A historical perspective of informed consent in clinical practice and research

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-2081(99)80065-5Get rights and content

Objectives:

To review the historical perspective of informed consent in clinical practice and research as it pertains to human subjects.

Data Sources:

Published professional journals, books, case law, and the internet pertaining to the historical development of informed consent.

Conclusions:

The history of informed consent is complex. Informed consent as a fundamental principle of clinical ethics has developed within the past 50 years. Full disclosure and shared decision making have not come naturally to clinicians. Consequently, respecting the autonomy of patients and research subjects requires a conscious, sustained effort by clinicians.

Implications for Nursing Practice:

Knowledge of the history of informed consent is important for practicing cancer nurses to ensure they understand the significance of preserving patient autonomy and advocate for the patient and research subject.

References (22)

  • Mohr v Williams, 104 NW 12...
  • Pratt v Davis, 79 NE 562...
  • Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospitals, 105 NE 92, 95...
  • Salgo v Leland Stanford Jr University Board of Trustees, 317 P 2d 170...
  • FurrowBR et al.

    The patient professional relationship, in Health Law—Cases, Materials and Problems

  • Canterbury v Spence, 464 F 2d 772, 776, 784 (DC Cir...
  • Black's Law Dictionary. St Paul, MN, West Publishing, p...
  • KatzJ

    Sharing authority: The willingness to treat

  • Code of Medical Ethics

  • KatzJ

    Experimentation With Human Beings: The Authority of the Investigator, Subject, Professions, and State in the Human Experimentation Process

    (1972)
  • Cited by (34)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text