Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
Review ArticleREVIEWS AND CONTEMPORARY UPDATES
Open Access

Understanding Broad Consent

John W. Maloy and Pat F. Bass
Ochsner Journal March 2020, 20 (1) 81-86; DOI: https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.19.0088
John W. Maloy
1Assistant Vice Chancellor for Research Management, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA
JD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jmalo1{at}lsuhsc.edu
Pat F. Bass III
2Office of Research, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA
MD, MS, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Federal policy for the protection of human subjects (‘common rule’). Office for Human Research Protection. Department of Health and Human Services. www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/common-rule/index.html. Accessed November 12, 2019.
  2. 2.↵
    Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Federal Regist. 2017 Jan 19;82(12). www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2017-01-19/pdf/2017-01058.pdf. Accessed November 11, 2019.
  3. 3.↵
    Revised common rule. Office for Human Research Protections. Department of Health and Human Services. www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/finalized-revisions-common-rule/index.html. Accessed November 12, 2019.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Swerdlow PS,
    2. Macrina FL.
    Use of humans in biomedical experimentation. In: Macrina FL, ed. Scientific Integrity. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2003:137.
  5. 5.↵
    Companion Q&As about the revised common rule. Office for Human Research Protections. Department of Health and Human Services. www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/Revised-Common-Rule-Q-and-As-march2019.pdf#page7. Updated February 25, 2019. Accessed November 12, 2019.
  6. 6.↵
    General requirements for informed consent. 45 CFR §46.116. US Department of Health and Human Services. www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=83cd09e1c0f5c6937cd9d7513160fc3f&pitd=20180719&n=pt45.1.46&r=PART&ty=HTML#se45.1.46_1116. Accessed November 12, 2019.
  7. 7.↵
    Definitions for purposes of this policy. 45 CFR §46.102(e)(5). US Department of Health and Human Services. www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=83cd09e1c0f5c6937cd9d7513160fc3f&pitd=20180719&n=pt45.1.46&r=PART&ty=HTML#se45.1.46_1102. Accessed November 12, 2019.
  8. 8.↵
    Bureau of justice statistics. 34 USC §10132. Office of the Law Revision Counsel. United States Code. uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title34-section10132&num=0&edition=prelim. Accessed November 11, 2019.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lynch HF,
    2. Wolf LE,
    3. Barnes M
    . Implementing regulatory broad consent under the revised common rule: clarifying key points and the need for evidence. J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Jun;47(2):213-231. doi: 10.1177/1073110519857277.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    IRB review of research. 45 CFR §46.109. US Department of Health and Human Services. www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=83cd09e1c0f5c6937cd9d7513160fc3f&pitd=20180719&n=pt45.1.46&r=PART&ty=HTML#se45.1.46_1109. Accessed November 12, 2019.
  11. 11.↵
    Exempt research. 45 CFR §46.104. US Department of Health and Human Services. www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=83cd09e1c0f5c6937cd9d7513160fc3f&pitd=20180719&n=pt45.1.46&r=PART&ty=HTML#se45.1.46_1104. Accessed November 12, 2019.
  12. 12.↵
    Criteria for IRB approval of research. 45 CFR §46.111. US Department of Health and Human Services. www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=83cd09e1c0f5c6937cd9d7513160fc3f&pitd=20180719&n=pt45.1.46&r=PART&ty=HTML#se45.1.46_1111. Accessed November 12, 2019.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal: 20 (1)
Ochsner Journal
Vol. 20, Issue 1
Mar 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Understanding Broad Consent
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Understanding Broad Consent
John W. Maloy, Pat F. Bass
Ochsner Journal Mar 2020, 20 (1) 81-86; DOI: 10.31486/toj.19.0088

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Understanding Broad Consent
John W. Maloy, Pat F. Bass
Ochsner Journal Mar 2020, 20 (1) 81-86; DOI: 10.31486/toj.19.0088
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • DEFINITION AND ELEMENTS OF BROAD CONSENT
    • THE ROLE OF BROAD CONSENT UNDER THE REVISED COMMON RULE
    • USING BROAD CONSENT
    • EXEMPT RESEARCH AND LIMITED INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD REVIEW RELATED TO BROAD CONSENT
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • An Open Access Collaborative Global Virtual Biorepository System (VBS): A Delphi Consensus
  • Chinas Personal Information Protection Law
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Pharmacologic Management of Central Fever in Patients With Acute Brain Injury
  • Beta-Blocker Usage in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction During Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Hospitalizations
  • Impact of Coffee Consumption on Cardiovascular Health
Show more REVIEWS AND CONTEMPORARY UPDATES

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Ethics committees–research
  • informed consent
  • research
  • research personnel
  • research subjects

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2025 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire