The Accuracy of Intraoperative Subareolar Frozen Section in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Fersis N.,
   2. Hoenig A.,
   3. Relakis K.,
   4. Pinis S.,
   5. Wallwiener D.

   (2004) Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: incidence of recurrence in patients with invasive breast cancer. Breast 13((6)):488–493, pmid:15563856.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. ↵
   1. Cunnick G. H.,
   2. Mokbel K.

   (2004) Skin-sparing mastectomy. Am J Surg 188((1)):78–84, pmid:15219490.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Cense H. A.,
   2. Rutgers E. J.,
   3. Lopes Cardozo M.,
   4. Van Lanschott J. J.

   (2001) Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option? Eur J Surg Oncol 27((6)):521–526, pmid:11520082.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Laronga C.,
   2. Kemp B.,
   3. Johnston D.,
   4. Robb G. L.,
   5. Singletary S. E.

   (1999) The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 6((6)):609–613, pmid:10493632.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Wertheim U.,
   2. Ozzello L.

   (1980) Neoplastic involvement of nipple and skin flap in carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 4((6)):543–549, pmid:7212147.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Simmons R. M.,
   2. Brennan M.,
   3. Christos P.,
   4. King V.,
   5. Osborne M.

   (2002) Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol 9((2)):165–168, pmid:11888874.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Gerber B.,
   2. Krause A.,
   3. Reimer T.,
   4. et al.

   (2003) Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg 238((1)):120–127, pmid:12832974.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Loibl S.,
   2. von Minckwitz G.,
   3. Raab G.,
   4. et al.

   (2006) Surgical procedures after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: results of the GEPARDUO trial. Ann Surg Oncol 13((11)):1434–1442, pmid:16983592.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Rusby J. E.,
   2. Brachtel E. F.,
   3. Othus M.,
   4. Michaelson J. S.,
   5. Koerner F. C.,
   6. Smith B. L.

   (2008) Development and validation of a model predictive of occult nipple involvement in women undergoing mastectomy. Br J Surg 95((11)):1356–1361, pmid:18844271.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Rusby J. E.,
    2. Kirstein L. J.,
    3. Brachtel E. F.,
    4. Michaelson J. S.,
    5. Koerner F. C.,
    6. Smith B. L.

    (2008) Nipple-sparing mastectomy: lessons from ex vivo procedures. Breast J 14((5)):464–470, pmid:18821932.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. ↵
    1. Sacchini V.

    (2006) Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg 203((5)):704–714, pmid:17084333.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Crowe J. P. Jr.,
    2. Kim J. A.,
    3. Yetman R.,
    4. Banbury J.,
    5. Patrick R. J.,
    6. Baynes D.

    (2004) Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg 139((2)):148–150, pmid:14769571.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Brachtel E. F.,
    2. Rusby J. E.,
    3. Michaelson J. S.,
    4. et al.

    (2009) Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens. J Clin Oncol 27((30)):4948–4954, pmid:19720921.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text