Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
Case ReportCase Reports

Fetal Surgery: The Ochsner Experience with In Utero Spina Bifida Repair

Lora Kahn, Nnenna Mbabuike, Edison P. Valle-Giler, Juanita Garces, R. Clifton Moore, Hugo St. Hilaire and Cuong J. Bui
Ochsner Journal March 2014, 14 (1) 112-118;
Lora Kahn
Department of Neurosurgery, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nnenna Mbabuike
Department of Neurosurgery, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edison P. Valle-Giler
Department of Neurosurgery, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
Department of Neurosurgery, Tulane Medical Center, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juanita Garces
Department of Neurosurgery, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
Department of Neurosurgery, Tulane Medical Center, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Clifton Moore
Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hugo St. Hilaire
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Children's Hospital, New Orleans, LA, and Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cuong J. Bui
Department of Neurosurgery, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Myelomeningocele is the most common form of congenital central nervous system defect that is compatible with life. Most patients with myelomeningocele have significant functional impairment of ambulation and bowel and bladder function, require permanent cerebrospinal fluid diversion with shunting, and have significant morbidity and mortality from hindbrain herniation (Chiari II malformation). The advent of intrauterine surgery has provided new opportunities to better address this lifelong debilitating disease.

Case Report The patient was a 19-year-old gravida 2 para 1 at 22-6/7 weeks whose fetus was diagnosed with an open neural tube defect and further demonstrated to have ventriculomegaly and hindbrain herniation. Amniocentesis confirmed normal karyotype and the presence of acetylcholinesterase. After an intrauterine procedure, the patient underwent cesarean section at 35-5/7 weeks and delivered a male infant. His spinal incision was well healed at birth without any evidence of cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and his extremities were normal in appearance, range of motion, and movement. The infant also has maintained relatively normal, age-appropriate bowel and bladder function and has no obvious neurologic deficit.

Conclusion As the benefit of fetal surgery becomes more widely accepted, quality of care and patient safety must be at the forefront of any institution's effort to offer fetal surgery. Given the current prevalence of spina bifida and the amount of resources required to treat this disease effectively either in utero or postnatally, it is our opinion that the treatment of spina bifida should be regionalized to tertiary referral centers with the interdisciplinary expertise to offer comprehensive treatment for all aspects of the disease and all phases of care for the patients.

Keywords
  • Arnold-Chiari malformation
  • fetal therapies
  • hydrocephalus
  • hysterotomy
  • meningomyelocele
  • spinal dysraphism
  • ventriculoperitoneal shunt

INTRODUCTION

Myelomeningocele, or herniation of the neural elements through a posterior spinal and skin defect, results from failure of the neural tube to close during the early period of embryonic development. Myelomeningocele's incidence has decreased to less than 1 per 1,000 live births since the advent of folic acid supplementation,1 but it still remains a formidable disease from a patient care as well as healthcare cost perspective. It is the most common form of congenital central nervous system defect compatible with life, and its associated symptoms are a lifelong medical burden for affected patients and their families. The defect has traditionally been treated postpartum with operative repair within 72 hours of birth and with early multidisciplinary therapy. Despite aggressive surgical and medical treatment, more than 80% of patients require ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) and have ambulation impairments such that two-thirds of patients are wheelchair bound by adulthood. Virtually all myelomeningocele patients have significant hindbrain herniation, also known as Chiari II malformation, that is believed to contribute to premature death in this patient population.

ESTABLISHMENT OF INTRAUTERINE MYELOMENINGOCELE REPAIR

The concept of in utero surgery is not a novel idea; it was first performed in dogs in the 1930s2 and advanced further by reducing amniotic fluid loss in the 1960s.3 In 1980 at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), Harrison et al developed a successful modern animal model for fetal surgery.4 Results of animal models and surgeries for spina bifida in the 1980s established technical feasibility and showed early evidence of improved outcomes.5,6 Fetal surgery has been employed for various congenital diseases including congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung,7 congenital diaphragmatic hernia,8 sacrococcygeal teratoma,9 and fetal airway obstruction.10

The hypothesis that intrauterine repair of myelomeningocele would improve outcomes is based on evidence that exposure of neural elements to the amniotic fluid and the intrauterine environment results in secondary injuries to the neural elements and facilitates hindbrain herniation. Therefore, earlier closure may prevent secondary injuries and result in improved functional outcomes. The first fetal surgeries for spina bifida repair in animals were performed in 199411,12 and were followed by successful repairs in humans in 1997 and 1998 at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), respectively.13-15

Intrauterine surgery is not without significant ethical implications and controversies. Lawyers, ethicists, doctors, nurses, and the media at large have discussed the implications of intrauterine surgery since the 1980s,16-19 particularly as it relates to the mother's autonomy in making healthcare decisions, as maternal complication is a risk to be weighed against the potential benefit of improving the fetus's outcome. Two of the most frequent complications of hysterotomy are wound dehiscence and uterine scarring that may complicate future pregnancy. Another major potential complication is preterm labor that can result in an unviable fetus, particularly if delivery occurs before the 24th week. Regardless, most mothers and physicians feel the benefits of improved outcomes outweigh the ethical and moral considerations of intrauterine fetal surgery, so fetal repairs have been performed with gradually increasing frequency since the 1990s. However, a lack of sufficient data prevented widespread establishment of the surgery.

After promising initial data20-22 and with international medical consensus, the National Institutes of Health–funded randomized prospective Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) trial was initiated in 2003 at 3 tertiary centers: UCSF, CHOP, and Vanderbilt. While the study was active, all other centers throughout the country suspended in utero myelomeningocele repairs. To be eligible to participate, women had to have a singleton pregnancy with a fetus meeting the following requirements: a lesion with the upper end located between T1 and S1, evidence of hindbrain herniation, gestational age of 19 to 25.9 weeks, and a normal karyotype. Participants were also required to be at least 18 years old, be US residents, have a body mass index <35, have no previous hysterotomy, and have no other apparent risk factor for preterm birth.23

The 2 primary outcomes of the study were (1) a composite of fetal/neonatal death or the need for a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-diverting shunt at 12 months and (2) a composite score of development and motor function at 30 months. Secondary outcomes were defined for the fetus/infant and the mother. For infants, secondary outcomes included radiographic appearance of Chiari II malformation, time to eligibility for shunt placement, locomotion, motor and developmental outcome measures, functional examination, and degree of disability. Secondary outcomes for mothers focused on surgical and pregnancy complications.

Because of favorable primary and secondary outcomes, the trial was terminated early to allow more patients to have prenatal surgery. For the first primary outcome, only 68% in the prenatal group compared with 98% in the postnatal group (P<0.001) had fetal or neonatal death or met criteria for a VPS. Only 40% of prenatal patients met criteria for a shunt, whereas 82% of postnatal patients did. For the second primary outcome, composite functional measures were also better in the prenatal surgery group (P=0.007) than in the postnatal group.

Pregnancy-related outcomes were worse for mothers in the prenatal group; they were more likely to suffer poor-quality wound healing or wound dehiscence, chorioamniotic separation, placental abruption, and spontaneous membrane rupture. Fetuses from the prenatal group were more likely to be delivered prematurely, at an average age of 34.1 weeks as opposed to 37.3 weeks in the postnatal group. Prenatal-surgery infants were also more likely to require further procedures for delayed spinal cord tethering.

Secondary outcomes were also more favorable in the prenatal-surgery infants compared to the postnatal group. Of the prenatal group, 36% had no evidence of hindbrain herniation as opposed to 4% in the postnatal group. Level of function was more likely to be 2 or more levels better than expected according to the level of the lesion (32% vs 12%, P=0.005) and less likely to be 2 or more levels worse (13% vs 28%, P=0.03) in the prenatal vs postnatal patients. Prenatal patients were also more likely to be able to walk without prosthetics and orthotics than their postnatal counterparts (42% vs 21%, P=0.01). Cognition was equal in the 2 groups; however, motor function on both the Bayley and Peabody motor scales and disability as measured by the Functional Independence Measure instrument showed better outcomes in the prenatal surgery group.

The overall results are compelling, given a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 51% with respect to shunting; an RRR of 33% with respect to hindbrain herniation; and better outcomes with respect to ambulation, motor function, and disability function. These advantages are not without risks, as significantly more prenatal patients were born preterm, and mothers undergoing hysterotomy are more likely to have complications from scarring that might affect future pregnancies. Unfortunately, in utero repair has not conferred an advantage with respect to infants' bladder function.24

THE OCHSNER EXPERIENCE

Ochsner has a long and successful track record of treating and caring for children with spina bifida. After the publication of the MOMS data, we felt that it was imperative for Ochsner to be able to offer families this option. We were able to assemble a fetal surgery team with active participation of pediatric neurosurgery, maternal fetal medicine, pediatric surgery, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric cardiology, and pediatrics. After more than a year of preparation, the first fetal surgery in the southeast region was performed on December 3, 2012.

We have thus far performed 6 fetal repairs without any intraoperative complications, although a major shortcoming of our current experience is a limited follow-up period. We are also concurrently following 4 infants locally who had fetal repairs at Vanderbilt and CHOP. We present our first patient as an illustrative case because we have the longest follow-up for this patient and her child.

The patient was a 19-year-old gravida 2 para 1 at 22-6/7 weeks whose fetus was diagnosed with an open neural tube defect by ultrasound that was confirmed with maternal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ultrasound and MRI further demonstrated ventriculomegaly (Figure 1) and hindbrain herniation (Chiari II malformation). Amniocentesis confirmed normal karyotype and the presence of acetylcholinesterase. After full evaluation and counseling by the Ochsner fetal surgery team, the patient and her family wished to proceed with intrauterine repair.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

In utero ultrasound (A) and magnetic resonance imaging (B) demonstrate open neural tube defect and (C) marked ventriculomegaly.

The surgical technique employed was the standard as established by the MOMS investigators, with a minor modification: we included Seprafilm (Sanofi US) under the dural repair to help minimize the incidence of spinal cord tethering (Figure 2). The patient was maintained postoperatively on magnesium sulfate drip for several days with an unremarkable hospital course and was discharged home on postoperative day 7 with plans to return for elective cesarean section (C-section) at 36 weeks.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Photographs from the operating room demonstrating (A) exposure of the myelomeningocele through the hysterotomy, (B) placement of Seprafilm during closure of the myelomeningocele, (C) the repaired myelomeningocele defect, and (D) the hysterotomy repair.

At 35-5/7 weeks, she presented with uterine contractions and underwent C-section. She delivered a male infant with Apgar scores of 8 and 8. His spinal incision was well healed at birth without any evidence of CSF leakage. Both lower extremities were normal in appearance, range of motion, and movement. Head ultrasound at birth (Figure 3) noted only mild prominence of the ventricular system and showed improvement when compared with preoperative in utero imaging.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Echoencephalography demonstrating the lateral ventricle on day 1 of life.

The infant has maintained relatively normal bladder function with mild constipation. At 7 months of age, he has continued to do well without any obvious neurologic deficit and demonstrates normal leg movement, age-appropriate bladder function, and excellent cosmetic results. On follow-up echoencephalography when the infant was 4 months old, we found stability of the lateral ventricle without any evidence of hydrocephalus (Figure 4) and no obvious hindbrain herniation.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Echoencephalography demonstrating stability of the lateral ventricle at 4 months of life.

DISCUSSION

Intrauterine repair of myelomeningocele confers multiple advantages to infants, including lower rates of shunt dependency, lower rates of hindbrain herniation, and better motor and disability functional outcomes. Our first infant repaired in utero appears to have favorable outcomes in all the aforementioned areas. Given the high rate of shunt failure, the healthcare issues related to being wheelchair bound, and the complications from hindbrain herniation, the long-term healthcare benefits and savings may be immeasurable. Although we have performed 6 successful repairs, our current follow-up is still limited and it is too early to know our true long-term efficacy rate and whether we can reproduce the favorable outcomes seen with the MOMS trial.

Fetal surgery is a challenging, and at times controversial, medical technology that has shown tremendous progress in the past few decades. In addition to spina bifida, fetal surgery may benefit myriad other congenital abnormalities. Beyond the immediate possible medical benefits to individual patients, the tremendous downstream healthcare savings opportunities for patients, their families, and the healthcare system at large cannot be overlooked. A study of the fiscal cost of myelomeningocele has suggested that each patient with spina bifida spends a mean of $10,000 to $41,000 (2003 dollars) more per year in healthcare than the average person without spina bifida.25 As spina bifida patients are living longer and have a more normal life expectancy, the lifetime cost-saving potentials offered by in utero repair are great. Yet these benefits must be weighed against potential surgical risks, the most significant of which is preterm delivery. Follow-up data are too limited to indicate if long-term adverse risks to the child or mother exist in preterm surgery cases.

CONCLUSION

Assembly of a fetal surgery team is both expertise- and resource-intensive and requires superlative focus of all involved subspecialties on both quality and safety. As the benefit of fetal surgery becomes more widely accepted, quality of care and patient safety must be at the forefront of any institution's effort to offer fetal surgery. Given the current prevalence of spina bifida and the amount of resources required to treat this disease effectively either in utero or postnatally, it is our opinion that the treatment of spina bifida should be regionalized to tertiary referral centers with the interdisciplinary expertise to offer comprehensive treatment for all aspects of the disease and all phases of care for the patients. These centers will have sufficient volume to deliver the highest quality care in the most cost-effective manner.

This article meets the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Medical Specialties Maintenance of Certification competencies for Patient Care, Medical Knowledge, and Systems-Based Practice.

Footnotes

  • The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter of this article.

  • © Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Perry VL,
    2. Albright AL,
    3. Adelson PD
    (9, 2002) Operative nuances of myelomeningocele closure. Neurosurgery 51(3):719–23, pmid:12188950, discussion 723-724.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Barnard CN
    (5, 1957) A method of operating on fetal dogs in utero. Surgery 41(5):805–807, pmid:13433235.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Jackson BT,
    2. Egdahl RH
    (9, 1960) The performance of complex fetal operations in utero without amniotic fluid loss or other disturbances of fetal-maternal relationships. Surgery 48:564–570, pmid:14406274.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Harrison MR,
    2. Jester JA,
    3. Ross NA
    (7, 1980) Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero. I. The model: intrathoracic balloon produces fatal pulmonary hypoplasia. Surgery 88(1):174–182, pmid:7385020.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Harrison MR,
    2. Golbus MS,
    3. Filly RA,
    4. et al.
    (3 11, 1982) Fetal surgery for congenital hydronephrosis. N Engl J Med 306(10):591–593, pmid:7057815.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Michejda M
    (8, 1984) Intrauterine treatment of spina bifida: primate model. Z Kinderchir 39(4):259–261, pmid:6388186.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Harrison MR,
    2. Adzick NS,
    3. Jennings RW,
    4. et al.
    (10 20, 1990) Antenatal intervention for congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation. Lancet 336(8721):965–967, pmid:1977005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Harrison MR,
    2. Adzick NS,
    3. Longaker MT,
    4. et al.
    (5 31, 1990) Successful repair in utero of a fetal diaphragmatic hernia after removal of herniated viscera from the left thorax. N Engl J Med 322(22):1582–1584, pmid:2336088.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Graf JL,
    2. Albanese CT,
    3. Jennings RW,
    4. Farrell JA,
    5. Harrison MR
    (10, 2000) Successful fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma resection in a hydropic fetus. J Pediatr Surg 35(10):1489–1491, pmid:11051157.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Mychaliska GB,
    2. Bealer JF,
    3. Graf JL,
    4. Rosen MA,
    5. Adzick NS,
    6. Harrison MR
    (2, 1997) Operating on placental support: the ex utero intrapartum treatment procedure. J Pediatr Surg 32(2):227–230, pmid:9044127, discussion 230-231.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Meuli M,
    2. Meuli-Simmen C,
    3. Hutchins GM,
    4. et al.
    (4, 1995) In utero surgery rescues neurological function at birth in sheep with spina bifida. Nat Med 1(4):342–347, pmid:7585064.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Meuli M,
    2. Meuli-Simmen C,
    3. Yingling CD,
    4. et al.
    (7, 1995) Creation of myelomeningocele in utero: a model of functional damage from spinal cord exposure in fetal sheep. J Pediatr Surg 30(7):1028–1032, pmid:7472926, discussion 1032-1033.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Tulipan N,
    2. Bruner JP
    (4, 1998) Myelomeningocele repair in utero: a report of three cases. Pediatr Neurosurg 28(4):177–180, pmid:9732243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Tulipan N
    (2 15, 2004) Intrauterine closure of myelomeningocele: an update. Neurosurg Focus 16(2):E2, pmid:15209485.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Adzick NS,
    2. Sutton LN,
    3. Crombleholme TM,
    4. Flake AW
    (11 21, 1998) Successful fetal surgery for spina bifida. Lancet 352(9141):1675–1676, pmid:9853442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Barclay WR,
    2. McCormick RA,
    3. Sidbury JB,
    4. Michejda M,
    5. Hodgen GD
    (10 2, 1981) The ethics of in utero surgery. JAMA 246(14):1551–1552, 1554–1555, pmid:6792373.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Belluck P
    (2011) Risk and reward in utero. New York Times, Feb 13:WK5.
    1. Knopoff KA
    (3, 1991) Can a pregnant woman morally refuse fetal surgery? Calif Law Rev 79(2):499–540, pmid:11659841.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Twomey JG Jr.
    (12, 1989) The ethics of in utero fetal surgery. A possible threat to the autonomy of pregnant women? Nurs Clin North Am 24(4):1025–1032.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Bruner JP,
    2. Tulipan N,
    3. Paschall RL,
    4. et al.
    (11 17, 1999) Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele and the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. JAMA 282(19):1819–1825, pmid:10573272.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Tulipan N,
    2. Sutton LN,
    3. Bruner JP,
    4. Cohen BM,
    5. Johnson M,
    6. Adzick NS
    (1, 2003) The effect of intrauterine myelomeningocele repair on the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 38(1):27–33, pmid:12476024.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Johnson MP,
    2. Gerdes M,
    3. Rintoul N,
    4. et al.
    (4, 2006) Maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(4):1145–1150, pmid:16580316, discussion 1150-1152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Adzick NS,
    2. Thom EA,
    3. Spong CY,
    4. et al.
    (3 17, 2011) MOMS Investigators. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med 364(11):993–1004, pmid:21306277, Epub 2011 Feb 9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Lee NG,
    2. Gomez P,
    3. Uberoi V,
    4. et al.
    (10, 2012) In utero closure of myelomeningocele does not improve lower urinary tract function. J Urol 188((4 Suppl)):1567–1571, pmid:22917751, Epub 2012 Aug 20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Ouyang L,
    2. Grosse SD,
    3. Armour BS,
    4. Waitzman NJ
    (7, 2007) Health care expenditures of children and adults with spina bifida in a privately insured U.S. population. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 79(7):552–558, pmid:17335056.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal
Vol. 14, Issue 1
Mar 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fetal Surgery: The Ochsner Experience with In Utero Spina Bifida Repair
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Fetal Surgery: The Ochsner Experience with In Utero Spina Bifida Repair
Lora Kahn, Nnenna Mbabuike, Edison P. Valle-Giler, Juanita Garces, R. Clifton Moore, Hugo St. Hilaire, Cuong J. Bui
Ochsner Journal Mar 2014, 14 (1) 112-118;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Fetal Surgery: The Ochsner Experience with In Utero Spina Bifida Repair
Lora Kahn, Nnenna Mbabuike, Edison P. Valle-Giler, Juanita Garces, R. Clifton Moore, Hugo St. Hilaire, Cuong J. Bui
Ochsner Journal Mar 2014, 14 (1) 112-118;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • ESTABLISHMENT OF INTRAUTERINE MYELOMENINGOCELE REPAIR
    • THE OCHSNER EXPERIENCE
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • Recent Publications by Ochsner Authors: October 2013 - March 2014
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Propofol Infusion Syndrome or Not? A Case Report
  • Recurrent Angiomatoid Fibrous Histiocytoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
  • Late Recurrence of Light Chain Deposition Disease after Kidney Transplantation Treated with Bortezomib: A Case Report
Show more Case Reports

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Arnold-Chiari malformation
  • fetal therapies
  • hydrocephalus
  • hysterotomy
  • meningomyelocele
  • spinal dysraphism
  • ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Current Post at the Blog

No Author Credit for ChatGPT

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2023 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire