Elsevier

Leukemia Research

Volume 38, Issue 7, July 2014, Pages 773-780
Leukemia Research

Population-based disparities in survival among patients with core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: A SEER database analysis,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2014.04.001Get rights and content

Abstract

We performed a retrospective population-based study using the SEER database to assess survival trends in CBF-AML between 2000 and 2010. Median OS increased from 16 months in 2000–2002 to 25 months in 2006–2008 (P = 0.002). The 3-year OS rate for patients with inv(16) was 57.3%, but in t(8;21) was only 35.5%. Patients aged 75–84 had worse survival than patients aged 15–44 (HR 5.61, P = 0.0002). Black race was associated with higher mortality (HR 1.50, P = 0.03). Compared to clinical trial outcomes, CBF-AML survival is poorer in the general population, particularly among African Americans and the elderly, and in t(8;21) compared to inv(16) AML.

Introduction

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with a translocation between chromosomes 8 and 21 (t(8;21)) or a pericentric inversion of chromosome 16 (inv(16)/t(16;16)) is associated with alterations in the core binding factors RUNX1 (also known as CBFA2 or AML1) and CBFB [1], [2], [3], [4]. Patients harboring these alterations carry a more favorable prognosis when given intensive chemotherapy regimens[5], [6], [7], [8], and excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia, have the best long term survival reported among AML subtypes. Although the group of patients with core-binding factor AML (CBF-AML) is relatively small – only approximately 7–12% of patients with AML carry the t(8;21) or inv(16) abnormality [5], [9] – their identification is critical as it significantly impacts their subsequent management and prognosis. Nonetheless, despite a favorable prognosis associated with CBF-AML overall, certain small subgroups continue to have poorer outcomes [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15].

Multicenter cooperative group trials report 5-year overall survival (OS) rates approximating 45–66% among patients with CBF-AML [14], [15], [16], [17]; much less is known about an unselected patient population treated outside of a clinical trial in the current era. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database is a population-based database maintained by the National Cancer Institute (NCI); it captures 28% of the US population based on the 2010 US Census. Several previous analyses have used SEER data to assess population-level trends in cancer survival and incidence among patients with acute myeloid leukemia in the United States, but none to date have looked specifically at CBF-AML [18], [19], [20], [21]. It is not currently known whether the favorable outcomes seen in clinical trials for CBF-AML are achieved at the population level.

This analysis presents outcomes of the largest cohort of unselected patients with CBF-AML reported to date. We assessed survival trends at the population level in order to determine their uniformity with data from previous clinical trials, and to identify specific subgroups with relatively poor outcomes among all patients with CBF-AML.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Patients with a diagnosis of CBF-AML were identified using the 1973–2010 SEER database (Nov 2012 submission) issued on April 29, 2013 [22]. Starting in 2000, this includes 18 population-based registries: Atlanta, Connecticut, Detroit, Hawaii, Iowa, New Mexico, San Francisco – Oakland, Seattle-Puget Sound, Utah, San Jose – Monterey, Los Angeles, rural Georgia, Alaska Natives, greater California, Kentucky, Louisiana, New Jersey, and greater Georgia. SEER maintains accurate patient surveillance by

Patient characteristics

We identified 777 patients aged 15–84 diagnosed with CBF-AML between 2000 and 2010. Three patients were excluded from the survival and early death rate analyses either because there was no available survival time (n = 1) or they were diagnosed by autopsy/death certificate (n = 2). Of the 774 remaining patients, 101 died within one month from diagnosis and 9 were not followed for a full month. The subset of cases followed and alive for at least one month after diagnosis was 664 patients.

Incidence of CBF-AML

The annual

Discussion

CBF-AML, characterized by alterations in the RUNX1 and CBFB genes, has been associated with more favorable prognosis compared to other non-APL subtypes of AML, based on data mainly derived from clinical trials. In this analysis, we performed a retrospective cohort study using the SEER database to investigate survival trends for CBF-AML at the population level. This is the largest such study to date, evaluating 777 AML patients with core binding factor alterations.

There was a marked improvement

Role of the funding source

This research was performed with departmental support; there are no funding sources to disclose.

Conflict of interest statement

The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

Contributors: AMB and ATF designed the research, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. TMB and DSN analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. HS, AMP, EAC, PCA, KKB, and YC contributed to the preparation of the manuscript and the analysis of the data. All authors have approved the final version of this manuscript.

Disclosures: Dr. Fathi has served on advisory boards for Seattle Genetics, Teva, and Agios, and has received funding to conduct clinical trials from Seattle Genetics, Exelixis,

References (43)

  • D. Grimwade et al.

    The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial

    Blood

    (2001)
  • J.C. Byrd et al.

    Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461) Presented in part at the 43rd annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Orlando, FL, December 10, 2001, and published in abstract form 59

    Blood

    (2002)
  • G. Juliusson et al.

    Acute myeloid leukemia in the real world: why population-based registries are needed

    Blood

    (2012)
  • A.K. Burnett et al.

    Reasons for survival improvement in core binding factor AML: a 25 year analysis of the UK MRC/NCRI AML trials

    Blood

    (2013)
  • G. Marcucci et al.

    Adding the KIT inhibitor dasatinib (DAS) to standard induction and consolidation therapy for newly diagnosed patients (pts) with core binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia (AML): initial results of the CALGB 10801 (alliance) study

    Blood

    (2013)
  • M.I. Patel et al.

    Age and genetics how do prognostic factors at diagnosis explain disparities in acute myeloid leukemia?

    Am J Clin Oncol

    (2013)
  • M.M. Le Beau et al.

    Association of an inversion of chromosome 16 with abnormal marrow eosinophils in acute myelomonocytic leukemia

    N Engl J Med

    (1983)
  • P. Liu et al.

    Fusion between transcription factor CBF beta/PEBP2 beta and a myosin heavy chain in acute myeloid leukemia

    Science

    (1993)
  • A.T. Look

    Oncogenic transcription factors in the human acute leukemias

    Science

    (1997)
  • J.C. Byrd et al.

    Patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22) and acute myeloid leukemia have superior failure-free and overall survival when repetitive cycles of high-dose cytarabine are administered

    J Clin Oncol

    (1999)
  • N. Dastugue et al.

    Prognostic significance of karyotype in de novo adult acute myeloid leukemia. The BGMT group

    Leukemia

    (1995)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Epidemiology of acute myeloid leukemia: Recent progress and enduring challenges

      2019, Blood Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast, other studies have observed slightly better 5-year OS (21.5% vs. 19.8%) and 3-year OS (26.8% vs. 23.5%, p = .0009) among African-American patients than in Caucasian patients, but with the difference abrogated after adjusting for age, region and sex [24,177]. African-American patients with CBF-AML are reported to have increased mortality despite this traditional favorable cytogenetic subgroup (HR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.05–2.13; p = .03) [25–27]. When evaluating the effect of race or ethnicity on AML survival by era, the OS for African-American patients diagnosed and reported to SEER during the periods 1974–1976 and 1983–1989 (despite overall improvements for all races and age groups <45 years) were consistently lower in comparison to Caucasians with little gender difference [178].

    • Survival of patients with mixed phenotype acute leukemias: A large population-based study

      2015, Leukemia Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The reason for the bimodal age distribution of MPAL is probably genetic (younger patients biologically related to ALL, older patients biologically related to AML). Ethnic disparities are well established in acute leukemias [20,21] and are confirmed here for MPAL diagnosed in African American patients. The reasons for ethnic disparities are unclear (genetic, environmental and social factors may play a role).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study has been presented in abstract form at the American Society of Hematology 2013 Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, December 7–10, 2013.

    ☆☆

    In this study, CBF-AML refers to patients harboring cytogenetic abnormalities that are associated with core-binding factor alterations in AML, specifically, acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22), CBFB/MYH11; or acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22), RUNX1-RUNX1T1.

    View full text