Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
Research ArticleQUARTERLY COLUMNS
Open Access

When Is Imaging Appropriate for a Patient With Low Back Pain?

Brian Lancaster, Joshua Goldman, Yuka Kobayashi and Andrew W. Gottschalk
Ochsner Journal September 2020, 20 (3) 248-249; DOI: https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.20.0077
Brian Lancaster
1Department of Family Medicine, Division of Sports Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua Goldman
1Department of Family Medicine, Division of Sports Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuka Kobayashi
2Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew W. Gottschalk
3Department of Orthopedics, Sports Medicine Institute, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

CASE

A 48-year-old pickleball player comes to the primary care clinic complaining of low back pain for 5 days. He was playing in a game when he reached for the ball and noted immediate sharp pain in his right lumbar region. He has been managing the pain with relative rest, alternating ice and heat, and appropriately dosed ibuprofen. However, he is concerned that the sharp pain has not resolved. He asks the provider to “get pictures” to make sure “everything is okay.”

BACKGROUND

Low back pain is the second most common complaint in the United States, with a lifetime incidence of 80% to 85%.1 Internationally, the prevalence of back pain has been reported as high as 20% in first-world countries.1 Acute low back pain, defined as pain of less than 6 weeks’ duration, is a self-limited condition that does not require imaging for uncomplicated cases.2 Uncomplicated cases are typically defined as a lack of red flag signs, symptoms, and concerns (Tables 1 and 2), with resolution of presenting symptoms within 6 weeks of conservative medical management.1 However, inconsistency and confusion remain with regard to appropriate utilization of imaging modalities when patients present with new-onset back pain. Inappropriate imaging leads to increased healthcare costs, risk to patients through unnecessary radiation exposure, and potentially unnecessary care.3

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Red Flags for Malignancy

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Comprehensive Red Flags and Reasons for Concern as Defined by the American College of Radiology1

REVIEW OF EVIDENCE

Physicians order imaging on nearly one-third of patients not meeting appropriateness criteria set forth by the American College of Radiology (ACR).1 A systematic review and metaanalysis of 31 studies that included 1.2 million patients evaluated physician imaging practices between 1995 and 2017.4 The authors found that 34% of lumbar imaging was inappropriate based on the absence of symptoms for serious pathology such as fractures, severe neurologic compromise, and malignancy. Conversely, patients who presented with red flag signs/symptoms or physician-reported concern for serious pathology were not appropriately imaged in 65.6% and 60.8% of cases, respectively.4

A comprehensive evaluation looking for red flag signs and symptoms remains a cornerstone of the initial assessment of acute low back pain. As such, the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society endorse screening for red flag signs/symptoms and a trial of management without imaging in adults without risk factors.5 However, the true utility of these signs and symptoms is not readily understood in the primary care setting. A 2017 systematic review of 33 publications that included 13 different red flags endorsed by 16 guidelines found that a history of malignancy and high clinical suspicion were the only 2 red flags of 7 with acceptable diagnostic accuracy for malignancy.6 Of the 33 publications, the studies that evaluated the 7 signs and symptoms with the most acceptable diagnostic accuracy showed moderate quality evidence. The positive likelihood ratios for diagnostic accuracy of malignancy were reported to range from 6.4 to 15.3 for history of malignancy and 12 to 54.2 for high clinical suspicion. However, high clinical suspicion is a subjective measure, and the cues the physicians used to predict malignancies were not reported in the studies.6

An important note is that the prevalence of serious pathology in the primary care setting is low, and prospective cohort studies estimate the prevalence of spinal malignancy to range between 0% and 0.7% in patients presenting with low back pain.6 Radiographic studies of patients referred by primary care providers for low back imaging corroborate the low prevalence of spinal malignancy, with imaging-confirmed prevalence ranging from 0.2% to 0.7%.6 The low prevalence of serious pathology causing low back pain is insufficient to warrant imaging on all patients.

The ACR accordingly recommends imaging for low back pain in (1) patients who have had up to 6 weeks of medical management and physical therapy for low back pain without improvement in symptoms, and (2) patients with red flag symptoms for serious pathology.1

For patients meeting one of the above criteria for imaging, the choice of imaging should be guided by the suspected pathology (Table 2). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine is the modality of choice for the majority of patients requiring imaging, especially if the suspected pathology is malignancy or neurologic compromise, per the ACR appropriateness criteria. The use of intravenous contrast with MRI is generally only appropriate for patients with a history of prior lumbar surgery or cancer patients with concern for epidural or intraspinal disease.1 Lumbar spine radiographs are of limited utility and are generally only indicated when fracture is a concern because of a history of trauma or prolonged steroid use.1 Computed tomography should be reserved for patients with a contraindication to MRI.

CASE RESOLUTION

After taking the patient's history and performing an examination, the provider determined that the patient had no red flags. The physician explained to the patient that imaging was unnecessary and provided the evidence presented above. The patient verbalized understanding of the reasoning and agreed to start a home exercise program. Four weeks later, the patient sent a message stating that his pain had improved. The decision to forego imaging saved the patient healthcare costs and radiation exposure.

This article meets the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Medical Specialties Maintenance of Certification competencies for Patient Care and Medical Knowledge.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter of this article.

  • ©2020 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)

©2020 by the author(s); licensee Ochsner Journal, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode) that permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Patel ND,
    2. Broderick DF,
    3. Burns J,
    4. et al.
    ACR appropriateness criteria low back pain. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Sep;13(9):1069-1078. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.06.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Fatoye F,
    2. Gebrye T,
    3. Odeyemi I
    . Real-world incidence and prevalence of low back pain using routinely collected data. Rheumatol Intl. 2019 Apr;39(4):619-626. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04273-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Darlow B,
    2. Forster BB,
    3. O’Sullivan K,
    4. O’Sullivan P
    . It is time to stop causing harm with inappropriate imaging for low back pain. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;51(5):414-415. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096741.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Jenkins HJ,
    2. Downie AS,
    3. Maher CG,
    4. Moloney NA,
    5. Magnussen JS,
    6. Hancock MJ
    . Imaging for low back pain: is clinical use consistent with guidelines? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2018 Dec;18(12):2266-2277. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Chou R,
    2. Qaseem A,
    3. Snow V,
    4. et al.
    Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):478-491. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Verhagen AP,
    2. Downie A,
    3. Maher CG,
    4. Koes BW
    . Most red flags for malignancy in low back pain guidelines lack empirical support. Pain. 2017 Oct;158(10):1860-1868. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000998.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal: 20 (3)
Ochsner Journal
Vol. 20, Issue 3
Sep 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
When Is Imaging Appropriate for a Patient With Low Back Pain?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
When Is Imaging Appropriate for a Patient With Low Back Pain?
Brian Lancaster, Joshua Goldman, Yuka Kobayashi, Andrew W. Gottschalk
Ochsner Journal Sep 2020, 20 (3) 248-249; DOI: 10.31486/toj.20.0077

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
When Is Imaging Appropriate for a Patient With Low Back Pain?
Brian Lancaster, Joshua Goldman, Yuka Kobayashi, Andrew W. Gottschalk
Ochsner Journal Sep 2020, 20 (3) 248-249; DOI: 10.31486/toj.20.0077
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • CASE
    • BACKGROUND
    • REVIEW OF EVIDENCE
    • CASE RESOLUTION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Autoimmune Encephalitis Presenting as Dystonia-Parkinsonism
  • Optimizing Pain Control and Function in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis by Choosing the Best Injection Site
  • Sacroiliac Joint Pain in the Athlete
Show more QUARTERLY COLUMNS

Similar Articles

Current Post at the Blog

Elsevier Editors Resign Over Open-Access Fees

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2023 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire