Web-Based Intervention for Transitioning Smokers From Inpatient to Outpatient Care: An RCT
Introduction
Despite impressive declines during the past 50 years, tobacco use continues as a major public health issue in the U.S.1 Approximately 18% of U.S. adults smoke cigarettes, with the highest prevalence in the South (19.7%).2 Almost 0.5 million U.S. adults die prematurely each year because of smoking, with smoking-attributable annual health costs estimated at nearly $170 billion.3
Comprehensive tobacco control policies and programs have effectively reduced tobacco-related morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures.1, 4 In 1992, the Joint Commission required hospitals to be smoke free and in 2012 adopted optional tobacco care quality measures.5 This smoking ban, together with smoking-cessation interventions during hospitalization, has yielded smoking reduction and cessation among hospitalized patients.4, 6 The requisite indoor smoking ban may force abstinence initiating a smoking-cessation attempt. In addition, feelings of increased health vulnerability during hospitalization may raise smokers’ perceptions of personal health risk, thereby increasing their motivation to quit.7, 8, 9 During hospitalization, patients have easier access to smoking-cessation services, including pharmacotherapy for withdrawal symptoms, to assist a quit attempt. However, brief in-hospital interventions do not necessarily convert temporary smoking abstinence into long-term abstinence.10 The meta-analysis of Rigotti and colleagues11 indicates that interventions initiated during hospitalization and continued at least 1 month post-discharge increase the odds of cessation at 6 months by 37%–71%, depending on the population. Interventions continuing beyond discharge are suggested as essential to achieving long-term effects.
Web-assisted tobacco interventions (WATIs), an innovative e-health approach, have potential for low-cost reach to millions of smokers.12 Reviews of WATIs among the general population indicate they can be effective in aiding cessation, especially when interactive and tailored, compared with self-help booklets or no intervention; however, results are mixed when compared with controls receiving in-person or telephone counseling.13, 14, 15 WATIs have been found more effective when tailored among smokers seeking to quit and when used in addition to nicotine-replacement therapy.16, 17 This suggests the utility of tailored WATIs among smokers in general; however, the only report for hospitalized smokers was for German rehabilitation hospital patients who had double the quit rates than a control group.18
The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of an interactive and semi-tailored web-based smoking-cessation intervention that transitioned patients from inpatient to outpatient care against usual care. This study is part of the Consortium of Hospitals Advancing Research on Tobacco collaborative,19 NIH-funded projects testing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of interventions initiated at hospitalization. This manuscript describes both intent-to-treat (ITT) and complete case (CC) analyses of 6-month follow-up smoking cessation and reduction by study condition, as well as predictors of smoking cessation, biochemical verification of abstinence, and cost results. In addition, findings regarding the use of cessation aides (pharmacotherapy, services) and e-cigarettes post-hospitalization and intervention engagement are presented.
Section snippets
Methods
This study was a 1:1-ratio two-arm RCT initiated with smokers during a hospitalization and continued post-discharge for 6 months. The study was approved by the University of Alabama at Birmingham IRB. Study methods have previously been published.20
Results
Between July 12, 2011, and May 22, 2013, a total of 1,488 eligible patients consented to the study and were randomized, representing 71.4% of those eligible, 28.9% of those screened, and 15.6% of those identified as smokers at admission (Figure 1). Seven-hundred forty-eight patients were assigned to the intervention arm. At 6 months, follow-up surveys were completed by 81.1% of WI and 85.1% of UC participants (p=0.040). Compared with respondents, participants not providing data at 6 months were
Discussion
This two-arm RCT examining the effectiveness of a WATI that transitioned inpatients to outpatient care resulted in no difference between study groups in 30-day point prevalence smoking abstinence or reduction rates at 6 months post-hospitalization. Although WI did not appear to be more effective for smoking cessation or reduction than UC, the self-reported smoking-cessation rates at 6-month follow-up in both study arms were higher than those in many other WATIs (range, 9.7%–25.8%),38, 39 and
Conclusions
This randomized controlled effectiveness study found no additional effect of a web-based intervention for post-hospital smoking-cessation care over brief existing in-patient hospital smoking-cessation services at 6 months after hospitalization. Although both study arms have self-reported abstinence rates around 31%, saliva cotinine verification indicates about 40% inflation, suggesting true quit rates were more likely 16%–20%. These findings support requiring at least minimal cessation
Acknowledgments
This study is part of the Consortium of Hospitals Advancing Research on Tobacco (CHART) initiative, jointly sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Cancer Institute, National Institute on Drug Abuse, and NIH Office of Behavioral and Social Science Research.
The research presented in this paper is that of the authors and does not reflect the official policy of NIH. The funding source was the National Institute of Drug Abuse (U01DA031515). The funding organization had
References (61)
- et al.
Annual healthcare spending attributable to cigarette smoking: an update
Am J Prev Med
(2015) - et al.
Motivation to quit using cigarettes: a review
Addict Behav
(2006) - et al.
Efficacy of an Internet program for smoking cessation during and after inpatient rehabilitation treatment: a quasi-randomized controlled trial
Addict Behav
(2011) - et al.
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation
J Chron Dis
(1987) - et al.
Electronic nicotine delivery systems: international tobacco control four-country survey
Am J Prev Med
(2013) - et al.
Randomized controlled trial of the combined effects of web and quitline interventions for smokeless tobacco cessation
Internet Interv
(2015) - et al.
Do smoking reduction interventions promote cessation in smokers not ready to quit?
Addict Behav
(2011) - et al.
Assessing the association between the use of NRT for smoking reduction and attempts to quit smoking using propensity score matching
Drug Alcohol Depend
(2012) - et al.
Natural history of attempts to stop smoking
Nicotine Tob Res
(2013) - et al.
Trial design: the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital Cancer Survivors Tobacco Quit Line study
Contemp Clin Trials
(2010)
The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General
Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults—United States, 2005-2012
MMWR
Effectiveness of an inpatient smoking cessation program
J Hosp Med
A smoking-cessation intervention for hospital patients
Med Care
Tobacco use and cessation for cancer survivors: an overview for clinicians
CA Cancer J Clin
The motivating impact of informing women smokers of a link between smoking and cervical cancer: the role of coherence
Health Psychol
Implementation and effectiveness of a brief smoking-cessation intervention for hospital patients
Med Care
Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Effect of adding a virtual community (bulletin board) to smokefree.gov: randomized controlled trial
J Med Internet Res
Perceptions of risk among childhood and young adult cancer survivors who smoke
Support Care Cancer
Effects of web- and computer-based smoking cessation programs: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Arch Intern Med
Online support for smoking cessation: a systematic review of the literature
Addiction
Randomized controlled trial of a web-based computer-tailored smoking cessation program as a supplement to nicotine patch therapy
Addiction
The efficacy of computer-tailored smoking cessation material as a supplement to nicotine polacrilex gum therapy
Arch Intern Med
Overview of the consortium of hospitals advancing research on tobacco (chart)
Trials
Web-based smoking cessation intervention that transitions from inpatient to outpatient: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Trials
Smoking cessation interventions for hospitalized smokers: a systematic review
Arch Intern Med
Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory
The transtheoretical model and stages of change
Cited by (21)
Cost evaluation of tobacco control interventions in clinical settings: A systematic review
2021, Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :a training/education intervention (Cantor et al., 2015), and a training and audit and feedback intervention (Ferketich et al., 2014). The cost evaluations in included publications fell under the categories of cost-effectiveness (n = 10) (Rigotti et al., 2014; Rigotti et al., 2011; Smith et al., 2011; Cantor et al., 2015; Glasgow et al., 2009; Ferketich et al., 2014; Fraser et al., 2017; Harrington et al., 2016; Piper et al., 2018; Richter et al., 2015), cost utility analysis (n = 3) (Barnett et al., 2015; Barnett et al., 2016; Calhoun et al., 2016) and cost identification (n = 4) (Ruger et al., 2009; Sadasivam et al., 2013; Cluss et al., 2011; Duffy et al., 2015). Some studies reported primarily on the cost evaluation (n = 5) while the rest included costs as a secondary outcome (n = 12).
Effects of post-discharge counseling and medication utilization on short and long-term smoking cessation among hospitalized patients
2019, Preventive Medicine ReportsCitation Excerpt :Providing smoking cessation medications for patients as an adjunct to counseling significantly improves long term quit rates (Fiore et al., 2008). A number of studies have examined methods for implementing these two elements of care into hospital treatment and post-discharge care planning (Sherman et al., 2016; Rigotti et al., 2016; Rigotti and Stoney, 2016; Richter et al., 2016; Harrington et al., 2016; Fellows et al., 2016; Duffy et al., 2016; Cummins et al., 2016). Post-discharge smoking cessation treatment providing automated telephone interactive voice response (IVR) counseling calls and free medication increased biochemically verified quit rates by almost two-fold (26% vs. 15%; RR 1.71, 95% CI, 1.14–2.56) in a single site study.
CHARTing the Future Course of Tobacco-Cessation Interventions for Hospitalized Smokers
2016, American Journal of Preventive MedicineHospital-Initiated Smoking Cessation Among Patients Admitted with Behavioral Health Conditions
2024, Journal of General Internal MedicineA Scoping Review and Meta-analysis of the Use of Remote Biochemical Verification Methods of Smoking Status in Tobacco Research
2023, Nicotine and Tobacco Research
This article is part of a theme section titled Implementing Tobacco Cessation Interventions for Hospitalized Smokers