Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement for Penile Prosthesis

REFERENCES

1. ↵
   1. Bernal RM,
   2. Henry GD.

   Contemporary patient satisfaction rates for three-piece inflatable penile prostheses. Adv Urol. 2012; 2012: 707321 doi: 10.1155/2012/707321. pmid:22899909

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. ↵
   1. Aaronson NK.

   Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: methodologic issues. Control Clin Trials. 1989 12; 10 4 suppl: 195S- 208S. pmid:2605968

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. ↵
   1. Viktrup L,
   2. Hayes RP,
   3. Wang P,
   4. Shen W.

   Construct validation of patient global impression of severity (PGI-S) and improvement (PGI-I) questionnaires in the treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. BMC Urol. 2012; 12: 30 doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-12-30. pmid:23134716

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. 1. Yalcin I,
   2. Bump RC.

   Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 7; 189 1: 98- 101. pmid:12861145

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 1. Srikrishna S,
   2. Robinson D,
   3. Cardozo L.

   Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 5; 21 5: 523- 528. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1069-5. pmid:20013110

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. ↵
   1. Twiss CO,
   2. Fischer MC,
   3. Nitti VW.

   Comparison between reduction in 24-hour pad weight, International Consultation of Incontinence-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and Post-Operative Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score in patient evaluation after male perineal sling. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007; 26 1: 8- 13. pmid:17016797

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. ↵
   1. Guy W.

   ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology: Revised, 1976. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1976: 217- 222.
8. ↵
   1. Slevin ML,
   2. Plant H,
   3. Lynch D,
   4. Drinkwater J,
   5. Gregory WM.

   Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? Br J Cancer. 1988 1; 57 1: 109- 112. pmid:3348942

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Rosen RC,
   2. Cappelleri JC,
   3. Smith MD,
   4. Lipsky J,
   5. Peña BM.

   Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999 12; 11 6: 319- 326. pmid:10637462

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 1. Russo R.

    Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences: An Introduction. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press; 2003.
11. ↵
    1. Althof SE,
    2. Corty EW,
    3. Levine SB,
    4. et al.

    EDITS: development of questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction with treatments for erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1999 4; 53 4: 793- 799. pmid:10197859

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Mulhall JP,
    2. Ahmed A,
    3. Branch J,
    4. Parker M.

    Serial assessment of efficacy and satisfaction profiles following penile prosthesis surgery. J Urol. 2003 4; 169 4: 1429- 1433. pmid:12629377

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Wintner LM,
    2. Giesinger JM,
    3. Kemmler G,
    4. et al.

    The benefits of using patient-reported outcomes in cancer treatment: an overview [in German]. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2012. May; 124 9-10: 293- 303. doi: 10.1007/s00508-012-0168-3. pmid:22538839

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed