Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Prospective Trial Comparing 1% Lymphazurin vs 1% Methylene Blue in Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping of Gastrointestinal Tumors

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Methylene blue (M), as a dye in sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM), has been introduced as an alternative to lymphazurin (L) after the recent shortage of L. M has been evaluated in breast cancer in multiple studies with favorable results. Our study compares L with M in the SLNM of gastrointestinal (GI) tumors.

Methods

Between Jan 2005 and Aug 2008, 122 consecutive patients with GI tumors were enrolled. All patients (pts) underwent SLNM with either L or M by subserosal injection of 2–5 mL of dye. Efficacy and rates of adverse reactions were compared between the two dyes. Patients were prospectively monitored for adverse reactions including anaphylaxis, development of blue hives, and tissue necrosis.

Results

Of 122 pts, 60 (49.2%) underwent SLNM using L and 62 (50.8%) underwent SLNM using M. Colon cancer (CrCa) was the most common site in both groups. The success rate of L and M in SLNM was 96.6% and 96.7%, respectively, with similar numbers of total number of lymph nodes per pt, SLNs per pt (<3), nodal positivity, skip metastasis, and accuracy. The only adverse reaction in the L group was oxygen desaturation >5% in 5% (3/60) of pts, compared with none in the M group. Cost per vial of L was $210 vs $7 for M.

Conclusion

The success rate, nodal positivity, average SLNs per patient, and overall accuracy were similar between L and M. Absence of anaphylaxis and lower cost make M more desirable than L in SLNM of GI tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cabanas RM. An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer. 1977;39:456–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, Economou JS, Cagle LA, Storm FK, et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg. 1992;127:392–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1994;220:391–8; discussion 398–401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Giuliano AE, Jones RC, Brennan M, Statman R. Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2345–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsoulias GJ, Wood TF, Morton DL, Bilchik AJ. Lymphatic mapping and focused analysis of sentinel lymph nodes upstage gastrointestinal neoplasms. Arch Surg. 2000;135:926–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saha S, Dan AG, Bilchik AJ, Kitagawa Y, Schochet E, Choudhri S, et al. Historical review of lymphatic mapping in gastrointestinal malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11:245S–9S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burian, M, Stein HJ, Sendler A, Piert M, Nährig J, Feith M, et al. Sentinel node detection in Barrett’s and Cardia cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11:255S–8S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saha S, Ganatra BK, Gauthier J, et al. Localization of sentinel lymph node in colon cancer. A feasibility study. In Society of Surgical Oncology 50th Annual Cancer Symposium. vol. 54, 1997. p. 80.

  9. Saha S, Dan AG, Berman B, Wiese D, Schochet E, Barber K, et al. Lymphazurin 1% versus 99mTc sulfur colloid for lymphatic mapping in colorectal tumors: A comparative analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11:21–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dan AG, Saha S, Monson KM, Wiese D, Schochet E, Barber KR, et al. 1% lymphazurin vs 10% fluorescein for sentinel node mapping in colorectal tumors Arch Surg. 2004;139:1180–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Saha S, Seghal R, Patel M, Doan K, Dan A, Bilchik A, et al. A multicenter trial of sentinel lymph node mapping in colorectal cancer: prognostic implications for nodal staging and recurrence. Am J Surg. 2006;191:305–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kitagawa Y, Saha S, Kubo A, Kitajima M. Sentinel node for gastrointestinal malignancies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2007;16:71–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Levenback CF. Status of sentinel lymph node biopsy in gynecological cancers. Surg Oncol. 2008;15:18–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Simmons R, Thevarajah S, Brennan MB, Christos P, Osborne M. Methylene blue dye as an alternative to isosulfan blue dye for sentinel lymph node localization. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:242–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sandhu, S, Farag E, Argalious, M. Anaphylaxis to isosulfan blue dye during sentinel lymph node biopsy. J Clin Anesth. 2005;17:633–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thevarajah S, Huston TL, Simmons RM. A comparison of the adverse reactions associated with isosulfan blue versus methylene blue dye in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2005;189:236–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Leong SP, Donegan E, Heffernon W, Dean S, Katz JA. Adverse reactions to isosulfan blue during selective sentinel lymph node dissection in melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:361–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaufman, G, Guth AA, Pachter HL, Roses DF. A cautionary tale: Anaphylaxis to isosulfan blue dye after 12 years and 3339 cases of lymphatic mapping. Am Surg. 2008;74:2.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dewachter P, Mouton-Faivre C, Tréchot P, Lleu JC, Mertes PM. Severe anaphylactic shock with methylene blue instillation. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:149–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Millo T, Misra R, Girdhar S, Rautji R, Lalwani S, Dogra TD. Fatal pulmonary edema following laparascopic chromopertubation. Natl Med J India. 2006;19:78–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saha S, Dan AG, Viehl CT, Zuber M, Wiese D. Sentinel lymph node mapping in colon and rectal cancer: Its impact on staging, limitations, and pitfalls. Cancer Treat Res. 2005;127:105–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Momeni R, Ariyan S. Pulse oximetry declines due to intradermal isosulfan blue dye: A controlled prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11:434–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morell, R, Heyneker T, Kashtan HI, Ruppe C. False desaturation due to intradermal patent blue dye. Anesthesiology. 1993;78:363–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vokach-Brodsky L, Jeffrey SS, Lemmens HJ, Brock-Utne JG. Isosulfan blue affects pulse oximetry. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:1002–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vieira SC, Sousa RB, Tavares MB, de Abreu BA, Ibiapina JO, de Sousa Oliveira AK, et al. Changes in pulse oximetry after patent blue dye injection into uterine the uterine cervix. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2862–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehul Soni MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soni, M., Saha, S., Korant, A. et al. A Prospective Trial Comparing 1% Lymphazurin vs 1% Methylene Blue in Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping of Gastrointestinal Tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 16, 2224–2230 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0529-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0529-y

Keywords

Navigation