Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
Research ArticleQUALITY IMPROVEMENT
Open Access

Lower Double-Wall Puncture Rate During Ultrasound-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation Using Sharper, Narrower-Gauge, and/or Length-Optimized Needles: A 6-Year Quality Improvement Clinical Series in Adult Patients

James M. Riopelle, Valeriy V. Kozmenko, Melville Q. Wyche, Marion L. Yapuncich and Eddie J. Pitre
Ochsner Journal September 2023, 23 (3) 232-242; DOI: https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.22.0117
James M. Riopelle
1Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center–New Orleans, New Orleans, LA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jriope{at}lsuhsc.edu
Valeriy V. Kozmenko
2Office of Medical Education, University of South Dakota Medical Center Sanford School of Medicine, Vermillion, SD
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melville Q. Wyche III
1Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center–New Orleans, New Orleans, LA
3Department of Anesthesiology, New Orleans Veterans Administration Medical Center, New Orleans, LA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marion L. Yapuncich
1Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center–New Orleans, New Orleans, LA
PhD, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eddie J. Pitre III
4Licensed electrician (deceased)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Cannulating needles used during the project. (A) Orifice views of needle tips. Black underlined letters (top) indicate manufacturer: A–Arrow-Teleflex Incorporated, N–Navilyst Medical Inc/AngioDynamics, C–Cook Medical, B–Becton, Dickinson and Company. Numbers (middle) indicate Birmingham gauge scale. White letters in black boxes (bottom) indicate sharpness categorization: A-, extra-sharp; B-, of lesser sharpness customary for vascular access; I-, of sharpness intermediate between A- and B-. Scale lines are 2 mm apart. (B) Braun 22-gauge intravenous catheter hub positioned to serve as a funnel to conduct a microaccess guidewire into the shaft of a 21-gauge Becton, Dickinson and Company needle. (C) Two nylon screw-on mechanical needle stops. The needle stop above the needle displays a hole drilled through the bolt shaft just below the bolt head through which the cannulating needle will be inserted. The lower needle stop is shown positioned along the shaft of an 18-gauge needle.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Trigonometry of needle length optimization to limit tip depth insertion to the internal jugular vein (IJV) mid-lumen. csc, cosecant (ratio Loptimal/Dmid); Dmid, distance from the skin to the internal jugular vein mid-lumen; Loptimal, optimal needle insertion distance; SCM, sternocleidomastoid muscle; subcut, subcutaneous tissue; θ, angle between cannulating needle and skin.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Frequency distribution of cannulating needle types used in project. Numbers in parentheses specify numbers of each type of cannulating needle used with or without a needle stop. Sharpness categories are as follows: A-, extra-sharp; B-, of lesser sharpness customary for vascular access; I-, of sharpness intermediate between A- and B-. In contrast to A- needles (always 21 gauge) and I- needles (always 20 gauge), some B- needles had 18-gauge diameter (*) and others were 21 gauge (•). ga, gauge; NS, needle stop; NS+, needle stop used; NS-, no needle stop used; NShub, manufacturer's hub used as needle stop; NSs-o, screw-on needle stop used.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Distribution of anatomic depth measurements for 3 points of internal jugular vein (IJV) anatomy relevant to achieving single-wall puncture during IJV cannulation. Ddeep, depth from the skin to the deepest point of the IJV wall; Dmid, depth from the skin to the IJV lumen central axis; Dsuperf, depth from the skin to the most superficial point of the IJV wall.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Internal jugular vein (IJV) double-wall puncture (DWP) rates during cannulations by needle type, with and without needle stop (NS). Ninety-five percent CIs are expressed as black or white lines starting within and extending above bars. Numbers in parentheses above bars are upper limits of 95% CIs that extend beyond the range of the graph. The white bottom portion of the leftmost bar (DWP rate for 21-gauge extra-sharp NS+ needles) denotes the 0% double-wall puncture rate achieved for subcategory of 40 venipunctures performed using NShub needles (original manufacturer's hub served as the needle stop). Needle diameters are expressed using Birmingham gauge scale. 21A-, 21-gauge, A-bevel; 21B-, 21-gauge, B-bevel; 20I-, 20-gauge, I-bevel; 18B-, 18-gauge, B-bevel; NS+, needle stop used; NS-, no needle stop used.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Needle Overinsertion Injuries Reported to Have Occurred During Internal Jugular Venous Cannulation Despite Ultrasound Guidance

    Injured StructureComplications
    Carotid artery1-4Hematoma, stroke, arteriovenous fistula
    Subclavian artery5-7Hematoma, arteriovenous fistula
    Vertebral artery8-10 (mainly pediatric)Hematoma, pseudoaneurysm
    Pleura/lung11,12Pneumothorax, hemothorax
    Thoracic duct13,14Cutaneous chyle leak
    Stellate ganglion15,16Horner syndrome
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Smart Phrase Addendum to Central Venous Cannulation Note in the Electronic Medical Record

    DEMOGRAPHICSVEIN ANATOMYNEEDLEOUTCOME
    date:IJ,SCL,Fem:gauge:Cannulation success?
    pt age:side (R/L):tip sharpness (A-,B-,I-)overshoot (DWP)?
    pt height:skin→superficial wall (mm):length (mm):# skin punctures:
    pt weight:skin→mid-lumen (mm):insertion angle (°):# needle re-directs:
    pt sex:skin→deep wall (mm):tip insertion depth (mm):notes:
    operator experience:A-P diameter (mm): M-L diameter (mm):needle stop used? needle stop type:
    • A-,B-,I-, sharpness category: A-, extra-sharp; B-, of lesser sharpness customary for vascular access; I-, of sharpness intermediate between A- and B-; A-P, anteroposterior; DWP, double-wall puncture; IJ, SCL, Fem, internal jugular, subclavian, femoral (vein being cannulated); M-L, medial-lateral; pt, patient; R/L, right/left.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Attributes of Hypodermic Needles Used During Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation

    Outside DiameterLengthBevel Bias AnglebTip Grind TypecW-t-P SiliconedW-t-P LatexdSharpnessVenipuncturesf, n=228 (122 male, 106 female)
    ManufacturergaammmmdegreesggClassificationeTotal, n (%)Male, nFemale, n
    Becton, Dickinson and Companyg210.825, 38, 5115LP^10.011.1A-93 (41)4548
    Cook Medical SST-CSVh210.84014LP^11.0–A-56 (25)2729
    Navilyst Medical Inc/ AngioDynamicsi Cook Medical (SST)i210.87022LP^18.526.3B-37 (16)2512
    Arrow-Teleflex Incorporatedj200.98817BB^18.113.7I-11 (5)74
    Arrow-Teleflex Incorporatedk181.36425LP^19.925.7B-31 (14)1813
    • ↵aBirmingham wire gauge.

    • ↵bPrimary (first) needle grind (bias) angle, measured with respect to needle long axis using light microscopy, computerized photographic enlargement, and protractor.

    • ↵cNeedle tip geometric classifications: LP^ – lancet point with all 3 grinds on the same side of the needle tip; BB^ – back bevel point with the second and third grinds on the opposite side of the tip from the first.

    • ↵dW-t-P is the weight in grams needed for a needle and attached syringe, perched atop an elastomeric membrane, to puncture the membrane. Membranes were 270-μm thick silicone rubber (McMaster-Carr) or 400-μm thick latex (Covidien). Each value is a mean of 5 consecutive trials performed with at least 7 needles of the same type.

    • ↵eNearest traditional sharpness classification, usually based on primary grind (bias) angle (A-, bias angle ∼12° [ie, intramuscular bevel]; B-, bias angle ∼18° [ie, venous bevel]), but here also classified based on our W-t-P determinations. Arrow-Teleflex Incorporated 20-gauge needles, having a nontraditional back-bevel tip grind geometry (bias angle 14°) and W-t-P values between A- and B- needles, are categorized as intermediate sharpness (I-).

    • ↵fNumber of internal jugular vein cannulations using each needle type.

    • ↵gMarketed for intramuscular/subcutaneous injection.

    • ↵hExtra-sharp Cook Medical Micropuncture needle.

    • ↵iNavilyst Medical Inc/AngioDynamics and Cook Medical (SST) microaccess needles all had traditional B- tip geometry and nearly identical W-t-P measurements.

    • ↵jNeedle in the Arrow-Teleflex Incorporated central venous cannulation kit that is provided as a component of an 18-gauge catheter-over-20-gauge needle device. During this project, such needles were used without the catheter as part of the microaccess technique.

    • ↵kBare cannulating needle in the Arrow-Teleflex Incorporated central venous cannulation kit.

    • BB, back bevel point; LP, lancet point; W-t-P weight to puncture.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Patient Demographics by Cannulation Outcome, n=228

    Cannulation OutcomeAge, yearsHeight, mWeight, kgBMI, kg/m2
    Single-wall puncture, n=207 (91%)62 ± 141.7 ± 0.186 ± 3029 ± 10
     Male, n=113 (55%)62 ± 151.8 ± 0.198 ± 3830 ± 10
     Female, n=94 (45%)62 ± 151.6 ± 0.177 ± 2429 ± 9
    Double-wall puncture, n=21 (9%)58 ± 151.7 ± 0.181 ± 1829 ± 9
     Male, n=9 (43%)59 ± 161.8 ± 0.186 ± 1526 ± 4
     Female, n=12 (57%)57 ± 151.6 ± 0.177 ± 2031 ± 12
    • Note: Data are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated.

    • BMI, body mass index.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Summary Statistics for Measurements of Adult Patient Internal Jugular Vein Anatomy, n=228

    Anatomic VariableMean ± SDMinimum, Median, Maximum
    Diameter
     Anteroposterior11.6 ± 3.05, 11, 20
     Medial-lateral16.7 ± 4.86, 16, 30
     Anteroposterior: medial-lateral ratio0.7 ± 0.20.3, 0.7, 1.3
    Distance
     Skin to superficial-most portion of wall (Dsuperf)10.6 ± 3.63, 10, 25
     Skin to mid-lumen (Dmid)16.7 ± 3.98, 17, 30
     Skin to deepest portion of wall (Ddeep)22.6 ± 4.811, 23, 38
     Mid-lumen to deepest portion of wall (Ddeep – Dmid)5.9 ± 1.82, 6, 13
    • Note: All measurements taken perpendicular to plane of skin in mm except for (unitless) diameter ratio.

    • View popup
    Table 6.

    Double-Wall Puncture Rates for Individual Needles and Some Groupings Based on Tip Sharpness, Gauge, and Length

    Needle CharacteristicDouble-Wall Puncture Rate, %Double-Wall Puncture, n/n95% CI, %
    Tip Sharpness
    A-bevel, 21 gauge8.713/1494.7-14.5
    I-bevel, 20 gauge0.00/110.0-28.5
    B-bevel, all gauges11.88/685.2-21.9
     21 gauge13.55/374.5-28.8
     18 gauge9.73/312.0-25.8
    Gauge
    21 gauge, any bevel, NS±9.718/1865.8-14.9
    20 gauge, I-bevel, NSs-o0.00/110.0-28.5
    18 gauge, B-bevel, NS±9.73/312.0-25.8
    Length optimization
    NS-, all gauges25.011/4413.2-40.3
     21 gauge, A-bevel and B-bevel22.09/4110.6-37.6
      21 gauge, A-bevel18.26/337.0-35.5
      21 gauge, B-bevel37.53/88.5-75.6
     18 gauge B-bevel66.72/39.4-99.2
    NS+, all gauges5.410/1842.6-9.8
     21 gauge, A-bevel6.07/1162.5-12.0
      21 gauge, A-bevel, NSs-o9.27/763.8-18.1
      21 gauge, A-bevel, NShub0.00/400.0-8.8
     21 gauge, B-bevel, NSs-o6.92/290.9-22.8
     20 gauge I-bevel, NSs-o0.00/110.0-28.5
     18 gauge B-bevel, NSs-o3.61/280.1-18.3
    • Note: A-bevel, extra-sharp; B-bevel, of lesser sharpness customary for vascular access; I-bevel, of sharpness intermediate between A-bevel and B-bevel.

    • NS±, with or without a needle stop; NS+, with a needle stop; NS-, without a needle stop; NShub, original manufacturer's hub served as the needle stop; NSs-o, nylon screw-on mechanical needle stop.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal: 23 (3)
Ochsner Journal
Vol. 23, Issue 3
Sep 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lower Double-Wall Puncture Rate During Ultrasound-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation Using Sharper, Narrower-Gauge, and/or Length-Optimized Needles: A 6-Year Quality Improvement Clinical Series in Adult Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Lower Double-Wall Puncture Rate During Ultrasound-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation Using Sharper, Narrower-Gauge, and/or Length-Optimized Needles: A 6-Year Quality Improvement Clinical Series in Adult Patients
James M. Riopelle, Valeriy V. Kozmenko, Melville Q. Wyche, Marion L. Yapuncich, Eddie J. Pitre
Ochsner Journal Sep 2023, 23 (3) 232-242; DOI: 10.31486/toj.22.0117

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Lower Double-Wall Puncture Rate During Ultrasound-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation Using Sharper, Narrower-Gauge, and/or Length-Optimized Needles: A 6-Year Quality Improvement Clinical Series in Adult Patients
James M. Riopelle, Valeriy V. Kozmenko, Melville Q. Wyche, Marion L. Yapuncich, Eddie J. Pitre
Ochsner Journal Sep 2023, 23 (3) 232-242; DOI: 10.31486/toj.22.0117
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Low Unintended Dural Puncture Rate Using a Flush-Measure-Check-Advance Technique to Perform Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia in Parturients: A Quality Improvement Clinical Series
  • Enhancing Physician Satisfaction and Patient Safety Through an Artificial Intelligence–Driven Scheduling System in Anesthesiology
  • Improving Resident Physician Participation in Reporting Patient Safety and Quality Concerns
Show more QUALITY IMPROVEMENT

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cannulation
  • central venous access
  • double-wall puncture
  • jugular veins
  • needles
  • posterior wall puncture

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2026 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire