Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
LetterArticles

Letter to the Editor: A Delayed Diagnosis of Iatrogenic Guidewire Retention After Central Line Placement

Pichapong Tunsupon, Andrea Tara Providence and Pojchawan Yampikulsakul
Ochsner Journal September 2017, 17 (3) 216-217;
Pichapong Tunsupon
1Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Tara Providence
2Department of Medicine, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pojchawan Yampikulsakul
2Department of Medicine, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

TO THE EDITOR

Central line placement is a life-saving procedure commonly performed in the intensive care unit (ICU) for various indications, including intravenous fluid resuscitation, hemodynamic monitoring, vasopressor infusion, hemodialysis, and parenteral nutrition. Complications have occurred after central line placement, such as arrhythmia, pneumothorax, and vascular injury. We describe a case of iatrogenic guidewire retention in the inferior vena cava, show the chest x-ray finding, and identify preventive measures to avoid this complication. We emphasize that physicians must learn the abnormal chest x-ray of guidewire retention and interpret the chest x-ray after central line placement themselves to avoid a delayed diagnosis of guidewire retention.

CASE REPORT

A 92-year-old-woman was admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of septic shock from urosepsis that occurred after outpatient lithotripsy and right ureteral stent placement. Physical examination was significant for high-grade temperature, hypotension, and tachycardia. Laboratory findings were significant for leukocytosis and serum lactate of 6 mmol/L. A right internal jugular vein central line was cannulated with the Seldinger technique (insertion of a catheter over a flexible J-point guidewire) for administration of vasopressors and intravenous fluid. A routine chest x-ray postprocedure was done (Figure 1). Upon chart review, we learned that the patient had been admitted to the ICU 2 months earlier with a similar diagnosis of a right ureteral stone complicated by acute pyelonephritis and septic shock requiring central line placement through the right femoral vein by an emergency department training physician at 3:00 am. Chest x-ray during that admission revealed a similar radiographic finding (Figure 2). The diagnosis of iatrogenic guidewire retention was established. The guidewire was successfully removed by interventional radiology under fluoroscopy without complication.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Chest x-ray postprocedure shows a metal-opaque structure with a J-point projecting toward the right lung apex extending distally into the abdomen, below the lower limits of the radiographic examination. The right neck central line tip projects at the superior vena cava.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

An official reading from radiology reported as a catheter extends over the right neck, right paraspinal region into the right upper abdomen and out of the field of view, which misled the physicians who read the report without interpreting the actual image.

DISCUSSION

When reviewing the chest x-ray after central line placement, physicians must confirm the position of the line, the absence of pneumothorax, and potential iatrogenic guidewire retention. Guidewire retention from any site of cannulation could lead to a mortality rate up to 20%.1 Retention can occur when the physician does not hold the proximal end of the guidewire all the time during cannulation of the central line, and the wire is not properly removed from the venous lumen. Generally, guidewire retention is not recognized immediately after central line placement. The guidewire could be left in the circulation up to 17 months without symptoms.2 Factors contributing to guidewire retention include physician inexperience, inadequate supervision, a hastily performed procedure, and overworked house staff physicians.3 Completing a checklist postprocedure with the nursing staff is imperative to confirm that all the equipment is accounted for, including the appropriate disposal of the guidewire. The radiologist should notify the physician directly of abnormal findings. In addition, reviewing previous chest images is mandatory to determine if the complication occurred after the previous procedure as for this patient.

  • © Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation 2017

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Heberer M,
    2. Moser J,
    3. Dürig M,
    4. Harder F
    Prospective study of complications of central venous catheters [in German]. Infusionsther Klin Ernahr. 1984 10; 11 5: 254- 261. pmid:6439638
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Gunduz Y,
    2. Vatan MB,
    3. Osken A,
    4. Cakar MA
    A delayed diagnosis of a retained guidewire during central venous catheterisation: a case report and review of the literature. BMJ Case Rep. 2012 Nov 19;2012. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2012-007064.
  3. ↵
    1. Taslimi R,
    2. Safari S,
    3. Kazemeini A,
    4. Aminian A,
    5. Joneidi E,
    6. Larti F
    Abdominal pain due to a lost guidewire: a case report. Cases J. 2009 8 12; 2: 6680 doi: 10.4076/1757-1626-2-6680. pmid:19918535
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal
Vol. 17, Issue 3
Sep 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Letter to the Editor: A Delayed Diagnosis of Iatrogenic Guidewire Retention After Central Line Placement
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Letter to the Editor: A Delayed Diagnosis of Iatrogenic Guidewire Retention After Central Line Placement
Pichapong Tunsupon, Andrea Tara Providence, Pojchawan Yampikulsakul
Ochsner Journal Sep 2017, 17 (3) 216-217;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Letter to the Editor: A Delayed Diagnosis of Iatrogenic Guidewire Retention After Central Line Placement
Pichapong Tunsupon, Andrea Tara Providence, Pojchawan Yampikulsakul
Ochsner Journal Sep 2017, 17 (3) 216-217;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • TO THE EDITOR
    • CASE REPORT
    • DISCUSSION
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Clinical Images: A Rare Case of Cryptococcal Meningoencephalitis in an Immunocompetent Patient
  • Welcome Home and Welcome to the Healthcare Team at Ochsnera
  • Letter to the Editor: Bicuspid Aortic Valve–Family Screening and Indications for Intervention
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2026 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire