Letters to the EditorHow Much Negative Pressure Are We Generating During Thoracentesis?Heat Stroke: A Public Health Crisis: Reflections from Pakistan

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Lee HJ,
   2. Yarmus L,
   3. Kidd D.,
   4. et al.

   Comparison of pleural pressure measuring instruments. Chest. 2014 10; 146 4: 1007- 1012. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-3004. pmid:24853674

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. ↵
   1. Folch E,
   2. Mahajan A,
   3. Majid A.

   Pleural manometry: ready for prime time. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2013 10; 20 4: 297- 298. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000019. pmid:24162110

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. ↵
   1. Pannu J,
   2. DePew ZS,
   3. Mullon JJ,
   4. Daniels CE,
   5. Hagen CE,
   6. Maldonado F.

   Impact of pleural manometry on the development of chest discomfort during thoracentesis: a symptom-based study. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2014 10; 21 4: 306- 313. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000095. pmid:25321449

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. ↵
   1. Kasmani R,
   2. Irani F,
   3. Okoli K,
   4. Mahajan V.

   Re-expansion pulmonary edema following thoracentesis. CMAJ. 2010 12 14; 182 18: 2000- 2002. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090672. pmid:20643838

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
5. ↵
   1. Boshuizen RC,
   2. Sinaasappel M,
   3. Vincent AD,
   4. Goldfinger V,
   5. Farag S,
   6. van den Heuvel MM.

   Pleural pressure swing and lung expansion after malignant pleural effusion drainage: the benefits of high-temporal resolution pleural manometry. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2013 7; 20 3: 200- 205. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0b013e31829af168. pmid:23857193

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. ↵
   1. Salamonsen M,
   2. Ware R,
   3. Fielding D.

   A new method for performing continuous manometry during pleural effusion drainage. Respiration. 2014; 88 1: 61- 66. doi: 10.1159/000358842. pmid:24820119

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed