Leptomeningeal metastasis: survival and prognostic factors in 155 patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2004.05.008Get rights and content

Abstract

In this single-center retrospective study, 155 consecutive patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) were analyzed for the prognostic role of patient- and therapy-related variables. Ten percent of the patients received radiotherapy alone, 32% had chemotherapy alone, 31% received radiochemotherapy, 17% had supportive therapy only, and 10% were not evaluable for therapy. Chemotherapy was systemic (17%), combined systemic and intrathecal (10%), or intrathecal only (35%). Clinical improvement was noted in 41% of the patients. Overall median survival time (MST) was 4.8 months. Survival varied considerably depending on the type of primary tumor in this largest published cohort of LM patients. Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age >60 and elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) albumin or lactate levels were therapy-independent predictors of poor survival in the entire cohort as well as in the subgroup of patients with systemic primary tumors (n=105). The assessment of three therapy-independent parameters allows to group LM patients into groups of low, intermediate, and high risk of poor survival. Moreover, the application of systemic chemotherapy was a positive prognostic factor in patients with subarachnoid lesions detected by neuroimaging (RR 1.94, p=0.001) or with extra-CNS tumor deposits (RR 1.52, p=0.05). The results of this study suggest that systemic chemotherapy alone or in combination with other therapeutic modalities may improve outcome in patients with subarachnoid tumor cell deposits detectable by neuroimaging.

Introduction

The dissemination of tumor cells within the subarachnoid space is a devastating complication of systemic cancer. Except for some hematological malignancies [1], [2], leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is usually a feature of advanced stages of disease. Due to more effective systemic chemotherapy and therefore prolonged survival and due to more sensitive diagnostic tools such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the frequency of antemortem-diagnosed LM may have increased during the last decades. Nevertheless, the knowledge about pathogenesis, rational therapy, and prognostic factors in LM has remained scarce. Only few larger retrospective case collections [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] and some prospective trials of intrathecal (i.t.) [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] or systemic intravenous (i.v.) chemotherapy [16], [17] have been published.

The clinical presentation is characterized by symptoms and signs attributable to one or more levels of the nervous system, symptoms and signs of increased intracranial pressure, psychomotor slowing and seizures [2], [3], [7], [18].The treatment of patients with LM is almost always palliative. Therapy commonly consists of i.t. chemotherapy [methotrexate (MTX), AraC, thiotepa] with or without radiotherapy [4], [6], [7], [11], [12], [13]. Other authors advocate the application of systemic (i.v. or oral) chemotherapy rather than i.t. chemotherapy [16], [17], [19]. Randomized studies comparing i.t. and systemic chemotherapy for LM have not been performed. Therefore, given the current uncertainty about the best therapeutic approach to LM, we analyzed therapy-dependent and therapy-independent prognostic factors in the largest cohort of patients with LM reported to date.

Section snippets

Study population

This retrospective study includes 155 consecutive patients diagnosed with LM at the Department of Neurology, University of Tuebingen Medical School between September 1980 and April 2002. Some of these patients were included in previous reports on clinical [20] or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings in LM [21], [22], [23] or primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) [24], [25], [26], [27]. All patient records were evaluated for type and status of the primary tumor and metastases, CSF findings and neuroimaging

Study population

From 1980 to 2002, 155 patients with LM were diagnosed and treated at the University of Tuebingen Medical School (69 male, 86 female, median age 53 years, range 16–87 years). The largest subgroup of patients had primary brain tumors, particularly glioblastoma. Other large subgroups comprised patients with breast cancer, melanoma, and lung cancer. Diagnostic work-up did not reveal any extra-CNS tumor deposits in nine patients, classified as cancer of unknown primary (CUP; Table 1). The median

Discussion

This large database on the diagnosis and clinical course of LM in 155 consecutive patients followed at a single institution resulted in the identification of three therapy-independent predictors of poor outcome, age >60, and elevated levels of CSF lactate and albumin. Moreover, it suggests a role in improving outcome for systemic chemotherapy specifically in LM patients with leptomeningeal lesions detected by neuroimaging.

The percentage of patients with primary brain tumors was relatively high

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Christoph Meisner, MA, Institute for Medical Information Processing, University of Tuebingen, for valuable help with statistical analysis.

References (59)

  • A.M. Khalil et al.

    Case report and review of literature: leptomeningeal relapse in epithelial ovarian cancer

    Gynecol. Oncol

    (1994)
  • J.G. Kaplan et al.

    Leptomeningeal metastases: comparison of clinical features and laboratory data of solid tumors, lymphomas and leukemias

    J. Neuro-oncol

    (1990)
  • R.J. Van Oostenbrugge et al.

    Treatment of leptomeningeal metastases evaluated by interphase cytogenetics

    J. Clin. Oncol

    (2000)
  • M. Balm et al.

    Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Presenting features and prognostic factors

    Arch. Neurol

    (1996)
  • W. Boogerd et al.

    Meningeal carcinomatosis in breast cancer: prognostic factors and influence of treatment

    Cancer

    (1991)
  • K. Fizazi et al.

    Meningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast carcinoma. Clinical features, prognostic factors, and results of a high-dose intrathecal methotrexate regimen

    Cancer

    (1996)
  • M.R. Pfeffer et al.

    Leptomeningeal metastases. Treatment results in 98 consecutive patients

    Isr. J. Med. Sci

    (1988)
  • W.R. Wasserstrom et al.

    Diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors

    Cancer

    (1982)
  • S. Berg et al.

    Phase I/II trial and pharmacokinetics of intrathecal diaziquone in refractory meningeal malignancies

    J. Clin. Oncol

    (1992)
  • S.M. Blaney et al.

    Phase I clinical trial of intrathecal topotecan in patients with neoplastic meningitis

    J. Clin. Oncol

    (2003)
  • M.C. Chamberlain

    A phase II trial of intra-cerebrospinal fluid alpha interferon in the treatment of neoplastic meningitis

    Cancer

    (2002)
  • M.J. Glantz et al.

    A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal sustained-release cytarabine (DepoCyt) to intrathecal methotrexate in patients with neoplastic meningitis from solid tumors

    Clin. Cancer Res

    (1999)
  • M.J. Glantz et al.

    Randomized trial of a slow-release versus a standard formulation of cytarabine for the intrathecal treatment of lymphomatous meningitis

    J. Clin. Oncol

    (1999)
  • S.A. Grossman et al.

    Randomized prospective comparison of intraventricular methotrexate and thiotepa in patients with previously untreated neoplastic meningitis

    J. Clin. Oncol

    (1993)
  • K.A. Jaeckle et al.

    Intrathecal treatment of neoplastic meningitis due to breast cancer with a slow-release formulation of cytarabine

    Br. J. Cancer

    (2001)
  • K.A. Jaeckle et al.

    An open label trial of sustained-release cytarabine (DepoCyt) for the intrathecal treatment of solid tumor neoplastic meningitis

    J. Neuro-oncol

    (2002)
  • F. Bokstein et al.

    Leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: a comparison of two prospective series treated with and without intra-cerebrospinal fluid chemotherapy

    Cancer

    (1998)
  • M.J. Glantz et al.

    High-dose intravenous methotrexate for patients with nonleukemic cancer: is intrathecal chemotherapy necessary?

    J. Clin. Oncol

    (1998)
  • W.H. Theodore et al.

    Meningeal carcinomatosis

    Arch. Neurol

    (1981)
  • E. Morra et al.

    The role of systemic high-dose cytarabine in the treatment of central nervous system leukemia

    Cancer

    (1993)
  • M. Schabet et al.

    Diagnosis and treatment of meningeal carcinomatosis in 10 patients with breast cancer

    Eur. Neurol

    (1986)
  • M. Weller et al.

    Tumor cell dissemination triggers an intrathecal immune response in neoplastic meningitis

    Cancer

    (1992)
  • M. Weller et al.

    Humoral CSF parameters in the differential diagnosis of hematologic CNS neoplasia

    Acta Neurol. Scand

    (1992)
  • M. Weller et al.

    Intrathecal IgM response in disseminated cerebrospinal metastasis from malignant melanoma

    J. Neuro-oncol

    (1993)
  • U. Herrlinger et al.

    Primary CNS lymphoma 1991–1997: outcome and late adverse effects after combined modality treatment

    Cancer

    (2001)
  • U. Herrlinger et al.

    German Cancer Society Neuro-Oncology Working group NOA-03 multi-center trial of single agent high-dose methotrexate for primary CNS lymphoma

    Ann. Neurol

    (2002)
  • U. Herrlinger et al.

    PCV salvage chemotherapy for recurrent primary CNS lymphoma

    Neurology

    (2000)
  • U. Herrlinger et al.

    First-line therapy with temozolomide induces complete response in primary CNS lymphoma

    Neurology

    (2002)
  • E.L. Kaplan et al.

    Non-parametric estimations from incomplete observations

    J. Am. Stat. Assoc

    (1958)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text