Abstract
Purpose
Exposure to ionizing radiation during electrophysiologic procedures in children is believed to increase the risk of future malignancy. Electroanatomical navigation can reduce exposure, but the cohort of children who derive the greatest benefit from this approach is incompletely defined. We sought to determine factors associated with fluoroscopy exposure with conventional catheter ablation versus electroanatomical navigation.
Methods
A retrospective review of all ablation procedures over a 5-year period during the transition to electroanatomical navigation performed by a single electrophysiologist was performed. Fluoroscopy time >20 min was considered “prolonged.” Statistical analysis was performed to determine differences among groups.
Results
Two hundred thirty-four subjects underwent catheter ablation during the study period (conventional, n = 127; navigation, n = 107). Mean fluoroscopy decreased from 11.1 to 3.5 min with electroanatomical navigation (p < 0.0001). Overall 53/107 subjects (50 %) undergoing catheter ablation using electroanatomical navigation required no fluoroscopy, of which atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) (n = 23) and right-sided accessory pathways (n = 22) were most common (p = 0.001). Prolonged fluoroscopic exposure was observed for 22/127 (17 %) subjects undergoing conventional fluoroscopy versus 3/107 (3 %) subjects with electroanatomical navigation (p = 0.001) and was not observed after increased experience. Flouroscopy time decreased significantly after the first 20 procedures (p = 0.04). There was no difference in success, complication, or recurrence rate between groups.
Conclusions
Electroanatomical navigation significantly reduced fluoroscopic exposure without compromising safety, efficacy, or recurrence. Subjects with AVNRT and right-sided accessory pathways derived the greatest benefit as did those requiring prolonged fluoroscopy by the conventional approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Van Hare, G. F., Javitz, H., Carmelli, D., Saul, J. P., Tanel, R., Fischbach, P. S., et al. (2004). Prospective assessment after pediatric cardiac ablation: demographics, medical profiles, and initial outcomes. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 15, 759–770.
Pierce, D. A., & Preston, D. L. (2000). Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiation Research, 154, 178–186.
Baruch, M., Lital, K., Tzvia, B., & Sadetzki, S. (2000). Cancer following cardiac catheterization in childhood. International Journal of Epidemiology, 29, 424–428.
Infante-Rviard, C., Mathonnet, G., & Sinnett, D. (2000). Risk of childhood leukemia associated with diagnostic irradiation and polymorphisms in DNA repair genes. Environmental Health Perspectives, 108, 495–498.
Strauss, K. J., & Kaste, S. C. (2006). ALARA in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients—a white paper executive summary. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 3, 686–688.
Miyake, C. Y., Mah, D. Y., Atallah, J., Oikle, H. P., Melgar, M. L., Alexander, M. E., et al. (2011). Nonfluoroscopic imaging systems reduce radiation exposure in children undergoing ablation of supraventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm, 8, 519–525.
Drago, F., Silvetti, M. S., Pino, A. D., Grutter, G., Bevilacqua, M., & Leibovich, S. (2002). Exclusion of fluoroscopy during ablation treatment of right accessory pathway in children. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 13, 778–782.
Alvarez, M., Tercedor, L., Almansa, I., Ros, N., Galdeano, R. S., Burillo, F., et al. (2009). Safety and feasibility of catheter ablation for atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia without fluoroscopic guidance. Heart Rhythm, 6, 1714–1720.
Smith, G., & Clark, J. M. (2007). Elimination of fluoroscopy use in a pediatric electrophysiology laboratory utilizing three-dimensional mapping. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 30, 510–8.
Sra, J., Krum, D., Schweitzer, J., & Hauck, J. (2003). Three-dimensional right atrial geometry construction and catheter tracking using cutaneous patches. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 14, 897.
Tuzco, V. (2007). A nonfluoroscopic approach for electrophysiogy and catheter ablation procedures using a three-dimensional navigations system. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 30, 519–525.
Antz, M., McClelland, J., Gonzalez, M., Beckman, K., Otoma, K., Tondo, C., et al. (1996). Ablation along a line between the tricuspid annulus and the coronary sinus and within the coronary sinus ostium results in a low recurrence of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia despite residual slow pathway conduction. Circulation, 94, 1–683 [abstract].
Calkins, H., Kim, Y. N., Schmaltz, S., Sousa, J., El-Atassi, R., & Leon, A. (1992). Electrogram criteria for identification of appropriate target sites for radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections. Circulation, 85, 565–573.
Haisaguerre, M., Fisher, B., Warin, J. F., Dartigues, J. F., Lemetayer, P., & Egloff, P. (1992). Electrogram patterns predictive of successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 15, 2138–2145.
Papagiannis, J., Tsoutsinos, A., Kirvassilis, G., Sofianidou, I., Koussi, T., Laskari, C., et al. (2006). Nonfluoroscopic catheter navigation for radiofrequency catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia in children. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 29, 971–978.
Clark, J., Bockoven, J. R., Lane, J., Patel, C. R., & Smith, G. S. (2008). Use of three-dimensional catheter guidance and transesophageal echocardiography to eliminate fluoroscopy in catheter ablation of left-sided accessory pathways. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 31, 283–289.
Papagiannis, J., Avramidis, D., Alexopoulos, C., & Kirvassilis, G. (2011). Radiofrequency ablation of accessory pathways in children and congenital heart disease patients: impact of a nonfluoroscopic navigation system. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 34(10), 1288–1396.
Hayashi, M., Kobayashi, Y., Miyauchi, Y., Ino, T., Atarashi, H., & Takano, T. (2001). A randomized comparison of the straight linear approach with electrogram mapping focal approach in selective slow pathway ablation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 24, 1187–1197.
Disclosures
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study provides additional evidence on the importance of 3D mapping in clinical practice. With the introduction of 3D mapping systems, the investigators were able to reduce the fluoroscopy exposure during ablation procedures in pediatric patients.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wan, G., Shannon, K.M. & Moore, J.P. Factors associated with fluoroscopy exposure during pediatric catheter ablation utilizing electroanatomical mapping. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 35, 235–242 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-012-9701-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-012-9701-6