Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of a high-intensity and a low-intensity lumbar extensor training program as minimal intervention treatment in low back pain: a randomized trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a randomized, observer-blinded trial, the effectiveness of 3-month high-intensity training (HIT) of the isolated lumbar extensors was compared to low-intensity training (LIT). Eighty-one workers with nonspecific low back pain longer than 12 weeks were randomly assigned to either of the two training programs.

Training sessions were performed on a modified training device that isolated the lower back extensors. Total intervention time was limited to 5–10 min (one or two training sessions) per week. Training effects were assessed in terms of changes in self-rated degree of back complaints, functional disability, and general, physical and mental health. Secondary outcomes in this study were muscle strength and fear of moving the back (kinesiophobia). Outcomes were evaluated at 1,2, 3, 6, and 9 months after randomization.

The results showed that the two treatment programs led to comparable improvements in all outcome measures, except for mean isometric strength at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 9 months and kinesiophobia score at 2 and 9 months of follow-up. The high-intensity training group showed a higher strength gain (24 to 48 Nm) but a smaller decline in kinesiophobia (2.5 and 3.4 points, respectively), compared to the low-intensity training group.

It can be concluded that high-intensity training of the isolated back extensors was not superior to a non-progressive, low-intensity variant in restoring back function in nonspecific (chronic) low back pain. In further research, emphasis should be put on identifying subgroups of patients that will have the highest success rate with either of these training approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Köke AJ, van der Heijden GJ, Knipschild PG (1995) Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Assessment of the quality of four disease-specific questionnaires. Spine 20:1017–1028

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bronfort G, Goldsmith CH, Nelson CF, Boline PD, Anderson AV (1996) Trunk exercise combined with spinal manipulative or NSAID therapy for chronic low back pain: A randomized, observer-blinded clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 19:570–582

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Darden E (1990) The Nautilus Book. Contemporary Books, Chicago

  4. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Graves JE, Webb DC, Pollock ML, Matkozich J, Leggett SH, Carpenter DM, Foster DN, Cirulli J (1994) Pelvic stabilization during resistance training: Its effect on the development of lumbar extension strength. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:210–215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hansen FR, Bendix T, Skov P, Jensen CV, Kristensen JH, Krohn L, Schioeler H (1993) Intensive, dynamic back-muscle exercises, conventional physiotherapy, or placebo-control treatment of low-back pain: A randomized, observer-blind trial. Spine 18:98–108.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kori SH, Miller RP, Todd DD (1990) Kinisiophobia: A new view of chronic pain behavior. Pain Management Jan/Feb:35–43

  8. Kuukkanen T, Mälkiä E (1996) Muscular performance after a 3 month progressive physical exercise program and 9 month follow-up in subjects with low back pain. A controlled study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 112–121

  9. Leggett SH, Mooney V, Matheson LN, Nelson B, Dreisinger T, van Zytveld J, Vie L (1999) Restorative exercise for clinical low back pain: a prospective two-center study with 1-year follow-up. Spine 24:889–898

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ljunggren AE, Weber H, Kogstad O, Thom E, Kirkesola G (1997) Effect of exercise on sick-leave due to low back pain. Spine 22:1610–1617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Manniche C, Lundberg E, Christensen I, Bentzen L, Hesselsøe G (1991) Intensive dynamic back exercise for chronic low back pain: a clinical trial. Pain 47:53–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mannion AF, Müntener M, Taimela S, Dvorak J (1999) A randomised clinical trial of three active therapies for chronic low back pain. Spine 24:2435–2448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mannion AF, Junge A, Taimela S, Müntener M, Lorenzo K, Dvorak J (2001) Active therapy for chronic low back pain: part 3. Factors influencing self-rated disability and its change following therapy. Spine 26:920–929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marras WS (2000) Occupational low back disorder causation and control. Ergonomics 43:880–902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr (1994) Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: Results from a national survey. Med Care 32:551–567

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mior S (2001) Exercise in the treatment of chronic pain. Clin J Pain 17:S77–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten L (2002) Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Stat Med 21:2917–2930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pollock ML, Leggett SH, Graves JE, Jones A, Fulton M, Cirulli J (1989) Effect of resistance training on lumbar extension strength. Am J Sports Med 17:624–629

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rasbash J, Browne W, Goldstein H, Yamg M, Plewis I, Draper D, Healy M, Woodhouse G (1999) A user’s guide to MlwiN. Institute of Education, London

  20. Risch SV, Norvell NK, Pollock ML, Risch ED, Langer H, Fulton M, Graves JE, Leggett SH (1993) Lumbar strengthening in chronic low back pain patients. Spine 18:232–238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rissanen A, Kalimo H, Alaranta H (1995) Effect of intensive training on the isokinetic strength and structure of the lumbar muscles in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 20:333–340

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. I. Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8:141–144

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shmueli A (1998) The SF-36 profile and health-related quality of life: an interpretative analysis. Qual Life Res 7:187–195

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tulder van M, Malmivaara A, Esmail R, Koes B (2000) Exercise therapy for low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 25:2784–2796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, van Eek H (1995) Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain 62:363–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Rotteveel AM, Ruesink R, Heuts PH (1995) The role of fear of movement/(re)injury in pain disability. J Occup Rehabil 5:235–252

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vrijens J (1984) Basis voor verantwoord trainen. PVLO, Gent, p 120

  28. Vuori IM (2001) Dose-response of physical activity and low back pain, osteoarthritis, and osteoporosis. Med Sci Sports Exerc 6:S551–586

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ware J, Sherbourne C (1992) The MOS 36 item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Med Care 30:473–483

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. van der Zee K, Sanderman R (1993) Het meten van de algemene gezondheidstoestand met de RAND-36: Een handleiding. Noordelijk Centrum voor Gezondheidsvraagstukken, Groningen

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Training Medicine and Training Physiology, Occupational Health and Safety Service Royal Netherlands Army, LGen Knoopkazerne, Mineurslaan 500, 3521 AG, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    P. H. Helmhout & C. C. Harts

  2. Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    J. B. Staal & R. A. de Bie

  3. Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    M. J. J. M. Candel

Authors
  1. P. H. Helmhout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. C. Harts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. B. Staal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. J. J. M. Candel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. A. de Bie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. H. Helmhout.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helmhout, P.H., Harts, C.C., Staal, J.B. et al. Comparison of a high-intensity and a low-intensity lumbar extensor training program as minimal intervention treatment in low back pain: a randomized trial. Eur Spine J 13, 537–547 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0671-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0671-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation