Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
LetterArticle

From the Editor's Desk: The Importance of Publication Ethics

Ronald G. Amedee
Ochsner Journal December 2015, 15 (4) 397;
Ronald G. Amedee
Designated Institutional Official, Office of Graduate Medical Education, A Division of Ochsner Academics, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
Professor, The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA
Editor-in-Chief,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

As a peer-reviewed publication, The Ochsner Journal serves an important role in the transference of medical knowledge and in the promotion of the highest levels of professional standards and publication ethics. These dual roles require that all parties involved in the process—editors-in-chief, authors, reviewers, and editorial staff—share in the important responsibility of adhering to the same professional standards and publication ethics.

As an editor-in-chief, I must ensure (1) the prompt acknowledgment of receipt of submitted manuscripts, (2) the strict confidentiality of the content of a submitted work, and (3) the expedient selection of reviewers to complete the peer-review process. Ultimately, I make the final decision on all manuscripts submitted to the Journal. Within the context of these duties, it is my responsibility to respond promptly and fairly when an ethical issue or complaint arises concerning a submitted or published manuscript.

We have several processes in place to ensure the Journal's compliance with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors ethics guidelines. Since 2013, we have scanned all manuscript submissions with the iThenticate plagiarism software and have rejected the submissions discovered to have material appropriated from other sources. We do not accept previously published tables or graphics without written permission from the copyright holder. All authors are required to sign and submit an Author Responsibility, Financial Disclosure, Copyright Transfer and Acknowledgment form, confirming that their work is original, that it represents their own scholarly product, and that the manuscript has not been submitted to any other publication for consideration. To this last point, even if the work is of an original nature, we reject submissions that would otherwise result in a duplicate publication. We also require all authors to disclose their financial conflicts and publish those conflicts in the Acknowledgments section of the article.

In recent months, we have turned our ethics spotlight on the peer-review process, paying close attention to potential conflicts of interest when we assign reviewers, instituting an evaluative process to provide feedback to reviewers about the quality of their reviews, and requiring reviewers to complete their assignments in a timely fashion. All of these measures are specifically designed to enhance the rigor of our reviews and to ensure that authors receive the most constructive feedback possible for improving their manuscripts. We have also added a second review prior to making a decision on each manuscript. Revised manuscripts are now reviewed by the same reviewers who evaluated the original submission to determine if the authors addressed their recommendations. In some cases, manuscripts have been rejected after the second review because of the authors' failure to adequately address the review comments. The increased rigor of our peer-review process has had the positive effect of reducing the average time from submission to final decision from 60 days to 31 days.

We are proud of these successes and will continue to brainstorm and implement practices to ensure the integrity of our processes and of the manuscripts we publish.

The Ochsner Journal is committed to the highest levels of professional standards and publication ethics and requires the same commitment from its authors and peer reviewers.

  • © Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal
Vol. 15, Issue 4
Dec 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
From the Editor's Desk: The Importance of Publication Ethics
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
From the Editor's Desk: The Importance of Publication Ethics
Ronald G. Amedee
Ochsner Journal Dec 2015, 15 (4) 397;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
From the Editor's Desk: The Importance of Publication Ethics
Ronald G. Amedee
Ochsner Journal Dec 2015, 15 (4) 397;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • Letters to the Editor
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Clinical Images: Interventional Management of Pediatric Rex Shunt Stenosis
  • Letters to the EditorBeware of Right Renal Vein Valves in Transplanted Kidneys: Renal Vein Valvuloplasty in a Donor KidneySeizure Caused by Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Inhibitor-Induced Central Nervous System DemyelinationPositron Emission Tomography-Positive Pleural-Based Nodule Following Talc Pleurodesis
  • From the Editor's Desk: A Focus on Organ Transplantation
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Current Post at the Blog

American Association for the Advancement of Science Surveys Scientists About Article Publishing Charges—And Uncovers More Problems

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2023 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire