Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
Research ArticleQUARTERLY COLUMNS
Open Access

Pulmonary Carcinoid and the Importance of Correct Radiotracer Selection

Nicholas J. Foto and Daniel J. Lee
Ochsner Journal March 2021, 21 (1) 6-9; DOI: https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.20.0155
Nicholas J. Foto Jr
1Department of Radiology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel J. Lee
1Department of Radiology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
2The University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

INTRODUCTION

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a nuclear medicine examination involving the injection of radiotracers that provide a functional assessment of biochemical, physiologic, and pathophysiologic processes. PET radiotracers contain radioactive elements that undergo positron decay and subsequent annihilation with nearby electrons to produce two 511-keV photons traveling in opposite directions at 180 degrees from each other. Modern PET cameras implementing coincidence detection with the help of computer software use this opposite photon trajectory to reconstruct a spatial distribution. Computed tomography (CT) complements the examination to provide anatomic correlation and attenuation correction. Hybrid or fusion PET-CT imaging has become a crucial imaging tool utilized for detection, staging, and treatment follow-up of various benign and malignant conditions.

F18-fludeoxyglucose (F18-FDG) is the most commonly used PET radiotracer. A glucose analog, F18-FDG capitalizes on the known propensity for malignant cells to overutilize glucose by favoring glycolytic metabolism.1 Otto Warburg discovered this principle in the 1930s, and it is known as the Warburg effect.2 The predisposition for malignant tumors to demonstrate hypermetabolism of glucose provides the basis for F18-FDG PET cancer imaging. While highly sensitive and versatile for imaging a variety of solid and hematologic tumors, F18-FDG has certain limitations, including lack of target specificity because of the ubiquitous utilization of glucose in the body and poor sensitivity for tumors with more indolent behavior and lower utilization of glucose. These F18-FDG limitations have prompted development of several new target-specific radiotracers with more specific mechanisms of localization.1 One such PET radiotracer is gallium (Ga)-68 DOTATATE that is commonly used in the imaging of neuroendocrine tumors.

Our case demonstrates how a negative F18-FDG PET-CT examination does not necessarily equate to benignity and how not all malignant lesions are hypermetabolic. We illustrate the importance of understanding the mechanism of localization for PET radiotracers in the evaluation and characterization of unknown lesions.

CASE DESCRITPION

A 54-year-old male presented to pulmonary medicine with a several-month history of chronic cough. The patient had no other significant medical or surgical history.

RADIOGRAPHIC APPEARANCE AND TREATMENT

The patient's symptoms prompted initial evaluation with a noncontrast chest CT that revealed a soft-tissue endobronchial lesion in the left upper lobe bronchus (Figure 1). Incidental finding of left anterior descending coronary artery atherosclerosis was also seen in the image. F18-FDG PET-CT demonstrated no appreciable uptake in the endobronchial lesion, suggesting a low-grade, well-differentiated tumor (Figures 2 and 3). Physiologic uptake was seen in the brain, heart, liver, spleen, gastrointestinal tract, urinary collecting system, and bone marrow. The patient underwent bronchoscopy and biopsy, and pathology was positive for carcinoid tumor. Ga-68 DOTATATE PET-CT demonstrated significant radiotracer uptake in the endobronchial lesion, reflective of the tumor's high somatostatin receptor expression (Figures 4 and 5). Physiologic uptake was seen in the pituitary, thyroid, and salivary glands; spleen; liver; adrenal glands; renal collecting system; and gastrointestinal tract. Incidental uptake in the right antecubital fossa corresponded with the injection site.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Noncontrast axial chest computed tomography image demonstrates a 1.3-cm soft-tissue endobronchial lesion within the left upper lobe bronchus, concerning for a primary bronchial tumor or metastasis (arrow).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

F18-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography maximum intensity projection image demonstrates physiologic radiotracer uptake with no significant activity in the known left upper lobe endobronchial lesion (arrow).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Fused F18-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography axial image shows the left upper lobe endobronchial lesion without significant radiotracer uptake, suggesting a low-grade, well-differentiated tumor (arrow).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Gallium-68 DOTATATE maximum intensity projection image demonstrates increased radiotracer uptake in the location of the left upper lobe endobronchial lesion, as well as physiologic distribution in the spleen; liver; bowel; urinary tract; and pituitary, thyroid, and salivary glands. Focal right upper extremity uptake represents the right antecubital fossa injection site (arrow).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Fused gallium-68 DOTATATE positron emission tomography-computed tomography axial image demonstrates focal increased somatostatin receptor avidity within the left upper lobe endobronchial mass consistent with a neuroendocrine tumor.

Because of the negative F18-FDG PET-CT and lack of distant metastasis shown on the Ga-68 DOTATATE PET-CT, the patient could be considered for surgical excision. Cardiothoracic surgery offered treatment with a left upper lobectomy for tumor resection. The patient underwent surgery, and his chronic cough resolved postoperatively.

DISCUSSION

Carcinoid tumors are a type of neuroendocrine tumor derived predominantly from enterochromaffin cells. The overall incidence of these tumors is estimated to be approximately 5.25/100,000, with approximately 60% to 70% arising from the gastrointestinal tract.3 The second most common site for carcinoid tumors is the tracheobronchial tree, accounting for 25% to 30% of tumors. Given the relatively low incidence of carcinoid tumors, pulmonary carcinoids make up only 1% to 2% of all lung cancers.4

Well-differentiated carcinoid tumors are known to have low FDG avidity; therefore, F18-FDG PET-CT has diminished utility in typical carcinoid imaging. FDG avidity increases with tumor grade, so F18-FDG has more efficacy evaluating high-grade, poorly differentiated carcinoid tumors. Neuroendocrine tumor imaging takes advantage of the overexpression of somatostatin receptors on the tumor surface membrane. Carcinoid tumors may express 5 subtypes of somatostatin receptors and are known to express somatostatin receptor 2 most commonly.5 Ga-68 DOTATATE contains a synthetic somatostatin analog that binds to somatostatin receptor 2 with high affinity. This radiotracer has shown significantly better accuracy, image quality, and lower radiation dose than indium-111 pentetreotide (octreotide) for neuroendocrine imaging.6 The sensitivity and specificity of Ga-68 DOTATATE for detection of neuroendocrine tumors are approximately 80% to 95%.6 Ga-68 DOTATATE should be considered when imaging all neuroendocrine tumors such as carcinoid, pancreatic islet cell, medullary thyroid cancer, pheochromocytoma of the adrenal gland, and extra-adrenal paraganglioma.

Fluorine-18 sodium fluoride (F18-NaF) is a bone-specific PET radiotracer that can be used for evaluating osseus metastasis, osteomyelitis, and fracture. This PET radiotracer distributes through the skeleton primarily based on regional perfusion and bone turnover. The specific mechanism of F18-NaF uptake onto the bone surface is known as adsorption, or chemisorption, and leads to tracer integration in the structure of hydroxyapatite.6 Technetium (Tc)-labeled diphosphonates are widely used for the detection and evaluation of osteoblastic metastasis because of their availability and relatively low cost; however, F18-NaF PET offers advantages in terms of image quality and lesion detection. With respect to evaluating osteoblastic metastatic disease, F18-NaF offers higher sensitivity (99%) and specificity (97%) compared to Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate (MDP) planar bone imaging alone or with single photon emission CT (SPECT) sensitivity (70% MDP planar and 92% SPECT) and specificity (57% MDP planar and 82% SPECT).6

F-18 fluciclovine (Axumin) is a PET radiotracer used to detect prostate cancer recurrence and metastatic disease. This tracer is a radiolabeled amino acid analog that localizes based on the amino acid upregulation known to take place in prostate cancer cells. F-18 fluciclovine has shown sensitivity and specificity for prostate or prostatectomy bed recurrence at 90% and 40%, respectively. In the evaluation of extraprostatic recurrence, sensitivity and specificity are 55% and 97%, respectively.7

CONCLUSION

This case demonstrates the importance of understanding the mechanism of localization for nuclear medicine radiotracers. F18-FDG was the first widely used PET radiotracer for functional tumor imaging and is still the most commonly used radiotracer in the management of cancer patients because of the increased glucose metabolism in most tumors and the increased uptake of F18-FDG seen with many malignancies. However, not all malignant tumors demonstrate these same characteristics, so radiotracers that use different mechanisms of localization are necessary. Having a current working knowledge of the different radiotracers available for PET-CT and understanding that a negative F18-FDG PET-CT does not necessarily exclude malignancy are critical for clinicians. Depending on the biology of a tumor, other PET radiotracers may better identify and show the extent of disease than F18-FDG.

This article meets the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Medical Specialties Maintenance of Certification competencies for Patient Care and Medical Knowledge.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter of this article.

  • ©2021 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)

©2021 by the author(s); licensee Ochsner Journal, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode) that permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Chen K,
    2. Chen X
    . Positron emission tomography imaging of cancer biology: current status and future prospects. Semin Oncol. 2011;38(1):70-86. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.11.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Miles KA,
    2. Williams RE
    . Warburg revisited: imaging tumour blood flow and metabolism. Cancer Imaging. 2008;8(1):81-86. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2008.0011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ganeshan D,
    2. Bhosale P,
    3. Yang T,
    4. Kundra V
    . Imaging features of carcinoid tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(4):773-786. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9758
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bertino EM,
    2. Confer PD,
    3. Colonna JE,
    4. Ross P,
    5. Otterson GA
    . Pulmonary neuroendocrine/carcinoid tumors: a review article. Cancer. 2009;115(19):4434-4441. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24498
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Sanli Y,
    2. Garg I,
    3. Kandathil A,
    4. et al.
    Neuroendocrine tumor diagnosis and management: 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211(2):267-277. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19881
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Mettler FA Jr.,
    2. Guiberteau MJ
    . Essentials of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 7th ed. Elsevier; 2019.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Gusman M,
    2. Aminsharifi JA,
    3. Peacock JG,
    4. Anderson SB,
    5. Clemenshaw MN,
    6. Banks KP
    . Review of 18 F-fluciclovine PET for detection of recurrent prostate cancer. Radiographics. 2019;39(3):822-841. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180139
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal: 21 (1)
Ochsner Journal
Vol. 21, Issue 1
Mar 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pulmonary Carcinoid and the Importance of Correct Radiotracer Selection
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Pulmonary Carcinoid and the Importance of Correct Radiotracer Selection
Nicholas J. Foto, Daniel J. Lee
Ochsner Journal Mar 2021, 21 (1) 6-9; DOI: 10.31486/toj.20.0155

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Pulmonary Carcinoid and the Importance of Correct Radiotracer Selection
Nicholas J. Foto, Daniel J. Lee
Ochsner Journal Mar 2021, 21 (1) 6-9; DOI: 10.31486/toj.20.0155
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • INTRODUCTION
    • CASE DESCRITPION
    • RADIOGRAPHIC APPEARANCE AND TREATMENT
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Autoimmune Encephalitis Presenting as Dystonia-Parkinsonism
  • Optimizing Pain Control and Function in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis by Choosing the Best Injection Site
  • Sacroiliac Joint Pain in the Athlete
Show more QUARTERLY COLUMNS

Similar Articles

Current Post at the Blog

No Author Credit for ChatGPT

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2023 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire