Review ArticleREVIEWS AND CONTEMPORARY UPDATES
Open Access
A Modern History of Informed Consent and the Role of Key Information
Lydia A. Bazzano, Jaquail Durant and Paula Rhode Brantley
Ochsner Journal March 2021, 21 (1) 81-85; DOI: https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0105
Lydia A. Bazzano
1Department of Internal Medicine, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
2The University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA
3Institutional Review Board, Division of Academics, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
MD, PhD, MPH, CIPJaquail Durant
3Institutional Review Board, Division of Academics, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
BSPaula Rhode Brantley
4Institutional Review Board, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA
PhDREFERENCES
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- Baker MT,
- Taub HA
- 3.
- 4.
- Hekkenberg RJ,
- Irish JC,
- Rotstein LE,
- Brown DH,
- Gullane PJ.
- 5.↵
- Katz J
- 6.↵
- Alper J
- 7.↵
- Sugarman J,
- McCrory DC,
- Powell D,
- et al.
- 8.↵
- Sherlock A,
- Brownie S
- 9.↵
- Shekelle PG,
- Wachter RM,
- Pronovost PJ
- Cordasco KM
- 10.↵
- 11.
- Will JF
- 12.↵
- Faden RR,
- Beauchamp TL
- 13.↵Pratt v Davis. 118 Ill App 161 (1905). Accessed February 5, 2021. www.ravellaw.com/opinions/967d63e3e4aceb0c7ccc62e78af2d543
- 14.↵Mohr v Williams. 95 Minn 261, 104 NW 12 (1905). Accessed February 5, 2021. www.lexisnexis.com/community/casebrief/p/casebrief-mohr-v-williams
- 15.↵Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital. 211 NY 125, 105 NE 92 (1914). Accessed February 5, 2021. biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/consent/schoendorff.htm
- 16.↵Rolater v Strain. 39 Okla 572, 137 P 96 (1913). Accessed February 5, 2021. law.justia.com/cases/oklahoma/supreme-court/1913/14030.html
- 17.↵Salgo v Leland Stanford, Jr University Board of Trustees. 154 Cal App 2d 560, 317 P2d 170 (1957). Accessed February 5, 2021. caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1759823.html
- 18.↵Permissible Medical Experiments. In: Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10. Vol 2. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office; 1949:181-182.
- 19.↵
- Weindling P
- 20.↵National Archives and Records Administration. Federal Register: 46 Fed. Reg. 7933 (Jan. 26, 1981). Library of Congress. Published January 26, 1981. Accessed February 5, 2021. www.loc.gov/item/fr046016/
- 21.↵National Archives and Records Administration. Federal Register: 56 Fed. Reg. 27889 (June 18, 1991). Library of Congress. Published June 18, 1991. Accessed February 5, 2021. www.loc.gov/item/fr056117/
- 22.↵WMA Declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. World Medical Association. Accessed February 5, 2021. www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
- 23.↵
- Beecher HK
- 24.↵
- Heller J
- 25.↵National Research Service Award Act of 1974. Pub L No. 93-348, 88 Stat. Effective July 12, 1974. Accessed February 5, 2021. www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-88/pdf/STATUTE-88-Pg342.pdf#page=1
- 26.↵The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Accessed February 5, 2021. www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html
- 27.↵Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Fed Regist. 2017;82(12):7149-7274. Accessed February 5, 2021. www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2017-01-19/pdf/2017-01058.pdf
- 28.↵
- 29.↵
- Paasche-Orlow MK,
- Taylor HA,
- Brancati FL
- 30.↵
- Rosenfeld S
- 31.↵
- 32.↵
- Yarborough M
- 33.↵
- 34.↵
In this issue
A Modern History of Informed Consent and the Role of Key Information
Lydia A. Bazzano, Jaquail Durant, Paula Rhode Brantley
Ochsner Journal Mar 2021, 21 (1) 81-85; DOI: 10.31486/toj.19.0105