Retrospective Analysis of Route Selection for Hysterectomy for Benign Indications at Ochsner Baptist Hospital

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Wright JD,
   2. Herzog TJ,
   3. Tsui J,
   4. et al.

   Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;122(2 Pt 1):233-241. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318299a6cf.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Aarts JWM,
   2. Nieboer TE,
   3. Johnson N,
   4. et al.

   Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. 3.↵
   1. Dayaratna S,
   2. Goldberg J,
   3. Harrington C,
   4. Leiby BE,
   5. McNeil JM

   . Hospital costs of total vaginal hysterectomy compared with other minimally invasive hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;210(2):120.e1-120.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.028.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 4.↵
   1. Daraï E,
   2. Soriano D,
   3. Kimata P,
   4. Laplace C,
   5. Lecuru F

   . Vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri, with or without laparoscopic assistance: randomized study. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 May;97(5 Pt 1):712-126.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.
   1. Price JT,
   2. Zimmerman LD,
   3. Koelper NC,
   4. Sammel MD,
   5. Lee S,
   6. Butts SF

   . Social determinants of access to minimally invasive hysterectomy: reevaluating the relationship between race and route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):572.e1-572.e10.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. 6.↵
   Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Committee opinion no 701: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129(6):e155-e159. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002112.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 7.↵
   1. Sinha R,
   2. Sanjay M,
   3. Rupa B,
   4. Kumari S

   . Robotic surgery in gynecology. J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):50-59. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.147690.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. 8.↵
   1. Sheyn D,
   2. Mahajan S,
   3. Billow M,
   4. Fleary A,
   5. Hayashi E,
   6. El-Nashar SA

   . Geographic variance of cost associated with hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;129(5):844-853. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001966.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. 9.
   1. Mittapalli R,
   2. Fanning J,
   3. Flora R,
   4. Fenton BW

   . Cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of large leiomyomas: laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;196(5):e19-e21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.029.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Khorgami Z,
    2. Li WT,
    3. Jackson TN,
    4. Howard CA,
    5. Sclabas GM

    . The cost of robotics: an analysis of the added costs of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery using the National Inpatient Sample. Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2217-2221. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6507-3.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Bouquet de Joliniere J,
    2. Librino A,
    3. Dubuisson JB,
    4. et al.

    Robotic surgery in gynecology. Front Surg. 2016 May 2;3:26. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00026.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 12.↵
    1. Woelk JL,
    2. Borah BJ,
    3. Trabuco EC,
    4. Heien HC,
    5. Gebhart JB

    . Cost differences among robotic, vaginal, and abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):255-262. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000090.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 13.↵
    1. Papalekas E,
    2. Fisher J

    . Trends in route of hysterectomy after the implementation of a comprehensive robotic training program. Minim Invasive Surg. 2018 Sep 17;2018:7362489. doi: 10.1155/2018/7362489.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. 14.↵
    1. Burkett D,
    2. Horwitz J,
    3. Kennedy V,
    4. Murphy D,
    5. Graziano S,
    6. Kenton K

    . Assessing current trends in resident hysterectomy training. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011 Sep;17(5):210-214. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182309a22.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Schmitt JJ,
    2. Carranza Leon DA,
    3. Occhino JA,
    4. et al.

    Determining optimal route of hysterectomy for benign indications: clinical decision tree algorithm. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;129(1):130-138. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001756.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 16.
    1. Occhino JA,
    2. Gebhart JB

    . Difficult vaginal hysterectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;53(1):40-50. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181ce8945.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Figueiredo O,
    2. Figueiredo EG,
    3. Figueiredo PG,
    4. Pelosi MA III.,
    5. Pelosi MA

    . Vaginal removal of the benign nonprolapsed uterus: experience with 300 consecutive operations. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Sep;94(3):348-351.

    OpenUrlPubMed
18. 18.↵
    Review Committee for Obstetrics and Gynecology. Case log minimum numbers: obstetrics and gynecology. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. https://acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramResources/220_Ob_Gyn_Minimum_Numbers_Announcement.pdf?ver=2020-07-10-145129-077. Updated July 2020. Accessed October 9, 2020.
19. 19.↵
    1. Moen M,
    2. Walter A,
    3. Harmanli O

    , et al; Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Education Committee. Considerations to improve the evidence-based use of vaginal hysterectomy in benign gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;124(3):585-588. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000398.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
20. 20.
    1. Kovac SR,
    2. Barhan S,
    3. Lister M,
    4. Tucker L,
    5. Bishop M,
    6. Das A

    . Guidelines for the selection of the route of hysterectomy: application in a resident clinic population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;187(6):1521-1527. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.129165.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Kovac SR

    . Route of hysterectomy: an evidence-based approach. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;57(1):58-71. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000009.

    OpenUrlCrossRef