Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
Case ReportCASE REPORTS AND CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS
Open Access

Successful Percutaneous Ultrasonic Lithotripsy of Gallstones

Adam Ostergar, Muhammad Hassan Alkazemi, Hayden Hill, Michael M. Awad, Alexander Ushinsky, Michael Darcy, Alana C. Desai and Robert Sherburne Figenshau
Ochsner Journal March 2024, 24 (1) 84-86; DOI: https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.23.0071
Adam Ostergar
1Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muhammad Hassan Alkazemi
1Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hayden Hill
1Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael M. Awad
2Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Ushinsky
3Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Darcy
3Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alana C. Desai
1Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Sherburne Figenshau
1Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: figenshaur{at}wustl.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Acute calculous cholecystitis is the obstruction of the cystic duct by a gallstone that leads to inflammation of the gallbladder necessitating cholecystectomy.

Case Series: We present the cases of 2 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis who were deemed ineligible candidates for cholecystectomy because of their complicating medical histories. Both patients initially underwent cholecystostomy and drain placement with interventional radiology for management of acute calculous cholecystitis. Their large gallstones remained refractory to attempts at removal by electrohydraulic lithotripsy via the cholecystostomy access. The patients’ gallstones were successfully removed via percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy during a collaborative procedure with interventional radiology and urology.

Conclusion: An interdisciplinary approach using percutaneous cholecystolithotomy with rigid ultrasonic lithotripsy is an effective method for removing challenging gallstones in patients for whom traditional approaches fail.

Keywords:
  • Cholelithiasis
  • endoscopy–digestive system
  • gallbladder diseases
  • gallstones
  • lithotripsy
  • ultrasonics

INTRODUCTION

Acute calculous cholecystitis—the obstruction of the cystic duct by a gallstone that leads to inflammation of the gallbladder—may present with right upper quadrant pain, nausea, vomiting, fever and, if left untreated, can result in perforation, abscess formation, or fistulae.1 The optimal treatment for acute calculous cholecystitis is surgical removal of the gallbladder by laparoscopic or conventional surgery.2 However, several studies show significant increases in postoperative mortality rates for otherwise healthy patients with medical comorbidities or advanced age.3,4 For these patients, an alternative treatment for acute or chronic cholecystitis is percutaneous cholecystolithotomy.5 Percutaneous cholecystolithotomy is similar to percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a procedure used for complex urinary stone disease, typically renal calculi >2 cm.

We present the cases of 2 medically comorbid patients who underwent percutaneous cholecystolithotomy for acute calculous cholecystitis. The patients’ stones proved refractory to removal via repeated electrohydraulic lithotripsy performed by interventional radiology. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy uses a charge generator that transmits across the electrodes of a bipolar probe, resulting in spark creation, expansion of fluid, and an oscillating shock wave of pressure that can fragment stones. Irrigation is used to transmit the shock wave, improve visualization, and flush away fragments as they are created.6

A cooperative approach between interventional radiology and urology with the use of the Swiss LithoClast Trilogy Lithotripter (E.M.S. Electro Medical Systems S.A.) provided effective treatment for both patients. In addition to its suction capability, this lithotripter uses a dual-energy system that generates both ultrasonic vibrations and electromagnetic energy for stone treatment. Suction was performed through Amplatz type renal dilators (Boston Scientific Corporation).

CASE SERIES

Case 1

A 53-year-old male presented for percutaneous cholecystolithotomy for a large recalcitrant gallstone. He had been hospitalized 1 year prior for acute cholecystitis. At that time, he underwent percutaneous drainage of the gallbladder as he was not considered an operative candidate because of severe respiratory disease and morbid obesity. The patient subsequently underwent serial catheter exchanges and 5 attempts at percutaneous stone extraction by interventional radiology; however, a large stone burden remained. Given the difficulty in fracturing his stone with electrohydraulic lithotripsy, urology was consulted for attempted ultrasonic lithotripsy.

Monitored anesthesia care with intravenous sedation was administered, and the patient was prepped around the existing cholecystostomy tube. Interventional radiology performed serial dilation of the preexisting access tract (16 French [F]) to accommodate a 30F sheath. The urology team used a rigid scope with an ultrasonic probe to enter the gallbladder. Multiple stones were visualized, fragmented, and evacuated with the ultrasonic lithotripter. When stone clearance was achieved, a catheter was advanced into the gallbladder through the sheath, contrast was injected to confirm intraluminal positioning, and a guidewire was coiled within the gallbladder lumen. The sheath was removed, and a new 16F drain was replaced in the gallbladder; position and bile duct patency were confirmed by contrast injection and fluoroscopy.

At 1-week interventional radiology follow-up, the patient had a patent cystic duct and no residual cholelithiasis, so the catheter was removed. The patient remained recurrence-free at his 4-month follow-up.

Case 2

A 63-year-old male was admitted for an episode of acute cholecystitis and underwent percutaneous cholecystolithotomy with placement of a 14F catheter as he was deemed a poor surgical candidate because of recently diagnosed nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis. Follow-up cholangiogram 2 months later showed persistent cholelithiasis. Interventional radiology attempted percutaneous stone removal with electrohydraulic lithotripsy. After 2 hours and the use of several electrohydraulic lithotripsy probes, only a small portion of the first stone had been fragmented, leaving a considerable amount of stone burden. The cholecystostomy tube was upsized to a 16F catheter, and plans were made to collaborate with urology for percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy.

Under general anesthesia, the access tract was dilated and a 24F sheath was placed. The urologist identified the first stone (Figure 1) and fragmented it with ultrasonic lithotripsy. Large fragments were removed with a basket, and small fragments were suctioned with the lithotripter. The second stone was identified and removed in similar fashion. The cystic duct was visualized and noted to be patent with efflux of bile. After successful ultrasound lithotripsy, a 16F catheter was placed within the gallbladder, and its position was confirmed under fluoroscopy. Some contrast extravasation from the gallbladder was seen, indicating partial disruption of the tract (Figure 2). The patient did not exhibit any pain or signs of peritonitis during the postoperative period.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Case 2: Two large stones were visualized with fluoroscopy within the patient's gallbladder.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Case 2: Fluoroscopy shows the stones removed, the catheter in place, and some extravasation of contrast, indicating partial tract disruption.

Interval biliary drainage catheter check performed 1 week later showed no residual stones or filling defects, and the cholecystostomy tube was removed (Figure 3). At 2-month follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Case 2: Interval cholangiogram prior to cholecystostomy tube removal shows patency of the common bile duct, as contrast reaches the small bowel.

DISCUSSION

While laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the established procedure for patients with gallstones and/or acute cholecystitis,2 percutaneous cholecystolithotomy can be performed with less risk than laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with serious comorbidities.3,7 Persistent drainage through a cholecystostomy catheter causes discomfort, increased hospital visits for tube complications, and overall reduced quality of life. Successful percutaneous cholecystolithotomy can eliminate stones and symptoms and reduce recurrence and the need for drainage catheters. Percutaneous cholecystolithotomy can be used in patients with contraindications to general anesthesia (Case 1) or contraindications to surgery (Case 2). Although percutaneous cholecystolithotomy has been reported since the 1970s, its incidence has been slowly growing.8 Percutaneous cholecystolithotomy can be performed with low-profile flexible endoscopic devices and electrohydraulic, ultrasonic, or laser lithotripsy. As demonstrated in our patients, a collaborative approach between interventional radiology and urology should be considered for difficult stones. Continued monitoring of patients for recurrence of stones or future cholecystitis will help to determine the benefits of percutaneous cholecystolithotomy.

CONCLUSION

These cases demonstrate that percutaneous cholecystolithotomy with rigid ultrasonic lithotripsy is an effective method for removing challenging gallstones in patients for whom traditional approaches fail.

This article meets the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Medical Specialties Maintenance of Certification competencies for Patient Care and Medical Knowledge.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of the Department of Urology and Department of Interventional Urology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis for the care of the patients discussed in this case series. No organizational or grant funding was received for this research. The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter of this article.

Footnotes

  • ↵*Drs Ostergar and Alkazemi contributed equally to this report.

  • ©2024 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)

©2024 by the author(s); licensee Ochsner Journal, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode) that permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Halpin V
    . Acute cholecystitis. BMJ Clin Evid. 2014;2014:0411.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Yamashita Y,
    2. Takada T,
    3. Kawarada Y,
    4. et al.
    Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(1):91-97. doi: 10.1007/s00534-006-1161-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Huber DF,
    2. Martin EW Jr.,
    3. Cooperman M
    . Cholecystectomy in elderly patients. Am J Surg. 1983;146(6):719-722. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(83)90326-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kamarajah SK,
    2. Karri S,
    3. Bundred JR,
    4. et al.
    Perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(11):4727-4740. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07805-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kim SK,
    2. Mani NB,
    3. Darcy MD,
    4. Picus DD
    . Percutaneous cholecystolithotomy using cholecystoscopy. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;22(3):139-148. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2019.04.006
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. ASGE Technology Committee
    2. Watson RR,
    3. Parsi MA
    , et al. Biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy devices. VideoGIE. 2018;3(11):329-338. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2018.07.010
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Indar AA,
    2. Beckingham IJ
    . Acute cholecystitis. BMJ. 2002;325(7365):639-643. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7365.639
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Patel N,
    2. Chick JFB,
    3. Gemmete JJ,
    4. et al.
    Interventional radiology-operated cholecystoscopy for the management of symptomatic cholelithiasis: approach, technical success, safety, and clinical outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(5):1164-1171. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18690
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal: 24 (1)
Ochsner Journal
Vol. 24, Issue 1
Mar 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Successful Percutaneous Ultrasonic Lithotripsy of Gallstones
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Successful Percutaneous Ultrasonic Lithotripsy of Gallstones
Adam Ostergar, Muhammad Hassan Alkazemi, Hayden Hill, Michael M. Awad, Alexander Ushinsky, Michael Darcy, Alana C. Desai, Robert Sherburne Figenshau
Ochsner Journal Mar 2024, 24 (1) 84-86; DOI: 10.31486/toj.23.0071

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Successful Percutaneous Ultrasonic Lithotripsy of Gallstones
Adam Ostergar, Muhammad Hassan Alkazemi, Hayden Hill, Michael M. Awad, Alexander Ushinsky, Michael Darcy, Alana C. Desai, Robert Sherburne Figenshau
Ochsner Journal Mar 2024, 24 (1) 84-86; DOI: 10.31486/toj.23.0071
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • CASE SERIES
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Esophageal Cancer in a Patient With Poland Syndrome
  • The Potential Role of Zilretta in Reducing Intra-Articular Effusions
  • Treatment of Spinal Epidural Abscess With Limited Decompression
Show more CASE REPORTS AND CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cholelithiasis
  • endoscopy–digestive system
  • gallbladder diseases
  • gallstones
  • lithotripsy
  • ultrasonics

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2026 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire