Clinical ResearchUrgent Carotid Endarterectomy Is Safe in Patients with Few Comorbid Medical Conditions
Introduction
Elective carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the established standard of care for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with high-grade carotid artery stenosis. Multiple randomized controlled trials have proven the efficacy of CEA in long-term secondary stroke prevention with acceptably low perioperative mortality and morbidity.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 However, intervention in symptomatic patients who present urgently or emergently remains controversial. For example, the optimal timing of CEA after an ipsilateral ocular or hemispheric event is still not established. In the 1960s, poor results were obtained after urgent interventions in symptomatic patients, and this increased perioperative mortality and morbidity was attributed to the conversion of an ischemic infarct into a disabling hemorrhagic stroke.6, 7 Additional reports of increased perioperative morbidity after early CEA led to recommendations to delay surgery for 4 weeks if possible.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 However, recent reports suggest the benefit of early CEA in preventing recurrent stroke in patients with good neurological recovery and absence of hemorrhage on computed tomographic scan.14, 15 Pooled analysis of the European and North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) data has suggested a benefit for CEA in symptomatic patients randomized within 2 weeks of symptoms.16 However, optimal timing for performance of CEA in symptomatic patients is not clearly established.
In addition, there are scant data concerning the impact of patient risk factors and hospital-associated factors on outcomes after CEA performed in an urgent or emergent manner. Since several patient risk factors, such as renal insufficiency and cardiac disease, are linked to worse perioperative and long-term outcome after electively performed CEA,17, 18, 19 it is important to determine whether these factors are also associated with increased adverse outcomes after urgently performed CEA.
Patients presenting in an urgent or emergent manner represent a high-risk group of patients, the treatment of whom is currently controversial. Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is an alternative method to treat carotid stenosis in patients considered to be high-risk for surgical complications; however, recent multicenter reports have demonstrated that CAS is not a perfect treatment for all high-risk patients, with different levels of risk and benefit for subgroups of patients;20, 21, 22 some high-risk groups, such as octogenarians, have been demonstrated to have improved outcomes if treated with CEA.22 Since several select series have reported increased adverse outcome after urgently performed CEA, we determined whether some groups of urgently presenting patients have acceptable risk of perioperative complications following CEA in community practice, clarifying the role of this generally low-risk procedure in higher-risk circumstances.
Section snippets
Methods
A database consisting of patient discharge records from all acute-care, nonfederal Connecticut hospitals is maintained by Chime, Inc. (www.cthosp.org; Wallingford, CT). The Connecticut Hospital Association (CHA) Chime Data Program has established and maintains a proprietary health-care information system that incorporates statewide clinical, financial, and patient demographic data dating back to 1980. Reports containing selected variables are available on a fee-for service basis. A previously
Results
There were 12,076 CEAs performed between 1992 and 2002 in the state of Connecticut and identified as being performed in an elective, urgent, or emergent fashion; 9,964 (82.5%) were performed in asymptomatic patients and 2,112 (17.5%) were performed in symptomatic patients. There were 764 (6.3%) procedures performed in an urgent or emergent fashion in patients who were symptomatic; these are the subject of this study. The demographic factors of these patients and the characteristics of the
Discussion
Patients presenting urgently with symptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis remain a clinical challenge. To our knowledge, we report the largest analysis of urgently performed CEA to date. We demonstrate that patients in the state of Connecticut who are symptomatic and present urgently for CEA have increased perioperative mortality and stroke, but not cardiac complications, compared to patients who present electively. However, increased perioperative mortality and stroke were confined to urgently
References (29)
- et al.
Early endarterectomy for severe carotid artery stenosis after a non-disabling stroke: results from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial
J Vasc Surg
(1994) - et al.
Early carotid endarterectomy in patients with small, fixed neurologic deficits
J Vasc Surg
(1984) - et al.
Timing of carotid endarterectomy in patients with recent stroke
Surgery
(1997) - et al.
Early carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients is associated with poorer perioperative outcomes
J Vasc Surg
(2006) - et al.
Causes of increased stroke rate after carotid endarterectomy in patients with previous strokes
Ann Vasc Surg
(1997) - et al.
Early carotid endarterectomy after non-disabling ischemic stroke: adequate therapeutic option in selected patients
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
(1998) - et al.
Early carotid endarterectomy in selected stroke patients
Ann Vasc Surg
(1999) - et al.
for the CEA Trialist Collaboration. Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery
Lancet
(2004) - et al.
Hospital based factors predict outcome after carotid endarterectomy
J Surg Res
(2006) - et al.
Influence of age and hospital volume on the results of carotid endarterectomy: a statewide analysis of 9918 cases
J Vasc Surg
(1998)
Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative
Surgery
Safety of carotid endarterectomy in a high-risk population: lessons from the VA and Connecticut
J Am Coll Surg
Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: does increased age indicate high risk?
J Vasc Surg
Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase
J Vasc Surg
Cited by (14)
Symptom Status of Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy in Canada and United States
2022, Annals of Vascular SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Despite the greater proportion of patients being treated for symptomatic disease in Canada, perioperative and long-term stroke/death rates remain similar to the US. This demonstrates that urgent/emergency CEA can be performed safely without compromising outcomes, which is corroborated by previous literature.45,46 Regional variations in pre-operative investigations also warrant further investigation.
Urgent carotid intervention is safe after thrombolysis for minor to moderate acute ischemic stroke
2015, Journal of Vascular SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Informed consent was waived by our Institutional Review Board. Carotid interventions (CEA and CAS) performed during the same (index) hospitalization for an acute cerebral TIA or stroke were deemed urgent, as previously defined.6,14 These patients underwent CEA or CAS for ischemic symptoms during the same admission as their initial presenting acute neurologic event, that is, during the index hospitalization.
Early versus late carotid artery stenting for symptomatic carotid stenosis
2015, Journal of NeuroradiologyCitation Excerpt :Based on a pooled analysis of randomized trials assessing CEA, the timing of carotid revascularization recommended is ≤ 14 days of the last ischemic symptom, if there is no contra-indication [1,2,4,5]. However, evidence suggests the earlier the CEA is performed after symptoms, the higher the risks of mortality or stroke, which may be higher than 10% [17–20]. In spite of that, according to Naylor based on data from The Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists Collaboration, performing a carotid revascularization procedure with a 10% risk within 2 weeks could prevent approximately 150 strokes per 1000 CEA, versus only 100 strokes if the procedure is performed after 4 weeks with a 3% risk [17,18].
Characterization of resident surgeon participation during carotid endarterectomy and impact on perioperative outcomes
2012, Journal of Vascular SurgeryCitation Excerpt :For logistic models, resident surgeon participation was defined as any level trainee scrubbed during the CEA. Adjusted multivariable models were created by combining resident participation status with candidate covariates previously identified as risk factors for adverse events following CEA based on literature review, including: history of stroke,8-11 history of transient ischemic attack (TIA),8,12,13 diabetes,8,11,14,15 hypertension,16,17 coronary artery disease (defined as history of angina, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization),9,11,16 smoking,8 preoperative creatinine,8,14 preoperative white blood cell (WBC) count,18,19 general anesthesia (vs other),8,9,20 age (evaluated as >80 years vs other),10,12,21-23 female gender,12 American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status classification (evaluated as ≥III vs other),10,21,24 and emergent procedure status.14,23 Candidate covariates were evaluated for inclusion in adjusted models using forward selection with P < .05 as the entry criterion.
Temporal Trends in the Risks of Stroke and Death due to Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: An Updated Systematic Review
2009, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
H. A. Bazan's current address is: Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular Surgery, LSUHSC, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA.