Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
Research ArticleArticle

Bioethics in Practice: A Quarterly Column About Medical Ethics – The Value of Bioethics Consults

David E. Taylor
Ochsner Journal March 2012, 12 (1) 2-3;
David E. Taylor
Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

It turns out that my medical school was correct in requiring midweek electives during the first and second years. Two particularly memorable classes were Bioethics and Death, Dying, and Bereavement. Although I didn't realize it at the time, I learned things then that I use daily in the intensive care unit (ICU) now—almost 30 years later.

Although articulating the role of bioethics in bedside care may seem difficult, the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care held in 2003 in Brussels provides this perspective:

The overriding goal for all involved parties should be to act in the patient's best interests. The decision to limit life-sustaining treatments in the ICU should be based on widely held ethical principles such as autonomy (the right of patients to make their own health-care decisions), beneficence (health care should benefit the patient), nonmaleficence (health care should do no harm), and distributive justice (resources should be used in a fair and equitable manner). Reasons for withholding or withdrawing therapy may therefore include patient refusal, the unlikelihood that a patient will benefit from a therapy because of a poor prognosis, or the failure of a therapy to improve a patient's condition after a reasonable trial. Application of these principles may, however, be complicated. There may be a conflict, such as when the family of a terminally ill patient demands a costly therapy that consumes scarce resources, and not all individuals or societies fully accept these ethical principles, so the decision-making may vary.1

As one can see from this position statement, almost all decisions regarding the care of critically ill patients involve bioethics. The bioethical context of care in the ICU setting is accentuated by the following factors:

  • Patients are at increased risk of dying.

  • Many patients are unable to participate directly in their own care.

  • Shared decisionmaking necessitates effective communication among the patient, family, and medical providers.

  • Technologically advanced care is typically expensive, and its availability may be limited.

When faced with such value-laden conflicts in caring for patients, ICU clinicians should consider a bioethics consultation. “Ethics consultation is a service provided…to address the ethical issues involved in a specific clinical case. Its central purpose is to improve the process and outcomes of patient care by helping to identify, analyze, and resolve ethical problems.”2 These consultations typically focus on questions regarding the patient's decision-making capacity, conflicts between staff and families, challenges in end-of-life care, and appropriateness of care. Failure to attain alignment of goals and expectations among the patient, family, and healthcare team may lead to a question of medical futility or even moral distress. In these situations, consultation with the bioethics committee may allow conflict resolution.

In addition to assisting in the care of individual patients, bioethics expertise is necessary to establish best practices for ethical and end-of-life care in the ICU. Specific direction includes the development of institutional policies such as ICU admission and transfer, daily multidisciplinary rounds, measures to facilitate provider communication with families, and withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining therapy.3 Bioethics consultation is intended to accomplish the following:

  • Individualized care—promote ethical resolution of a specific case.

  • Communication—encourage respectful communication among involved parties.

  • Education—teach those involved in the case how to work through future ethical uncertainties on their own.

  • Policy development— help the organization recognize issues that require institutional attention.

In summary, bioethics consultation should be available to guide physicians in caring for individuals as well as larger populations. Although formal bioethics education may be an elective experience, the challenges unique to the ICU make understanding these concepts essential to providing high quality care to critically ill patients.

  • Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Carlet J,
    2. Thijs LG,
    3. Antonelli M,
    4. et al.
    (2004 May) Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003. Intensive Care Med 30(5):770–784, pmid:15098087, Epub 2004 Apr 20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Fletcher JC,
    2. Siegler M
    (1996 Summer) What are the goals of ethics consultation? A consensus statement. J Clin Ethics 7(2):122–126, pmid:8889887.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Curtis JR,
    2. Vincent JL
    (2010 Oct 16) Ethics and end-of-life care for adults in the intensive care unit. Lancet 376(9749):1347–1353, pmid:20934213, Epub 2010 Oct 11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal
Vol. 12, Issue 1
Mar 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bioethics in Practice: A Quarterly Column About Medical Ethics – The Value of Bioethics Consults
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Bioethics in Practice: A Quarterly Column About Medical Ethics – The Value of Bioethics Consults
David E. Taylor
Ochsner Journal Mar 2012, 12 (1) 2-3;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Bioethics in Practice: A Quarterly Column About Medical Ethics – The Value of Bioethics Consults
David E. Taylor
Ochsner Journal Mar 2012, 12 (1) 2-3;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • Bioethics in Practice - A Quarterly Column About Medical Ethics: Questioning Parents' Medical Decisions
  • Recent Publications by Ochsner Authors
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • From the Editor's Desk: A Focus on Organ Transplantation
  • Clinical Images: Interventional Management of Pediatric Rex Shunt Stenosis
  • Letters to the EditorBeware of Right Renal Vein Valves in Transplanted Kidneys: Renal Vein Valvuloplasty in a Donor KidneySeizure Caused by Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Inhibitor-Induced Central Nervous System DemyelinationPositron Emission Tomography-Positive Pleural-Based Nodule Following Talc Pleurodesis
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Ochsner Journal Blog

Current Post

Ochsner Journal Features Reports from the BioDesign Lab and Pediatric Cardiology

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2025 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire