Abstract
Introduction
Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) can decrease image noise, thereby generating CT images of comparable diagnostic quality with less radiation. The purpose of this study is to quantify the effect of systematic use of ASIR versus filtered back projection (FBP) for neuroradiology CT protocols on patients’ radiation dose and image quality.
Methods
We evaluated the effect of ASIR on six types of neuroradiologic CT studies: adult and pediatric unenhanced head CT, adult cervical spine CT, adult cervical and intracranial CT angiography, adult soft tissue neck CT with contrast, and adult lumbar spine CT. For each type of CT study, two groups of 100 consecutive studies were retrospectively reviewed: 100 studies performed with FBP and 100 studies performed with ASIR/FBP blending factor of 40 %/60 % with appropriate noise indices. The weighted volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose–length product (DLP) and noise were recorded. Each study was also reviewed for image quality by two reviewers. Continuous and categorical variables were compared by t test and free permutation test, respectively.
Results
For adult unenhanced brain CT, CT cervical myelography, cervical and intracranial CT angiography and lumbar spine CT both CTDIvol and DLP were lowered by up to 10.9 % (p < 0.001), 17.9 % (p = 0.005), 20.9 % (p < 0.001), and 21.7 % (p = 0.001), respectively, by using ASIR compared with FBP alone. Image quality and noise were similar for both FBP and ASIR.
Conclusion
We recommend routine use of iterative reconstruction for neuroradiology CT examinations because this approach affords a significant dose reduction while preserving image quality.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ASIR:
-
Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction
- CTDIvol :
-
Weighted volume CT dose index
- DLP:
-
Dose–length product
- FBP:
-
Filtered back projection
- NI:
-
Noise index
References
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from ct scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284
Smith AB, Dillon WP, Lau BC, Gould R, Verdun FR, Lopez EB et al (2008) Radiation dose reduction strategy for ct protocols: successful implementation in neuroradiology section. Radiology 247:499–506
Kulkarni NM, Uppot RN, Eisner BH, Sahani DV (2012) Radiation dose reduction at multidetector ct with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for evaluation of urolithiasis: how low can we go? Radiology 265:158–166
Vorona GA, Zuccoli G, Sutcavage T, Clayton BL, Ceschin RC, Panigrahy A (2013) The use of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in pediatric head ct: a feasibility study. Am J Neuroradiol 34:205–211
Maxfield MW, Schuster KM, McGillicuddy EA, Young CJ, Ghita M, Bokhari SA et al (2012) Impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on radiation dose in evaluation of trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:1406–1411
Kilic K, Erbas G, Guryildirim M, Arac M, Ilgit E, Coskun B (2011) Lowering the dose in head ct using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1578–1582
Rapalino O, Kamalian S, Kamalian S, Payabvash S, Souza LC, Zhang D et al (2012) Cranial ct with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: improved image quality with concomitant radiation dose reduction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:609–615
Hamberg LM, Rhea JT, Hunter GJ, Thrall JH (2003) Multi-detector row ct: radiation dose characteristics. Radiology 226:762–772
Wintermark M, Maeder P, Verdun FR, Thiran JP, Valley JF, Schnyder P et al (2000) Using 80 kvp versus 120 kvp in perfusion ct measurement of regional cerebral blood flow. Am J Neuroradiol 21:1881–1884
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by a research grant from GE Healthcare.
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Table E1
(DOCX 24 kb)
Table E2
(DOCX 24 kb)
Table E3
(DOCX 24 kb)
Table E4
(DOCX 24 kb)
Table E5
(DOCX 24 kb)
Table E6
(DOCX 21 kb)
Table E7
(DOCX 21 kb)
Table E8
(DOCX 22 kb)
Table E9
(DOCX 22 kb)
Table E10
(DOCX 21 kb)
Table E11
(DOCX 22 kb)
Table E12
(DOCX 22 kb)
Table E13
(DOCX 21 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Komlosi, P., Zhang, Y., Leiva-Salinas, C. et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction reduces patient radiation dose in neuroradiology CT studies. Neuroradiology 56, 187–193 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-013-1313-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-013-1313-z