TY - JOUR T1 - The Modified Early Warning Score as a Predictive Tool During Unplanned Surgical Intensive Care Unit Admission JF - Ochsner Journal JO - Ochsner J SP - 176 LP - 181 DO - 10.31486/toj.19.0057 VL - 20 IS - 2 AU - Annandita Kumar AU - Hussam Ghabra AU - Fiona Winterbottom AU - Michael Townsend AU - Philip Boysen AU - Bobby D. Nossaman Y1 - 2020/06/20 UR - http://www.ochsnerjournal.org/content/20/2/176.abstract N2 - Background: The Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) has been proposed to warn healthcare providers of potentially serious adverse events. We evaluated this scoring system during unplanned escalation of care in hospitalized surgical patients during a 1-year period.Methods: Following institutional review board approval, all consecutive, unplanned surgical admissions into the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) during 2016 were entered into this study. MEWS and patient demographics during bedside evaluation for SICU admission were extracted from electronic medical records. Logistic regression was used to analyze the association of MEWS with the incidence of future mortality. P values were set at <0.01 for statistical significance.Results: In this series of 263 consecutive patients, the incidence of mortality following unplanned escalation of care was 29.3% (confidence interval [CI] 24.1% to 35.0%), ranging from 22% to 57%, with all positive MEWS values. The association of MEWS with future mortality was not statistically significant (P=0.0107). A misclassification rate of 0.29 (CI 0.24 to 0.35) was observed with this association.Conclusion: MEWS provided no clinical benefit as an early warning system, as mortality was elevated throughout the MEWS scale in this clinical setting. The high misclassification rate indicates MEWS does not provide discriminatory support for patients at risk for mortality. ER -