Clinical Trial
Dyads Affected by Chronic Heart Failure: A Randomized Study Evaluating Effects of Education and Psychosocial Support to Patients With Heart Failure and Their Partners

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2012.01.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Chronic heart failure (CHF) causes great suffering for both patients and their partners. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an integrated dyad care program with education and psychosocial support to patients with CHF and their partners during a postdischarge period after acute deterioration of CHF.

Methods

One hundred fifty-five patient-caregiver dyads were randomized to usual care (n = 71) or a psychoeducation intervention (n = 84) delivered in 3 modules through nurse-led face-to-face counseling, computer-based education, and other written teaching materials to assist dyads to develop problem-solving skills. Follow-up assessments were completed after 3 and 12 months to assess perceived control, perceived health, depressive symptoms, self-care, and caregiver burden.

Results

Baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of dyads in the experimental and control groups were similar at baseline. Significant differences were observed in patients’ perceived control over the cardiac condition after 3 (P < .05) but not after 12 months, and no effect was seen for the caregivers.No group differences were observed over time in dyads’ health-related quality of life and depressive symptoms, patients’ self-care behaviors, and partners’ experiences of caregiver burden.

Conclusions

Integrated dyad care focusing on skill-building and problem-solving education and psychosocial support was effective in initially enhancing patients’ levels of perceived control. More frequent professional contact and ongoing skills training may be necessary to have a higher impact on dyad outcomes and warrants further research.

Section snippets

Design and Setting

A randomized controlled design with follow-up assessment after 3 and 12 months was used to evaluate the effects of a 12-week intervention with education and psychosocial support delivered in 3 sessions to patient-partner dyads. The short-term follow-up after 3 months reflects the effects of the intervention soon after its termination, and the assessment at 12 months was used to measure the long-term effects of the intervention.

The setting was 1 university hospital and 1 county hospital in

Results

A total of 155 dyads were included in the study and completed baseline assessment (Fig. 1). Clinical and demographic characteristics of the dyads are described in Table 2, Table 3. The majority of the patients were men and the majority of the partners women. NYHA functional class III was the dominant function class of the patients.

The intervention lasted up to 12 weeks, and the follow-up evaluation presented in this study was carried out after 3 and 12 months. The patients had low control at

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first major randomized study to examine the effects of a theory-based intervention with education and psychosocial support for patients with CHF and their partners. Our main finding was that perceived control significantly improved in the patients at short-term follow up. This is an important outcome, because earlier studies have shown that a higher level of perceived control is important to reduce psychologic stress.31 Poor functional status of the caregiver,

Conclusion

The dyad care program focusing on the development of problem-solving skills to assist the dyads in managing CHF significantly improved the level of perceived control over the heart disease in the patient group during short-term follow up. In other aspects, such as physical and mental well-being, self-care, and caregiver burden experienced, the effects were limited in both patients and partners.

Acknowledgments

We thank Linköping University, the Swedish Institute for Health Science, the Swedish Research Council and the Health Sciences Centre for financial support. We also thank the partners and chronic HF patients who participated in the study, the secretaries at the Department of Cardiology and Emergency Department, especially Lotta Björk and Berit Anderson, and Annette Waldemar and Lillevi Nestor at the county hospital in Norrköping for support with data collection and intervention. Thanks also to

Disclosures

None.

References (41)

  • D. Lloyd-Jones et al.

    AHA heart disease and stroke statistics 2009

    Circulation

    (2009)
  • M.L. Luttik et al.

    The objective burden in partners of heart failure patients; development and initial validation of the Dutch Objective Burden Inventory

    Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs

    (2008)
  • G. Lamura et al.

    Family carers’ experiences using support services in Europe: empirical evidence from the EUROFAMCARE study

    Gerontologist

    (2008)
  • R. Gallager et al.

    Social support and self-care in heart failure

    J Cardiovasc Nurs

    (2011)
  • S. Ågren et al.

    Do partners of patients with heart failure experience caregiver burden?

    Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs

    (2010)
  • S.R. Beach et al.

    Risk factors for potentially harmful informal caregiver behavior

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2005)
  • G.J. Molloy et al.

    Family caregiving and congestive heart failure. Review and analysis

    Eur J Heart Fail

    (2005)
  • K.J. Boyd et al.

    Living with advanced heart failure: a prospective, community based study of patients and their carers

    Eur J Heart Fail

    (2004)
  • S. de Geest et al.

    Adherence to long-term therapies. Evidence for action

    Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs

    (2003)
  • J. Daugherty et al.

    Can we talk? Developing a social support nursing intervention for couples

    Clin Nurse Spec

    (2002)
  • Cited by (119)

    • Unmet needs in end-of-life care for heart failure patients

      2024, International Journal of Cardiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding: Grants from Linköping University, Swedish Research Council, Swedish Institute for Health Sciences, Heart and Lung Foundation, Heart and Lung Disease National Association, and Lions Research Foundation.

    See page 365 for disclosure information.

    View full text