Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Evaluation of Pediatricians' Adherence to Tobacco Prevention, Control, and Treatment Guidelines Before and After an Educational Outreach Program

Timothy Beaty, Adriana C. Dornelles, Terese Sahuque and Fernando Urrego
Ochsner Journal September 2013, 13 (3) 375-379;
Timothy Beaty
Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adriana C. Dornelles
Office of Biostatistics Support, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Terese Sahuque
Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fernando Urrego
Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Tobacco use is the world's leading single preventable cause of death. Because children exposed to second- and third-hand smoke are at risk for smoke-related morbidity, pediatricians have an obligation to address tobacco use in their practices. The purpose of this study was to measure physician adherence to the American Academy of Pediatrics' guidelines on tobacco prevention, control, and treatment before and after the implementation of an educational outreach program.

Methods Charts were randomly selected from pediatric clinics before and after the educational outreach. The intervention consisted of a review of the guidelines and available tools physicians could implement into their practices. We measured the rates of adherence to the guidelines before and after the educational outreach.

Results We analyzed 213 charts (116 pre- and 97 posteducation). The proportion of families screened for tobacco smoke exposure was comparable between the pre- and postintervention groups (67.2% vs 59.8%, P=0.317). The postintervention group had a higher proportion of counseling compared to the preintervention group (51.5% vs 31.9%, P<0.05). We found no statistically significant change in the rate of screening or referral to smoking cessation services.

Conclusion Current guidelines to reduce tobacco use are underutilized. Educational outreach may increase the rate of counseling. Physician acceptance of guidelines is urgently needed to affect the tobacco epidemic.

Keywords
  • Smoking–prevention and control
  • tobacco products
  • tobacco smoke pollution

INTRODUCTION

Tobacco use is the world's leading preventable cause of death. Children exposed to second- and third-hand smoke are at risk for smoke-related morbidity yet have limited options for avoiding exposure. Tobacco smoke exposure in infants and children increases the risk for sudden infant death syndrome, lower respiratory tract infections, middle ear disease, severe asthma, and slowed lung growth.1,2 Morbidity extends beyond the respiratory system to include increased risks for kidney disease and neurobehavioral disorders.3,4 Every possible effort should be made to decrease the burden of tobacco-related diseases. Many medical societies have published guidelines to help physicians integrate tobacco control guidelines into clinical practice. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends that pediatricians screen for tobacco smoke exposure at every visit and offer smoking parents counseling, treatment, and referral to quit lines.5,6

Despite existing guidelines, however, Winickoff et al7 have shown that pediatricians rarely screen for smoking and that rates of counseling and referral to state quit lines are low. These results may be attributed to a lack of physician awareness and familiarity with published guidelines, as well as a lack of knowledge regarding available tools.8 Previous studies that used direct physician education to increase adherence to tobacco control guidelines as the intervention did not include pediatric providers9,10 and did not directly measure physician adherence to the intervention.11 More recently, Winickoff et al12 measured physician adherence to tobacco control guidelines by asking parents if recommended services were actually provided.

Effective interventions to improve physician adherence to tobacco control guidelines are needed. The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommends continuing medical education interventions to improve physician practice performance.13 Live interactive sessions are more effective than printed material alone.

The primary aims of this study were to measure the rate of a pediatric group's adherence to the AAP tobacco prevention and control guidelines and to determine if an educational outreach activity with live interactive sessions would increase adherence to the guidelines and the use of tools to implement the guidelines.

Our study occurred during the institution's transition to a new electronic medical record system. The use of electronic medical records reportedly facilitates providers' use of recommended treatment guidelines by providing prompts at the point of care.14,15 As a secondary outcome, we compared the 2 electronic medical record (EMR) systems—Ochsner Clinical Workstation (OCW) and Epic (Verona, WI)—in use to determine if one were more effective than the other in helping physicians adhere to the AAP tobacco control guidelines.

METHODS

Using a random number chart process, we selected charts from Ochsner's pediatric clinics. Outcomes were measured before and after educational outreach sessions. Education modules were presented during physicians' lunch hour, and lunch was provided. During education sessions, physicians watched a PowerPoint presentation that included a review of the AAP guidelines and discussed the tools available to implement guidelines into their practices. These guidelines were taken from the AAP technical report that recommends documentation of screening for tobacco exposure, counseling, treatment, and referral to smoking cessation services.5

Tools were obtained from the AAP Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence website16 and included material from Clinical Effort Against Secondhand Smoke Exposure (CEASE).17,18 CEASE provides patient screening questionnaires and clinical pathways to guide providers. We also used the ACCP Tobacco Dependence Treatment ToolKit19 and the Quit With Us, Louisiana website20 as sources. Material distributed included patient questionnaires to assess tobacco dependency, treatment algorithms, and instructions on how to refer smokers to the Fax-to-Quit program. We only used material available to the public and free to download. The trainers encouraged physicians to use the provided tools, document efforts to educate patients, and use recommended tobacco billing codes. Billing codes included International Classification of Diseases-9 diagnostic codes 305.1 (tobacco use disorder) and 986.84 (toxic effects of tobacco); counseling codes 99406 (counseling time greater than 3 minutes but less than 10 minutes) and 99407 (counseling time greater than 10 minutes); and V15.89 (other specified personal history presenting hazards to health) and E869.4 (accidental poisoning secondary to tobacco smoke).

We compared the rates of adherence to the guidelines pre- and postintervention by reviewing every encounter available in the chart. All visits before the date of the outreach were considered for preintervention analysis. Any encounter that occurred after the outreach date was considered for postintervention analysis. Variables collected included patient age, the number of well-child-check (WCC) visits, the number of sick visits for nonrespiratory complaints, and the number of visits for respiratory complaints. We recorded visit type separately to assess whether the reason for the visit predicted tobacco screening. Respiratory complaints included nasal congestion, nasal discharge, ear pain, throat pain, cough, wheezing, and chest pain. Nonrespiratory events were those not related to the respiratory system. We reviewed clinic notes to assess the documentation of patient and parental smoking status, counseling, treatment, or referral to smoking cessation services. We also identified the billing codes used.

Adherence to the guidelines was defined as documentation of patient and/or parental smoking status, counseling given, and referral to either the state Fax-to-Quit program or the smoking cessation clinic. Explicit documentation of a discussion with the family regarding the negative effects of active and second-hand smoke exposure indicated counseling. We also identified the use of tobacco-related billing codes for the visit. Data collection was the same for both EMR systems analyzed, and we compared the systems using the postintervention data.

Our institutional board review approved this study. We employed 2 sample tests of proportion to assess statistical significance. All tests were 2-tailed, and a P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA v.11 (College Station, TX).

RESULTS

We reviewed 213 charts for analysis: 116 preintervention charts and 97 postintervention charts (Table 1). The mean patient age for both groups was 12.2 ± 5.62 years. We found a mean of 4.20 ± 7.7 visits with respiratory complaints. Seven patients were smokers, and 17 patients lived in families with at least 1 smoker. Overall, physicians screened 136 families (63.8%) for tobacco smoke exposure and counseled 87 families (40.9%).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Overall Characteristics of the Study Sample (n=213)

Table 2 shows pre- and postintervention data. Patients in the preintervention group were older and had a higher mean of sick visits (nonrespiratory and respiratory) than patients in the postintervention group. The proportion of families screened for tobacco smoking in the pre- and postintervention groups was comparable (67.2% vs 59.8%, P=0.317). The proportion of parents who were smokers in the preintervention group compared to the postintervention group was significantly higher (12.9% vs 2.1%, P<0.05). The proportion of families receiving counseling efforts increased after the intervention (31.9% vs 51.5%, P<0.05). No parent was offered treatment, referral to a cessation clinic, or referral to quit lines. One patient was counseled and referred for treatment. Prior to the intervention, pediatricians did not use the recommended tobacco billing codes. After the intervention, only 1 chart included the recommended smoking cessation counseling codes.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Comparison Between Before and After Educational Outreach

A comparison of EMR systems was available only for postintervention data (Epic had not been implemented during the preintervention period). A total of 97 charts with documentation in both systems were available for review. Fifty-eight (60%) patients were screened using OCW, and 56 (58%) patients were screened using the Epic system. Thirty-six patients were screened in both systems, and 18 were not screened in either OCW or Epic. No statistical difference was noted between the 2 systems in regard to their ability to improve physician adherence to tobacco control guidelines.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we sought to determine whether our pediatric group was adhering to the AAP's tobacco control and prevention guidelines and whether an educational outreach would increase physician adherence to the guidelines. In general, pediatricians screened at least 64% of families for second-hand smoke exposure. Counseling, however, was only conducted in 41% of clinic visits. After the educational outreach, the rate of counseling increased (P<0.05), but we found no statistically significant difference in the rate of screening, treatment, billing, or referral to quit lines. The reason for the visit was not predictive of whether pediatricians screened for tobacco smoke exposure.

Our results are in line with results from other studies assessing pediatricians' adherence to other clinical practice guidelines. The Bright Futures guidelines were developed to improve the quality and consistency of care by providing pediatricians with specific recommendations for every WCC.21 The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act states that providers must, at a minimum, provide preventive services as stated in the Bright Futures handbook.22 A recent paper assessing adherence to the Bright Futures guidelines, however, revealed that pediatricians are not following recommended guidelines.23 Mangione-Smith et al24 found that pediatric patients receive less than 50% of recommended preventive services. Several other studies have shown that pediatric healthcare providers are not adhering to basic preventive care, including recommendations for dental evaluation and referral,25 acute otitis media treatment,26 and overweight screening.27

We acknowledge that physician medical decisionmaking is complex and depends on many factors, such as physician experience and knowledge, patient characteristics and values, and weight of the clinical evidence.28 Isaac et al29 found that, in general, the AAP's guidelines are not always based on evidence but rather on expert opinion. We believe that the AAP's tobacco prevention and control recommendations are based on ample evidence1 and that their implementation should be strongly encouraged. If pediatricians are unwilling to treat parents' tobacco dependency, every effort should be made to refer them to smoking cessation services or parent support groups.30

A potential bias in our results is the heterogeneity of the comparison groups. We found a higher proportion of older patients in the preintervention group than the postintervention group. The number of WCC, sick nonrespiratory, and sick respiratory visits was significantly higher in the preintervention group compared to the postintervention group. These differences in patient characteristics reflect a real-world clinic that is likely to see patients of different ages at different times for different complaints. Pediatricians are encouraged to screen at every visit, regardless of the age or chief complaint. That the group with the higher rate of smoking exposure was also the group with the higher proportion of sick visits is of clinical interest.

Comparison of the 2 EMR systems at the institution revealed that neither was able to significantly impact physician adherence to tobacco control guidelines. Screening was not statistically different between them.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pediatric group is not adhering to the AAP tobacco control guidelines. Educational outreach efforts increased the rate of counseling but did not make a significant change in treatment or referral to tobacco cessation services. Our review of the 2 EMR systems showed that neither system was superior in increasing the screening rates.

Current evidence-based guidelines to reduce tobacco use are underutilized. Physician acceptance of guidelines is urgently needed to affect the tobacco epidemic. Optimizing EMR systems with reminders and access to treatment algorithms is likely to improve quality of care.

This article meets the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Medical Specialties Maintenance of Certification competencies for Patient Care and Practice-Based Learning and Improvement.

Footnotes

  • The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter of this article.

  • © Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
    (2013) The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke. A Report of the Surgeon General. June 27, 2006. http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/secondhandsmoke/index.html. Accessed June 18,.
  2. ↵
    1. Best D
    (11, 2009) Committee on Environmental Health; Committee on Native American Child Health; Committee on Adolescence. From the American Academy of Pediatrics: Technical report—secondhand and prenatal tobacco smoke exposure. Pediatrics 124(5):e1017–e1044, pmid:19841110, Epub 2009 Oct 19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. García-Esquinas E,
    2. Loeffler LF,
    3. Weaver VM,
    4. Fadrowski JJ,
    5. Navas-Acien A
    (5, 2013) Kidney function and tobacco smoke exposure in US adolescents. Pediatrics 131(5):e1415–e1423, pmid:23569089, Epub 2013 Apr 8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Kabir Z,
    2. Connolly GN,
    3. Alpert HR
    (8, 2011) Secondhand smoke exposure and neurobehavioral disorders among children in the United States. Pediatrics 128(2):263–270, pmid:21746720, Epub 2011 Jul 11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Committee on Environmental Health; Committee on Substance Abuse; Committee on Adolescence; Committee on Native American Child Health
    (11, 2009) From the American Academy of Pediatrics: Policy statement—Tobacco use: a pediatric disease. Pediatrics 124(5):1474–1487, pmid:19841108, Epub 2009 Oct 19. Erratum in: Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125(4):861.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Sims TH
    (11, 2009) Committee on Substance Abuse. From the American Academy of Pediatrics: Technical report—Tobacco as a substance of abuse. Pediatrics 124(5):e1045–e1053, pmid:19841120, Epub 2009 Oct 19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Winickoff JP,
    2. McMillen RC,
    3. Carroll BC,
    4. et al.
    (11, 2003) Addressing parental smoking in pediatrics and family practice: a national survey of parents. Pediatrics 112(5):1146–1151, pmid:14595060.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Cabana MD,
    2. Rand CS,
    3. Powe NR,
    4. et al.
    (10 20, 1999) Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282(15):1458–1465, pmid:10535437.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Cockburn J,
    2. Ruth D,
    3. Silagy C,
    4. et al.
    (3 14, 1992) Randomised trial of three approaches for marketing smoking cessation programmes to Australian general practitioners. BMJ 304(6828):691–694, pmid:1571645.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Ockene JK,
    2. Lindsay EA,
    3. Hymowitz N,
    4. et al.
    (1997) Tobacco control activities of primary-care physicians in the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation. COMMIT Research Group. Tob Control 6((Suppl 2)):S49–S56, pmid:9583653.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Curry SJ,
    2. Ludman EJ,
    3. Graham E,
    4. Stout J,
    5. Grothaus L,
    6. Lozano P
    (3, 2003) Pediatric-based smoking cessation intervention for low-income women: a randomized trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157(3):295–302, pmid:12622686.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Winickoff JP,
    2. Nabi-Burza E,
    3. Chang Y,
    4. et al.
    (6 24, 2013) Implementation of a Parental Tobacco Control Intervention in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics, Epub ahead of print.
  13. ↵
    1. Davis D,
    2. Galbraith R
    (3, 2009) American College of Chest Physicians Health and Science Policy Committee. Continuing medical education effect on practice performance: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines. Chest 135((3Suppl)):42S–48S, pmid:19265075.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Davis AM,
    2. Cannon M,
    3. Ables AZ,
    4. Bendyk H
    (5, 2010) Using the electronic medical record to improve asthma severity documentation and treatment among family medicine residents. Fam Med 42(5):334–337, pmid:20455109.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Rapp KI,
    2. Jack L Jr.,
    3. Post R,
    4. et al.
    (2, 2013) The HEAL, Phase II Project: enhancing features of an electronic medical record system to improve adherence to asthma guidelines. J Health Care Poor Underserved 24((1 Suppl)):20–28, pmid:23395941.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics
    (2013) Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence. http://www2.aap.org/richmondcenter. Accessed June 18,.
  17. ↵
    1. Winickoff JP,
    2. Park ER,
    3. Hipple BJ,
    4. et al.
    (8, 2008) Clinical effort against secondhand smoke exposure: development of framework and intervention. Pediatrics 122(2):e363–e375, pmid:18676523.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Hall N,
    2. Hipple B,
    3. Friebely J,
    4. Ossip DJ,
    5. Winickoff JP
    (8, 2009) Addressing family smoking in child health care settings. J Clin Outcomes Manag 16(8):367–373, pmid:20448841.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. American College of Chest Physicians
    (2013) Tobacco Dependence ToolKit. http://tobaccodependence.chestnet.org. Accessed June 18,.
  20. ↵
    1. The Louisiana Campaign for Tobacco-Free Living and the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals Tobacco Control Program
    (2013) Quit With Us, Louisiana. http://quitwithusla.org. Accessed June 18,.
  21. ↵
    1. Hagan JF,
    2. Shaw JS,
    3. Duncan PM
    (2008) Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents (American Academy of Pediatrics; Elk Grove Village, IL).
  22. ↵
    1. Foy JM
    (Jan-Feb 2013) Implementing Bright Futures guidelines for well-child care in North Carolina. N C Med J 74(1):28–33, pmid:23530376.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Norlin C,
    2. Crawford MA,
    3. Bell CT,
    4. Sheng X,
    5. Stein MT
    (Jan-Feb 2011) Delivery of well-child care: a look inside the door. Acad Pediatr 11(1):18–26, pmid:21272820.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Mangione-Smith R,
    2. DeCristofaro AH,
    3. Setodji CM,
    4. et al.
    (10 11, 2007) The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States. N Engl J Med 357(15):1515–1523, pmid:17928599.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Long CM,
    2. Quinonez RB,
    3. Beil HA,
    4. et al.
    (7 11, 2012) Pediatricians' assessments of caries risk and need for a dental evaluation in preschool aged children. BMC Pediatr 12:49, pmid:22559270.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Chu CH,
    2. Wang MC,
    3. Lin LY,
    4. Shiao AS
    (7, 2011) Physicians are not adherent to clinical practice guidelines for acute otitis media. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 75(7):955–959, pmid:21612831, Epub 2011 May 25.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Burman NJ,
    2. Cabana MD,
    3. Maselli JH,
    4. Hilton JF,
    5. Patel AI
    (10, 2012) Missing documentation of weight and height at preventive visits for children. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 51(10):933–938, pmid:22511198, Epub 2012 Apr 17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Bauchner H,
    2. Simpson L,
    3. Chessare J
    (6, 2001) Changing physician behaviour. Arch Dis Child 84(6):459–462, pmid:11369556.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Isaac A,
    2. Saginur M,
    3. Hartling L,
    4. Robinson JL
    (4, 2013) Quality of reporting and evidence in American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines. Pediatrics 131(4):732–738, pmid:23530180, Epub 2013 Mar 25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Rosen LJ,
    2. Guttman N,
    3. Hovell MF,
    4. et al.
    (6 28, 2011) Development, design, and conceptual issues of project zero exposure: a program to protect young children from tobacco smoke exposure. BMC Public Health 11:508, pmid:21711530.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal
Vol. 13, Issue 3
Sep 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Pediatricians' Adherence to Tobacco Prevention, Control, and Treatment Guidelines Before and After an Educational Outreach Program
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of Pediatricians' Adherence to Tobacco Prevention, Control, and Treatment Guidelines Before and After an Educational Outreach Program
Timothy Beaty, Adriana C. Dornelles, Terese Sahuque, Fernando Urrego
Ochsner Journal Sep 2013, 13 (3) 375-379;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of Pediatricians' Adherence to Tobacco Prevention, Control, and Treatment Guidelines Before and After an Educational Outreach Program
Timothy Beaty, Adriana C. Dornelles, Terese Sahuque, Fernando Urrego
Ochsner Journal Sep 2013, 13 (3) 375-379;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • Pediatricians' Confidence and Behaviors in Smoking Cessation Promotion and Knowledge of the Smoking Cessation Trust
  • Recent Publications by Ochsner Authors
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Adductor Canal Blocks Are Not Associated With Improved Early Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
  • Differential Impact of Body Mass Index in Hip Arthroscopy: Obesity Does Not Impact Outcomes
  • Revision Carpal Tunnel Release With Umbilical Cord Allograft: A Four-Year Retrospective Cohort Study
Show more ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Smoking–prevention and control
  • tobacco products
  • tobacco smoke pollution

Current Post at the Blog

American Association for the Advancement of Science Surveys Scientists About Article Publishing Charges—And Uncovers More Problems

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2023 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire