Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
LetterArticle

Letters to the EditorHow Much Negative Pressure Are We Generating During Thoracentesis?Heat Stroke: A Public Health Crisis: Reflections from Pakistan

Abdul Hamid Alraiyes, Syed Uzair Mahmood, Fayez Kheir, Kassem Harris, Thomas R. Gildea, Maryam Zulfiqar and Maria Shoaib
Ochsner Journal September 2016, 16 (3) 194-196;
Abdul Hamid Alraiyes
Interventional Pulmonary Section, Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute and Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY
MD, FCCP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: abdul.alraiyes@roswellpark.org
Syed Uzair Mahmood
Medical Student, Sindh Medical College, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: uzair.hbb@gmail.com
Fayez Kheir
Division of Pulmonary Diseases, Critical Care and Environmental Medicine, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
MD, MSCR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kassem Harris
Interventional Pulmonary Section, Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute and Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY
MD, FCCP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas R. Gildea
Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
MD, FCCP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maryam Zulfiqar
Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Shoaib
Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: syedamariashoaib@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

How Much Negative Pressure Are We Generating During Thoracentesis?

To the Editor

:

Handheld digital pleural manometers (DPMs) are used to measure pleural pressure during thoracentesis. Lee et al demonstrated concordance between pleural pressure measurements done with a DPM and with an electronic transducer manometer.1

Only static intrathoracic pressure can be measured with the DPM. Pleural pressure is usually measured at the beginning of the thoracentesis (opening pressure), after removal of 240 cc of fluid, and at the end of the thoracentesis (closing pressure). To our knowledge, no published studies document the negative pressure that occurs during the actual drainage. This letter focuses on the difference between the negative pressures generated with manual intermittent suction (MIS) vs the negative pressure bottle (NPB).

CASE REPORT

A 73-year-old male with a history of stage IV adenocarcinoma of the lung presented with progressive shortness of breath. Thoracic ultrasound examination demonstrated a large right pleural effusion. Ultrasound-assisted right-side thoracentesis was performed, and a DPM was used to measure pressures during the procedure. Three static pleural pressure measurements were assessed: the opening pressure, the pressure after the removal of 240 cc of pleural fluid, and the closing pressure. An NPB was used, and a total of 800 cc of pleural fluid was removed. No signs of lung entrapment were evident. Thoracic ultrasound confirmed the total removal of the fluid and the presence of pleural sliding at the conclusion of the procedure. The patient tolerated the procedure, confirmed improvement of his respiratory symptoms, and denied any chest pain or cough. A week later, the patient presented with dyspnea on exertion and reported the feeling of pleural fluid accumulation. Thoracic ultrasound confirmed reformation of the pleural fluid, and 760 cc of fluid was removed using a manual 60-cc suction syringe. As during the previous procedure, 3 pleural pressure measurements were performed and revealed the absence of lung entrapment. On both occasions, we measured the negative pressure generated by the suction device. The negative pressure generated by the NPB started at approximately −115 cm H2O. Following the removal of 800 cc of fluid, the bottle pressure was approximately −75 cm H2O (Figure 1). On the other hand, when MIS was performed with a 60-cc syringe, the negative pressure was approximately −250 cm H2O each time with a fully pulled syringe (Figure 2). Despite the large difference between the negative pressures generated in each method, we saw no difference in the outcomes (Table).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Graph demonstrates the difference in negative pressure generated by a negative pressure bottle in relation to the volume of fluid removed while performing thoracentesis. On the right, a digital pleural manometer shows the negative pressure measurement at the start and at the end of the procedure.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Graph demonstrates the difference in negative pressure generated by manual intermittent suction with a 60-cc syringe (13 full 60-cc syringe suctions) in relation to the volume of fluid removed while performing thoracentesis. On the right, a digital pleural manometer shows the measurement of negative pressure at each full syringe suction.

DISCUSSION

The DPM is a new tool that can measure pleural pressure during thoracentesis.1,2 The DPM is especially useful for patients with a high risk of expansion pulmonary edema or with lung entrapment.3 Young patients with large pleural effusion (>3 L) and more than 7 days' duration of lung collapse are at risk for developing expansion pulmonary edema.4,5 Obtaining static measurements of the pleural pressure while performing thoracentesis can provide information about the intrathoracic pressure. The measurements identify any sudden drop in the intrathoracic pressure and provide an early sign of lung entrapment. Our patient did not have any signs of lung entrapment during either procedure.

The amount of negative pressure generated by the NPB and MIS during the fluid removal process is significantly different. Although we saw no difference in the outcomes at the end of each procedure, the amount of negative pressure generated with MIS exceeded the negative pressure generated by the NPB by approximately 100 cm H2O with each syringe filling. On the other hand, the negative pressure generated by the NPB is a continuous negative pressure throughout fluid drainage that is inversely reduced by the volume removed. One of the factors that can contribute to the development of expansion pulmonary edema is the speed of the fluid removal. Considering both methods, the negative pressure generated by MIS can reach approximately −250 cm H2O with full syringe expansion and can cause more rapid fluid removal. Also, MIS can cause intermittent fluctuations in the intrathoracic pressure. To avoid the rapid removal of fluid and pressure fluctuations while using MIS, a gentle manual negative pressure can be applied.

The outcomes of both procedures did not show that one method was superior to the other. However, the NPB method is less cost effective than MIS because of the price of the bottles.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Our findings are an eye-opener about the amount of pressure generated with manual fluid removal.6 However, the real negative pressure generated by each method cannot be confirmed by static intermittent measurement of the pleural pressure. Intrathoracic pressure should be continuously measured to obtain the real correlation between the negative pressure generated and the pleural pressure.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Lee HJ,
    2. Yarmus L,
    3. Kidd D.,
    4. et al.
    Comparison of pleural pressure measuring instruments. Chest. 2014 10; 146 4: 1007- 1012. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-3004. pmid:24853674
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Folch E,
    2. Mahajan A,
    3. Majid A.
    Pleural manometry: ready for prime time. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2013 10; 20 4: 297- 298. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000019. pmid:24162110
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Pannu J,
    2. DePew ZS,
    3. Mullon JJ,
    4. Daniels CE,
    5. Hagen CE,
    6. Maldonado F.
    Impact of pleural manometry on the development of chest discomfort during thoracentesis: a symptom-based study. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2014 10; 21 4: 306- 313. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000095. pmid:25321449
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Kasmani R,
    2. Irani F,
    3. Okoli K,
    4. Mahajan V.
    Re-expansion pulmonary edema following thoracentesis. CMAJ. 2010 12 14; 182 18: 2000- 2002. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090672. pmid:20643838
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Boshuizen RC,
    2. Sinaasappel M,
    3. Vincent AD,
    4. Goldfinger V,
    5. Farag S,
    6. van den Heuvel MM.
    Pleural pressure swing and lung expansion after malignant pleural effusion drainage: the benefits of high-temporal resolution pleural manometry. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2013 7; 20 3: 200- 205. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0b013e31829af168. pmid:23857193
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Salamonsen M,
    2. Ware R,
    3. Fielding D.
    A new method for performing continuous manometry during pleural effusion drainage. Respiration. 2014; 88 1: 61- 66. doi: 10.1159/000358842. pmid:24820119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Heat Stroke: A Public Health Crisis: Reflections from Pakistan

To the Editor

:

Heat stroke is a life-threatening emergency, defined as a body temperature of >40°C (>104°F), that can result in a systemic inflammatory response leading to multiorgan dysfunction in which encephalopathy tends to predominate.1 The mechanism of heat stroke includes direct tissue injury and cell death resulting from cytotoxicity and delayed organ dysfunction because of the activation of inflammatory and coagulation pathways.2

Heat exhaustion with nonspecific symptoms such as malaise, nausea, and headache precedes heat stroke. If heat exhaustion persists, it develops into heat stroke3 and principally affects the central nervous system, causing delirium and coma. Eventually, multiorgan failure ensues, giving rise to rhabdomyolysis, liver failure, cardiac arrhythmia, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and subsequent death. Heat stroke that is not induced by exercise has a high mortality rate (62.6%) even if the patient is managed in a timely way.4 People at high risk include the elderly (>75 years); young children (<4 years); individuals with limited mobility; alcoholics; and patients taking antipsychotics, sedative-hypnotics, anticholinergics, anti-Parkinson medications, and cardiovascular medications (beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, and vasodilators).5

Pakistan is located in South Asia where residents are highly dependent on agriculture and water resources for survival. The country is inadequately prepared for emergencies or calamities such as floods or high temperatures that can cause heat stroke.6 Pakistan ranks 135th in global greenhouse gas emissions per capita but ranks 16th in its vulnerability to climate change.7

In June 2015, Karachi, Pakistan, experienced an intense and prolonged heat wave that claimed 1,200 lives even though heat stroke relief centers were established. The Edhi Foundation, the largest charity organization in Pakistan, reported that 2 of their city morgues received more than 500 corpses as a result of death from the heat wave.2 A significant factor contributing to the death toll was that Muslims were observing the Islamic month of Ramadan, during which strict fasting is observed from sunrise to sunset. Fasting can result in significant dehydration, particularly during harsh weather.2

Heat-related mortality is an important public health concern, particularly in the context of climate change.8 The principal predictors of outcome in heat stroke are the duration and degree of hyperthermia.9 Treatment of mild heat exhaustion involves observing the patient in a cool, sheltered environment and ensuring the patient is sufficiently hydrated.3 For heat stroke, various methods are used to reduce the core body temperature. One of the most effective methods is to immerse the individual in ice water.9 Other methods include immediate cooling through evaporation, a variety of invasive techniques, and the use of chemical agents such as dantrolene.9 In addition, doctors must monitor electrolyte abnormalities and replace fluids in patients in a timely manner. The goal of the treatment process is to reduce the core body temperature to 39°C (102.2°F) and then to halt the reduction in the body temperature to avoid hypothermia.10

Experts believe that doctors and public health officials should focus on preventing the incidence of heat stroke. Identifying susceptible individuals, raising awareness through print and electronic media, and establishing heat shelters may help prevent heat-related illness. These preventive measures, when paired with wise recognition of the early signs of heat-related illness, can allow physicians in the ambulatory setting to prevent significant morbidity and mortality associated with heat exhaustion and heat stroke.3

Malik et al have suggested that the government needs to direct its efforts to the socioeconomic uplift of resource-poor areas to reduce their populations' vulnerability to the adverse effects of climate change.6 Emergency mass causality drills should be practiced in the country's major hospitals to ensure staff are prepared for natural disasters. Bed capacity should be monitored through a central government communication center that can facilitate efficient contact and transfers between hospitals, giving prime importance to high quality patient care.

Finally, the population needs to be educated regarding first aid strategies to use during a heat wave, such as applying cold water to the skin, placing ice packs on the groin and axilla, and immersing the overheated individual in cool water. Encouraging oral consumption of fluids and seeking proper medical attention are equally important. The general public should also be made aware of the concept of emergency triage and how the overuse of hospital resources can result in delays in delivering proper medical attention to deserving patients.11

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Bouchama A,
    2. Knochel JP.
    Heat stroke. N Engl J Med. 2002 6 20; 346 25: 1978- 1988. pmid:12075060
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Baig MA,
    2. Waheed S,
    3. Mian A,
    4. Hussain E.
    Unforgiving heat wave deaths in the largest metropolitan city of Pakistan: lessons learned. Eurasian J Emerg Med. 2015 9 3; 14: 209- 210. doi: 10.5152/eajem.2015.03411.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Glazer JL.
    Management of heatstroke and heat exhaustion. Am Fam Physician. 2005 6 1; 71 11: 2133- 2140. pmid:15952443
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Misset B,
    2. De Jonghe B,
    3. Bastuji-Garin S,
    4. et al.
    Mortality of patients with heatstroke admitted to intensive care units during the 2003 heat wave in France: a national multiple-center risk-factor study. Crit Care Med. 2006 4; 34 4: 1087- 1092. pmid:16484920
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Semenza JC,
    2. Rubin CH,
    3. Falter KH,
    4. et al.
    Heat-related deaths during the July 1995 heat wave in Chicago. N Engl J Med. 1996 7 11; 335 2: 84- 90. pmid:8649494
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Malik SM,
    2. Awan H,
    3. Khan N.
    Mapping vulnerability to climate change and its repercussions on human health in Pakistan. Global Health. 2012 9 3; 8: 31. pmid:22938568
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Khan MA,
    2. Khan JA,
    3. Ali Z,
    4. Ahmad I,
    5. Ahmad MN.
    The challenge of climate change and policy response in Pakistan. Environ Earth Sci. 2016 2; 75 5: 412- 428. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-5127-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Huang C,
    2. Barnett AG,
    3. Wang X,
    4. Vaneckova P,
    5. FitzGerald G,
    6. Tong S.
    Projecting future heat-related mortality under climate change scenarios: a systematic review. Environ Health Perspect. 2011 12; 119 12: 1681- 1690. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103456. pmid:21816703
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Smith JE.
    Cooling methods used in the treatment of exertional heat illness. Br J Sports Med. 2005 8; 39 8: 503- 507; discussion 507. pmid:16046331
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Bouchama A,
    2. Dehbi M,
    3. Chaves-Carballo E.
    Cooling and hemodynamic management in heatstroke: practical recommendations. Crit Care. 2007; 11 3: R54. pmid:17498312
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Uscher-Pines L,
    2. Pines J,
    3. Kellermann A,
    4. Gillen E,
    5. Mehrotra A.
    Emergency department visits for nonurgent conditions: systematic literature review. Am J Manag Care. 2013 1; 19 1: 47- 59. pmid:23379744
    OpenUrlPubMed
  • © Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal
Vol. 16, Issue 3
Sep 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Letters to the EditorHow Much Negative Pressure Are We Generating During Thoracentesis?Heat Stroke: A Public Health Crisis: Reflections from Pakistan
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Letters to the EditorHow Much Negative Pressure Are We Generating During Thoracentesis?Heat Stroke: A Public Health Crisis: Reflections from Pakistan
Abdul Hamid Alraiyes, Syed Uzair Mahmood, Fayez Kheir, Kassem Harris, Thomas R. Gildea, Maryam Zulfiqar, Maria Shoaib
Ochsner Journal Sep 2016, 16 (3) 194-196;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Letters to the EditorHow Much Negative Pressure Are We Generating During Thoracentesis?Heat Stroke: A Public Health Crisis: Reflections from Pakistan
Abdul Hamid Alraiyes, Syed Uzair Mahmood, Fayez Kheir, Kassem Harris, Thomas R. Gildea, Maryam Zulfiqar, Maria Shoaib
Ochsner Journal Sep 2016, 16 (3) 194-196;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • To the Editor
    • CASE REPORT
    • DISCUSSION
    • REFERENCES
    • To the Editor
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • From the Editor's Desk: A Focus on Organ Transplantation
  • Clinical Images: Interventional Management of Pediatric Rex Shunt Stenosis
  • Letters to the EditorBeware of Right Renal Vein Valves in Transplanted Kidneys: Renal Vein Valvuloplasty in a Donor KidneySeizure Caused by Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Inhibitor-Induced Central Nervous System DemyelinationPositron Emission Tomography-Positive Pleural-Based Nodule Following Talc Pleurodesis
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Ochsner Journal Blog

Current Post

Be Careful Where You Publish

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2025 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire