Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation Between Prognostic Factors and Increasing Age in Melanoma

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Age of patients with melanoma varies directly with mortality and inversely with the presence of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis. To gain further insight into this apparent paradox, we analyzed the relationship between age and other major prognostic factors.

Methods: The Sunbelt Melanoma Trial is a prospective, randomized study with 79 institutions involving SLN biopsy for melanoma. Eligible patients were 18 to 70 years old with melanoma of ≥1.0-mm Breslow thickness and clinically N0 regional lymph nodes. SLNs were evaluated by serial histological sections and immunohistochemistry for S-100 protein.

Results: A total of 3076 patients were enrolled in the study, with a median follow-up of 19 months. Five age groups were examined: 18 to 30, 31 to 40, 41 to 50, 51 to 60, and 61 to 70 years. Trends between age and several key prognostic factors was identified: as age group increased, so did Breslow thickness (analysis of variance; P < .001), the incidence of ulceration and regression, and the proportion of male patients (each variable: χ2, P < .001). The incidence of SLN metastasis, however, declined with increasing age (χ2; P < .001).

Conclusions: As age increases, so does Breslow thickness, the incidence of ulceration and regression, and the proportion of male patients—all poor prognostic factors. However, the frequency of SLN metastasis declines with increasing age. It is not known whether this represents a decreased sensitivity (higher false-negative rate) of the SLN procedure in older patients or a different biological behavior (hematogenous spread) of melanomas in older patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balch CM, Soong SJ, Gershenwald JE, et al. Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:3622–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Austin PF, Cruse CW, Lyman G, et al. Age as a prognostic factor in the malignant melanoma population. Ann Surg Oncol 1994;1:487–94.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Statius Muller MG, van Leeuwen P, de Lange-de Klerk E, et al. The sentinel lymph node status is an important factor for predicting clinical outcome in patients with stage I or II cutaneous melanoma. Cancer 2001;91:2401–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McMasters KM, Wong SL, Edwards MJ, et al. Factors that predict the presence of sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with melanoma. Surgery 2001;130:151–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McMasters KM. The Sunbelt Melanoma Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8(9 Suppl):41S–43S.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McMasters KM, Reintgen DS, Ross MI, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: how many radioactive nodes should be removed? Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:192–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schuchter L, Schultz DJ, Synnestvedt M, et al. A prognostic model for predicting 10-year survival in patients with primary melanoma. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:369–75.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Loggie B, Ronan SG, Bean J, Das Gupta TK. Invasive cutaneous melanoma in elderly patients. Arch Dermatol 1991;127:1188–93.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kemeny MM, Busch E, Stewart AK, Menck HR. Superior survival of young women with malignant melanoma. Am J Surg 1998;175:437–45.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stidham KR, Johnson JL, Seigler HF. Survival superiority of females with melanoma. Arch Surg 1994;129:316–24.

    Google Scholar 

  11. MacKie RM, Hole D, Hunter JA, et al. Cutaneous malignant melanoma in Scotland: incidence, survival and mortality, 1979–94. BMJ 1997;315:1117–21.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gershenwald JE, Thompson W, Mansfield PF, et al. Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:976–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McMasters KM. Editorial comment on: Kemeny MM, Busch E, Stewart AK, Menck HR. Superior survival of young women with malignant melanoma. Am J Surg 1998;175:444.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Starz H, Balda BR, Kramer KU, Buchels H, Wang H. A micromorphometry-based concept for routine classification of sentinel lymph node metastases and its clinical relevance for patients with melanoma. Cancer 2001;91:2110–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carlson GW, Murray DR, Thourani V, Hestley A, Cohen C. The definition of the sentinel lymph node in melanoma based on radioactive counts. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:929–33.

    Google Scholar 

  16. McMasters KM, Reintgen DS, Ross MI, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: controversy despite widespread agreement. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2851–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Balch CM, Buzaid AC, Soon SJ, et al. Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging system for cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:3635–48.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gamel JW, George SL, Edwards MJ, Seigler HF. The long-term clinical course of patients with cutaneous melanoma. Cancer 2002;95:1286–93.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Langley RGB, Fitzpatrick TB, Sober AJ. Clinical characteristics. In: Balch CM, Houghton AN, Sober AJ, Soong SJ, eds. Cutaneous Melanoma. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, 1998: 15–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jaroszewski DE, Pockaj BA, DiCaudo DJ, Bite U. The clinical behavior of desmoplastic melanoma. Am J Surg 2001;182:590–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Demierre MF. Thin melanoma and regression, thick melanomas and older men. Arch Dermatol 2002;138:678–82.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guitart J, Lowe L, Peipkorn M, et al. Histological characteristics of metastasizing thin melanomas. Arch Dermatol 2002;138:603–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Caggiati A, Potenza C, Gabrielli F, Passarelli F, Tartaglione G. Sentinel node biopsy for malignant melanoma: analysis of a four-year experience. Tumori 2000;86:332–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly M. McMasters MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chao, C., Martin, R.C.G., Ross, M.I. et al. Correlation Between Prognostic Factors and Increasing Age in Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 11, 259–264 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2004.04.015

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2004.04.015

Key Words

Navigation