Effect of Breast Core Needle Biopsy Technique on Detection of Lobular Intraepithelial Neoplasia

References

1. ↵
   1. Foote F. W. Jr.,
   2. Stewart F. W.

   (1941) Lobular carcinoma in situ: a rare form of mammary cancer. Am J Pathol 17:491–496, pmid:19970575.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Rosen P. P.

   (1997) Lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia, 504–544, In: P.P. Rosen, ed. Rosen's Breast Pathology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
3. ↵
   Lobular carcinoma in situ. National Cancer Institute, 2 August 2007. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/breast/HealthProfessional/page6. Accessed 21 August 2007.
4. ↵
   1. Donegan W. L.,
   2. Perez-Mesa C. M.

   (1972) Lobular carcinoma—an indication for elective biopsy of the second breast. Ann Surg 176:178–187, pmid:4342638.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. ↵
   1. Carter D.,
   2. Smith R. R.

   (1977) Carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 40:1189–1193, pmid:198088.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Akashi-Tanaka S.,
   2. Fukutomi T.,
   3. Nanasawa T.

   (2000) Treatment of noninvasive carcinoma: fifteen-year results at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Tokyo. Breast Cancer 7(4):341–344, pmid:11114862, et al.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. ↵
   1. Jackman R. J.,
   2. Burbank F. H.,
   3. Parker S. H.

   (1997) Accuracy of sampling microcalcifications by three stereotactic breast biopsy methods. Radiology 205:325, et al, (P).

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Liberman L.,
   2. Smolkin J. H.,
   3. Dershaw D. D.

   (1998) Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 208(1):251–260, pmid:9646821, et al.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Reynolds H. E.,
   2. Poon C. M.,
   3. Goulet R. J.

   (1998) Biopsy of breast microcalcifications using an 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171(3):611–613, pmid:9725283, et al.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Jackman R. J.,
    2. Burbank F. H.,
    3. Parker S. H.

    (1997) Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: how often is carcinoma found at surgery? Radiology 205:325, et al, (P).

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Lee C. H.,
    2. Carter D.,
    3. Philpotts L. E.

    (2000) Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with stereotactic core needle biopsy: can invasion be predicted? Radiology 217(2):466–470, pmid:11058647, et al.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Jackman R. J.,
    2. Burbank F.,
    3. Parker S. H.

    (2001) Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 218(2):497–502, pmid:11161168, et al.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Philpotts L. E.,
    2. Shaheen N. A.,
    3. Carter D.

    (1999) Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:683–687, pmid:10063860, et al.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Fisher B.,
    2. Costantino J. P.,
    3. Wickerham D. L.

    (1998) Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1371–1388, pmid:9747868, et al.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Fisher E. R.,
    2. Land S. R.,
    3. Fisher B.

    (2004) Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project: 12-year observations concerning lobular carcinoma in situ. Cancer 100:238–244, pmid:14716756, et al.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Liberman L.,
    2. Cohen M. A.,
    3. Dershaw D. D.

    (1995) Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:1111–1113, pmid:7717215, et al.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Berg W. A.,
    2. Mrose H. E.,
    3. Ioffe O. B.

    (2001) Atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ at core-needle breast biopsy. Radiology 218:503–509, pmid:11161169.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Foster M. C.,
    2. Helvie M. A.,
    3. Gregory N. E.

    (2004 Jun) Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary? Radiology 231:813–819, pmid:15105449, et al.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Darling M. L.,
    2. Smith D. N.,
    3. Lester S. C.

    (2000) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:1341–1346, pmid:11044038, et al.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Mahoney M. C.,
    2. Robinson-Smith T. M.,
    3. Shaughnessy E. A.

    (2006) Lobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:949–954, pmid:16985141.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Liberman L.,
    2. Sama M.,
    3. Susnik B.

    (1999) Lobular carcinoma in situ at percutaneous breast biopsy: surgical biopsy findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:291–299, pmid:10430122, et al.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science