Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
Review ArticleREVIEWS AND CONTEMPORARY UPDATES
Open Access

Beta-Blocker Usage in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction During Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Hospitalizations

Matthew T. Brennan, Khaled M. Harmouch, Jawad Basit and M. Chadi Alraies
Ochsner Journal September 2024, 24 (3) 198-203; DOI: https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.24.0011
Matthew T. Brennan
1Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Khaled M. Harmouch
2Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jawad Basit
3Department of Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Chadi Alraies
4Cardiovascular Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: alraies{at}hotmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Acute decompensated heart failure accounts for more than 1 million hospitalizations in the United States every year. Beta-blockers are a first-line agent for patients experiencing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but beta-blocker use in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure remains low. We conducted an analysis of the existing evidence and guidelines to determine the conditions for prescribing beta-blockers to patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

Methods: We searched the PubMed database for studies from 2004 to 2024 that included the search terms “beta blockers” and “acute decompensated heart failure.” We included studies in which beta-blockers were used in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and excluded studies that did not study beta-blockers directly. We compiled recommendations from professional societies regarding beta-blocker usage—both for outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and for patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure.

Results: Studies consistently demonstrated lower rates of mortality and rehospitalization when beta-blocker therapy was maintained for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who were already on beta-blocker therapy. Conversely, withdrawal of beta-blocker therapy was associated with increased in-hospital and short-term mortality. We summarized our findings in a guideline-based flowchart to help physicians make informed decisions regarding beta-blocker therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Based on the evidence, beta-blockers should be initiated at a low dose in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who have never been on beta-blockers, provided the patient is hemodynamically stable.

Conclusion: Our research and our guideline-based flowchart promote guideline-directed use of beta-blockers to improve the outcomes of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Keywords:
  • Adrenergic beta-antagonists
  • heart failure
  • heart failure–systolic
  • hospitalization

INTRODUCTION

As the population ages, heart failure is an increasing challenge in the United States. Hospitalizations for heart failure have been increasing since 2012.1 In 2017 alone, 924,000 Americans were hospitalized for heart failure, accounting for a total of 1.2 million hospitalizations.1

Heart failure is classified into 3 phenotypes based on left ventricular ejection fraction: heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40%); heart failure with mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (41%-49%); and heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%). In developed countries, patients with reduced ejection fraction account for up to 60% of patients with heart failure, while patients with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction make up the remaining 40%.2,3

Acute decompensated heart failure is generally defined as the gradual or sudden onset of new or worsening signs and symptoms of heart failure, leading to a hospitalization or emergency department visit.4 A 2005 report from Gheorghiade et al categorized patients by heart failure chronicity.5 Among the patients hospitalized for heart failure, approximately 70% represented worsening chronic heart failure, 25% represented new-onset heart failure, and 5% represented advanced heart failure.5

METHODS

Because beta-blocker usage in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure is low, we conducted an analysis of the existing evidence and guidelines to determine the conditions for prescribing beta-blockers to patients with acute decompensated heart failure. We compiled recommendations from professional societies regarding beta-blocker usage both for outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and for patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure. We also searched the PubMed database for studies from 2004 to 2024 that included the search terms “beta blockers” and “acute decompensated heart failure” and included studies in which beta-blockers were used to treat patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. We excluded studies that did not study beta-blockers directly.

OUTPATIENT USE OF BETA-BLOCKERS FOR HEART FAILURE WITH REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION

Beta-blockers are a first-line treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. By antagonizing catecholamines at beta receptors, beta-blockers reduce the harmful effects of the chronic sympathetic activation seen in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: increased heart rate, high myocardial oxygen demand, arrhythmogenicity, and cardiac remodeling. In large randomized controlled trials, 3 different beta-blockers—bisoprolol, carvedilol, and sustained-release metoprolol succinate—were shown to reduce all-cause mortality and hospitalization.6-8 Consequently, professional societies universally recommend beta-blockers as the initial treatment for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (Table 1).4,9-11

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Professional Society Recommendations on the Use of Beta-Blockers for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

ACUTE DECOMPENSATED HEART FAILURE

Presentation of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Patients presenting with acute decompensated heart failure require immediate medical evaluation and treatment. In-hospital mortality rates for acute decompensated heart failure hospitalizations range from 4.2% to 5.3%, increasing to 22% to 27% within 1 year of hospitalization.12,13 However, most presentations of decompensated heart failure are not acute. Instead, patients typically present to the hospital following a gradual increase in cardiac filling pressures coupled with a precipitating event.9 The most common precipitating factors in descending order are pneumonia or respiratory processes, arrhythmias, medication noncompliance, renal failure, and uncontrolled hypertension.14

To aid in the management of acute decompensated heart failure, patients are assigned to 1 of 4 categories depending on whether they show signs of congestion (ie, wet vs dry) or hypoperfusion (ie, cold vs warm).15 A study of 7,865 patients in the European Heart Failure Long-Term Registry found that patients most often fell into the warm-wet classification (70%), followed by cold-wet (20%), warm-dry (10%), and cold-dry (0.4%).13 Of note, hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) is not necessary to diagnose hypoperfusion; only 5% to 8% of patients with acute decompensated heart failure present with hypotension.15 Instead, clinicians rely on clinical signs such as cold extremities, oliguria, or altered mental status.

Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Management of patients with acute decompensated heart failure should focus on addressing reversible factors, optimizing volume status, and prescribing guideline-directed medical therapy.9 Optimization of volume status entails the use of loop diuretics to relieve congestion.16 In rare instances—such as a patient with low systolic blood pressure, hypoperfusion, and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction—inotropes may be required.17

As shown in Table 1, beta-blockers are a mainstay of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Accordingly, professional societies recommend continuing or initiating beta-blockers during a hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure in most situations (Table 2).4,9-11 We have created a guideline-based flowchart to help physicians determine when or whether to withdraw beta-blockers during a hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (Figure).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Professional Society Recommendations on the Use of Beta-Blockers During a Hospitalization for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Figure.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure.

Guideline-based flowchart for using beta-blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who present with acute decompensated heart failure.

The other components of guideline-directed medical therapy include renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.9 Greene et al analyzed medications taken by patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in the Change the Management of Patients with Heart Failure (CHAMP-HF) registry and found that the guideline-directed medical therapy medications most often reduced in dosage were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers and beta-blockers.18

Physicians may have concerns about continuing a medication with negative inotropic effects at a time of worsening hemodynamics.19 This instinct may make sense in theory but does not hold in practice for several reasons. First, the initial goal in the management of acute decompensated heart failure is to address reversible factors. Beta-blocker medications would be a suspected culprit of decompensation only if they were initiated or increased shortly before the hospitalization. If not, physicians should look elsewhere for reversible factors precipitating an acute decompensated heart failure hospitalization. Second, sudden cessation of beta-blocker treatment may cause further adverse outcomes by causing a rebound of the sympathetic nervous system.20 Beta-blocker withdrawal has been shown to increase angina and the risk of coronary events.21

Despite the reasoning for the continuation of beta-blocker therapy during hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure, many providers fail to administer them. In a 2018 analysis of the CHAMP-HF registry, just 67% of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were prescribed beta-blockers.22 An analysis of claims data from 2009 to 2012 found that 42% of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were not prescribed any heart failure–specific medications as of 30 days following hospitalization.23 Although hypoperfusion is observed in only about 1 in 5 patients with acute decompensated heart failure,13 physicians often cited “medical reasons” as the impetus for reducing dosages of beta-blocker therapy.18

IN-HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES

Withdrawal of Beta-Blocker Therapy During Hospitalization Is Harmful

The withdrawal of beta-blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction experiencing acute decompensated heart failure is harmful in the short and long term. In the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF), patients whose beta-blocker treatment was withdrawn had higher rates of mortality compared to patients who continued beta-blocker treatment.24 A 2015 meta-analysis found beta-blocker discontinuation to be associated with an increased risk of both in-hospital mortality and short-term mortality (≤6 months of first hospitalization).19 Beta-blocker discontinuation also led to a higher risk of the combined outcome of rehospitalization or mortality.19

Maintenance of Beta-Blocker Therapy Is Beneficial

Studies support the claim that continuation of beta-blocker therapy throughout hospitalization leads to significant benefits. The OPTIMIZE-HF trial found reductions in 60-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and the combined outcome of rehospitalization or mortality in patients discharged on carvedilol compared to patients not on carvedilol.25

One benefit of continuing beta-blocker therapy throughout hospitalization may be the higher rate of adherence upon discharge, given the difficulty of resuming beta-blockers once they are discontinued. Higher usage of beta-blockers has been observed in patients whose medication was not discontinued during an acute decompensated heart failure hospitalization.26 The benefit of maintaining beta-blocker therapy during hospitalization may be associated with the difficulty patients face in reaching target dosages. In the CHAMP-HF registry, just 20.3% of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were prescribed target doses of beta-blockers at baseline, improving to only 26.4% after 12 months.18 The suboptimal beta-blocker dosage prescriptions may be due to the “start low, go slow” approach recommended when prescribing beta-blockers.27 Given the time needed to achieve optimal dosages, the choice to withdraw or decrease beta-blocker therapy during hospitalization takes on greater importance. A single hospitalization has the potential to undo months or years of careful titration.

Initiation of Beta-Blocker Therapy Is Recommended in Beta-Blocker–Naïve Patients

Beta-blocker–naïve patients should be started on beta-blocker therapy during an acute decompensated heart failure hospitalization because initiation during hospitalization consistently benefits patients. A 2018 analysis of 672 beta-blocker–naïve patients who were hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure and received inotropes showed that the predischarge initiation of beta-blockers resulted in lower 2-year mortality (21.3% vs 39.3%).28 The authors also found that predischarge prescriptions of beta-blockers in beta-blocker–naïve patients resulted in significantly higher prescription rates after 12 months (89% vs 25%).28 In an analysis of OPTIMIZE-HF, Fonarow et al found that initiation of beta-blockers during a heart failure hospitalization was well tolerated, as evidenced by 91.9% of patients maintaining therapy at 60 to 90 days postdischarge follow-up.24

Professional societies also recommend initiating beta-blocker therapy during acute decompensated heart failure hospitalizations in beta-blocker–naïve patients. The 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines state, “In patients admitted with AHF [acute heart failure], beta-blockers should be cautiously initiated in hospital, once the patient is haemodynamically stabilized.”4 The 2022 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Failure Society of America (AHA/ACC/HFSA) guidelines concur: “Oral GDMT [guideline-directed medical therapy] should not be withheld for mild or transient reductions in blood pressure.” The AHA/ACC/HFSA guidelines continue, “True contraindications are rare, such as advanced degree atrioventricular block….”9

Despite these encouraging findings, physicians should carefully monitor symptoms when initiating beta-blocker therapy. The Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF) found that the most common limiting factor for reaching target dosages of metoprolol CR/XL in the outpatient setting was low heart rate, seen in 11.3% of patients.29 MERIT-HF also found that the greatest risk for mortality or hospitalization occurred 4 to 8 weeks following initiation of beta-blockers. After 8 weeks, rates of deterioration shifted to favor beta blockade in all patients taking beta-blockers. Patients’ subjective well-being could even predict future events. Lainscak et al found that self-reported health was an independent predictor of adverse events in patients with chronic heart failure during the period of initiating or increasing beta-blocker dosages.30

Consider Withholding Beta-Blocker Therapy in Patients With Persistent Hypotension

In patients with persistent hypotension, physicians should consider withholding or reducing the dosage of beta-blocker therapy. To our knowledge, no studies have compared continuation vs withdrawal of beta-blocker therapy in acute decompensated heart failure patients with unresolved hypotension. However, professional guidelines recommend that physicians consider withholding beta-blockers or reducing the dosage while resolving persistent hypotension. The 2021 ESC guidelines state, “In those admitted with ADHF [acute decompensated heart failure], oral OMT [optimal medical therapy] should be continued, except for possible dose reduction or withdrawal if there is haemodynamic instability (symptomatic hypotension), severely impaired renal function or hyperkalaemia. Once haemodynamic stabilization is achieved with i.v. therapy, treatment should be optimized before discharge.”4 The 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guidelines state, “Withholding or reducing beta-blocker therapy should be considered in patients with marked volume overload or marginal low cardiac output.”9

CONCLUSION

Our analysis underscores the critical role of beta-blocker therapy in the treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who present with acute decompensated heart failure. The difficulty in attaining optimal beta-blocker dosages in the outpatient setting amplifies the importance of maintenance therapy during hospitalization. Discontinuing beta-blocker therapy during episodes of acute decompensated heart failure is associated with adverse outcomes in both the short and long term. Beta-blockers should be continued in patients already on stable regimens, except in rare situations. Additionally, for patients not previously on beta-blocker therapy, initiation should occur as soon as the patient is hemodynamically stable. The guideline-based flowchart we provide serves as a guide for physicians in making informed decisions regarding beta-blocker therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who are admitted to the hospital with acute decompensated heart failure.

This article meets the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Medical Specialties Maintenance of Certification competencies for Patient Care, Medical Knowledge, and Practice-Based Learning and Improvement.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter of this article.

  • ©2024 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)

©2024 by the author(s); licensee Ochsner Journal, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode) that permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Agarwal MA,
    2. Fonarow GC,
    3. Ziaeian B
    . National trends in heart failure hospitalizations and readmissions from 2010 to 2017. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6(8):952-956. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.7472
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Chioncel O,
    2. Lainscak M,
    3. Seferovic PM,
    4. et al.
    Epidemiology and one-year outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved, mid-range and reduced ejection fraction: an analysis of the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19(12):1574-1585. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.813
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Koh AS,
    2. Tay WT,
    3. Teng THK,
    4. et al.
    A comprehensive population-based characterization of heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19(12):1624-1634. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.945
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. McDonagh TA,
    2. Metra M,
    3. Adamo M,
    4. et al.
    2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: developed by the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2022;75(6):523. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2022.05.005
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Gheorghiade M,
    2. Zannad F,
    3. Sopko G,
    4. et al.
    Acute heart failure syndromes: current state and framework for future research. Circulation. 2005;112(25):3958-3968. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.590091
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    CIBIS-II Investigators and Committees. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II): a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;353(9146):9-13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)11181-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.
    MERIT-HF Study Group. Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet. 1999;353(9169):2001-2007. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04440-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Packer M,
    2. Fowler MB,
    3. Roecker EB,
    4. et al.
    Effect of carvedilol on the morbidity of patients with severe chronic heart failure: results of the carvedilol prospective randomized cumulative survival (COPERNICUS) study. Circulation. 2002;106(17):2194-2199. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000035653.72855.bf
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Heidenreich PA,
    2. Bozkurt B,
    3. Aguilar D,
    4. et al.
    2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines [published correction appears in J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Apr 18;81(15):1551. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.03.002]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(17):e263-e421. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. McDonald M,
    2. Virani S,
    3. Chan M,
    4. et al.
    CCS/CHFS heart failure guidelines update: defining a new pharmacologic standard of care for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37(4):531-546. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.01.017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Chronic heart failure in adults: dianosis and management. NICE guideline [NG106]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Published September 12, 2018. Accessed July 12, 2024. nice.org.uk/guidance/ng106
  12. 12.↵
    1. Chioncel O,
    2. Mebazaa A,
    3. Harjola VP,
    4. et al.
    Clinical phenotypes and outcome of patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19(10):1242-1254. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.890
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Chioncel O,
    2. Mebazaa A,
    3. Maggioni AP,
    4. et al.
    Acute heart failure congestion and perfusion status–impact of the clinical classification on in-hospital and long-term outcomes; insights from the ESC-EORP-HFA Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(11):1338-1352. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1492
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kapoor JR,
    2. Kapoor R,
    3. Ju C,
    4. et al.
    Precipitating clinical factors, heart failure characterization, and outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure with reduced, borderline, and preserved ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail. 2016;4(6):464-472. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.02.017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ponikowski P,
    2. Voors AA,
    3. Anker SD,
    4. et al.
    2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(8):891-975. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.592
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Mullens W,
    2. Damman K,
    3. Harjola VP,
    4. et al.
    The use of diuretics in heart failure with congestion–a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(2):137-155. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1369
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Maack C,
    2. Eschenhagen T,
    3. Hamdani N,
    4. et al.
    Treatments targeting inotropy. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(44):3626-3644. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy600
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Greene SJ,
    2. Fonarow GC,
    3. DeVore AD,
    4. et al.
    Titration of medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(19):2365-2383. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Prins KW,
    2. Neill JM,
    3. Tyler JO,
    4. Eckman PM,
    5. Duval S
    . Effects of beta-blocker withdrawal in acute decompensated heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis [published correction appears in JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Oct;3(10):847]. JACC Heart Fail. 2015;3(8):647-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.03.008
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Hjemdahl P,
    2. Olsson G
    . Rebound phenomena following withdrawal of long-term beta-adrenoceptor blockade. Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1982;665:43-47. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1982.tb00407.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Miller RR,
    2. Olson HG,
    3. Amsterdam EA,
    4. Mason DT
    . Propranolol–withdrawal rebound phenomenon. Exacerbation of coronary events after abrupt cessation of antianginal therapy. N Engl J Med. 1975;293(9):416-418. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197508282930902
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Greene SJ,
    2. Butler J,
    3. Albert NM,
    4. et al.
    Medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the CHAMP-HF Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(4):351-366. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.070
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Deschaseaux C,
    2. McSharry M,
    3. Hudson E,
    4. Agrawal R,
    5. Turner SJ
    . Treatment initiation patterns, modifications, and medication adherence among newly diagnosed heart failure patients: a retrospective claims database analysis. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016;22(5):561-571. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.5.561
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Fonarow GC,
    2. Abraham WT,
    3. Albert NM,
    4. et al.
    Influence of beta-blocker continuation or withdrawal on outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure: findings from the OPTIMIZE-HF program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(3):190-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.048
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Fonarow GC,
    2. Abraham WT,
    3. Albert NM,
    4. et al.
    Carvedilol use at discharge in patients hospitalized for heart failure is associated with improved survival: an analysis from Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF). Am Heart J. 2007;153(1):82.e1-82.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.10.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Jondeau G,
    2. Neuder Y,
    3. Eicher JC,
    4. et al.
    B-CONVINCED: Beta-blocker CONtinuation Vs. INterruption in patients with Congestive heart failure hospitalizED for a decompensation episode. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(18):2186-2192. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp323
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Taylor CJ,
    2. Moore J,
    3. O'Flynn N
    . Diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure: NICE guideline update 2018. Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69(682):265-266. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X702665
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Cho MS,
    2. Kim MS,
    3. Lee SE,
    4. et al.
    Outcomes after predischarge initiation of β-blocker in patients hospitalized for severe decompensated heart failure requiring inotropic therapy. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34(9):1145-1152. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.05.005
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Gottlieb SS,
    2. Fisher ML,
    3. Kjekshus J,
    4. et al.
    Tolerability of beta-blocker initiation and titration in the Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Circulation. 2002;105(10):1182-1188. doi: 10.1161/hc1002.105180
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Lainscak M,
    2. Farkas J,
    3. Inkrot S,
    4. et al.
    Self-rated health predicts adverse events during β-blocker treatment: the CIBIS-ELD randomised trial analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2013;163(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.05.037
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal: 24 (3)
Ochsner Journal
Vol. 24, Issue 3
Sep 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Beta-Blocker Usage in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction During Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Hospitalizations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Beta-Blocker Usage in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction During Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Hospitalizations
Matthew T. Brennan, Khaled M. Harmouch, Jawad Basit, M. Chadi Alraies
Ochsner Journal Sep 2024, 24 (3) 198-203; DOI: 10.31486/toj.24.0011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Beta-Blocker Usage in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction During Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Hospitalizations
Matthew T. Brennan, Khaled M. Harmouch, Jawad Basit, M. Chadi Alraies
Ochsner Journal Sep 2024, 24 (3) 198-203; DOI: 10.31486/toj.24.0011
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • OUTPATIENT USE OF BETA-BLOCKERS FOR HEART FAILURE WITH REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION
    • ACUTE DECOMPENSATED HEART FAILURE
    • IN-HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Pharmacologic Management of Central Fever in Patients With Acute Brain Injury
  • Impact of Coffee Consumption on Cardiovascular Health
Show more REVIEWS AND CONTEMPORARY UPDATES

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Adrenergic beta-antagonists
  • heart failure
  • heart failure–systolic
  • hospitalization

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2026 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire