Elsevier

Cancer Genetics

Volume 204, Issue 7, July 2011, Pages 351-365
Cancer Genetics

Review
Promiscuous partnerships in Ewing's sarcoma

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2011.07.008Get rights and content

Ewing’s sarcoma is a highly aggressive bone and soft tissue tumor of children and young adults. At the molecular genetic level Ewing’s sarcoma is characterized by a balanced reciprocal translocation, t(11;22)(q24;q12), which encodes an oncogenic fusion protein and transcription factor EWS/FLI. This tumor-specific chimeric fusion retains the amino terminus of EWS, a member of the TET (TLS/EWS/TAF15) family of RNA-binding proteins, and the carboxy terminus of FLI, a member of the ETS family of transcription factors. In addition to EWS/FLI, variant translocation fusions belonging to the TET/ETS family have been identified in Ewing’s sarcoma. These studies solidified the importance of TET/ETS fusions in the pathogenesis of Ewing’s sarcoma and have since been used as diagnostic markers for the disease. EWS fusions with non-ETS transcription factor family members have been described in sarcomas that are clearly distinct from Ewing’s sarcoma. However, in recent years there have been reports of rare fusions in “Ewing’s-like tumors” that harbor the amino-terminus of EWS fused to the carboxy-terminal DNA or chromatin-interacting domains contributed by non-ETS proteins. This review aims to summarize the growing list of fusion oncogenes that characterize Ewing’s sarcoma and Ewing’s-like tumors and highlights important questions that need to be answered to further support the existing concept that Ewing’s sarcoma is strictly a “TET/ETS” fusion-driven malignancy. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of action of the various different fusion oncogenes will provide better insights into the biology underlying this rare but important solid tumor.

Section snippets

The EWS/FLI fusion in Ewing’s sarcoma

Karyotypically, Ewing’s sarcoma is a relatively simple neoplasm, harboring the main cytogenetic hallmark t(11;22)(q24;q12) translocation 9, 18. Approximately 85% of Ewing’s sarcoma tumors harbor this characteristic translocation. The t(11;22) rearrangement creates a fusion between the Ewing’s sarcoma breakpoint region 1 gene (EWSR1) on chromosome 22 and the Friend leukemia virus integration site 1 gene (FLI1) on chromosome 11 (19) (Figure 1A).

The EWSR1 gene encodes the EWS protein, which is a

EWS/FLI fusion subtypes

“EWS/FLI” is not a single molecular entity, but rather includes a set of highly related isoforms or subtypes. This diversity is a result of differences in genomic breakpoints in the EWSR1 and FLI1 genes. Breakpoints have been observed in a variety of introns in these genes 66, 67, 68. In each case, the resultant fusion is really in the introns of the genes, and through typical splicing processes of the transcribed RNA, fusion mRNAs are generated containing 5′ exons derived from EWSR1 fused to

Other EWS/ETS fusions in Ewing’s sarcoma

The ETS family of proteins is comprised of transcription factors that are characterized by the presence of a highly conserved 85 amino acid ETS domain that mediates sequence-specific DNA binding (27). In many cases, ETS proteins function as signal-dependent transcriptional regulators controlling cellular differentiation and proliferation 74, 75. Many different members of the ETS family have been shown to be involved in oncogenesis, predominantly, by chromosomal translocations that fuse ETS

TET/ETS fusions in Ewing’s sarcoma

To further add to the complexity of Ewing’s sarcoma, non-EWS fusions have been identified in rare cases of the disease. As discussed above, EWS is a member of the TET (TLS/EWS/TAF15) family of proteins. Gene fusions have been identified between the TET family member TLS (also called FUS) and two different ETS family members, ERG and FEV (Figure 2). TLS/ERG and TLS/FEV fusion proteins are found in <1% of Ewing’s sarcoma cases. Conceptually, again, these “TLS/ETS” fusions are likely to

EWS/NFATc2

In 2009 there was a report on the identification of a new translocation partner of the EWSR1 gene, NFATc2 (nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin-dependent 2 also known as NFAT1 or NFATp), in “Ewing’s-like tumors” (94). In all cases identified, an in-frame chimeric fusion between exon 8 of EWSR1 and exon 3 of the NFATc2 gene was identified (Figure 3). The EWS/NFATc2 fusion harboring solid tumors were diagnosed in four male patients who were 16, 21, 25 and 39 years of age.

Cell-of-origin and cellular context in Ewing’s sarcoma

One important aspect that is crucial to understanding the biology of Ewing’s sarcoma is the identification and characterization of the cell-of-origin for the disease. Currently there is no resolution to this issue. On the one hand, there is a growing body of work suggestive of a mesenchymal stem or progenitor cell as the precursor cell type for Ewing’s sarcoma 118, 119, 120, 121, 122. On the other hand, several observations are consistent with a neural crest cell-of-origin 123, 124, 125.

Potential mechanisms of chromosomal translocations in Ewing’s sarcoma

There is relatively little known about the mechanism of generation of TET/ETS (and non-TET/ETS) chromosomal translocations in Ewing’s and Ewing’s-like tumors, but a few hypotheses have been advanced since the discovery of EWS/FLI nearly 20 years ago. Homologous recombination at site-specific sequences has been suggested as the potential mechanism of chromosomal translocations in human hematological malignancies such as lymphoid neoplasms (139). In contrast, analysis of 113 interchromosomal

Is it time to revisit the concept that TET/ETS fusions are pathognomonic for Ewing’s sarcoma?

The initial discovery of EWS/FLI and the demonstration that this fusion functions as an aberrant transcription factor to mediate oncogenesis in Ewing’s sarcoma provided a simple model for Ewing’s sarcoma tumorigenesis: EWS/FLI sits at the top of a transcriptional hierarchy to dysregulate a set of target genes that together mediate tumor formation. The discovery of the EWS/ERG fusion, with its highly conserved domain structure to EWS/FLI, provided additional support for this hypothesis. Indeed,

Should we care if non-TET/ETS-containing tumors are Ewing’s sarcoma?

Ewing’s sarcoma itself is a rare tumor, with approximately 250 new cases occurring in the United States each year (145). If each of the rare TET/ETS and non-TET/ETS fusion variants occurs in 1% of cases or less, these will contribute to a very small portion, and a very small total number of tumors. Are these an important set of tumors to understand?

We would suggest that these are indeed important tumors to understand. In the first place, patients will develop tumors harboring these rare fusion

Summary and conclusions

Ewing’s sarcoma is an enigmatic cancer driven by chromosomal translocation derived fusion oncogenes. TET/ETS proteins are undoubtedly the central mediators in the pathogenesis of Ewing’s sarcoma. In particular EWS/FLI, the most common gene rearrangement in Ewing’s sarcoma, is widely used as a molecular diagnostic marker for the disease. However, recent identification of an increasing number of similar TET/ETS as well as non-TET/ETS rearrangements has further complicated molecular diagnostics

Acknowledgments

S.S. is a University of Utah Howard Hughes Medical Institute Med into Grad Program Scholar. S.L.L. is supported by the NIH (R21 CA138295, R01 CA140394), the Terri Anna Perine Sarcoma Fund, the University of Utah Department of Pediatrics and Huntsman Cancer Institute/Huntsman Cancer Foundation. S.L.L. also acknowledges support to the Huntsman Cancer Institute (grant P30 CA042014). We would like to thank our reviewers for suggesting changes that allowed for a more comprehensive review of the

References (145)

  • R. Smith et al.

    Expression profiling of EWS/FLI identifies NKX2.2 as a critical target gene in Ewing’s sarcoma

    Cancer Cell

    (2006)
  • H. Kovar

    Context matters: the hen or egg problem in Ewing’s sarcoma

    Semin Cancer Biol

    (2005)
  • P. Aman et al.

    Expression patterns of the human sarcoma-associated genes FUS and EWS and the genomic structure of FUS

    Genomics

    (1996)
  • H.A. Chansky et al.

    Targeting of EWS/FLI-1 by RNA interference attenuates the tumor phenotype of Ewing’s sarcoma cells in vitro

    J Orthop Res

    (2004)
  • E. Beauchamp et al.

    GLI1 is a direct transcriptional target of EWS-FLI1 oncoprotein

    J Biol Chem

    (2009)
  • F. Nakatani et al.

    Identification of p21WAF1/CIP1 as a direct target of EWS-Fli1 oncogenic fusion protein

    J Biol Chem

    (2003)
  • S.M. Welford et al.

    DNA binding domain-independent pathways are involved in EWS/FLI1-mediated oncogenesis

    J Biol Chem

    (2001)
  • X. Mao et al.

    The FLI-1 and chimeric EWS-FLI-1 oncoproteins display similar DNA binding specificities

    J Biol Chem

    (1994)
  • B.S. Braun et al.

    Pediatric malignancies: update on sarcomas and leukemia development in children

    Curr Opin Genet Dev

    (2009)
  • F. Urano et al.

    A novel chimera gene between EWS and E1A-F, encoding the adenovirus E1A enhancer-binding protein, in extraosseous Ewing’s sarcoma

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun

    (1996)
  • A. Verger et al.

    Identification of amino acid residues in the ETS transcription factor Erg that mediate Erg-Jun/Fos-DNA ternary complex formation

    J Biol Chem

    (2001)
  • L. Wang et al.

    Undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas with rare EWS gene fusions: identification of a novel EWS-SP3 fusion and of additional cases with the EWS-ETV1 and EWS-FEV fusions

    J Mol Diagn

    (2007)
  • T.L. Ng et al.

    Ewing sarcoma with novel translocation t(2;16) producing an in-frame fusion of FUS and FEV

    J Mol Diagn

    (2007)
  • J. Ewing

    Diffuse Endothelioma of Bone

    Proceedings of the New York Pathological Society

    (1921)
  • C.T. Denny

    Ewing’s sarcoma–a clinical enigma coming into focus

    J Pediatr Hematol Oncol

    (1998)
  • M. Paulussen et al.

    Ewing tumour: incidence, prognosis and treatment options

    Paediatr Drugs

    (2001)
  • Horowitz ME, Malawer MM, Woo SY, et al., Ewing’s Sarcoma Family of Tumors: Ewing’s Sarcoma of Bone and Soft Tissue and...
  • J. Whang-Peng et al.

    Chromosome translocation in peripheral neuroepithelioma

    N Engl J Med

    (1984)
  • H. Kovar

    Ewing’s sarcoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors after their genetic union

    Curr Opin Oncol

    (1998)
  • P. Terrier et al.

    Small round blue cell tumors in bone: prognostic factors correlated to Ewing’s sarcoma and neuroectodermal tumors

    Semin Diagn Pathol

    (1996)
  • C.C. Wang et al.

    Ewing’s sarcoma; a study of fifty cases treated at the Massachusetts General Hospital, 1930-1952 inclusive

    N Engl J Med

    (1953)
  • D.C. Dahlin et al.

    Ewing’s sarcoma. A critical analysis of 165 cases

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1961)
  • M. Lahl et al.

    Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors: an overview from diagnosis to survivorship

    Clin J Oncol Nurs

    (2008)
  • R.L. Randall et al.

    Is There a Predisposition Gene for Ewing’s Sarcoma?

    J Oncol

    (2010)
  • A.M. Linabery et al.

    Childhood and adolescent cancer survival in the US by race and ethnicity for the diagnostic period 1975-1999

    Cancer

    (2008)
  • O. Delattre et al.

    Gene fusion with an ETS DNA-binding domain caused by chromosome translocation in human tumours

    Nature

    (1992)
  • A. Bertolotti et al.

    EWS, but not EWS-FLI-1, is associated with both TFIID and RNA polymerase II: interactions between two members of the TET family, EWS and hTAFII68, and subunits of TFIID and RNA polymerase II complexes

    Mol Cell Biol

    (1998)
  • R. Petermann et al.

    Oncogenic EWS-Fli1 interacts with hsRPB7, a subunit of human RNA polymerase II

    Oncogene

    (1998)
  • K.L. Rossow et al.

    The Ewing’s sarcoma gene product functions as a transcriptional activator

    Cancer Res

    (2001)
  • F. Melet et al.

    Generation of a novel Fli-1 protein by gene targeting leads to a defect in thymus development and a delay in Friend virus-induced erythroleukemia

    Mol Cell Biol

    (1996)
  • W.A. May et al.

    Ewing sarcoma 11;22 translocation produces a chimeric transcription factor that requires the DNA-binding domain encoded by FLI1 for transformation

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (1993)
  • W.A. May et al.

    The Ewing’s sarcoma EWS/FLI-1 fusion gene encodes a more potent transcriptional activator and is a more powerful transforming gene than FLI-1

    Mol Cell Biol

    (1993)
  • S.L. Lessnick et al.

    Multiple domains mediate transformation by the Ewing’s sarcoma EWS/FLI- 1 fusion gene

    Oncogene

    (1995)
  • T. Ohno et al.

    EWS/Fli-1 chimeric protein is a transcriptional activator

    Cancer Res

    (1993)
  • Y. Ben-David et al.

    Erythroleukemia induction by Friend murine leukemia virus: insertional activation of a new member of the ets gene family, Fli-1, closely linked to c-ets-1

    Genes Dev

    (1991)
  • A.D. Sharrocks

    The ETS-domain transcription factor family

    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol

    (2001)
  • B.J. Graves et al.

    Specificity within the ets family of transcription factors

    Adv Cancer Res

    (1998)
  • M. Ouchida et al.

    Loss of tumorigenicity of Ewing’s sarcoma cells expressing antisense RNA to EWS-fusion transcripts

    Oncogene

    (1995)
  • H. Kovar et al.

    EWS/FLI-1 antagonists induce growth inhibition of Ewing tumor cells in vitro

    Cell Growth Differ

    (1996)
  • K. Tanaka et al.

    EWS-Fli1 antisense oligodeoxynucleotide inhibits proliferation of human Ewing’s sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor cells

    J Clin Invest

    (1997)
  • Cited by (191)

    • Ewing sarcoma genomics and recent therapeutic advancements

      2023, Pediatric Hematology Oncology Journal
    • Esophageal extraskeletal neoplasm Ewing's sarcoma: Case report

      2022, International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
    • Combinatorial strategies to potentiate the efficacy of HDAC inhibitors in fusion-positive sarcomas

      2022, Biochemical Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Upon chromosomal translocation, the ETS binding domain of FLI1 undergoes a conformational change which allows activation of a wider repertoire of genes with respect to the wt protein [34–36]. Through the aberrant conjugation of partners’ activities and neomorphic functions, EWS-FLI1 oncoproteins heavily impact transcription and splicing mechanisms causing a massive rewiring of the transcriptome and a widespread reprogramming of the epigenome [7,21,28,36–38]. By binding DNA at either ETS-like sequences that contain GGAA motif or at GGAA microsatellites, the oncoproteins act as potent transcriptional activators [39].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text