
    Cerclage for sonographic short cervix in singleton gestations without prior spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using individual patient-level data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;50(5):569-577. doi: 10.1002/uog.17457.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    1. Enakpene CA,
    2. DiGiovanni L,
    3. Jones TN,
    4. Marshalla M,
    5. Mastrogiannis D,
    6. Della Torre M
    . Cervical cerclage for singleton pregnant patients on vaginal progesterone with progressive cervical shortening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;219(4):397.e1-397.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.06.020.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. 51.↵
    1. Abdel-Aleem H,
    2. Shaaban OM,
    3. Abdel-Aleem MA
    . Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD007873. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007873.pub3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. 52.↵
    1. Arabin B,
    2. Alfirevic Z.
    Cervical pessaries for prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: past, present and future. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;42(4):390-399. doi: 10.1002/uog.12540.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Nicolaides KH,
    2. Syngelaki A,
    3. Poon LC,
    4. et al.
    A randomized trial of a cervical pessary to prevent preterm singleton birth. N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1044-1052. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Saccone G,
    2. Maruotti GM,
    3. Giudicepietro A,
    4. Martinelli P
    ; Italian Preterm Birth Prevention (IPP) Working Group. Effect of cervical pessary on spontaneous preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies and short cervical length: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2317-2324. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18956.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. 55.↵
    1. Saccone G,
    2. Ciardulli A,
    3. Xodo S,
    4. et al.
    Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancies with short cervical length: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ultrasound Med. 2017 Aug;36(8):1535-1543. doi: 10.7863/ultra.16.08054.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. 56.↵
    1. Cetingoz E,
    2. Cam C,
    3. Sakallı M,
    4. Karateke A,
    5. Celik C,
    6. Sancak A
    . Progesterone effects on preterm birth in high-risk pregnancies: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Mar;283(3):423-429. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1351-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.
    1. Norman JE,
    2. Marlow N,
    3. Messow CM
    , et al; OPPTIMUM study group. Vaginal progesterone prophylaxis for preterm birth (the OPPTIMUM study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2016 May 21;387(10033):2106-2116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. O'Brien JM,
    2. Adair CD,
    3. Lewis DF,
    4. et al.
    Progesterone vaginal gel for the reduction of recurrent preterm birth: primary results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;30(5):687-696. doi: 10.1002/uog.5158.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Cahill AG,
    2. Odibo AO,
    3. Caughey AB,
    4. et al.
    Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;202(6):548.e1-548.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.12.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.
    1. Einerson BD,
    2. Grobman WA,
    3. Miller ES
    . Cost-effectiveness of risk-based screening for cervical length to prevent preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;215(1):100.e1-100.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.192.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. 61.↵
    1. Werner EF,
    2. Hamel MS,
    3. Orzechowski K,
    4. Berghella V,
    5. Thung SF
    . Cost-effectiveness of transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening in singletons without a prior preterm birth: an update. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):554.e1-554.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.020.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. 62.↵
    Prometrium [package insert]. Marietta, GA: Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc; 2009. www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/019781s017,020843s011lbl.pdf
  63. 63.↵
    Crinone [package insert]. Parsippany, NJ: Watson Pharma, Inc; 2013. www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/020701s026lbl.pdf
  64. 64.↵
    1. Meis PJ,
    2. Klebanoff M,
    3. Thom E
    , et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 12;348(24):2379-2385.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. 65.↵
    1. Blackwell SC,
    2. Gyamfi-Bannerman C,
    3. Biggio JR Jr.,
    4. et al.
    PROLONG clinical study protocol: hydroxyprogesterone caproate to reduce recurrent preterm birth. Am J Perinatol. 2018 Oct;35(12):1228-1234. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1642062.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. 66.↵
    1. Blackwell SC,
    2. Gyamfi-Bannerman C,
    3. Biggio JR Jr.,
    4. et al.
    17-OHPC to Prevent Recurrent Preterm Birth in Singleton Gestations (PROLONG Study): a multicenter, international, randomized double-blind trial. Am J Perinatol. 2020 Jan;37(2):127-136. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400227.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  67. 67.↵
    FDA advisory board votes to recommend withdrawing progesterone therapy for preterm birth. Pharmacy Times. October 30, 2019. www.pharmacytimes.com/news/fda-advisory-board-votes-to-recommend-withdrawing-progesterone-therapy-for-preterm-birth. Accessed October 22, 2020.
  68. 68.↵
    CDER proposes withdrawal of approval for Makena. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/cder-proposes-withdrawal-approval-makena. Published October 5, 2020. Accessed October 22, 2020.
  69. 69.↵
    SMFM statement: use of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate for prevention of recurrent preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul;223(1):B16-B18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  70. 70.↵
    1. da Fonseca EB,
    2. Bittar RE,
    3. Carvalho MHB,
    4. Zugaib M
    . Prophylactic administration of progesterone by vaginal suppository to reduce the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth in women at increased risk: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb;188(2):419-424. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. 71.↵
    1. Jarde A,
    2. Lutsiv O,
    3. Beyene J,
    4. McDonald SD
    . Vaginal progesterone, oral progesterone, 17-OHPC, cerclage, and pessary for preventing preterm birth in at-risk singleton pregnancies: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis. BJOG. 2019 Apr;126(5):556-567. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15566.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  72. 72.↵
    1. Hernandez-Andrade E,
    2. Romero R,
    3. Ahn H,
    4. et al.
    Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Sep;25(9):1682-1689. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.657278.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. 73.↵
    1. Hibbard JU,
    2. Tart M,
    3. Moawad AH
    . Cervical length at 16-22 weeks' gestation and risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Dec;96(6):972-978. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01074-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.↵
    1. McIntosh J,
    2. Feltovich H,
    3. Berghella V,
    4. Manuck T
    . The role of routine cervical length screening in selected high- and low-risk women for preterm birth prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):B2-B7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.027.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. 75.↵
    1. Berghella V,
    2. Rafael TJ,
    3. Szychowski JM,
    4. Rust OA,
    5. Owen J
    . Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):663-671. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31820ca847.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. 76.↵
    1. Berghella V,
    2. Haas S,
    3. Chervoneva I,
    4. Hyslop T
    . Patients with prior second-trimester loss: prophylactic cerclage or serial transvaginal sonograms? Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2002 Sep;187(3):747-751. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.124289.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. 77.↵
    1. Mackeen AD,
    2. Rafael TJ,
    3. Zavodnick J,
    4. Berghella V
    . Effectiveness of 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate on preterm birth prevention in women with history-indicated cerclage. Am J Perinatol. 2013 Oct;30(9):755-758. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1332799.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  78. 78.↵
    1. Stetson B,
    2. Hibbard JU,
    3. Wilkins I,
    4. Leftwich H
    . Outcomes with cerclage alone compared with cerclage plus 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;128(5):983-988. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001681.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  79. 79.↵
    1. Szychowski JM,
    2. Berghella V,
    3. Owen J
    , et al; Vaginal Ultrasound Trial Consortium. Cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in high risk women receiving intramuscular 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Dec;25(12):2686-2689. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.717128.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  80. 80.↵
    1. Berghella V,
    2. Figueroa D,
    3. Szychowski JM
    , et al; Vaginal Ultrasound Trial Consortium. 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate for the prevention of preterm birth in women with prior PTB and a short cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;202(4):351.e1-351.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.019.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. 81.↵
    SMFM preterm birth toolkit. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. www.smfm.org/publications/231-smfm-preterm-birth-toolkit. Published 2016. Accessed October 22, 2020.
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section

Keywords