Exemptions and Limited Institutional Review Board Review: A Practical Look at the 2018 Common Rule Requirements for Exempt Research

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   About HHS. US Department of Health and Human Services. www.hhs.gov/about/index.html. Accessed August 23, 2019.
2. 2.↵
   Advance notice of proposed rulemaking. Fed Regist. 2011 Jul;76(103):44515. www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2011-07-26/pdf/2011-18792.pdf. Accessed August 23, 2019.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.↵
   Final rule. Fed Regist. 2017 Jan;82(12). www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2017-01-19/pdf/2017-01058.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2019.
4. 4.↵
   1. Silverman H,
   2. Hull SC,
   3. Sugarman J

   . Variability among institutional review boards’ decisions within the context of a multicenter trial. Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2):235-241.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Abbott L,
   2. Grady C

   . A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: what we know and what we still need to learn. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Mar;6(1):3-19. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.1.3.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. 6.
   1. McWilliams R,
   2. Hoover-Fong J,
   3. Hamosh A,
   4. Beck S,
   5. Beaty T,
   6. Cutting G

   . Problematic variation in local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study. JAMA. 2003 Jul 16;290(3):360-366.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Mansbach J,
   2. Acholonu U,
   3. Clark S,
   4. Camargo CA Jr.

   . Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;14(4):377-380. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.11.031.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   Notice of proposed rulemaking. Fed Regist. 2015 Sep;80(173):53946-53947. www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-08/pdf/2015-21756.pdf. Accessed August 23, 2019.

   OpenUrl
9. 9.↵
   1. Schrag ZM

   . NPRM: escape for many, scant relief for those left behind. Institutional Review Blog. www.institutionalreviewblog.com/2015/09/nprm-escape-for-many-scant-relief-for.html. Published September 11, 2015. Accessed August 29, 2019.
10. 10.↵
    1. Schrag ZM

    . Historians love the NPRM. www.institutionalreviewblog.com/2015/11/historians-love-nprm.html. Published November 4, 2015. Accessed August 29, 2019.
11. 11.↵
    Criteria for IRB approval of research. 45 CFR §46.111. US Department of Health and Human Services. www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=83cd09e1c0f5c6937cd9d7513160fc3f&pitd=20180719&n=pt45.1.46&r=PART&ty=HTML#se45.1.46_1111. Accessed August 22, 2019.
12. 12.
    Pre-2018 requirements. Protection of human subjects. 45 CFR §46. US Department of Health and Human Services. www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2016-title45-vol1/pdf/CFR-2016-title45-vol1-part46.pdf. Accessed August 2, 2019.
13. 13.
    2018 requirements. Protection of human subjects. 45 CFR §46. US Department of Health and Human Services. www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=83cd09e1c0f5c6937cd9d7513160fc3f&pitd=20180719&n=pt45.1.46&r=PART&ty=HTML. Accessed August 2, 2019.
14. 14.↵
    The Belmont Report. US Department of Health and Human Services. www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html. Published April 18, 1979. Accessed August 2, 2019.