Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Grades 1-2: Patient-Reported Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Utility Analysis

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Ko SB,
   2. Lee SW

   (3, 2011) Prevalence of spondylolysis and its relationship with low back pain in selected population. Clin Orthop Surg 3(1):34–38, pmid:21369476, Epub 2011 Feb 15.

   OpenUrlPubMed
2. ↵
   1. Kalichman L,
   2. Kim DH,
   3. Li L,
   4. Guermazi A,
   5. Berkin V,
   6. Hunter DJ

   (1 15, 2009) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(2):199–205, pmid:19139672.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Mehta VA,
   2. McGirt MJ,
   3. Garces Ambrossi GL,
   4. et al.

   (1, 2011) Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity. Neurol Res 33(1):38–42, pmid:20546682.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. ↵
   1. Moskowitz A

   (4, 2002) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Clin North Am 33(2):359–366, pmid:12389281.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. ↵
   1. Harms J,
   2. Rolinger H:

   (May-Jun 1982) A one-stager procedure inoperative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author's transl) [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 120(3):343–347, pmid:7113376.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Hackenberg L,
   2. Halm H,
   3. Bullman V,
   4. Vieth V,
   5. Schneider M,
   6. Liljenqvist U

   (8, 2005) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results. Eur Spine J 14(6):551–558, pmid:15672243, Epub 2005 Jan 26.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Gejo R,
   2. Matsui H,
   3. Kawaguchi Y,
   4. Ishihara H,
   5. Tsuji H

   (5 15, 1999) Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 24(10):1023–1028, pmid:10332796.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Rantanen J,
   2. Hurme M,
   3. Falck B,
   4. et al.

   (4, 1993) The lumbar multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(5):568–574, pmid:8484147.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. McGirt MJ,
   2. Parker SL,
   3. Lerner J,
   4. Engelhart L,
   5. Knight T,
   6. Wang MY

   (6, 2011) Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 14(6):771–778, pmid:21417699.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. ↵
    1. Parker SL,
    2. Adogwa O,
    3. Witham TF,
    4. Aaronson OS,
    5. Cheng J,
    6. McGirt MJ

    (2, 2011) Post-operative infection after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): literature review and cost analysis. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 54(1):33–37, pmid:21506066.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Schizas C,
    2. Tzinieris N,
    3. Tsiridis E,
    4. Kosmopoulos V

    (12, 2009) Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience. Int Orthop 33(6):1683–1688, pmid:19023571.

    OpenUrlPubMed
12. ↵
    1. Park Y,
    2. Ha JW

    (3 1, 2007) Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(5):537–543, pmid:17334287.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Thomsen K,
    2. Christensen FB,
    3. Eiskjaer SP,
    4. Hansen ES,
    5. Fruensgaard S,
    6. Bunger CE

    (12 15, 1997) 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22(24):2813–2822, pmid:9431617.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Gallagher EJ,
    2. Liebman M,
    3. Bijur PE

    (12, 2001) Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med 38(6):633–638, pmid:11719741.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Kelly AM

    (5, 2001) The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J 18(3):205–207, pmid:11354213.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    1. Fairbank JC,
    2. Couper J,
    3. Davies JB,
    4. O'Brien JP

    (8, 1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66(8):271–273, pmid:6450426.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Fairbank JC,
    2. Pynsent PB

    (11 15, 2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(22):2940–2952, pmid:11074683, discussion 2952.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Peng CW,
    2. Yue WM,
    3. Poh SY,
    4. Yeo W,
    5. Tan SB

    (6 1, 2009) Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(13):1385–1389, pmid:19478658.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
19. ↵
    1. Dhall SS,
    2. Wang MY,
    3. Mummaneni PV

    (12, 2008) Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 9(6):560–565, pmid:19035748.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Scott LP,
    2. Stephen KM,
    3. David NS,
    4. et al.

    Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (tlif) for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. World Neurosurg, In press.
21. ↵
    1. Starkweather AR,
    2. Witek-Janusek L,
    3. Nockels RP,
    4. Peterson J,
    5. Mathews HL

    (2, 2008) The multiple benefits of minimally invasive spinal surgery: results comparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar fusion. J Neurosci Nurs 40(1):32–39, pmid:18330408.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. 1. Wang MY,
    2. Lerner J,
    3. Lesko J,
    4. McGirt MJ

    (8, 2012) Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 25(6):324–328, pmid:21685806.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. ↵
    1. Whitecloud TS 3rd,
    2. Roesch WW,
    3. Ricciardi JE

    (4, 2001) Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anteriorposterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis. J Spinal Disord 14(2):100–103, pmid:11285420.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science