Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
Case ReportCASE REPORTS AND CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS
Open Access

Tubulocystic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Underrecognized Clinicopathologic Entity

Sudeep Khera, Poonam Elhence, Taruna Yadav and Himanshu Pandey
Ochsner Journal June 2022, 22 (2) 182-187; DOI: https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.21.0065
Sudeep Khera
1Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: drsudeepkhera@gmail.com
Poonam Elhence
1Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taruna Yadav
2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Himanshu Pandey
3Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma is a lesser-known neoplastic entity compared to other common histologic variants of renal cell carcinoma. The World Health Organization identified tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma as a newly recognized renal tumor in 2016. We report a case of tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma in a young adult.

Case Report: A 21-year-old male presented with the chief complaint of a lump on the right side of his abdomen since childhood. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed an enlarged right kidney with multiple large multiloculated cysts with hemorrhagic contents and enhancing peripheral nodular solid components with enhancing septa in some of the cysts, suggesting the possibility of multifocal intracystic papillary renal cell carcinoma. Imaging showed a Bosniak type IV cystic lesion in the right kidney. Right radical nephrectomy was performed. Grossly, the kidney was almost replaced by variable-sized cystic lesions with thick septations filled with serous fluid to gelatinous material. The tubules and cysts were lined by a single layer of flat, hobnail, and cuboidal cells with high-grade nuclear features. No ovarian-type stroma was identified. In places, a papillary component was also identified. Tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma was diagnosed based on microscopy and immunohistochemistry results.

Conclusion: Tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma is a rare entity that was previously called Bellini duct carcinoma and low-grade collecting duct carcinoma. Because of the limited number of cases reported, tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma needs to be followed to determine the biologic behavior and metastatic potential of these tumors so that management guidelines for such cases can be developed.

Keywords:
  • Carcinoma–renal cell
  • cyst fluid
  • cysts

INTRODUCTION

Tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma is an uncommon and rare variant of renal cell carcinoma that can pose diagnostic difficulties. In 2009, Amin et al1 described a series of 31 tumors that they referred to as “tubulocystic carcinoma.”2 In 2010, the American Joint Committee on Cancer recognized tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma as a distinct entity, and it was included in the Vancouver Classification of Renal Cancer in 2012. The World Health Organization (WHO) modified the classification of renal cell carcinoma and identified tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma as a newly recognized renal tumor in 2016.3,4 The tumor has a predilection for male patients, with a male:female ratio of 7:1, and predominantly involves the left kidney.5 No specific risk factors have been identified for this rare tumor. Most patients are asymptomatic on presentation, although hematuria, distention, and abdominal pain are sometimes reported.6

Diagnosis of cystic neoplasms of the kidney is challenging, both clinically and radiologically. Histopathology is crucial in establishing the diagnosis. We report the case of a patient who presented with a large multiloculated solid cystic mass in the right kidney.

CASE REPORT

A 21-year-old male presented with complaints of a right flank mass that had progressively increased in size since childhood and was associated with dull aching pain for the prior 2 years. The patient also complained of constipation and burning micturition. Examination revealed a large nontender lump that was approximately 18 × 12 cm, firm to hard in consistency, and with well-defined borders and side-to-side mobility involving the right hypochondrium, lumbar, and iliac fossa regions. The mass also extended to the epigastric, hypogastric, and umbilical regions. The patient had no history of notable weight loss or loss of appetite. Renal function tests were normal. Bacteriologic examination of the urine did not identify any microorganism growth. Urine samples were sent on 3 consecutive days for malignant cytology examination but were reported as unsatisfactory for evaluation because of the lack of an adequate number of urothelial cells as per the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytopathology criteria.7

Abdominal ultrasound showed an enlarged right kidney with multiple variable-sized cysts. Hypoechoic heterogeneous contents were seen in 3 to 4 cysts. One to 2 cysts showed multiple septations with a small solid component. Except for the presence of a few small cystic lesions, the left kidney was the expected size.

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showed that the right kidney was replaced with innumerable cysts, many of them showing T1 hyperintense signal, and fluid-fluid levels consistent with hemorrhage or high mucinous contents within the cysts. One of the larger cysts and 1 to 2 smaller cysts showed a peripheral enhancing solid component and multiple enhancing internal septations (Figure 1). Four to 5 cystic lesions were characterized as Bosniak category IV cystic renal masses. The renal capsule was intact, with no invasion of adjacent structures. The inferior vena cava was compressed at the right kidney level, accompanied by the formation of multiple right perirenal collaterals. Multifocal cystic renal malignancy in the right kidney was established on imaging with a possibility of intracystic papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

(A) Axial T2-weighted image shows markedly enlarged right kidney (outlined by triangles) studded with multiple cysts, a few containing heterogeneous contents. Some cystic lesions are also seen in the normal sized left kidney. (B) In this axial T1-weighted image, some cysts show T1 hyperintensity suggestive of hemorrhagic/high mucin contents (arrowheads). (C) Corticomedullary phase and (D) nephrographic phase postcontrast (subtracted) axial T1-weighted images reveal progressive enhancement in one of the cysts (arrows) with multiple enhancing septations. (E) Axial 3-minute and (F) coronal 5-minute delayed postcontrast (nonsubtracted) T1-weighted images show further progressive enhancement of the wall of the cystic lesion and septations.

The patient underwent right radical nephrectomy with a clinical-radiologic diagnosis of malignant cystic neoplasm. A multiloculated solid cystic mass that replaced the entire right kidney was sent for histopathologic evaluation. The surgical specimen measured 37 × 19 × 10 cm and weighed 3,200 g, with the ureter measuring 6 cm in length (Figure 2). The outer surface was lobulated. The brown, fleshy tumor had numerous large and small cysts, ranging in size from 1 cm to 7 cm and filled with clear to hemorrhagic fluids. Three to 4 cysts were also filled with gelatinous fluid. Friable papillary projections were identified in 1 to 2 solid areas, with the largest solid area in the lower pole measuring 9 × 7 × 6 cm. The overlying renal capsule was intact, the pelvicalyceal system was dilated, and the tumor reached the renal pelvis.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

A large multiloculated solid cystic mass entirely replaced the whole of the renal parenchyma.

The microscopic examination (Figures 3 and 4) revealed a tumor composed of variable-sized tubules, anastomosing papillae, and variable-sized cysts. These cysts were separated by fibrous septa. The tubules and cysts were lined by a single layer of low cuboidal to columnar cells and many hobnail cells. These cells were mild to moderately pleomorphic, having round nuclei, conspicuous nucleoli (International Society of Urological Pathology grade 3), and clear to abundant eosinophilic granular cytoplasm. Areas of calcification and a focal area of ossification were also seen. The solid areas had papillae with fibrovascular cores lined by cuboidal to low columnar cells with moderate to abundant dense, eosinophilic cytoplasm. Focal areas of necrosis were seen. Mitoses were infrequent. No ovarian-type cellular stroma was noted.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

(A, B) Microscopy reveals both cyst structures and small tubules with intervening stroma (A: hematoxylin and eosin [H&E], magnification ×4; B: H&E, magnification ×10). (C, D) Cystic spaces are lined by cuboidal to low columnar eosinophilic epithelial cells with hobnailing (indicated with arrow) and high-grade nuclear features (C: H&E, magnification ×10; D: H&E, magnification ×40).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

(A) Low-power and (B) high-power magnification show papillary component associated with tubulocystic carcinoma.

The ureter and renal sinus were free of tumor invasion. No lymphovascular or perineural invasions were seen. Eight lymph nodes were resected, and all were free from tumor invasion.

No sarcomatoid or rhabdoid features were identified. The capsule and perinephric fat were free from tumor invasion. Based upon histomorphologic features, a diagnosis of tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma was favored.

Immunohistochemistry panel was performed to confirm the diagnosis and rule out other cystic neoplasms of the kidney with similar morphology. The tumor cells demonstrated immunoreactivity for PAX8, vimentin, and AMACR (Figure 5). The tumor cells were not immunoreactive for CK7 and CD117. No immunoreactivity for estrogen receptors and progesterone receptors was noted in the stroma. Based upon the histomorphologic features and immunohistochemistry profile, a final diagnosis of tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma was made. At 6-month follow-up, the patient had had no recurrence or evidence of metastasis. He did not receive adjuvant therapy. At 1-year follow-up, the patient still had no evidence of recurrence or metastasis.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Immunohistochemistry reveals diffuse immunoreactivity (A) for PAX8 (magnification ×4), (B) for vimentin (magnification ×10), and (C) for AMACR (magnification ×10).

DISCUSSION

Tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma is an uncommon tumor; to our knowledge, approximately 70 cases have been reported in the literature.8 Masson recognized this tumor as a separate entity based on its histomorphology in 1955, more than 60 years in advance of WHO recognition.9 In a series of 13 cases, MacLennan et al reported a detailed description of the tumor, designating it as low-grade mucinous tubulocystic renal cancer, likely of collecting duct origin because of the mucin production.10 Low-grade mucinous tubulocystic renal cell carcinomas behave in a less-aggressive fashion than collecting duct carcinomas.

Tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma, included in the 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs,8 accounts for <1% of all renal carcinomas and occurs predominantly in males in the third to ninth decades of life, with a mean of 58.4 years.5 Tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma is more commonly seen in the left kidney than the right and typically involves the renal cortex or corticomedullary junction.5 In our case, however, tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma occurred in a 21-year-old male in the right kidney and presented as a multifocal solid cystic mass.

Tubulocystic renal cell carcinomas are generally smaller than other variants such as clear cell, chromophobe, and papillary renal cell carcinoma; approximately 40% of the tumors are ≤2 cm.1 They are circumscribed, unencapsulated, and cortical in location and have been described as having a spongy, bubble-wrap, or Swiss cheese appearance because of the numerous variably sized cysts seen on the cut surface.10 In our case, almost the entire kidney was studded with variable-sized cysts except a small portion of normal renal parenchyma.

In 1955, tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma was thought to be a tumor of collecting duct origin and was sometimes confused with the collecting duct (Bellini duct) carcinoma.9 However, tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma and collecting duct carcinoma are not similar on immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies. Tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma tumor cells are immunoreactive for proximal convoluted tubules markers (CD10 and P504S), distal tubules (CK19), and intercalated collecting duct cells (parvalbumin). Even on ultrastructure examination, tubulocystic renal cell carcinomas have features of microvilli with a brush border as seen in the proximal convoluted tubules but with short microvilli and cytoplasmic interdigitation, similar to intercalated cells of the collecting duct. Ultrastructure examination led Brennan and colleagues to hypothesize a renal tubule stem cells origin.11

Other cystic tumors of the kidney with a multiloculated gross appearance should be considered in the differential diagnosis: (1) multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma, (2) cystic nephroma, (3) mixed epithelial and stromal tumors, (4) cystic oncocytoma, and (5) Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma. Variably sized cystic spaces are noted in multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma and are lined by flattened to cuboidal clear cells, similar to those seen in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.6 Cystic nephroma is composed of multilocular cysts lined by flattened to attenuated epithelial cells; however, hobnailing is an infrequent feature.12 The mixed epithelial and stromal tumors have solid areas and broad septa, in contrast to the thin fibrous septa of tubulocystic renal cell carcinomas. The cystic oncocytomas usually show a tubulocystic pattern with numerous closely packed cystically dilated tubular structures, and, at least focally, a solid nest of oncocytic cells along with loose myxoid stroma.5,13 Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma with a tubulocystic pattern is an unusual tumor composed of large cysts with hyalinized stroma. Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma may have an ovarian-type stroma.14 Both tubulocystic renal cell carcinomas and cystic nephromas have cysts lined by hobnail cells, but the cells have a low nuclear grade in cystic nephroma, whereas tubulocystic renal cell carcinomas have a high-grade nuclear feature.

The clinical behavior of tubulocystic renal cell carcinomas is not certain. Four patients have developed metastatic disease per the literature.1,15 Of the 4 patients who developed metastases, Srigley and Delahunt16 reported that 2 patients developed distant metastases to the bone or liver. In the other study, 1 patient developed metastases to the pelvic lymph nodes with exclusive morphology of tubulocystic carcinoma in the metastatic nodes. Generally, these tumors are gradually progressive; however, a few of them behave aggressively.

A relationship has also been proposed between tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma in view of similar molecular alterations noted in both the tumors (gains in chromosomes 7 and 17, loss of chromosome Y).14,15 Documentation of concomitant tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma in the same kidney and foci of papillary renal cell carcinoma within tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma has supported this proposal.16,17 In our case, we also documented the presence of foci of papillary renal cell carcinoma.

The histomorphologic features of tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma are so distinctive that diagnosis can be established on morphology alone; however, the immunohistochemistry panel is required to determine the tumor's origin.18

The treatment of choice is radical nephrectomy; however, nephron-sparing surgery is an option for T1 stage tumors <7 cm. Because most tubulocystic renal cell carcinomas behave indolently, adjuvant therapy is generally not required. Only T3 and T4 stage tumors that have invaded the renal vein, inferior vena cava, and adrenal gland require adjuvant therapy. Close follow-up is recommended to look for any recurrences and metastases.16 Targeted therapy, including sunitinib and everolimus, is being explored for metastatic disease, but its role has not yet been well established.19,20

Stringent follow-up is required for cases in which focal clear cell, papillary, and sarcomatoid changes are observed. Only one case of tubulocystic carcinoma with sarcomatoid changes had been reported as of May 2021.21

CONCLUSION

Cystic neoplasms of the kidney are uncommon and pose diagnostic challenges. Clinicians must consider the entire spectrum of differential diagnoses of all cystic entities of the kidney. Most cases of tubulocystic carcinoma are diagnosed on histomorphology alone, but immunohistochemistry is required to determine the origin of the tumor. Tubulocystic carcinomas behave in an indolent manner; however, occasional cases of recurrence and metastasis have been reported. In view of the few cases described in the literature, follow-up is recommended to precisely understand the biologic behavior of these tumors. No established guidelines are available for follow-up periods for tubulocystic carcinoma. Treatment options such as targeted therapy need to be explored.

This article meets the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Medical Specialties Maintenance of Certification competencies for Patient Care and Medical Knowledge.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter of this article.

  • ©2022 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)

©2022 by the author(s); licensee Ochsner Journal, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode) that permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Amin MB,
    2. MacLennan GT,
    3. Gupta R,
    4. et al.
    Tubulocystic carcinoma of the kidney: clinicopathologic analysis of 31 cases of a distinctive rare subtype of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(3):384-392. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181872d3f
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Eble JN,
    2. Sauter G,
    3. Epstein JI,
    4. Sesterhenn IA
    , eds. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. 3rd ed. IARC Press; 2004. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours, vol 7.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Srigley JR,
    2. Delahunt B,
    3. Eble JN
    , et al; ISUP Renal Tumor Panel. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Vancouver classification of renal neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37(10):1469-1489. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318299f2d1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Moch H,
    2. Cubilla AL,
    3. Humphrey PA,
    4. Reuter VE,
    5. Ulbright TM
    . The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs – part A: renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol. 2016;70(1):93-105. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.029
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Alexiev BA,
    2. Drachenberg CB
    . Tubulocystic carcinoma of the kidney: a histologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study. Virchows Arch. 2013;462(5):575-581. doi: 10.1007/s00428-013-1398-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bhullar JS,
    2. Varshney N,
    3. Bhullar AK,
    4. Mittal VK
    . A new type of renal cancer–tubulocystic carcinoma of the kidney: a review of the literature. Int J Surg Pathol. 2014;22(4):297-302. doi: 10.1177/1066896913509007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Barkan GA,
    2. Wojcik EM,
    3. Nayar R,
    4. et al.
    The Paris System for reporting urinary cytology: the quest to develop a standardized terminology. Acta Cytol. 2016;60(3):185-197. doi: 10.1159/000446270
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Moch H,
    2. Humphrey PA,
    3. Ulbright TM,
    4. Reuter VE
    1. Comperat E,
    2. Cheville J,
    3. Rioux-Leclercq N
    . Tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma. In: Moch H, , Humphrey PA, , Ulbright TM, , Reuter VE, eds. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. 4th ed. IARC; 2016: 38.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Masson P
    . Tumeurs humaines 1955. In: Kobernick SD, trans. Human Tumors, Histology, Diagnosis and Technique. 2nd ed. Wayne State University Press; 1970.
  10. 10.↵
    1. MacLennan GT,
    2. Farrow GM,
    3. Bostwick DG
    . Low-grade collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: report of 13 cases of low-grade mucinous tubulocystic renal carcinoma of possible collecting duct origin. Urology. 1997;50(5):679-684. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00335-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Brennan C,
    2. Srigley JR,
    3. Whelan C,
    4. Cooper J,
    5. Delahunt B
    . Type 2 and clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma, and tubulocystic carcinoma: a unifying concept. Anticancer Res. 2010;30(2):641-644.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Turbiner J,
    2. Amin MB,
    3. Humphrey PA,
    4. et al.
    Cystic nephroma and mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of kidney: a detailed clinicopathologic analysis of 34 cases and proposal for renal epithelial and stromal tumor (REST) as a unifying term. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(4):489-500. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31802bdd56
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Amin MB,
    2. Crotty TB,
    3. Tickoo SK,
    4. Farrow GM
    . Renal oncocytoma: a reappraisal of morphologic features with clinicopathologic findings in 80 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997;21(1):1-12. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199701000-00001. Erratum in: Am J Surg Pathol 1997;21(6):742.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kuroda N,
    2. Mikami S,
    3. Pan CC,
    4. et al.
    Review of renal carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocations/TFE3 gene fusions with focus on pathobiological aspect. Histol Histopathol. 2012;27(2):133-140. doi: 10.14670/HH-27.133
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Yang XJ,
    2. Zhou M,
    3. Hes O,
    4. et al.
    Tubulocystic carcinoma of the kidney: clinicopathologic and molecular characterization. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(2):177-187. doi: 10.1097/pas.0b013e318150df1d
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Srigley JR,
    2. Delahunt B
    . Uncommon and recently described renal carcinomas. Mod Pathol. 2009;22 Suppl 2:S2-S23. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2009.70
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Chen N,
    2. Nie L,
    3. Gong J,
    4. et al.
    Gains of chromosomes 7 and 17 in tubulocystic carcinoma of kidney: two cases with fluorescence in situ hybridisation analysis. J Clin Pathol. 2014;67(11):1006-1009. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202363
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Azoulay S,
    2. Vieillefond A,
    3. Paraf F,
    4. et al.
    Tubulocystic carcinoma of the kidney: a new entity among renal tumors. Virchows Arch. 2007;451(5):905-909. doi: 10.1007/s00428-007-0483-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kimura Y,
    2. Funahashi Y,
    3. Kato M,
    4. Fujita T,
    5. Tsuruta K,
    6. Gotoh M
    . Metastatic tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapies. J Urol Res. 2014;1(3):1013.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Mego M,
    2. Sycova-Mila Z,
    3. Rejlekova K,
    4. et al.
    Sunitinib in the treatment of tubulocystic carcinoma of the kidney. A case report. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(9):1655-1656. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn408
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Bhullar JS,
    2. Thamboo T,
    3. Esuvaranathan K
    . Unique case of tubulocystic carcinoma of the kidney with sarcomatoid features: a new entity. Urology. 2011;78(5):1071-1072. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.01.038
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal: 22 (2)
Ochsner Journal
Vol. 22, Issue 2
Jun 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tubulocystic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Underrecognized Clinicopathologic Entity
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Tubulocystic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Underrecognized Clinicopathologic Entity
Sudeep Khera, Poonam Elhence, Taruna Yadav, Himanshu Pandey
Ochsner Journal Jun 2022, 22 (2) 182-187; DOI: 10.31486/toj.21.0065

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Tubulocystic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Underrecognized Clinicopathologic Entity
Sudeep Khera, Poonam Elhence, Taruna Yadav, Himanshu Pandey
Ochsner Journal Jun 2022, 22 (2) 182-187; DOI: 10.31486/toj.21.0065
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • CASE REPORT
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Differential to Terminal Ileitis: Terminal Ileum Neuroendocrine Tumor Identified on Screening Colonoscopy
  • Pelvic Synovial Sarcoma Clinically Masquerading as an Ovarian Malignancy
  • Two-Stage Pediatric Ear Reconstruction Using Preserved Native Cartilage After a Dog Bite
Show more CASE REPORTS AND CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Carcinoma–renal cell
  • cyst fluid
  • cysts

Current Post at the Blog

No Author Credit for ChatGPT

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2023 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire