Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a novel, glycerol/sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, evaluator-blinded multicenter study

Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Jun;48(6):1130-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0954-8.

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative abdominal adhesions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, placing a substantial burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Development of a bioresorbable membrane containing up to 23 percent glycerol and chemically modified sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose offers ease of handling and has been shown to provide significant postoperative adhesion prevention in animals. This study was designed to assess the safety of glycerol hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose and to evaluate its efficacy in reducing the incidence, extent, and severity of postoperative adhesion development in surgical patients.

Methods: Twelve centers enrolled 120 patients with ulcerative colitis or familial polyposis who were scheduled for a restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy. Before surgical closure, patients were randomized to no anti-adhesion treatment (control) or treatment with glycerol hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose membrane under the midline incision. At ileostomy closure, laparoscopy was used to evaluate the incidence, extent, and severity of adhesion formation to the midline incision.

Results: Data were analyzed using the intent-to-treat population. Treatment with glycerol hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose resulted in 19 of 58 patients (33 percent) with no adhesions compared with 6 of 60 adhesion-free patients (10 percent) in the no treatment control group (P = 0.002). The mean extent of postoperative adhesions to the midline incision was significantly lower among patients treated with glycerol hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose compared with patients in the control group (P < 0.001). The severity of postoperative adhesions to the midline incision was significantly less with glycerol hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose than with control (P < 0.001). Adverse events were similar between treatment and no treatment control groups with the exception of abscess and incisional wound complications were more frequently observed with glycerol hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose.

Conclusions: Glycerol hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose was shown to effectively reduce adhesions to the midline incision and adhesions between the omentum and small bowel after abdominal surgery. Safety profiles for the treatment and no treatment control groups were similar with the exception of more infection complications associated with glycerol hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose use. Animal models did not predict these complications.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adjuvants, Immunologic / administration & dosage*
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Biocompatible Materials*
  • Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium*
  • Colonic Pouches
  • Female
  • Glycerol / administration & dosage*
  • Humans
  • Hyaluronic Acid / administration & dosage*
  • Ileostomy / adverse effects
  • Male
  • Membranes, Artificial*
  • Middle Aged
  • Peritoneal Diseases / etiology
  • Peritoneal Diseases / prevention & control*
  • Proctocolectomy, Restorative / adverse effects
  • Prospective Studies
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Tissue Adhesions / etiology
  • Tissue Adhesions / prevention & control
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Adjuvants, Immunologic
  • Biocompatible Materials
  • Membranes, Artificial
  • Hyaluronic Acid
  • Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium
  • Glycerol