Abstract
Myocardial recovery occurs in a small cohort of patients receiving left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support, but identification of candidates for device removal remains challenging. We hypothesized that hemodynamic evaluation using echocardiography and right heart catheter during temporary suspension of LVAD support (LVAD-off test) can assess cardiac recovery to predict successful device removal. To prove this hypothesis, we reviewed 44 patients who underwent LVAD-off test from January 2000 to March 2011 at Osaka University Hospital. Twenty-two of them underwent LVAD explant, 9 showed sustaining recovery (successful explant, SE-group); whereas 13 had a recurrent heart failure (failed explant, FE-group). The other 22 patients remained LVAD dependent (nonrecovery, NR-group). Echocardiography showed significant lower ejection fraction (LVEF) in NR-group than in SE- and FE-group after termination of LVAD support, but there was no difference between SE- and FE-group. On the other hand, elevation in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (ΔPCWP) was significantly smaller in SE-group than in FE- and NR-groups. The degree of cardiac fibrosis significantly increased in FE- and NR-group during the LVAD support, while it did not increase in SE-group. The degree of cardiac fibrosis at the time of LVAD explantation correlated significantly with PCWP at LVAD halt and ΔPCWP, and it had significant impact on the outcome after LVAD weaning. In conclusion, the data obtained during LVAD-off test using echocardiography and right heart catheter significantly correlated with the degree of cardiac fibrosis at the time of LVAD explantation. LVAD-off test is a useful method to predict the successful LVAD explantation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mancini DM, Beniaminovitz A, Levin H, Catanese K, Flannery M, DiTullio M, Savin S, Cordisco ME, Rose E, Oz M. Low incidence of myocardial recovery after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation. 1998;98:2383–9.
Yacoub MH. A novel strategy to maximize the efficacy of left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to recovery. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:534–40.
Matsumiya G, Monta O, Fukushima N, Sawa Y, Funatsu T, Toda K, Matsuda H. Who would be a candidate for bridge to recovery during prolonged mechanical left ventricular support in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:699–705.
Saito S, Matsumiya G, Sakaguchi T, Miyagawa S, Yamauchi T, Kuratani T, Sawa Y. Cardiac fibrosis and cellular hypertrophy decrease the degree of reverse remodeling and improvement in cardiac function during left ventricular assist. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29:672–9.
Dandel M, Weng Y, Siniawski H, Potapov E, Lehmkuhl HB, Hetzer R. Long-term results in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy after weaning from left ventricular assist device. Circulation. 2005;112:I37–45.
Dandel M, Weng Y, Siniawski H, Potapov E, Drews T, Lehmkuhl HB, Knosalla C, Hetzer R. Prediction of cardiac stability after weaning from ventricular assist device in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2008;118:S94–105.
Dandel M, Weng Y, Siniawski H, Stepanenko A, Krabatsch T, Potapov E, Lehmkuhl HB, Knosalla C, Hetzer R. Heart failure reversal by ventricular unloading in patients with chronic cardiomyopathy: criteria for weaning from ventricular assist devices. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1148–60.
George RS, Yacoub MH, Tasca G, Webb C, Bowles CT, Tansley P, Hardy JP, Dreyfus G, Khaghani A, Birks EJ. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic responses to acute interruption of left ventricular assist device support: relevance to assessment of myocardial recovery. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007;26:967–73.
Myers T, Frazier O, Mesina H, Radovancevic B, Gregoric I. Hemodynamics and patient safety during pmp-off studies of an axial-flow left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25:379–83.
Ando M, Nishimura T, Takewa Y, Ogawa D, Yamazaki K, Kashiwa K, Kyo S, Ono M, Taenaka Y, Tatsumi E. What is the ideal off-test trial for continuous-flow ventricular-assit-device explantation? Intracircuit back-flow analysis in a mock circulation model. J Artif Organs. 2011;14:70–3.
Kato TS, Chokshi A, Singh P, Khawaja T, Cheema F, Akashi H, Shahzad K, Iwata S, Homma S, Takayama H, Naka Y, Jorde U, Farr M, Mancini DM, Shulze PC. Effects of continuous-flow versus pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices on myocardial unloading and remodeling. Circ Heart Fail. 2011;4:546–53.
Krabatsch T, Schweiger M, Dandel M, Stepanenko A, Drews T, Potapov E, Pasic M, Weng YG, Huebler M, Hetzer R. Is bridge to recovery more likely with pulsatile left ventricular assist device than with nonpulsatile-flow systems? Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1335–41.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saito, S., Toda, K., Miyagawa, S. et al. Hemodynamic changes during left ventricular assist device-off test correlate with the degree of cardiac fibrosis and predict the outcome after device explantation. J Artif Organs 18, 27–34 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-014-0802-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-014-0802-0