Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
Case ReportCASE REPORTS AND CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS
Open Access

Recurrent Intracranial Ewing Sarcoma

Soo Ann Yap, Annabel Helga Sophie Alig, Alena Annbalou Hasenburg, Georg Hilfenhaus, Lars Uwe Stephan, Uwe Pelzer, Sebastian Stintzing and Arndt Stahler
Ochsner Journal September 2024, 24 (3) 213-218; DOI: https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.24.0014
Soo Ann Yap
1Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
2Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
3German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annabel Helga Sophie Alig
1Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alena Annbalou Hasenburg
1Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georg Hilfenhaus
1Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars Uwe Stephan
1Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Uwe Pelzer
1Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastian Stintzing
1Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
3German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arndt Stahler
1Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: arndt.stahler{at}charite.de
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Ewing sarcoma is a rare malignant neoplasm that is primarily localized in bone tissues. The prognosis for patients with a newly diagnosed localized Ewing sarcoma has been greatly improved by multimodality treatment. However, treating patients with disseminated or recurrent disease is challenging, with a 5-year overall survival rate of <30%.

Case Report: A 17-year-old female with an asymptomatic tumor of the left temple underwent 3 cycles of vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide and achieved partial remission. However, the patient refused further chemotherapy and surgical intervention and was lost to follow-up. After 7 months, the patient presented again with a sizeable tumor on her left temple and worsening symptoms. Chemotherapy with alternating cycles of vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and etoposide according to the EURO EWING 2012 trial was initiated. After a positive response, debulking surgery was performed, followed by postsurgical radiation, and partial remission was achieved.

Conclusion: Optimal treatment protocols for recurrent Ewing sarcoma are lacking. Treatments are individualized based on the patient's response to treatment and the decisions of tumor boards. Patients with rare tumors such as Ewing sarcoma benefit from multidisciplinary collaboration, resulting in improved quality of care and treatment outcomes.

Keywords:
  • Chemotherapy–adjuvant
  • neoplasm metastasis
  • radiotherapy
  • sarcoma–Ewing
  • soft tissue neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Ewing sarcoma is an aggressive, rare, malignant, mesenchymal tumor with high recurrence and mortality rates. Primary tumors occur predominantly in the long bones (47%), pelvis (19%), ribs (12%), and (rarely) skull (4%),1-3 but extraosseous manifestation in soft tissues also occurs.4,5 Unique disease features include translocation between chromosomes 11 and 22, which results in the formation of the fusion gene EWSR1-FL1.6,7 Ewing sarcoma is known to display a heterogeneous clinical presentation; therefore, tumor biopsy is vital to differentiate the disease from other intracranial malignancies.7 Treatment strategies include the multidisciplinary approaches of systemic chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Nevertheless, an international treatment standard of systemic treatment has not been defined, and the overall survival rate at 5 years for disseminated disease is poor at <30%.8 The EURO EWING 2012 (EE2012) trial results published in 2022 reported that the US standard of vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and etoposide (VDC/IE) was more effective and less toxic than the European standard of vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (VIDE) for Ewing sarcoma treatment.9

We report the rare case of a patient with a massive extraosseous Ewing sarcoma, intracranial growth, and disseminated metastatic disease who experienced a major clinical response while being treated analogous to the EE2012 protocol and eventually achieved partial remission.

CASE REPORT

Figure 1 is a timeline of the patient's disease course.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Timeline of disease progression. Dx, diagnosis; Gy, gray; VDC/IE, vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and etoposide; VIDE, vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide.

In December 2019, a 17-year-old Ukrainian female first noticed an asymptomatic tumor on her left temple. In 2020, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans showed a tumor measuring 54 mm × 26 mm × 59 mm with infiltration into the skull but without metastatic spread (Figure 2A). After histologic confirmation of Ewing sarcoma, treatment was initiated with 3 cycles of VIDE from January to March 2021. Partial remission was achieved (6 mm × 10 mm, Figure 2B), and surgical resection was planned after the fourth cycle of VIDE. However, the patient refused further treatment and was lost to follow-up.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

(A) Cranial magnetic resonance imaging shows a large tissue mass (54 mm × 26 mm × 59 mm) in the temporal lobe. (B) Cranial computed tomography shows partial remission (6 mm × 10 mm) after 3 cycles of vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (VIDE).

After continuous disease progression and exacerbated pain, the patient decided to recommence treatment in March 2022. The outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian war delayed the initiation of treatment until the patient was transported 4 months later to the emergency department at the Charité Universitätsmedizin in Berlin, Germany.

The now 20-year-old cachectic patient (170 cm, 34 kg, body mass index 11.8 kg/m3, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Scale grade of 4) presented with a massive tumor on her left temple (Figure 3A) that penetrated through the oral cavity but was not associated with neurologic symptoms except for dysphagia. Cranial CT showed a tumor mass of 130 mm × 160 mm × 200 mm with intense vascularization (Figure 3B). Because of the size of the tumor, the pharynx was narrowed, and the left orbital soft tissue was shifted. Surgical resection was not possible.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

(A) The 20-year-old patient presented with a massive nontender tumor mass on the left temple with visible oral and orbital infiltration. (B) Computed tomography shows a tumor mass of 130 mm × 160 mm × 200 mm in the left hemisphere and (C) pulmonary metastasis.

Dexamethasone (8 mg 3 times daily) was initiated to reduce intracranial pressure, and the dosage was subsequently tapered following improvement of clinical symptoms and intracranial edema shown on follow-up CT. The patient's airway was secured via tracheostomy. Concomitant biopsy histologically confirmed the prior Ewing sarcoma diagnosis. Diagnostic staging procedures (bilateral bone marrow biopsy and CT scan) revealed pulmonary metastases (Figure 3C), pleural carcinomatosis, and suspected peritoneal carcinomatosis.

The multidisciplinary tumor board recommended treatment according to the EE2012 protocol9 with restaging after the fourth cycle of chemotherapy with VDC/IE. The recommended treatment was initiated with continuous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Complications of the first cycle were subtle tumor bleeding in the oral cavity, which was treated with tranexamic acid, and generalized epilepsy, which required prophylactic levetiracetam (1,000 mg twice daily, initially intravenously and then administered orally upon regression of the intracranial tumor) and lacosamide (45 mg twice daily, orally).

Headaches, pancytopenia, and recurrent neutropenic sepsis were among the most frequent adverse events. The recurrent neutropenic sepsis resulted from a superinfection of the primary tumor, the tracheostomy wound, aspiration pneumonia, and bilateral pyelonephritis. Consequently, the patient required multiple rounds of antibiotic treatment.

CT scan following the fourth cycle of chemotherapy showed a significant reduction of the primary tumor to approximately 25% of the initial volume (Figures 4A, 4C, and 4D), along with regression of the pulmonary metastasis and pleural carcinomatosis. The previously suspected peritoneal carcinomatosis was no longer detectable. Because of the patient's positive response to chemotherapy, her case was once again presented to the multidisciplinary sarcoma tumor board, and the decision was to follow up with a total of 6 cycles of chemotherapy and evaluation of a secondary resection.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

(A) Photograph shows tumor volume reduction and the appearance of necrotic tissue after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. (B) R0 resection was achieved with a successful reconstruction of the calotte. (C) Cranial computed tomography (CT) and (D) cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) show significant shrinkage of the primary tumor (85 mm × 87 mm × 124 mm) after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. (E) Cranial CT shows postsurgical hematoma and fluid retention without evidence of tumor mass. (F) Two months postoperative cranial MRI shows regression of hematoma and fluid retention.

Prehabilitation was implemented to assist the patient who was initially bedridden, impaired by cancer-related fatigue and malnutrition. The prehabilitation regimen included the administration of nutritional supplements, physiotherapy, and psychological support aimed to improve the patient's physical fitness while also enhancing her capacity to withstand stressful events. Oral feeding was challenging because of the invasive tumor in the oral cavity. High caloric nutritional infusion was initially administered to manage the progressive cancer cachexia, followed by regular logopedics, physiotherapy training, and reintroduction of oral feeding upon regression of the tumor in the oral cavity.

Upon completion of the final chemotherapy cycle, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-CT scan demonstrated significant regression of the Ewing sarcoma in the left frontal lobe with lesional calcification and pulmonary metastases.

In October 2022, debulking surgery was performed on the collum mandibulae following hemimaxillectomy; left orbital exenteration; and partial resection of the frontal, parietal, and temporal bone. Microsurgical free flaps were used for the reconstruction of the calotte with a customized left temporomandibular joint and polyether ether ketone implantation (Figure 4B). The postsurgical CT scan (Figure 4E) showed no signs of residual tumor but showed postsurgical hematoma and fluid retention. The hematoma and fluid retention subsequently subsided as seen on the cranial MRI 2 months later (Figure 4F). Pathology confirmed a successful R0 resection and classified the tumor as grade 2 according to the Salzer-Kuntschik classification.10

Prophylactic seizure medications were discontinued after successful tumor resection. Adjuvant radiotherapy was conducted with a total dose of 45 Gy. Postradiotherapy staging showed no signs of residual tumor on the cranial MRI; however, lung CT demonstrated progressive pulmonary metastasis, resulting in a partial remission. The patient was hospitalized for a total of 8 months and was discharged after administration of adjuvant radiochemotherapy.

DISCUSSION

Morphologically, Ewing sarcoma appears as poorly differentiated small round blue cells that can develop in various anatomic locations.11 Without treatment, the disease is aggressive as experienced by our patient, in which the initially localized Ewing sarcoma developed into an intrusive large intracranial tumor with distant metastases. Based on the formula V = (13 cm (L) × 16 cm (W) × 20 cm (W))/2, where V is tumor volume, W is tumor width, and L is tumor length,12 the cranial tumor volume of our patient was estimated to be 2,080 mL. Tumor volume >200 mL and metastatic disease are associated with a poor prognosis.13-15 Despite the poor prognosis in our case, the patient responded well to chemotherapy. After 6 cycles of systemic chemotherapy, the significant reduction of tumor volume permitted surgical reevaluation and subsequent resection.

Systemic chemotherapy is an important part of multimodal treatment of Ewing sarcoma, as initial cytoreduction and postsurgical consolidation are necessary to eradicate microscopic metastatic foci, facilitate sufficient tumor shrinkage, and reduce the likelihood of tumor recurrence.16,17 After multiple adjustments in dosage and chemotherapy intervals during the last 30 years, the current EE2012 protocol showed an improvement in 3-year event-free survival with VDC/IE compared to VIDE (67% vs 61%, respectively).9 When combined with surgery and irradiation, Krasin et al reported a 5-year local control rate of 89%.18 European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines recommend adjuvant radiotherapy with the goal to reduce local recurrence in patients with large tumor volume (>200 mL), inadequate surgical margins, and poor histologic response.19

Nevertheless, with a 5-year overall survival of 65% to 75% for patients with localized disease and <30% for patients with distant metastasis, approximately 30% of Ewing sarcoma patients will develop disease recurrence within 2 years.20,21

The high recurrence rate and poor disease prognosis upon relapse highlight the urgency of novel therapeutic approaches for Ewing sarcoma. Second-line standard regimens are not yet defined. Current experimental approaches consist of treatment intensification with subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autologous or allogeneic) and the evaluation of effective cytotoxic agents.22-24 The introduction of comprehensive genomic profiling established the option of broad molecular profiling and targeted treatment based on tumor alterations, particularly for rare cancers.25

Ewing sarcoma has a simple genetic arrangement, with 85% of the tumor associated with the t(11;22)(q24;q12) translocation leading to an EWS-FLI1 formation, 5% with t(21;12)(22;12), and the remaining 10% of the cases with a less common translocation inducing a EWS-ERG fusion.26 Lurbinectedin, a synthetic tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloid, has been reported to effectively suppress the activity of oncogenic transcription factor EWS-FLI1.27 In a single-arm, open-label, multicenter basket phase II trial, lurbinectedin showed positive efficacy, with 5 of 28 patients achieving disease stabilization for more than 6 months.28

A phase II trial of the immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody cixutumumab and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor temsirolimus demonstrated a positive response, in which 35% (7/20) of Ewing sarcoma patients responded with stable disease of more than 5 months, and tumor regression was reported in 29% of patients.29 Moreover, profiling of 113 patients with Ewing sarcoma revealed secondary ERF and FGFR1 alterations with a prevalence of 7% and 3%, respectively.30 Future trials might address these alterations pharmacologically to improve treatment lines and overall survival.

