Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Anesthetic Management for Wingspan Stent

Ehab Farag, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Michael Anderson, Joseph Abdelmalak and Armin Schubert
Ochsner Journal March 2012, 12 (1) 30-34;
Ehab Farag
*Departments of General Anesthesiology and Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
MD, FRCA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alaa Abd-Elsayed
‡Department of Anesthesiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Anderson
†Department of Anesthesiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
CRNA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Abdelmalak
§Department of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Armin Schubert
∥Department of Anesthesiology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
MD, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Erratum - June 20, 2012

Abstract

Background The bare metal self-expanding Wingspan stent (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration under the Humanitarian Device Exemption in August 2005 for patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) who are refractory to medical therapy. Relatively low rates of periprocedural morbidity and mortality have been reported.

Methods After receiving institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective chart review to examine the anesthetic management and perioperative mortality and morbidity for all Wingspan stent insertions performed at our institution from 2005 to 2007.

Results A total of 72 patients with a history of intracranial stenosis had angioplasty and Wingspan stent insertion: 34 male and 38 female, with an average age of 64 ± 11.6 years. Preoperative systolic blood pressure was 200 ± 45 mmHg, and diastolic blood pressure was 100 ± 23 mmHg. All patients received general anesthesia for stent insertion. Five patients died (6.9%), 4 had perioperative stroke (5.5%), and 9 had recurrent stenosis (12.5%).

Conclusions Anesthetic management for Wingspan stent insertion for ICAD is challenging. Maintenance of hemodynamic stability with optimum brain perfusion during the stent deployment is crucial to patient safety. A prospective study is warranted to assess the optimal anesthetic choice during Wingspan stent insertion.

Keywords
  • Anesthetic management
  • bare metal
  • intracranial atherosclerosis
  • self-expanding
  • stent
  • Wingspan stent

INTRODUCTION

Atherosclerotic disease of the major intracranial arteries is a major cause of stroke. The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) trial1 revealed that aspirin is as effective as and safer than warfarin for preventing stroke or vascular death in patients with atherosclerotic disease and that patients with ≥70% intracranial stenosis are at particularly high risk of stroke despite antithrombotic therapy.2 Therefore, the use of cerebral stents seems to be an effective therapeutic tool for managing high-grade cerebral stenosis.

The bare metal self-expanding Wingspan stent (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under a Humanitarian Device Exemption in August 2005 to be used in patients with intracranial stenosis (>50%) who are refractory to medical therapy. The preliminary results from Europe and Asia for using the Wingspan stent showed very low rates of periprocedural morbidity and mortality (4.4%) in a series of 45 patients undergoing treatment.3

More recently, a multicenter registry in the United States led by Cleveland Clinic reported relatively low rates of periprocedural complications (6.1%) and a high rate of successful deployment (>98%).4 We describe for the first time our experience with anesthetic management of patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) who underwent Wingspan stent insertion.

METHODS

After receiving institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective chart review to assess the anesthetic management of all Wingspan stent insertions performed at our institution over a 2-year period, as well as these patients' perioperative mortality and morbidity.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients with a history of intracranial stenosis underwent angioplasty and Wingspan stent insertion. Preoperative systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 200 ± 45 mmHg, and preoperative diastolic blood pressure was 100 ± 23 mmHg.

The patients' demographics and comorbidities are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Pathological diagnoses and vessels involved are shown in Tables 3 and 4.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Patients' Demographic Characteristics

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Patients' Preoperative Comorbidities

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3.

Patients' Pathological Diagnoses

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 4.

Patients' Vessels Involved

All patients received general anesthesia during stent insertion. Anesthetic drugs and medications used during the perioperative period are shown in Table 5. Nitrous oxide was not administered to avoid enlarging minute air emboli that commonly occur during angiography and irrigation. Inhalation anesthetics were used in most patients to ensure the patient's immobility during the procedure.5 Inhalation anesthetics have neuroprotective effects via preconditioning and postconditioning that might be helpful during the ischemic events of the procedure.6-9 All patients had an arterial line inserted prior to the induction of anesthesia to ensure continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring and to facilitate tight control. Arterial blood gas analysis was obtained at regular intervals to ensure proper levels of arterial oxygenation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 5.

Anesthetic Management and Medications Used for Blood Pressure Control

During the procedure, the patients were kept normocapnic or slightly hypercapnic to ensure proper cerebral perfusion both before angioplasty and during temporary cerebral blood flow reduction at angioplasty and stent insertion. More than 50% of our patients required vasopressor support. This is understandable because 65.3% of our patients had a history of systemic hypertension that predisposes to relative hypotension after the induction of anesthesia. Phenylephrine was used in 40 patients (55.6%) to keep the SBP above 160 mmHg and the mean arterial pressure above 95 mmHg to promote collateral circulation before and during stent deployment. If the patient had impaired left ventricular function and low ejection fraction, norepinephrine was used instead because of its inotropic and vasopressor properties.

Postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients and included gastrointestinal bleeding, stroke, transient ischemic attacks, infarction, and hemorrhage (Table 6). Recurrent stenosis occurred in 9 patients (12.5%), and postoperative death occurred in 5 patients (6.9%).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 6.

Incidence of Neurologic and Other Complications

DISCUSSION

The Wingspan stent gained FDA approval in 2005 for the treatment of symptomatic intracranial stenoses (>50%) refractory to medical therapy. The substantial reduction in periprocedural complications with Wingspan stents (6.1%) in comparison to symptomatic vertebrobasilar ICAD undergoing treatment with traditional stent (23.1%) reported in the Fiorella et al study is because of the recommended treatment strategy and the device design.4 Before deployment of the Wingspan stent, angioplasty is performed with the Gateway balloon (Boston Scientific). The balloon is only inflated to 80% of the normal parent vessel diameter, reducing the risk of target vessel perforation and downstream embolization of atheromatous debris caused by plaque disruption. In terms of design, the Wingspan microstent is composed of nitinol and is housed in a low-profile, hydrophilic microcatheter delivery system. These properties make the stent delivery system considerably easier to navigate to and across an intracranial target lesion. The enhanced navigational ability of the Wingspan stent is thought to result in decreased perioperative complications.2,4,10

The anesthetic management for Wingspan stent insertion in patients suffering from ICAD requires an understanding of the technical aspects of the stent insertion, the ability to anticipate periprocedural complications, and the recognition of cerebral hemodynamic principles.

In our retrospective study, most of the patients undergoing Wingspan stent insertion were elderly and had multiple comorbidities related to atherosclerosis and age, potentially complicating anesthetic management. Although all patients received general anesthesia, different agents were used for anesthetic induction, and maintenance of anesthesia was accomplished primarily with inhalation anesthetics and muscle relaxants. The anesthetic technique used most frequently consisted of propofol for induction and isoflurane for maintenance. Total intravenous anesthesia, monitored anesthesia care, and sedation were not used.

General anesthesia may be preferable for this procedure. Immobility is critical during mapping, while crossing the atherosclerotic lesion with the microwire, and during stent insertion. Moreover, the upper airway can be secured effectively with general anesthesia, reducing the risk of hypoxic episodes that might exacerbate brain ischemia during angioplasty and stent insertion.

We are aware of only one report of Wingspan stent insertion without the use of general anesthesia.11 Sedation may result in unpredictable effects on patients' ability to lie still for the procedure. Sedation may also compromise upper airway patency and result in startle reactions that jeopardize safe stent deployment. Some patients may also experience paradoxical effects with benzodiazepine sedation.

After successful stent insertion, SBP should be reduced to ≤ 140 mmHg to avoid reperfusion syndrome or hemorrhage. In our institution, we prefer using nicardipine infusion to maintain the BP within the required target range because of its primary physiologic effect as opposed to vasodilation that has limited effects on chronotropy, dromotropy, and inotropy.12

The ischemic brain causes an increase in plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine to maintain its perfusion.13 Increased serum catecholamine levels may have adverse consequences such as elevating the risk of myocardial ischemia in susceptible patients. During the procedure, anesthetic management aims to maintain proper perfusion to the brain and other vital organs while at the same time counteracting the surge of catecholamines.

Dexmedetomidine infusion was used in 4 patients in this study as an adjunct to inhalation anesthesia. The experience from this very limited number of patients was encouraging. Dexmedetomidine induced smooth reduction of BP in patients with severely elevated BP. Also, we noticed that patients on dexmedetomidine during the immediate postoperative period needed less medication to keep SPB ≤140 mmHg. Another potentially beneficial effect of dexmedetomidine may be a neuroprotective effect mediated through sympatholysis. The mechanisms of such a neuroprotective effect may involve improvements in the balance between cerebral oxygen demand and oxygen supply; dexmedetomidine may also lessen direct toxic catecholamine effects and improve perfusion in the ischemic penumbra.13

However, the use of dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic agent for patients with ICAD is still controversial. Dexmedetomidine has been reported to decrease cerebral blood flow (CBF) in humans.14 This observation, taken with the fact that cerebral metabolic rate (CMR) was reported unchanged in an experimental study,15 gave rise to the concern that dexmedetomidine might result in an unfavorable cerebral oxygen balance. However, in a study of human volunteers, Drummond et al16 showed, contrary to previously reported animal studies, that human CMR/CBF coupling is preserved during dexmedetomidine administration. Also, the incidence of intracarotid shunting in patients undergoing awake carotid endarterectomy who received dexmedetomidine during the procedure did not increase.17 Further studies regarding the safety of dexmedetomidine during stenting procedures for ICAD are necessary.

During the stent insertion procedure, patients are usually given heparin to maintain activating clotting time between 250 seconds and 300 seconds, and duel antiplatelet therapy is initiated or maintained with aspirin and clopidogrel. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy presents a challenge when vessel rupture occurs during the procedure. Rapid reversal of anticoagulation by the administration of protamine and platelet transfusion is a standard practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Periprocedural neurological complications in our report were 5.5%, comparable to the incidence of 6.1% previously reported in a US multicenter trial of 70 patients.4 Awareness of periprocedural complications is critical for anesthesiologists managing patients undergoing interventional neuroradiologic procedures for ICAD. The rupture of intracerebral vessels is the most severe complication, resulting in intracerebral hemorrhage. Close communication with the neurointerventional team is essential. Decisions regarding the reversal of anticoagulation, the control of BP, and management of temporary cerebral ischemia may become necessary and should be made jointly. Vessel rupture can often be treated endovascularly but might also require urgent craniotomy. The availability of blood products, adequate intravenous access, and management of expanding intracerebral hematoma with attention to intracranial volume control and cerebral perfusion pressure maintenance are of utmost importance.

The use of the Wingspan stent will likely expand over the coming years. Anesthetic management may well contribute to enhanced periprocedural patient safety and outcome. Our experience highlights the importance of conducting further prospective studies to evaluate the best anesthetic technique to be used during cerebral stenting procedures.

This article meets the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Medical Specialties Maintenance of Certification competencies for Patient Care and Medical Knowledge.

  • Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Chimowitz MI,
    2. Lynn MJ,
    3. Howlett-Smith H,
    4. et al.
    Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 352(13):1305–1316, pmid:15800226, 2005 Mar 31.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Derdeyn CP,
    2. Chimowitz MI
    (2007 Aug) Angioplasty and stenting for atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis: rationale for a randomized clinical trial. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 17(3):355–363, viii-ix, pmid:17826637.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Henkes H,
    2. Miloslavski E,
    3. Lowens S,
    4. Reinartz J,
    5. Liebig T,
    6. Kühne D
    (2005 Mar) Treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses with balloon dilatation and self-expanding stent deployment (WingSpan). Neuroradiology 47(3):222–228, pmid:15912418, Epub 2005 Mar 15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Levy EI,
    3. Turk AS,
    4. et al.
    (2007 Mar) US multicenter experience with the wingspan stent system for the treatment of intracranial atheromatous disease: periprocedural results. Stroke 38(3):881–887, pmid:17290030, Epub 2007 Feb 8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Yang J,
    2. Chai YF,
    3. Gong CY,
    4. et al.
    Further proof that the spinal cord, and not the brain, mediates the immobility produced by inhaled anesthetics. Anesthesiology 110(3):591–595, pmid:19212265, 2009 Mar.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kapinya KJ,
    2. Löwl D,
    3. Fütterer C,
    4. et al.
    Tolerance against ischemic neuronal injury can be induced by volatile anesthetics and is inducible NO synthase dependent. Stroke 33(7):1889–1898, pmid:12105371, 2002 Jul.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.
    1. Tanaka K,
    2. Ludwig LM,
    3. Krolikowski JG,
    4. et al.
    Isoflurane produces delayed preconditioning against myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury: role of cyclooxygenase-2. Anesthesiology 100(3):525–531, pmid:15108964, 2004 Mar.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.
    1. Preckel B,
    2. Schlack W,
    3. Comfère T,
    4. Obal D,
    5. Barthel H,
    6. Thämer V
    Effects of enflurane, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane on reperfusion injury after regional myocardial ischaemia in the rabbit heart in vivo. Br J Anaesth 81(6):905–912, pmid:10211018, 1998 Dec.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lange M,
    2. Redel A,
    3. Lotz C,
    4. et al.
    Desflurane-induced postconditioning is mediated by beta-adrenergic signaling: role of beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptors, protein kinase A, and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. Anesthesiology 110(3):516–528, pmid:19225392, 2009 Mar.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Woo HH
    (2007 Aug) Emerging endovascular therapies for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Stroke 38(8):2391–2396, pmid:17585085, Epub 2007 Jun 21.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kelly ME,
    2. Turner RD,
    3. Moskowitz SI,
    4. et al.
    (2009 Jan) Revascularization of symptomatic subacute cerebrovascular occlusions with a self-expanding intracranial stent system. Neurosurgery 64(1):72–78, pmid:19050658, discussion 78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Tobias JD
    Nicardipine: applications in anesthesia practice. J Clin Anesth 7(6):525–533, pmid:8534474, 1995 Sep.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Engelhard K,
    2. Werner C,
    3. Kaspar S,
    4. et al.
    Effect of the alpha2-agonist dexmedetomidine on cerebral neurotransmitter concentrations during cerebral ischemia in rats. Anesthesiology 96(2):450–457, pmid:11818781, 2002 Feb.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Zornow MH,
    2. Maze M,
    3. Dyck JB,
    4. Shafer SL
    Dexmedetomidine decreases cerebral blood flow velocity in humans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 13(2):350–353, pmid:8094720, 1993 Mar.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Karlsson BR,
    2. Forsman M,
    3. Roald OK,
    4. Heier MS,
    5. Steen PA
    Effect of dexmedetomidine, a selective and potent alpha 2-agonist, on cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption during halothane anesthesia in dogs. Anesth Analg 71(2):125–129, pmid:1973880, 1990 Aug.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Drummond JC,
    2. Dao AV,
    3. Roth DM,
    4. et al.
    Effect of dexmedetomidine on cerebral blood flow velocity, cerebral metabolic rate, and carbon dioxide response in normal humans. Anesthesiology 108(2):225–232, pmid:18212567, 2008 Feb.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Bekker A,
    2. Gold M,
    3. Ahmed R,
    4. et al.
    Dexmedetomidine does not increase the incidence of intracarotid shunting in patients undergoing awake carotid endarterectomy. Anesth Analg 103(4):955–958, pmid:17000811, 2006 Oct.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal
Vol. 12, Issue 1
Mar 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Anesthetic Management for Wingspan Stent
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Anesthetic Management for Wingspan Stent
Ehab Farag, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Michael Anderson, Joseph Abdelmalak, Armin Schubert
Ochsner Journal Mar 2012, 12 (1) 30-34;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Anesthetic Management for Wingspan Stent
Ehab Farag, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Michael Anderson, Joseph Abdelmalak, Armin Schubert
Ochsner Journal Mar 2012, 12 (1) 30-34;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • Recent Publications by Ochsner Authors
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • HEART Score Agreement Between Attending and Resident Emergency Medicine Physicians for Patients With Potential Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the T2Resistance Panel (Research Use Only) in Patients With Possible Bacterial Bloodstream Infections
  • Effect of Weekend Admission on Hip Fracture Mortality
Show more ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Anesthetic management
  • bare metal
  • intracranial atherosclerosis
  • self-expanding
  • stent
  • Wingspan stent

Ochsner Journal Blog

Current Post

Be Careful Where You Publish

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2025 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire