So What?

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Nakagawa S,
   2. Cuthill IC

   . Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists [published correction appears in Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009 Aug;84(3):515]. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007;82(4):591-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Benjamin DJ,
   2. Berger JO,
   3. Johannesson M,
   4. et al.

   Redefine statistical significance. Nat Hum Behav. 2018;2(1):6-10. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Schober P,
   2. Bossers SM,
   3. Schwarte LA

   . Statistical significance versus clinical importance of observed effect sizes: what do P values and confidence intervals really represent? Anesth Analg. 2018;126(3):1068-1072. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002798

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Kim HY

   . Statistical notes for clinical researchers: effect size. Restor Dent Endod. 2015;40(4):328-331. doi: 10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.328

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Kim HY

   . Statistical notes for clinical researchers: risk difference, risk ratio, and odds ratio. Restor Dent Endod. 2017;42(1):72-76. doi: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.1.72

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Chai M,
   2. Vining A,
   3. Koveleskie J,
   4. Sumrall W,
   5. Nossaman BD

   . Risk of instrumental delivery in maternal obesity: estimates with measures of effect size. Ochsner J. 2024;24(3). doi: 10.31486/toj.24.0041

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Kaminski HM,
   2. Stafl A,
   3. Aiman J

   . The effect of epidural analgesia on the frequency of instrumental obstetric delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69(5):770-773.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.
   1. Thorp JA,
   2. Hu DH,
   3. Albin RM,
   4. et al.

   The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169(4):851-858. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90015-b

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Walton P,
   2. Reynolds F

   . Epidural analgesia and instrumental delivery. Anaesthesia. 1984;39(3):218-223. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb07230.x

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Jouppila R,
    2. Jouppila P,
    3. Karinen JM,
    4. Hollmén A

    . Segmental epidural analgesia in labour: related to the progress of labour, fetal malposition and instrumental delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1979;58(2):135-139. doi: 10.3109/00016347909154571

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. 11.
    1. Sharma SK,
    2. Sidawi JE,
    3. Ramin SM,
    4. Lucas MJ,
    5. Leveno KJ,
    6. Cunningham FG

    . Cesarean delivery: a randomized trial of epidural versus patient-controlled meperidine analgesia during labor. Anesthesiology. 1997;87(3):487-494. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199709000-00006

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.
    1. Bakhamees H,
    2. Hegazy E

    . Does epidural increase the incidence of cesarean delivery or instrumental labor in Saudi populations? Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2007;19(3):693-704.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Halpern SH,
    2. Muir H,
    3. Breen TW,
    4. et al.

    A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing patient-controlled epidural with intravenous analgesia for pain relief in labor. Anesth Analg. 2004;99(5):1532-1538. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000136850.08972.07

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Naimi AI,
    2. Whitcomb BW

    . Estimating risk ratios and risk differences using regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2020;189(6):508-510. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa044

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed