Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
Original articleA comparison of accuracy between clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament tears
References (25)
- et al.
MR scanning of the acutely injured knee: Sensitive, but is it cost-effective?
Arthroscopy
(1990) - et al.
The accuracy of clinical examination of injury of the knee joint
Injury
(1984) - et al.
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the knee in a community setting
- et al.
Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of knee injuries
South Med J
(1991) - et al.
Meniscal tears of the knee: Accuracy of MR imaging
Radiology
(1987) - et al.
Accuracy of diagnoses from magnetic resonance imaging of the knee
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(1991) - et al.
Clinical value and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of knee disorders in a sports medicine practice
- et al.
Double-blind assessment of the value of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate and meniscal lesions
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(1989) - et al.
Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee
Am J Sports Med
(1988) - et al.
Anterior cruciate ligament tears: MR imaging compared with arthroscopy and clinical tests
Radiology
(1988)
Magnetic resonance imaging as a tool for evaluation of traumatic knee injuries
Am J Sports Med
The accuracy of selective magnetic resonance imaging compared with the findings of arthroscopy of the knee
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Cited by (137)
Traumatic meniscus tears
2022, Sports Orthopaedics and TraumatologyAutomated knee ligament injuries classification method based on exemplar pyramid local binary pattern feature extraction and hybrid iterative feature selection
2022, Biomedical Signal Processing and ControlCitation Excerpt :In the MRI view of the anterior of the acute rupture, the appearance of the linear line normally replaces the cloudy view, and the anterior cruciate ligament intercodes lose their parallel course to the roof as shown in Fig. 4 [4,11]. The diagnosis of cruciate ligament rupture can be made with accurate sensitivity and specificity in MR reports [12]. Mellado et al. [13] and Murao et al. [14] used the anterior cruciate ligament angle.
Clinical, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Arthroscopic Correlation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscal Injuries of the Knee
2018, Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and RehabilitationCitation Excerpt :Investigations support the fact that the accuracy of clinical examination compared with arthroscopic findings ranges between 64% and 85%.19,20 Rose and Gold9 found that clinical examination is as accurate as MRI in diagnosing meniscal tears and ACL ruptures, so they concluded that MRI, because of its high cost, is not necessary in patients with clinical suspicion of meniscus and cruciate ligament tears. A similar conclusion was reported by Boden et al21 who supported that when clinical examination sets the diagnosis of meniscus damage, MRI will not change treatment decisions.
Meniscal Injuries
2018, Essentials of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: Musculoskeletal Disorders, Pain, and RehabilitationUse of MRI by radiologists and orthopaedic surgeons to detect intra‐articular injuries of the knee
2018, Revista Brasileira de OrtopediaLoss of anterior cruciate ligament integrity and the development of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: A sub-study of the osteoarthritis initiative
2015, Osteoarthritis and CartilageCitation Excerpt :This decreased prevalence of ACL tears may be related to the selection factors used to define the 355 participants chosen from the OAI study to become part of this sub-study. The fidelity of MRI in ACL diagnosis has accuracy between 90% and 100% compared to knee arthroscopy, which is the gold standard23,24, but is yet to be demonstrated in patients with knee OA. Such misclassification would bias towards a null result, so our findings may underestimate the true associations.