Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Ochsner Journal
  • Other Publications
    • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Ochsner Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
  • About Us
    • About the Ochsner Journal
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
OtherOriginal Articles

Guess the Case from the Ochsner Archives

David J. Licini and William S. Richardson
Ochsner Journal June 2008, 8 (2) 65-67;
David J. Licini
*Department of Orthopedics, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William S. Richardson
†Department of Surgery, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dlicini@ochsner.org
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • Achalasia
  • Heller myotomy
  • hyperemesis gravidarum

Introduction

A 29-year-old female with a past medical history of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) presented to her primary care doctor with intractable nausea and vomiting 3 weeks after the cesarean delivery of a healthy baby. The patient stated that she first began feeling nauseated and vomited during the second half of her pregnancy. At that time, the patient was diagnosed with hyperemesis gravidarum. It was thought that her symptoms would resolve after the delivery. Since the birth of her child though, her nausea and vomiting had become worse. The symptoms occurred daily. She said that she had trouble swallowing solids and liquids, and anytime she tried to eat she would vomit it right back up. The patient did have significant weight loss from her inability to keep food down but denied any fevers/chills, hematemesis, recent blood transfusions, icterus, constipation/diarrhea, increased cough, or hoarseness. The patient was initially admitted to an outside hospital with the diagnosis of postoperative ileus.

The initial physical examination was unremarkable. The patient was afebrile, and vital signs were within normal limits. She was well-nourished and anicteric. The abdomen was non-distended and had only a well-healed low transverse abdominal incision. Bowel sounds were normoactive, the abdomen was soft with no epigastric or right upper quadrant pain, and hepatosplenomegaly was not present. Results of the laboratory tests were unremarkable.

Preoperative image from the barium swallow study is shown in Figure 1 and from the computed tomography (CT) scan in Figure 2.

What is the diagnosis, and what treatment would you recommend?

What is the Diagnosis?

This patient has achalasia. This was confirmed with esophageal manometry, which showed an absence of coordinated esophageal peristalsis and an increased resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure with incomplete relaxation. The patient's barium swallow study shows severe dilation of the distal esophagus with a bird-beak deformity near the gastroesophageal (GE) junction. There is no contrast entering the stomach (Figure 1). The CT scan also shows a dilated esophagus with narrowing of the esophagus at the GE junction (Figure 2).

The patient underwent a laparoscopic Heller myotomy. She tolerated the procedure well, was started on a clear liquid diet, and discharged on postoperative day 1. The patient was advised to follow a full liquid diet for the first week, a soft mechanical diet for the second week, and a normal diet thereafter. The symptoms were resolved.

Discussion

Achalasia is a term that was first used by Sir Thomas Willis in the 17th century. The Greek word literally means “failure to relax.” The etiology of achalasia is unknown, but the underlying problem is degeneration of the ganglion cells in the myenteric plexus of the esophageal wall.1 This degeneration leads to loss of peristalsis in the distal esophagus and failure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to relax. Although both of these problems are present in the disease, the primary problem seems to be the defect in LES relaxation. Treatment is typically focused on this defect.

Achalasia is uncommon and affects an estimated 1 in 100 000 persons. Hyperemisis gravidarum is approximately 2000 times more common than achalasia.2,3 Differentiating between achalasia and other disorders is difficult because many disorders, positively GERD, can mimic achalasia clinically. Asking the right questions may be helpful, but often the diagnosis of achalasia is not entertained until further studies have been performed. Achalasia typically presents between the ages of 25 and 60 with a major symptom being dysphagia for both solids and liquids.4 The timing of these symptoms is important because dysphagia of liquids prior to dysphagia of solids may represent psuedoachalasia rather than true achalasia. Another common symptom is difficulty belching, although most patients will not provide this information unless prompted. Regurgitation, chest pain, and weight loss are also common associated symptoms.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1 Representative image from the barium swallow study.

Making the diagnosis of achalasia is often difficult and may be delayed for many years.5 Often, the signs and symptoms are present but are misinterpreted as GERD. Patients frequently have heartburn, which is probably related to the food that eventually becomes acidic after retention in the esophagus. The acidity irritates the esophagus. A delay in diagnosing achalasia can be detrimental to the patient since early treatment may reduce the risk of developing cancer. Studies have shown that there may be a 16-fold increase in cancer, specifically in squamous cell carcinoma.6 The role of endoscopy for cancer surveillance after achalasia treatment is unknown.

Once a diagnosis of achalasia is suspected, confirming the diagnosis is straightforward. The initial screening test is a barium swallow study. This will classically show a dilated distal esophagus with a smooth taper to the LES. The barium at this level will taper off and is often described as a “bird's beak.” To confirm achalasia, esophageal manometry is the study of choice.2 The findings will not only include an elevated resting LES pressure (typically greater than 45 mm Hg), but also incomplete relaxation of the esophagus during swallowing and absence of peristalsis.7 Endoscopy is performed prior to definitive treatment to rule out any disorder which may mimic achalasia, such as Chagas disease and cancer.

There are many options for the treatment of achalasia. The first therapy used by Sir Thomas Willis consisted of dilation using a sponge attached to a long, thin whale bone.8 Today, treatments for achalasia include medical management, endoscopic procedures, and surgery. Medical therapy consists of calcium channel blockers and nitrates.9 This option is unsatisfactory. Approximately 10% of patients will benefit from this, but often the side effects outweigh the benefits.10,11 Endoscopic procedures routinely used are botulin toxin injections and pneumatic dilation. The short-term results of these treatments have been shown to be excellent, but symptoms often return.12 Endoscopic procedures may be appropriate in certain patients, but they can make more definitive treatment in the future difficult.13 Surgical treatment will provide the best long-term result,14 and newer techniques involving laparoscopic approaches have become the ideal treatments of choice because they shorten recovery time and length of hospital stay.15

The most common surgical treatment for achalasia is the Heller myotomy, first used by Ernest Heller in 1913. This technique involves cutting through the adventitia and both the longitudinal and circular smooth muscle layers of the muscularis propria. The cut is made down to the submucosa. The incision is extended from approximately 3–4 cm above the gastroesophageal junction to 2 cm onto the cardia of the stomach.16 There is some debate regarding whether to perform a partial fundoplication at this point. The most commonly used partial fundoplication is the Dor technique, in which the fundus of the stomach is brought anterior to the esophagus. Heller myotomy has been shown to decrease GERD, which is the most common complication following Heller myotomy, and to be more cost effective long-term in some studies.17–19 In this case, a fundoplication was not performed because of the very dilated esophagus.

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2 Representative image from the CT scan.
  • Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation

References

  1. ↵
    1. Csendes A.,
    2. Smok G.,
    3. Braghetto I.,
    4. Ramirez C.,
    5. Velasco N.,
    6. Henriquez A.
    (1985) Gastroesophageal sphincter pressure and histological changes in distal esophagus in patients with achalasia of the esophagus. Dig Dis Sci 30:941–945, pmid:4028910.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Howard P. J.,
    2. Maher L.,
    3. Pryde A.,
    4. Cameron E. W.,
    5. Heading R. C.
    (1992) Five year prospective study of the incidence, clinical features, and the diagnosis of achalasia in Edinburgh. Gut 33:1011–1015, pmid:1398223.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Wilcox S. R.,
    2. Edelman A.,
    3. Logan J. R.
    Pregnancy hyperemesis gravidarum. eMedicine, July 18, 2006. Available at: http://www.emedicine.com/emerg/TOPIC479.HTM. Accessed October 15, 2007.
  4. ↵
    1. Katz P. O.,
    2. Dalton C. B.,
    3. Richter J. E.,
    4. Wu W. C.,
    5. Castell D. O.
    (1987) Esophageal testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Ann Intern Med 106:593–597, pmid:3826958.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Eckardt V. F.,
    2. Kohne U.,
    3. Junginger T.,
    4. Westermeier T.
    (1997) Risk factors for diagnostic delay in achalasia. Dig Dis Sci 42:580–585, pmid:9073142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Sandler R. S.,
    2. Nyren O.,
    3. Ekbom N. O.,
    4. Eisen G. M.,
    5. Yuen J.,
    6. Josefsson S.
    (1995) The risk of esophageal cancer in patients with achalasia: a population-based study. JAMA 274:1359–1362, pmid:7563560.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Couturier D.,
    2. Samama J.
    (1991) Clinical aspects and manometric criteria in achalasia. Hepato-gastroenterology 38:481–487, pmid:1778574.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Willis T.
    (1674) Pharmaceutice rationalis sive diatribe de medicamentorum operationibus in human corpore (Hagae Comitis, London, England).
  9. ↵
    1. Gelfond M.,
    2. Rozen P.,
    3. Gilat T.
    (1982) Isosorbide dinitrate and nifedipine treatment of achalasia: a clinical, manometric and radionuclide evaluation. Gastroenterology 83:963–969, pmid:6288509.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Fisichella P. M.,
    2. Patti M.
    Achalasia. Emedicine, Oct 10, 2006. http://www.emedicine.com/MED/topic16.htm. Accessed March 3, 2008.
    1. Spechler S. J.
    Overview of treatment of achalasia. UptoDate, May 30, 2006. http://www.uptodate.com/online/content/topic.dotopicKeyeso_dis/5220selectedTitle256sourcesearch_result. Accessed March 6, 2008.
  10. ↵
    1. Levine M. L.,
    2. Moskowitz G. W.,
    3. Dorf B. S.,
    4. Bank S.
    (1991) Pneumatic dilation in patients with achalasia with a modified Gruntzig dilator (Levine) under direct endoscopic control: results after 5 years. Am J Gastroenterol 86:1581–1584, pmid:1951233.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Richardson W. S.,
    2. Willis G. W.,
    3. Smith J. W.
    (2003) Evaluation of scar formation after botulinum toxin injection or forced balloon dilation to the lower esophageal sphincter. Surg Endosc 17:696–698, pmid:12616390.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Jeansonne L. O.,
    2. White B. C.,
    3. Pilger K. E.,
    4. et al.
    (2007) Ten-year follow-up of laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia shows durability. Surg Endosc 21:1498–1502, pmid:17623235.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Richardson W. S.,
    2. Bowen J. C.
    (1998) Minimally invasive esophageal surgery. Surg Clin North Am 78:795–803, pmid:9891577.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Patti M. G.,
    2. Fisichella P. M.
    Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for esophageal achalasia. How I do it. J Gastrointest Surg, Accepted: 19 September 2007.
    1. Richards W. O.,
    2. Torquati A.,
    3. Holzman M. D.,
    4. et al.
    (2005) Heller myotomy versus Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication for achalasia: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. Ann Surg 240:405–412, pmid:15319712.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Angkoolpakdeekul T.,
    2. Jakapark S.
    (2007) Laparoscopic Heller myotomy with dor antireflux for achalasia. Journal Med Assoc Thai 90:988–993, pmid:17596057.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Torquati A.,
    2. Lutfi R.,
    3. Khaitan L.,
    4. et al.
    (3, 2006) Heller myotomy vs Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication: cost-utility analysis of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 20:389–393, pmid:16437281.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Ochsner Journal
Vol. 8, Issue 2
Jun 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Ochsner Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Guess the Case from the Ochsner Archives
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Ochsner Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Ochsner Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Guess the Case from the Ochsner Archives
David J. Licini, William S. Richardson
Ochsner Journal Jun 2008, 8 (2) 65-67;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Guess the Case from the Ochsner Archives
David J. Licini, William S. Richardson
Ochsner Journal Jun 2008, 8 (2) 65-67;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • What is the Diagnosis?
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • CME QUESTIONS VOLUME 8, No. 1
  • Education Update
  • Why Nutrition Matters in Healthcare Outcomes
Show more Original Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Achalasia
  • Heller myotomy
  • hyperemesis gravidarum

Current Post at the Blog

Elsevier Editors Resign Over Open-Access Fees

Our Content

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Featured Contributors
  • Ochsner Journal Blog
  • Archive at PubMed Central

Information & Forms

  • Instructions for Authors
  • Instructions for Reviewers
  • Submission Checklist
  • FAQ
  • License for Publishing-Author Attestation
  • Patient Consent Form
  • Submit a Manuscript

Services & Contacts

  • Permissions
  • Sign up for our electronic table of contents
  • Feedback Form
  • Contact Us

About Us

  • Editorial Board
  • About the Ochsner Journal
  • Ochsner Health
  • University of Queensland-Ochsner Clinical School
  • Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers

© 2023 Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Powered by HighWire