Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
Research ArticleORIGINAL RESEARCH
Open Access

Impact of Low-Dose Computed Tomography on Computed Tomography Orders and Scan Length

Curtis Simmons and James Milburn
Ochsner Journal December 2019, 19 (4) 303-308; DOI: https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0008
Curtis Simmons
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
MD, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: simmons.curtis{at}mayo.edu
James Milburn
2Department of Radiology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure.

    Histograms of size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) and computed tomography dose index (CTDI) volume by frequency before and after iterative reconstruction.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Number of Computed Tomography (CT) Scans in 2013 Based on Aggregated Billing Data

    TypeNumber of Scans
    Head61,811
    Neck6,089
    Chest41,014
    Abdomena8,601
    Abdomen/pelvisa65,250
    Renal stone studya1,339
    Pelvis1,316
    Spine13,068
    Extremities3,784
    CT-guided study1,294
    CT-angiogram20,896
    Other15,372
    Total239,834
    • ↵aAbdomen and abdomen/pelvis scans and renal stone studies were combined for analysis (n=75,190).

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Patient Demographics and Computed Tomography Factors Analyzed Before and After Iterative Reconstruction Presented by Analysis Phase

    Assessment Timepoint
    Phase/VariablesPre-ASIR, JulyPost-ASIR, November
    Phase 1n=243n=233P-Value
     Mean age, years, all patients (range)52 ± 20 (10-92)53 ± 20 (4-94)0.59
     Male, n (%)112 (46)106 (45)
     Male mean age, years (range)53 ± 18 (10-87)56 ± 20 (4-89)0.45
     Female, n (%)131 (54)127 (55)
     Female mean age, years (range)51 ± 21 (16-92)51 ± 21 (20-94)1.0
     Mean CTDIvol, mGy17.5 ± 5.711.0 ± 6.0<0.001
     Mean AP dimension, cm26.4 ± 5.326.1 ± 5.00.48
     Mean lateral dimension, cm34.4 ± 4.934.3 ± 5.10.80
     Mean AP+lateral dimensions, cm60.8 ± 9.860.3 ± 9.80.62
     Mean length of scan, cm45.1 ± 7.543.7 ± 10.40.08
     Mean SSDE (AP), mGy20.3 ± 4.612.5 ± 5.1<0.001
     Mean SSDE (AP+lateral), mGy20.8 ± 5.012.7 ± 5.1<0.001
     Mean number of phases1.27 ± 0.601.29 ± 0.630.79
    Pre-ASIR, JulyPost-ASIR, November
    Phase 2n=199n=184
     Mean age, years, all patients (range)52 ± 20 (10-92)52 ± 21 (4-94)1.0
     Male, n (%)90 (45)84 (46)
     Male mean age, years (range)54 ± 19 (10-87)53 ± 21 (4-89)0.74
     Female, n (%)109 (55)100 (54)
     Female mean age, years (range)50 ± 21 (16-92)50 ± 21 (20-94)1.0
     Mean number of phases1.3 ± 0.61.3 ± 0.60.79
     Mean DLP, mGy*cm1,076 ± 527715 ± 512<0.001
    Pre-ASIR, June/JulyPost-ASIR, October/November
    Phase 3n=408n=389
     Mean age, years, all patients (range)52 ± 20 (6-97)50 ± 21 (4-94)0.17
     Male, n (%)157 (38)171 (44)
     Male mean age, years (range)54 ± 19 (10-97)52 ± 21 (4-93)0.37
     Female, n (%)251 (62)218 (56)
     Female mean age, years (range)51 ± 21 (6-93)49 ± 21 (7-94)0.31
     Mean number of phases1.2 ± 0.51.3 ± 0.60.15
     Mean DLP, mGy*cm1,069 ± 634676 ± 480<0.001
    • AP, anterior-posterior; ASIR, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction; CDTIvol, computed tomography dose index volume; DLP, dose length product; SSDE, size-specific dose estimate.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal: 19 (4)
Ochsner Journal
Vol. 19, Issue 4
Dec 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of Low-Dose Computed Tomography on Computed Tomography Orders and Scan Length
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Impact of Low-Dose Computed Tomography on Computed Tomography Orders and Scan Length
Curtis Simmons, James Milburn
Ochsner Journal Dec 2019, 19 (4) 303-308; DOI: 10.31486/toj.19.0008

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of Low-Dose Computed Tomography on Computed Tomography Orders and Scan Length
Curtis Simmons, James Milburn
Ochsner Journal Dec 2019, 19 (4) 303-308; DOI: 10.31486/toj.19.0008
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Short-Term Risk of Complications Related to Obstructive Sleep Apnea After Sinonasal Surgery
  • Effect of Statin Potency on Rapid Coronary Intimal Thickening and Rejection in Heart Transplant Recipients
  • Examination of Aeroallergen Sensitization Patterns in Southeastern Louisiana
Show more ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Dose-response relationship–radiation
  • radiation exposure
  • radiology
  • retrospective studies
  • tomography–x-ray computed

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2026 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire