Abstract
Background context
Postoperative symptomatic epidural hematoma (SEH) is a serious complication of lumbar spine surgery. Despite its rarity, this uncommon complication may result in devastating neurological sequelae, including lower limb weakness.
Purpose
A retrospective study was made to identify possible risk factors of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma by reviewing the clinical cases of this rare complication and analyzing the postoperative evaluations of patients.
Methods
From 2002 to 2010, out of 15,562 who underwent lumbar decompression procedure with/without instrumentation, 25 patients required reoperation for epidural hematoma after the initial spinal surgery. For the control group, another 75 patients were randomly selected from the pool of patients who received lumbar decompression surgery during the same period of time. The medical records of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors were collected to determine possible risk factors by comparing between the cases and controls, and the postoperative evaluations of muscle power, intractable pain, saddle anesthesia, time to detection and time to evacuation were analyzed to find if there is any significant relation within the case group. Mann–Whitney U test, two-sample t test, χ 2 test and Fisher’s exact test were used for statistical analysis.
Results
The incidence of postoperative symptomatic epidural hematoma is 0.16 %. After the initial procedure, 20 (80 %) patients developed progressive decrease in muscle power (MP ≤ 3), 14 (56 %) patients had intractable pain (VAS ≥ 7), and 19 (76 %) patients had saddle anesthesia. Preoperative diastolic blood pressure, intraoperative use of gelfoam for dura coverage and postoperative drain output were statistically significant risk factors (p < 0.01). Within the SEH case group, postoperative symptom of decreased muscle power had significant relation with blood loss, laminectomy level and fusion level (p = 0.016, 0.021, 0.010). If the symptom of decreased muscle power or perianal anesthesia was not improved after hematoma evacuation, there was a tendency for permanent leg weakness after 1-year follow-up (p = 0.001, 0.003).
Conclusions
The findings suggest that preoperative diastolic blood pressure, intraoperative use of gelfoam for dura coverage and postoperative drain output are risk factors for symptomatic epidural hematoma after lumbar decompression surgery. Major blood loss and multilevel surgical procedure could result in poor recovery of muscle power. After spine decompression surgery, early detection and evacuation of hematoma are the key to avoid neurologic deterioration and have better clinical outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jackson R (1869) Case of spinal apoplexy. Lancet 2:5–6
Boukobza M, Guichard JP, Boissonet M, George B, Reizine D, Gelbert F, Merland JJ (1994) Spinal epidural haematoma: report of 11 cases and review of the literature. Neuroradiology 36(6):456–459
Dickman CA, Shedd SA, Spetzler RF, Shetter AG, Sonntag VK (1990) Spinal epidural hematoma associated with epidural anesthesia: complications of systemic heparinization in patients receiving peripheral vascular thrombolytic therapy. Anesthesiology 72(5):947–950
Foo D, Rossier AB (1981) Preoperative neurological status in predicting surgical outcome of spinal epidural hematomas. Surg Neurol 15(5):389–401
Gundry CR, Heithoff KB (1993) Epidural hematoma of the lumbar spine: 18 surgically confirmed cases. Radiology 187(2):427–431
Ikuta K, Tono O, Tanaka T, Arima J, Nakano S, Sasaki K, Oga M (2006) Evaluation of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma after microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosurg Spine 5(5):404–409. doi:10.3171/spi.2006.5.5.404
Kotilainen E, Alanen A, Erkintalo M, Helenius H, Valtonen S (1994) Postoperative hematomas after successful lumbar microdiscectomy or percutaneous nucleotomy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Surg Neurol 41(2):98–105
Awad JN, Kebaish KM, Donigan J, Cohen DB, Kostuik JP (2005) Analysis of the risk factors for the development of post-operative spinal epidural haematoma. J Bone Jt Surg Br 87(9):1248–1252. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.87B9.16518
Kebaish KM, Awad JN (2004) Spinal epidural hematoma causing acute cauda equina syndrome. Neurosurg Focus 16(6):e1 pii 160601
Kou J, Fischgrund J, Biddinger A, Herkowitz H (2002) Risk factors for spinal epidural hematoma after spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(15):1670–1673. doi:10.1097/0007632-200208010-00016
Fraser S, Roberts L, Murphy E (2009) Cauda equina syndrome: a literature review of its definition and clinical presentation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90(11):1964–1968. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.021
Sokolowski MJ, Garvey TA, Perl J 2nd, Sokolowski MS, Cho W, Mehbod AA, Dykes DC, Transfeldt EE (2008) Prospective study of postoperative lumbar epidural hematoma: incidence and risk factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(1):108–113. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e39af
Aono H, Ohwada T, Hosono N, Tobimatsu H, Ariga K, Fuji T, Iwasaki M (2011) Incidence of postoperative symptomatic epidural hematoma in spinal decompression surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 15(2):202–205. doi:10.3171/2011.3.SPINE10716
Canale ST, Campbell WC (2003) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, 10th edn. Mosby, St. Louis
Sandhagen B, Frithz G, Waern U, Ronquist G (1990) Increased whole blood viscosity combined with decreased erythrocyte fluidity in untreated patients with essential hypertension. J Intern Med 228(6):623–626
Devereux RB, Case DB, Alderman MH, Pickering TG, Chien S, Laragh JH (2000) Possible role of increased blood viscosity in the hemodynamics of systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 85(10):1265–1268 (pii S0002-9149(00)00744-X)
de Simone G, Devereux RB, Chien S, Alderman MH, Atlas SA, Laragh JH (1990) Relation of blood viscosity to demographic and physiologic variables and to cardiovascular risk factors in apparently normal adults. Circulation 81(1):107–117
LaRocca H, Macnab I (1974) The laminectomy membrane. Studies in its evolution, characteristics, effects and prophylaxis in dogs. J Bone Jt Surg Br 56B(3):545–550
Light RU, Prentice HR (1945) Gelatin sponge; surgical investigation of a new matrix used in conjunction with thrombin in hemostasis. Arch Surg 51:69–77
Friedman J, Whitecloud TS 3rd (2001) Lumbar cauda equina syndrome associated with the use of gelfoam: case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(20):E485–E487
Epstein NE, Silvergleid RS, Hollingsworth R (2009) Increased postoperative cervical myelopathy and cord compression resulting from the use of Gelfoam. Spine J 9(2):e19–e21. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2008.03.009
Herndon JH, Grillo HC, Riseborough EJ, Rich JC Jr (1972) Compression of the brain and spinal cord following use of gelfoam. Arch Surg 104(1):107
Alander DH, Stauffer ES (1995) Gelfoam-induced acute quadriparesis after cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 20(8):970–971
Knowlson GT (1974) Gel-foam granuloma in the brain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 37(8):971–973
Mirzai H, Eminoglu M, Orguc S (2006) Are drains useful for lumbar disc surgery? A prospective, randomized clinical study. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(3):171–177. doi:10.1097/01.bsd.0000190560.20872.a7
Lawton MT, Porter RW, Heiserman JE, Jacobowitz R, Sonntag VK, Dickman CA (1995) Surgical management of spinal epidural hematoma: relationship between surgical timing and neurological outcome. J Neurosurg 83(1):1–7. doi:10.3171/jns.1995.83.1.0001
Braun P, Kazmi K, Nogues-Melendez P, Mas-Estelles F, Aparici-Robles F (2007) MRI findings in spinal subdural and epidural hematomas. Eur J Radiol 64(1):119–125. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.02.014
Uribe J, Moza K, Jimenez O, Green B, Levi AD (2003) Delayed postoperative spinal epidural hematomas. Spine J 3(2):125–129 (pii S1529943002005351)
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
F.-C. Kao and T.-T. Tsai have contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kao, FC., Tsai, TT., Chen, LH. et al. Symptomatic epidural hematoma after lumbar decompression surgery. Eur Spine J 24, 348–357 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3297-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3297-8