In addition to diagnostics and treatment, comprehensive cancer care requires multidimensional supportive care, taking into consideration the physical, psychological, and social needs of patients.31 Nutritional status is an important surgical prognostic marker, as patients with cancer cachexia are associated with poor outcomes after major surgery.32 Moreover, malnutrition is associated with the poor outcomes of prolonged hospital length of stay, increased risk of infections, and increased mortality.33,34 A meta-analysis of 9 studies involving 914 patients who underwent colorectal surgery showed that the hospital stays of patients who received at least 7 days of nutritional prehabilitation decreased by 2 days.35

Participation in a supervised exercise program prior to surgery by patients with rectal cancer who were undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy increased the patients’ postsurgical fitness significantly within 3 weeks.36 By primary endpoint analysis (ie, 6 weeks postoperatively), patients of the exercise group recovered in terms of fitness and physical activity, while the control group was at high risk of surgical adverse events.36 Poor preoperative physical fitness reflects poor physiologic reserves that are associated with postoperative morbidity.37 These findings demonstrate the importance of involving multiple disciplines to improve the quality of life, symptom control, and survival of patients with cancer.38-41

CONCLUSION

Management of Ewing sarcoma requires a multidisciplinary effort. Despite available treatment guidelines, the interdisciplinary tumor board should develop a strategy personalized to the patient's condition and tumor growth, especially in cases of relapsed Ewing sarcoma. Along with cancer-specific treatment, patients require comprehensive supportive care to improve symptom burden, quality of life, and outcomes.

This article meets the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Medical Specialties Maintenance of Certification competencies for Patient Care and Medical Knowledge.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The patient gave permission for the publication of the photographs. The images have not been manipulated or retouched.

Sebastian Stintzing reports honoraria for talks and advisory board roles with Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, ESAI, Leo-Pharma, Lilly, Merck KGaA, MSD, Pierre-Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Taiho, and Takeda. Arndt Stahler reports consulting or advisory roles with Bristol Myers Squibb, NovoCure, and Takeda; honoraria from Roche, Servier, and Taiho Pharmaceutical; and travel, accommodations, and expenses from Amgen, Roche, and Lilly.

The remaining authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter of this article.

  • ©2024 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)

©2024 by the author(s); licensee Ochsner Journal, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode) that permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Falk S,
    2. Alpert M
    . The clinical and roentgen aspects of Ewing's sarcoma. Am J Med Sci. 1965;250(5):492-508.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.
    1. Fitzer PM,
    2. Steffey WR
    . Brain and bone scans in primary Ewing's sarcoma of the petrous bone. J Neurosurg. 1976;44(5):608-612. doi: 10.3171/jns.1976.44.5.0608
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Turner JL,
    2. Sweeney P,
    3. Hardy R
    . Ewing's tumor metastatic to the clivus, simulating meningitis: case report. Neurosurgery. 1980;7(6):619-620. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198012000-00017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Pankratjevaite L,
    2. Eskandarani HA,
    3. Lizdenis P,
    4. Saladzinskas Z
    . Challenges in diagnosing an extraosseous Ewing sarcoma: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022;91:106708. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106708
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Sparreboom BD,
    2. Trautman J,
    3. Yaxley J
    . Ewing sarcoma: a pictorial review of typical and atypical locations with reference to the updated 2020 WHO classification system. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022;66(6):812-818. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13456
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Turc-Carel C,
    2. Philip I,
    3. Berger MP,
    4. Philip T,
    5. Lenoir GM
    . Chromosome study of Ewing's sarcoma (ES) cell lines. Consistency of a reciprocal translocation t(11;22)(q24;q12). Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1984;12(1):1-19. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(84)90002-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Zöllner SK,
    2. Amatruda JF,
    3. Bauer S,
    4. et al.
    Ewing sarcoma-diagnosis, treatment, clinical challenges and future perspectives. J Clin Med. 2021;10(8):1685. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081685
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Paulussen M,
    2. Bielack S,
    3. Jürgens H,
    4. Jost L
    ; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Ewing's sarcoma of the bone: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2008;19 Suppl 2:ii97-ii98. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn103
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Brennan B,
    2. Kirton L,
    3. Marec-Bérard P,
    4. et al.
    Comparison of two chemotherapy regimens in patients with newly diagnosed Ewing sarcoma (EE2012): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022;400(10362):1513-1521. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01790-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Salzer-Kuntschik M
    . Klassifikation und grading der weichgewebstumoren [Classification and grading of soft tissue tumors]. Article in German. Chirurg. 1993;64(6):435-442.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Durer S,
    2. Gasalberti DP,
    3. Shaikh H
    . Ewing sarcoma. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; January 8, 2024.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Monga SP,
    2. Wadleigh R,
    3. Sharma A,
    4. et al.
    Intratumoral therapy of cisplatin/epinephrine injectable gel for palliation in patients with obstructive esophageal cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2000;23(4):386-392. doi: 10.1097/00000421-200008000-00016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Paulussen M,
    2. Ahrens S,
    3. Dunst J,
    4. et al.
    Localized Ewing tumor of bone: final results of the cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Study CESS 86. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(6):1818-1829. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1818
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.
    1. Cotterill SJ,
    2. Ahrens S,
    3. Paulussen M,
    4. et al.
    Prognostic factors in Ewing's tumor of bone: analysis of 975 patients from the European Intergroup Cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(17):3108-3114. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.17.3108
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ladenstein R,
    2. Pötschger U,
    3. Le Deley MC
    , et al. Primary disseminated multifocal Ewing sarcoma: results of the Euro-EWING 99 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(20):3284-3291. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.9864
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Oberlin O,
    2. Deley MC,
    3. Bui BN,
    4. et al.
    Prognostic factors in localized Ewing's tumours and peripheral neuroectodermal tumours: the third study of the French Society of Paediatric Oncology (EW88 study). Br J Cancer. 2001;85(11):1646-1654. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2150
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Wunder JS,
    2. Paulian G,
    3. Huvos AG,
    4. Heller G,
    5. Meyers PA,
    6. Healey JH
    . The histological response to chemotherapy as a predictor of the oncological outcome of operative treatment of Ewing sarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(7):1020-1033. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199807000-00011
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Krasin MJ,
    2. Rodriguez-Galindo C,
    3. Davidoff AM,
    4. et al.
    Efficacy of combined surgery and irradiation for localized Ewings sarcoma family of tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2004;43(3):229-236. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20095
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Strauss SJ,
    2. Frezza AM,
    3. Abecassis N,
    4. et al.
    Bone sarcomas: ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS-ERN PaedCan Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(12):1520-1536. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1995
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Stahl M,
    2. Ranft A,
    3. Paulussen M,
    4. et al.
    Risk of recurrence and survival after relapse in patients with Ewing sarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;57(4):549-553. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23040
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Gaspar N,
    2. Hawkins DS,
    3. Dirksen U,
    4. et al.
    Ewing sarcoma: current management and future approaches through collaboration. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(27):3036-3046. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.5256
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Koch R,
    2. Gelderblom H,
    3. Haveman L,
    4. et al.
    High-dose treosulfan and melphalan as consolidation therapy versus standard therapy for high-risk (metastatic) Ewing sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(21):2307-2320. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01942
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.
    1. Meyers PA,
    2. Krailo MD,
    3. Ladanyi M,
    4. et al.
    High-dose melphalan, etoposide, total-body irradiation, and autologous stem-cell reconstitution as consolidation therapy for high-risk Ewing's sarcoma does not improve prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(11):2812-2820. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.11.2812
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Burdach S,
    2. Meyer-Bahlburg A,
    3. Laws HJ,
    4. et al.
    High-dose therapy for patients with primary multifocal and early relapsed Ewing's tumors: results of two consecutive regimens assessing the role of total-body irradiation. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(16):3072-3078. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.039
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kovar H
    . Downstream EWS/FLI1—upstream Ewing's sarcoma. Genome Med. 2010;2(1):8. doi: 10.1186/gm129
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Riggi N,
    2. Stamenkovic I
    . The biology of Ewing sarcoma. Cancer Lett. 2007;254(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2006.12.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Harlow ML,
    2. Maloney N,
    3. Roland J,
    4. et al.
    Lurbinectedin inactivates the Ewing sarcoma oncoprotein EWS-FLI1 by redistributing it within the nucleus. Cancer Res. 2016;76(22):6657-6668. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0568
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Subbiah V,
    2. Braña I,
    3. Longhi A,
    4. et al.
    Antitumor activity of lurbinectedin, a selective inhibitor of oncogene transcription, in patients with relapsed Ewing sarcoma: results of a basket phase II study. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28(13):2762-2770. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-0696
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Naing A,
    2. LoRusso P,
    3. Fu S,
    4. et al.
    Insulin growth factor-receptor (IGF-1R) antibody cixutumumab combined with the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus in patients with refractory Ewing's sarcoma family tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(9):2625-2631. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0061
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Ogura K,
    2. Elkrief A,
    3. Bowman AS,
    4. et al.
    Prospective clinical genomic profiling of Ewing sarcoma: ERF and FGFR1 mutations as recurrent secondary alterations of potential biologic and therapeutic relevance. JCO Precis Oncol. 2022;6:e2200048. doi: 10.1200/PO.22.00048
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Hui D
    . Definition of supportive care: does the semantic matter? Curr Opin Oncol. 2014;26(4):372-379. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000086
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Braga M,
    2. Ljungqvist O,
    3. Soeters P,
    4. et al.
    ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: surgery. Clin Nutr. 2009;28(4):378-386. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.04.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Villet S,
    2. Chiolero RL,
    3. Bollmann MD,
    4. et al.
    Negative impact of hypocaloric feeding and energy balance on clinical outcome in ICU patients. Clin Nutr. 2005;24(4):502-509. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.03.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Lew CCH,
    2. Yandell R,
    3. Fraser RJL,
    4. Chua AP,
    5. Chong MFF,
    6. Miller M
    . Association between malnutrition and clinical outcomes in the intensive care unit: a systematic review [formula: see text]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017;41(5):744-758. doi: 10.1177/0148607115625638
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. 35.↵
    1. Gillis C,
    2. Buhler K,
    3. Bresee L,
    4. et al.
    Effects of nutritional prehabilitation, with and without exercise, on outcomes of patients who undergo colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(2):391-410.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. West MA,
    2. Loughney L,
    3. Lythgoe D,
    4. et al.
    Effect of prehabilitation on objectively measured physical fitness after neoadjuvant treatment in preoperative rectal cancer patients: a blinded interventional pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114(2):244-251. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu318
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Smith TB,
    2. Stonell C,
    3. Purkayastha S,
    4. Paraskevas P
    . Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a risk assessment method in non cardio-pulmonary surgery: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(8):883-893. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05983.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Bakitas M,
    2. Lyons KD,
    3. Hegel MT,
    4. et al.
    Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: the Project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;302(7):741-749. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1198
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.
    1. Maione P,
    2. Perrone F,
    3. Gallo C,
    4. et al.
    Pretreatment quality of life and functional status assessment significantly predict survival of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy: a prognostic analysis of the multicenter Italian lung cancer in the elderly study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(28):6865-6872. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.527
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.
    1. Temel JS,
    2. Greer JA,
    3. Muzikansky A,
    4. et al.
    Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):733-742. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000678
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Brown J,
    2. Thorpe H,
    3. Napp V,
    4. et al.
    Assessment of quality of life in the supportive care setting of the big lung trial in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(30):7417-7427. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.158
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal: 24 (3)
Ochsner Journal
Vol. 24, Issue 3
Sep 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Recurrent Intracranial Ewing Sarcoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Recurrent Intracranial Ewing Sarcoma
Soo Ann Yap, Annabel Helga Sophie Alig, Alena Annbalou Hasenburg, Georg Hilfenhaus, Lars Uwe Stephan, Uwe Pelzer, Sebastian Stintzing, Arndt Stahler
Ochsner Journal Sep 2024, 24 (3) 213-218; DOI: 10.31486/toj.24.0014

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Recurrent Intracranial Ewing Sarcoma
Soo Ann Yap, Annabel Helga Sophie Alig, Alena Annbalou Hasenburg, Georg Hilfenhaus, Lars Uwe Stephan, Uwe Pelzer, Sebastian Stintzing, Arndt Stahler
Ochsner Journal Sep 2024, 24 (3) 213-218; DOI: 10.31486/toj.24.0014
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • CASE REPORT
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cobalt Toxicity Presenting as Bilateral Optic Neuropathy
  • Esophageal Cancer in a Patient With Poland Syndrome
  • The Potential Role of Zilretta in Reducing Intra-Articular Effusions
Show more CASE REPORTS AND CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • chemotherapy–adjuvant
  • neoplasm metastasis
  • radiotherapy
  • sarcoma–Ewing
  • soft tissue neoplasms

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2026 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire