Original article
A comparison of accuracy between clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament tears

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(96)90032-8Get rights and content

Abstract

A prospective and retrospective study was undertaken to compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with clinical examination in diagnosing meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Pathological findings were then confirmed during arthroscopy. One hundred fifty-four patients clinically diagnosed with a meniscal or ACL tear who ultimately had arthroscopic knee surgery were evaluated; 100 patients underwent clinical examination followed by MRI, and 54 underwent clinical examination alone. The presence or absence of meniscal and ACL tears was confirmed during arthroscopy. The accuracies of clinical examination and MRI were compared for the 100 patients who underwent both clinical examination and MRI. The accuracy of MRI was 75% for medial meniscal tears, 69% for lateral meniscal tears and 98% for ACL tears. The accuracy of clinical examination was 82% for medial meniscal tears, 76% for lateral meniscal tears and 99% for complete tears of the ACL. Furthermore, the accuracy of clinical examination for the 54 patients who underwent clinical examination alone was not significantly different from the accuracy of clinical examination in the 100 patients who also underwent MRI. There was no significant difference between the accuracy of clinical examination and MRI in the diagnosis of meniscal and ACL tears and, overall, MRI contributed to treatment in only 16 of 100 cases. Based on these findings, we feel that MRI, except in certain circumstances, is an expensive and unnecessary diagnostic test in patients with suspected meniscal and ACL pathology.

References (25)

  • SD Boden et al.

    MR scanning of the acutely injured knee: Sensitive, but is it cost-effective?

    Arthroscopy

    (1990)
  • O Simonsen et al.

    The accuracy of clinical examination of injury of the knee joint

    Injury

    (1984)
  • FC Balduini et al.

    Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the knee in a community setting

  • BF Boeve et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of knee injuries

    South Med J

    (1991)
  • JV Crues et al.

    Meniscal tears of the knee: Accuracy of MR imaging

    Radiology

    (1987)
  • SP Fischer et al.

    Accuracy of diagnoses from magnetic resonance imaging of the knee

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1991)
  • HJ Gelb et al.

    Clinical value and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of knee disorders in a sports medicine practice

  • JL Glashow et al.

    Double-blind assessment of the value of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate and meniscal lesions

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1989)
  • DW Jackson et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee

    Am J Sports Med

    (1988)
  • JK Lee et al.

    Anterior cruciate ligament tears: MR imaging compared with arthroscopy and clinical tests

    Radiology

    (1988)
  • BR Mandelbaum et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging as a tool for evaluation of traumatic knee injuries

    Am J Sports Med

    (1986)
  • DW Polly et al.

    The accuracy of selective magnetic resonance imaging compared with the findings of arthroscopy of the knee

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1988)
  • Cited by (137)

    • Traumatic meniscus tears

      2022, Sports Orthopaedics and Traumatology
    • Automated knee ligament injuries classification method based on exemplar pyramid local binary pattern feature extraction and hybrid iterative feature selection

      2022, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the MRI view of the anterior of the acute rupture, the appearance of the linear line normally replaces the cloudy view, and the anterior cruciate ligament intercodes lose their parallel course to the roof as shown in Fig. 4 [4,11]. The diagnosis of cruciate ligament rupture can be made with accurate sensitivity and specificity in MR reports [12]. Mellado et al. [13] and Murao et al. [14] used the anterior cruciate ligament angle.

    • Clinical, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Arthroscopic Correlation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscal Injuries of the Knee

      2018, Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Investigations support the fact that the accuracy of clinical examination compared with arthroscopic findings ranges between 64% and 85%.19,20 Rose and Gold9 found that clinical examination is as accurate as MRI in diagnosing meniscal tears and ACL ruptures, so they concluded that MRI, because of its high cost, is not necessary in patients with clinical suspicion of meniscus and cruciate ligament tears. A similar conclusion was reported by Boden et al21 who supported that when clinical examination sets the diagnosis of meniscus damage, MRI will not change treatment decisions.

    • Meniscal Injuries

      2018, Essentials of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: Musculoskeletal Disorders, Pain, and Rehabilitation
    • Loss of anterior cruciate ligament integrity and the development of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: A sub-study of the osteoarthritis initiative

      2015, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
      Citation Excerpt :

      This decreased prevalence of ACL tears may be related to the selection factors used to define the 355 participants chosen from the OAI study to become part of this sub-study. The fidelity of MRI in ACL diagnosis has accuracy between 90% and 100% compared to knee arthroscopy, which is the gold standard23,24, but is yet to be demonstrated in patients with knee OA. Such misclassification would bias towards a null result, so our findings may underestimate the true associations.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text