@article {Lee292, author = {Christian Lee and Hana Ahsan and Hoon Chae and Danielle M. Esnard and David Broussard and Stuart Hart and Alex Allain III and Brittany Bond and Eric Busch and Preya Jhita and Melissa Matte and Robin Stedman and Jacob Lessing and Joseph Koveleskie and Bobby D. Nossaman}, title = {Perioperative Efficiency of Sugammadex Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Clinical Practice}, volume = {22}, number = {4}, pages = {292--298}, year = {2022}, doi = {10.31486/toj.22.0064}, publisher = {Ochsner Journal}, abstract = {Background: Studies have proposed that the routine use of the modified gamma-cyclodextrin, sugammadex, could provide perioperative time savings. However, these investigations have been limited to small group analyses. The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of sugammadex on perioperative times when compared to neostigmine under general clinical practice conditions following rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: Following institutional review board approval, data from 1,611 consecutive surgical records for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were reviewed. Patient characteristics, type of primary neuromuscular blocking reversal agent, operating room (OR) discharge times, and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) recovery times were the measures of interest. Equivalence testing was used to determine the between-group differences of the reversal agents in the two perioperative time periods of interest.Results: OR discharge times averaged 10.9 (95\% CI, 10-11.8) minutes for patients administered sugammadex and 8.9 (95\% CI, 8.2-9.7) minutes for patients administered neostigmine. PACU recovery times averaged 77.6 (95\% CI, 74.1-81.1) minutes for sugammadex and 68.6 (95\% CI, 65.9-71.3) minutes for neostigmine. Equivalence testing demonstrated no improvement in the two perioperative times with sugammadex.Conclusion: These results suggest no perioperative time savings with sugammadex when compared to neostigmine following laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general clinical practice conditions.}, issn = {1524-5012}, URL = {https://www.ochsnerjournal.org/content/22/4/292}, eprint = {https://www.ochsnerjournal.org/content/22/4/292.full.pdf}, journal = {Ochsner Journal} }