Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
Research ArticleArticles

Clinical Images: Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Reduction for Management of Recurrent Hepatic Encephalopathy

Hafez Khalili, Daryl Goldman, Sarah Frischhertz and David Kirsch
Ochsner Journal December 2017, 17 (4) 311-316;
Hafez Khalili
1Department of Radiology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daryl Goldman
2The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Frischhertz
1Department of Radiology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Kirsch
1Department of Radiology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
2The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

INTRODUCTION

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is currently one of the major treatment modalities for complications associated with portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis.1 The TIPS procedure entails the formation of a low-resistance conduit between the hepatic and portal veins, thereby bypassing the liver parenchyma. One of the major complications associated with TIPS, reported to occur in 15%-30% of TIPS cases,2 is new or worsened hepatic encephalopathy (HE) which can be severely debilitating, with symptoms including confusion, disorientation, lethargy, and frank obtundation. The primary treatment for recurrent HE following TIPS is similar to the treatment provided to any encephalopathic patient and begins with a search for precipitating factors such as infection, electrolyte abnormalities, bleeding, and constipation. Medical treatment with agents such as lactulose and nonabsorbable antibiotics such as rifaximin are usually successful in reversing the problem.3 However, further intervention including shunt reduction or occlusion and organ transplantation is estimated to be required in 3%-7% of patients who continue to suffer from refractory HE.3

We present a case of refractory HE post TIPS revision that was treated with shunt reduction. TIPS revision is a safe and effective procedure for restoring shunt patency if the TIPS becomes occluded. TIPS reduction is a procedure that decreases the diameter of the lumen of the TIPS and subsequently allows less flow through the shunt.

HISTORY

A 61-year-old male undergoing outpatient evaluation for liver transplantation because of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis and symptomatic portal hypertension presented for recurrent debilitating encephalopathy secondary to prior TIPS procedure. His TIPS had been placed at another institution on November 9, 2015. The patient's HE had been managed medically with lactulose and rifaximin.

RADIOGRAPHIC APPEARANCE AND TREATMENT

Hepatic ultrasound with Doppler performed at Ochsner approximately 10 months after original TIPS placement showed the shunt to be patent but with potential dysfunction as evidenced by loss of expected retrograde right portal venous flow (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Ultrasound Doppler with spectral analysis demonstrates loss of expected retrograde flow in the right portal vein.

On September 28, 2016, TIPS evaluation and revision were performed by interventional radiology. A 5-French (Fr) MPV catheter (Merit Medical Systems, Inc.) was used to select the right hepatic vein and a Glidewire was advanced through the shunt. The catheter was placed into the portal vein. Portogram demonstrated shunt patency with adequate direction of flow within the shunt. The stent was dilated using a 10-mm balloon (Figure 2). Final images demonstrated patency of the TIPS shunt and flow of contrast material across the stent. The revision resulted in successful reduction of the portosystemic gradient to approximately 10 mmHg from 13 mmHg (Table).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Fluoroscopic image demonstrates wire extending from the inferior vena cava to the hepatic vein through the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) into the portal system. The TIPS stent was dilated with a 10-mm balloon, reducing the portosystemic gradient from 13 mmHg to 10 mmHg.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table.

Preprocedure and Postprocedure Pressures

Follow-up ultrasound with Doppler performed on October 18, 2016, showed appropriate flow through the stent. However, the patient developed debilitating encephalopathy post TIPS revision, and the patient was referred for possible TIPS reduction. After discussing the risks of increasing the portosystemic gradient with the patient's family, TIPS reduction was performed on November 4, 2016.

First, two access sites were made within the right jugular vein, and two 0.035 wires were placed into the inferior vena cava. Tandem 6-Fr and 10-Fr sheaths were placed. Two wires were advanced through the TIPS. A pigtail catheter was placed into the portal vein. Images (not shown) demonstrated no stenosis within the shunt, brisk shunting through the TIPS, and the absence of collateral filling within esophageal varices. The initial portosystemic gradient across the TIPS was 12 mmHg. Through the 6-Fr sheath, a 7-mm diameter × 17-mm length balloon-expandable Genesis stent (Boston Scientific) was placed. Through the 10-Fr sheath, a new 10-mm diameter, 2-cm uncovered, 7-cm covered VIATORR stent (Gore Medical) was brought into position within the TIPS. The balloon-expandable stent was expanded in the middle of the covered portion of the existing TIPS, and the VIATORR stent was deployed over the Genesis stent with the balloon inflated. The proximal and distal ends of the TIPS were balloon dilated (Figure 3). The balloon and the wire for the balloon-expandable stent were removed. This procedure resulted in successful reduction of the TIPS with an appropriate increase in the portosystemic gradient to approximately 17 mmHg from 12 mmHg. Postreduction pressures within the portal vein and right atrium are shown in the Table. Final fluoroscopic images demonstrated patency of the TIPS. Figure 4 is a fluoroscopic image from a different patient that illustrates the same TIPS reduction procedure. Follow-up computed tomography demonstrated final Genesis stent positioning (Figure 5). At the 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month follow-ups post TIPS reduction, the patient reported significant improvement with no clinical signs of HE. Endoscopy approximately 2 months post TIPS reduction showed no evidence of esophageal variceal bleeding.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

A. The new stent is deployed over a balloon-expanded Genesis stent. B. Cross-section of the reduced stent. I, balloon expandable Genesis stent; II, lumen of the new covered VIATORR stent; III, existing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; IV, wire.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Digital subtraction angiography image from a different patient demonstrates appropriate post transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt reducing stent reduction in the mid-shunt lumen.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

A. Axial computed tomography (CT) image of the liver shows the deployed Genesis stent (top arrow) and the reduced patent lumen of the new VIATORR stent (bottom arrow). B. Coronal CT image demonstrates 1.7-cm total length of the Genesis stent.

Follow-up ultrasound with Doppler (Figure 6) was performed 10 days post TIPS reduction. Ultrasound demonstrated approximately 50% narrowing of the TIPS and associated elevated velocities at the hepatic venous end consistent with successful TIPS reduction.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Ultrasound power Doppler images show flow prior to TIPS reduction (A) and the expected results with elevated velocity and 50% narrowing at the hepatic vein end of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) after TIPS reduction (B).

DISCUSSION

This case demonstrates the common complication of refractory HE following TIPS and is also an example of how shunt reduction has become a key element in TIPS-related refractory HE treatment.3 Previous studies have demonstrated 58%-71% clinical success in treatment of refractory HE via shunt reduction.3-5 While this success rate clearly shows the clinical value in shunt reduction for a potentially debilitating process, caution is advised prior to pursuing reduction because the initial indication for TIPS may recur postprocedure. In particular, ascites may recur in 60% of cases after shunt reduction, risking the development of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.1 Less commonly, recurrent variceal bleeding has been reported in 9.3% of cases after shunt reduction; consequently, prereduction variceal banding is advised to reduce this complication.1 While the recurrent sequela of portal hypertension is a risk, patients with refractory HE who are not transplant candidates have limited options for treatment after failing medical therapy.1 Proven options such as TIPS-reducing stents provide benefit and can significantly improve quality of life.

As discussed above, endovascular management, such as shunt reduction or occlusion, is often successful for treating patients with TIPS-related refractory HE; however, management pathways need to be adopted for patients in whom the procedure is unsuccessful.3 Pereira et al identified the major mechanisms involved in unsuccessful endovascular management as liver failure or the presence of spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS).3 When liver failure is the cause of HE, liver transplantation is the remaining treatment option. When SPSS is the cause of HE, treatment options before transplantation need to be considered. SPSS result from an increased portosystemic gradient causing intrahepatic or extrahepatic collateral flow and are found in 40% of patients with cirrhosis and in 46%-70% of patients with HE.3 The collateral flow bypasses the liver and shunts blood into the systemic circulation; the resulting decreased hepatic clearance of ammonia and other neurotoxins can lead to HE.2 Treatment options for SPSS include balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO), balloon-occluded antegrade transvenous obliteration (BATO), or a modified retrograde approach from a variety of systemic vascular access points.2 BRTO is an endovascular technique that has been used to occlude gastric varices.2 A balloon is introduced into the outflow vein by a retrograde approach through the shunt and is used to occlude blood flow. A sclerosant is then placed proximal to the site of balloon occlusion.6 As its name suggests, BATO is similar to BRTO but takes an antegrade approach, usually from the portal veins.3

Splenic artery embolization (SAE) has become an option for the management of complications caused by portal hypertension as both an adjunct to BRTO and as a salvage option after previous treatments have failed.3,7 Yoshida et al showed that a combination of BRTO and SAE correlated with a greater reduction in HE episodes compared to BRTO alone.7 While BRTO successfully treats the SPSS, it is not without complications as it can lead to increased portal venous pressure and portal congestion.3 In these cases, SAE has been successful in preventing new SPSS formation by reducing portal flow and pressure.3 Simultaneously, SAE likely increases blood flow to the liver, aiding HE resolution through improved hepatic function.3

We agree with Pereira et al that their proposed clinical practice algorithm and guidelines should be adopted for the optimal endovascular management of TIPS-related refractory HE.3 In addition to adopting this treatment algorithm and future technique improvement, early identification and management of potential complications of SPSS prior to TIPS procedure could result in less posttreatment HE and reduced risk for patients. Because postprocedure complications are significant in number, continued efforts to reduce complications must be pursued. In the meantime, this clinical management algorithm should be applied when these complications occur.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter of this article.

  • © Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation 2017

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kochar N,
    2. Tripathi D,
    3. Ireland H,
    4. Redhead DN,
    5. Hayes PC
    Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPSS) modification in the management of post-TIPSS refractory hepatic encephalopathy. Gut. 2006 11; 55 11: 1617- 1623. pmid:16571635
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sanyal AJ,
    2. Freedman AM,
    3. Shiffman ML,
    4. Purdum PP 3rd,.,
    5. Luketic VA,
    6. Cheatham AK
    Portosystemic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: Results of a prospective controlled study. Hepatology. 1994 7; 20 1 Pt 1: 46- 55. pmid:8020904
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Pereira K,
    2. Carrion AF,
    3. Salsamendi J,
    4. Doshi M,
    5. Baker R,
    6. Kably I
    Endovascular management of refractory hepatic encephalopathy complication of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): comprehensive review and clinical practice algorithm. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016 2; 39 2: 170- 182. doi: 10.1007/s00270-015-1197-x. pmid:26285910
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.
    1. Rossi P,
    2. Salvatori FM,
    3. Fanelli F,
    4. et al.
    Polytetrafluoroethylene-covered nitinol stent-graft for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: 3-year experience. Radiology. 2004 6; 231 3: 820- 830. pmid:15118117
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fanelli F,
    2. Salvatori FM,
    3. Rabuffi P,
    4. et al.
    Management of refractory hepatic encephalopathy after insertion of TIPS: long-term results of shunt reduction with hourglass-shaped balloon-expandable stent-graft. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 12; 193 6: 1696- 1702. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2968. pmid:19933667
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Saad WEA
    Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices: concept, basic techniques, and outcomes. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2012 6; 29 2: 118- 128. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1312573. pmid:23729982
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Yoshida H,
    2. Mamada Y,
    3. Taniai N,
    4. et al.
    Long-term results of partial splenic artery embolization as supplemental treatment for portal-systemic encephalopathy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 1; 100 1: 43- 47. pmid:15654779
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal
Vol. 17, Issue 4
Dec 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Images: Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Reduction for Management of Recurrent Hepatic Encephalopathy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Clinical Images: Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Reduction for Management of Recurrent Hepatic Encephalopathy
Hafez Khalili, Daryl Goldman, Sarah Frischhertz, David Kirsch
Ochsner Journal Dec 2017, 17 (4) 311-316;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Clinical Images: Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Reduction for Management of Recurrent Hepatic Encephalopathy
Hafez Khalili, Daryl Goldman, Sarah Frischhertz, David Kirsch
Ochsner Journal Dec 2017, 17 (4) 311-316;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • INTRODUCTION
    • HISTORY
    • RADIOGRAPHIC APPEARANCE AND TREATMENT
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Letter to the Editor: Bicuspid Aortic Valve–Family Screening and Indications for Intervention
  • Letter to the Editor: Diagnosing Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathy With Lactic Acidosis and Stroke-Like Episodes (MELAS) Requires Not Only Phenotypic But Also Genotypic Verification
  • From the Editor's Desk: Welcome to Spring!
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Current Post at the Blog

American Association for the Advancement of Science Surveys Scientists About Article Publishing Charges—And Uncovers More Problems

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2023 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire